/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12322537]

is 5g harmful in any way or it is just a conspiracy theory?

[Anonymous No.12322542]

Fake bullshit

[Anonymous No.12322568]

Yes it is harmful do not go near them stay in your fields making corn

[Anonymous No.12322571]

Not harmful

[Anonymous No.12322572]

>>12322537
Humans can survive up to 9G so we still have a few generations of telecom left before we're extinct.

[Anonymous No.12322653]

>>12322537
We need to do more research, but I certainly don't think we should halt the use of 5G or anything like that. From what I understand, it's a great technology that is useful to literally hundred of millions of people in the US alone. However, I also think that it's important to remain open to the possibility that it could be dangerous. I don't think we need to be super concered about the issue, but science must always remain open to new evidence and data, and there must always be room for debate. After all, if we were wrong about something as robust and powerful as Newtonian mechanics, then we could certainly turn out to be wrong about 5G.

[Anonymous No.12322737]

>>12322537
5g is nonionizing. It has less energy than visible light. The light hitting you right now is more energetic and damaging than 5G wavelengths.

[Anonymous No.12322878]

>>12322537
Probably no harmful than asbestos was years ago.

[Anonymous No.12322897]

>>12322653
>After all, if we were wrong about something as robust and powerful as Newtonian mechanics,
says you

[Anonymous No.12323002]

>>12322537
both

[Anonymous No.12323259]

>>12322653
It has undocumented hardware, amplifiers and all sorts of questionable problems while being unnecessary if you consider the additional useful functionality.

>>12322737
This reply is repeated all over the internet for some reason and it's bullshit. It doesn't need to be ionizing to cause harm.

[Anonymous No.12323263]

>>12322737
Or have high energy.

[Anonymous No.12323269]

>>12322537
when you see dead birds and bees near 5g networks, just imagine the damage it does to people

[Anonymous No.12323312]

there is documented harm caused by millimeter waves, so probably

[Anonymous No.12323337]

>5g masts everywhere
>covid infections everywhere
You have to be an idiot to not see what's happening here

[Anonymous No.12323406]

>>12322537
With 5g the government can accurately find your location within a few cm.

[Anonymous No.12324119]

>>12323406
it's more than that, phones will be constantly generating a 3D model of the world in real time

5G is about sending data from users to big tech, not the other way around

[Anonymous No.12324395]

>>12322537
Mske up your own mind,
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
Top text document.

For the hell of it. go toa typical parking lot and just watch them all. Look at how zombified people have become already. This can be correlated with NIR exposure.

[Anonymous No.12324468]

>>12322537
These waves alone shouldn't be harming, the problem is the density that are expected to be in service in cities and such. Microwaves are also more penetrating than light, light is stopped in the skin, but MW can penetrate further. There are some studies that reveal that MW can affect the nervous system too.

[Anonymous No.12324477]

>>12324468
>light is stopped in the skin
I was always told this as well, "light scatters off the skin surface", however it's demonstrably false. Just take a flashlight and put it up to your finger tip, the whole thing lights up.

[Anonymous No.12324478]

>>12324395
Yeah people who hang out in parking lots don't belong to the upper echelons of society like they used to

[Anonymous No.12324484]

>>12324477
Alright

[Anonymous No.12324493]

>>12324478
>hang out
Yeah, you've never people watched. Reply discarded.

[Anonymous No.12324542]

>>12322537
Reminder:
5g +4g + sun + albedo + radio + any other

[Anonymous No.12324595]

>>12322537
If you're the type who thinks dihydrogen monoxide is bad for you, then sure: 5G is harmful.

[Anonymous No.12324614]

>>12324595
You forgot to refer to him as "Karen".

[Anonymous No.12325205]

>>12323259
>It has undocumented hardware
source?

[Anonymous No.12325232]

>>12324595
wtf dihydrogen monoxide is extremely dangerous. It's the third leading cause of death in the world. Be very fucking wary anon.

[Anonymous No.12325305]

>>12322537
ehh idk but i definitely wouldnt put my balls on top of that tower

[Anonymous No.12325318]

>>12322897
Obviously it is a correct theory, but it was an incomplete theory of motion, force, and matter.

[Anonymous No.12325899]

>>12322897
Newton is wrong you dumb cunt, that's why we have special and general relativity.

[Anonymous No.12325911]

>>12323337
How exactly would 5G spread one specific disease?

Is the idea that ILI pneumonia is clustering around 5G towers?

Isn't it too much of a convenience that two novel phenomena are being related.

[Anonymous No.12325927]

>>12325911
Well gee, those are a lot of good questions. If only there was scientific literature you could just read in order to answer them yourself.

[Anonymous No.12325940]

>>12322537
Pager towers are a lot more powerful and they exist since the 1990's. Nobody complained.

[Anonymous No.12325946]

>>12325940
Maybe they should have. Shit logic apologist, get rekt.

[Anonymous No.12327839]

it's funny that they never mention stuff like this in the "debunkings" of 5g safety

[Anonymous No.12327854]

>>12327839
or pic related, re: causal mechanism. instead all we hear about is ionization. granted this is speculative but that's what science is supposed to begin with: a hypothesis. you validate 0% of the hypotheses you don't test. and the precautionary principle would say that if your existing science is insufficient to test a hypothesis, and if the hypothesis is plausible given an evolutionary argument, and if the risks of that hypothesis being true are catastrophic, then you cannot say that the thing (not) being tested is safe.

[Anonymous No.12327858]

>>12324614
Or kike. Because you are smug retards who are always full of shit.

[Anonymous No.12327864]

>>12325205
Search engine.

[Anonymous No.12327896]

>>12323337
Take your meds, anon. I'm worried about your mental health.

[Anonymous No.12327931]

>>12324395
everyone on the fence about 5g safety needs to read this doc

[Anonymous No.12327932]

>>12322537
using the internet it provides is way more harmful than standing near it

[Anonymous No.12327941]

>>12327864
???

[Anonymous No.12328509]

>>12322572
loloraptil

[Anonymous No.12328525]

>>12322737
Just ignore all of the research that shows non-ionizing radiation can still have various negative effects.

[Anonymous No.12328546]

>>12322537
It leads to more internet for everybody, so its extremely harmful

[Anonymous No.12328616]

>>12328525
5G emits less radiation then sunlight, dosn't mean you should stay in your mother's basement all the time.

[Anonymous No.12328702]

>>12322537

I heard that the US’s atomic bomb second mechanism is WiFi. It’s always existed just watched for real close. Like the bomb explodes a small sharp atom into trillion of pieces into the population. You can even hear the peculiar sound as it hits acoustic producing material. Then the WiFi engram module goes on. Distorting reality through visual receptors.

My worry as it was the worry of many electro physicist I met is that it may be used to form fermi paradoxes. If within reason we run biological programs on society according to any criteria. Then it will cause groups to separate. Making it easier for a Fermi paradox to be implemented. For example you have a friend whom is supposedly in Guam. However his region has militia sponsoring its usage. The closer you approach the stronger the signal becomes. A schrodingers cat scenario where your friend has you believe he is in Guam but really in Southern California where you are at but you two will never see eachother even if you move there because the progrom is implemented.

[Anonymous No.12328767]

>>12328616
why do these disingenuous arguments keep coming up when legitimate 5G fears are raised?

[Anonymous No.12328771]

>>12328702
wtf

[Anonymous No.12328779]

5G caused voter fraud and stole the election from based orange man. It's a Democrat mind control device. It also causes coronavirus, which isn't real.

[Anonymous No.12328819]

>>12328616
Sunlight is unpolarized, not pulsed, and doesn't have the same spectral density as 5G transmissions.

[Anonymous No.12329596]

>>12323337
Nigger

[Anonymous No.12329598]

>>12322568
Ironically, automatic farming is one of the bigger potential tasks for 5G.

[Anonymous No.12329600]

>>12323337
>The new consoles are coming out
>The Germans announced a breakthrough regarding Corona vaccines.

[Anonymous No.12329603]

>>12327858
Spot the actual kike. Lul. Can one of you faggots be a second without self-victimyzing?

[Anonymous No.12329610]

>>12329600
>stay inside playing video games all day
>don't catch Covid
Hmmm, it's almost like those two things are related.

[Anonymous No.12329613]

>>12327839
>>12327854
Oh wow, not only did you provide some text in images, it's also written in a monospace front. It certainly must be true, then! Don't bother providing sources.

[Anonymous No.12329615]

>>12327839
>>12327854
>>12328767
Source pls?

[Anonymous No.12329618]

>>12329613
>checkmate honky, I don't like your format!

[Anonymous No.12329645]

>>12329618

[Anonymous No.12329664]

>>12322537
Whether 5G is a threat to health or not is not the real issue. The real issue is that's an inherently totalitarian technology whose sole and only purpose is mass surveillance of everyone and everything, and the implementation of ultra-totalitarian concepts like "the internet of things" that no one ever wanted or asked for (except governments and big corporations of course), and would make North Korea look like a libertarian utopia by comparison.
No matter if safe or harmful, 5G must be destroyed NOW. I applaud the schizos who are burning down the towers: they might do it for the wrong reasons, but for now they are literally saving our asses from the worst tyranny the world has ever seen, and they have all my support.

[Anonymous No.12329665]

Okay who will profit if the entire world is basically a cancer causing hell?

[Anonymous No.12329685]

>>12328819
sunlight from vertically above you is linearly polarized.

[Anonymous No.12329689]

>>12328767
it is a good argument. Your capped picture of some random text is not.

[Anonymous No.12329697]

>>12329664
take your meds

[Anonymous No.12329879]

5G is harmful, sure, if you go up in a cherrypicker and get up close to the transmitter then yeah, you might get burned by any microwave transmitters that are also up there. Beyond that, no, it's not harmful to human health.

The whole '5G is harmful to health/causes cancer/covid/what the fuck ever' is a giant psyop made by intelligence agencies to distract from the fact that it has some incredibly worrying surveillance possibilities that supplement the already worrying arsenal of tools available to the Five Eyes.

This incredibly successful psyop now means that if you try and talk about government/corporate spying on the average person, you get lumped in with the tinfoil hat boomers and unmedicated schizos on Zogbook who rant and rave about it being responsible for the bunion on their toe. Dumb normies will happily go with what seems socially acceptable and laugh at you for being one of "those people" despite the fact that things such as PRISM and other weird spying operations are known to definitely exist.

>>12329664
This guy gets it.

[Anonymous No.12329933]

>>12329664
>Whether 5G is a threat to health or not is not the real issue.

>AHHHHH only my concerns matter
>Both can't be an issue at once
I hear people say this stupid shit all the time,
Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.12329943]

>>12329685
It's randomly polarized.

[Anonymous No.12329944]

>>12329613
>>12329615
>>12329689

See:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
Top text document.

[Anonymous No.12329993]

>>12329944
Have you been sleeping throughout the parts of school and uni where you're taught how to give proper citations?

[Anonymous No.12329998]

>>12329993
Anon, maybe they didn't teach you this in school, but you're supposed to open the book first.

>reaches over
>opens the book to page 1

There you go. See there's more to it than its cover.

[Anonymous No.12330000]

>>12329998
Look, mate. You're the one who's familiar with the sources you're supposed to provide. Don't expect everyone else to have the same level of familiarity. Provide information that lets readers unambiguously identify the section and work you're quoting because otherwise you may as well just not provide citations at all. Your attitude seems to be "bro just look for documents that agree with me if you don't believe me."

[Anonymous No.12330004]

>>12330000
Top text document. It's just a raw txt file, open with any text editor, ctrl+f some unique part of the quoted text, you'll be right at the correct section.

[Anonymous No.12330008]

>>12322537
all the Gs are its that you don't make the correlation

[Anonymous No.12330014]

>>12323269
I saw a dead deer on my way to work, please interpret this for me oh wise one. Am I going to die?

[Anonymous No.12330022]

>>12324119
Source?

>>12324395
>make up your own mind by reading this list I selected to only support one conclusion.

[Anonymous No.12330025]

>>12330014
Deer symbolizes gentle luring to new adventure, or potentially, it's an earthly feminine force (as in the deer woman), which would serve to lure and punish you. Either way, a dead deer implies a need for caution and potential misadventure ahead.

[Anonymous No.12330026]

>>12324542
0+x = x

[Anonymous No.12330036]

>>12330022
>>make up your own mind by reading this list I selected to only support one conclusion.
Irrelevant, the core focus is on hazards and risk assessment. I do include studies that don't find an effect when it's relevant, but whether I did or not, you're still left explaining and reconciling the mere existence of the body of positive effect literature which is something I've continuously done. I also have sections on medical use.

You're not a step ahead of me, you're several steps behind. Piss off and stop making excuses to not have to read.

[Anonymous No.12330039]

>>12322737
>uv light is non ionising
>perfectly safe
lol

[Anonymous No.12330041]

>>12330036
Gary, the only thing you've continuously done is ragespam hundreds of links when people bother to interact with you. There's no point reading further when you're going to say anyone's criticisms are invalid because they didn't read every single thing you posted. This is all assuming you don't fall back into spamming "clamped durr hurr" and dumping your pictures folder when the questions and criticisms make you uncomfortable.

[Anonymous No.12330052]

>>12330039
5g is microwaves you mong. Or are you trying to say that uv light is non ionising?

[Anonymous No.12330058]

>>12330041
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_story
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

[Anonymous No.12330061]

>>12322737
Funny you say that given that blue light is neurotoxic and the sun would basically rape us all to death if it wasn't for the red light that quenches the excitatory effects (see: photobiomodulation, dr michael hamblin)

[Anonymous No.12330066]

Even if regular 5g wasn't harmful they could hypothetically build beamforming superpowered 5g death rays that invisibly induce heart attacks and also thanks to the data available with cellphones can target you with millimetre (no pun intended) precision

[Anonymous No.12330068]

>>12330061
>blue light is neurotoxic
Prove it

[Anonymous No.12330071]

>>12330068
Sure, in a few hours

[Anonymous No.12330073]

>>12330066
>5g death rays that invisibly induce heart attacks

[Anonymous No.12330078]

>>12330061
This is true, bluetooth got its name because it uses invisible 5g blue light to remotely assassinate people with smart home devices

[Anonymous No.12330099]

>>12322537
A facet of Brave New World USSR-esque central planning economy technocratic circumclampifluoraccimirradicimination, so to speak.

[Anonymous No.12330137]

>>12330036
>Irrelevant, the core focus is on hazards and risk assessment.
This doesn't respond to my point. No one can draw a conclusion from your morass. If people could "make up their own mind" from selective eviscerated we wouldn't need scientists and doctors. Oh right, that's who you don't want people to listen to.

[Anonymous No.12330138]

>>12330073
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.12330144]

>>12330137
Statements from the California Medical Association, many doctors and researchers, American Academy of Pediatrics, IARC, and so on are included within the first few lines. Exposed yourself again, it seems. It's not the 1950's anymore, you can't just say "99% of scientists agree that [x]" and have people believe you, which is the underlying tactic you're trying to draw on. It doesn't even make sense.

[Anonymous No.12330167]

>>12330144
>Statements from the California Medical Association, many doctors and researchers, American Academy of Pediatrics, IARC, and so on are included within the first few lines.
OK, and your point is?

[Anonymous No.12330174]

>>12330167
See:
>>12330058

If you have a functioning brain and the capacity for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind
you should already know what the point is.

[Anonymous No.12330184]

>>12330144
>It's not the 1950's anymore, you can't just say "99% of scientists agree that [x]" and have people believe you, which is the underlying tactic you're trying to draw on. It doesn't even make sense.
Greater than 99% of the experts on this agree 5G is harmless. There will always be a handful of fringe and contrarian figures in any field. And they will always be ignored until they have solid evidence. Deal with it schizo.

[Anonymous No.12330185]

>>12330174
Gee sure seems suspicious you can't even explain your own point and instead vaguely refer to a bunch of links. Almost like you're mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.12330201]

>>12330184
[citation needed]
[definitions needed]
Hint, ICNIRP, FCC, SCENIHR, etc do not constitute 100% of the "experts".

>>12330185
This is known as framing. The gist of ther tactic is you refuse to engage with the substance of a topic and instead gradually shift it into a meta-discussion, about the character of the psoters and the nature of the discussion itself. At this point you can try to insert certain notions as though they're factual, then repeatedly loop abck to them until it becomes an embedded "fact" of the discussion, eg here you've seen it as expedient to claim I'm "mentally ill", and thus you'll then double down on it at loop back until, hopefully if all goes well and your opponent isn't wise to it, I'm on the defensive and the entire discussion is centered around your target having to prove he is not mentally ill. Or put more classically, he is trying to prove his own sanity, an impossible endeavor.

It's very transparent. This is the essence of "bad faith". The only use for bad faith posters is using them as a medium to deliver your own greater message to the hypothetic unseen audience, but even then the use of time and energy is questionable and I don't actually know if it's a net positive.

[Anonymous No.12330228]

>>12330184
Most experts tell me to eat corn oil and avoid saturated fat. KYS.

[Anonymous No.12330294]

>>12330004
There, was that so hard? I don't even completely disagree with you, regarding the 5G debate, I just hate when people make claims that I can't verify. Would have been even nicer if you'd just provided a direct link, or gone to the effort of providing the sources, but this will do. I've started to read one of the sources, found some interesting points. I'd like to point two additional things out:
1. Regardless of the wavelengths we're talking about, any health effects are ALWAYS a function of the intensity. A single quantum of millimeter band radiation won't kill you faster than a single x ray, a single visible photon (wavelength < 1 µm, if you've forgotten) or a single electron.
2. I doubt the correctness of the claim that millimeter waves don't exist in nature, or are much rarer than the adjacent types (microwave radiation and the single-digit GHz RF spectrum).

That said, I am worried about the intensity of ambient millimeter wave radiation increasing. We're getting into the territory where the wavelength is starting to be on the same order of magnitude as cellular structures, which is worrying when you've been paying attention in your RF / microwave lectures -- EM absorption starts peaking when you've got more-or-less conductive structures on the same order of magnitude as the wavelength, so the intensity of the radiation can be lower to achieve the same effect as with longer or shorter wavelengths.
On the other hand, this also makes it easier to block, in a way, you just need to wear shielding that absorbs it to a sufficient degree. 1mm thick plate armor should do the trick. But jokes aside, Faraday clothing could become a thing.

[Anonymous No.12330295]

>>12330201
>[citation needed]
>[definitions needed]
>Search engine.

>ICNIRP, FCC, SCENIHR, etc do not constitute 100% of the "experts".
They constitute and speak for the vast vast majority of experts.

[Anonymous No.12330305]

>>12330201
>This is known as framing. The gist of ther tactic is you refuse to engage with the substance of a topic and instead gradually shift it into a meta-discussion, about the character of the psoters and the nature of the discussion itself.
This is called projection. The schizo posted a nonsubstantive response in which he failed to explain his (nonexistent) point and now blames others for the discussion being nonsubstantive.

[Anonymous No.12330327]

>>12330228
>Most experts tell me to eat corn oil and avoid saturated fat. KYS.
I doubt any expert has explicitly told you to eat a particular oil, but why do you think they're wrong?

[Anonymous No.12330341]

How will 5g interact with the microchips Soros and Bill Gates has put in the covid vaccines? Will it turn me gay?

[Anonymous No.12330497]

>>12324595
Comparing dihydrogen monoxide to 5g is like comparing weed to cocaine.
Seriously man, dihydrogen monoxide is extremely fatal. Dont even try to go near it.

[Anonymous No.12330499]

>>12329943
http://physics.bu.edu/py106/notes/Polarization.html
huh, I guess insects evolved the ability to detect polarization for nothing, then.

[Anonymous No.12330508]

>>12330295
https://microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house
https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/health-council-netherlands-5g

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

[Anonymous No.12330513]

>>12324595
Hydrogen is extremely flammable. Dihydrogen is twice as flammable as hydrogen alone. How is this supposed to be good for you?

[Anonymous No.12330520]

>>12330513
>>12330497
>>12324595
have sex

[Anonymous No.12330522]

>>12330499
Well gee, maybe they benefit from detecting polarization because they live in the understory and are covered by a vast multi-tiered canopy.

[Anonymous No.12330540]

>>12330341
Microsoft 2020 - WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&tab=PCTBIBLIO

https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006O6EHUA0?tab=publications
Government response to Covid-19 -> Global governance -> Transnational actors -> 5G

It's pretty straightforward.

[Anonymous No.12330559]

>>12330522
I wonder if this ability allows them to subjugate a majority of financial institutions and media outlets to modulate public opinion in their favor while gaining ever increasing control of various populations...

ah nvm, it’s just for navigation because sunlight is polarized
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207014017

[Anonymous No.12330577]

>>12322537
5G signals are safe. What's not safe is putting your data on 5G transmitters made by Huawei.

[Anonymous No.12330681]

>>12330508
>https://microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house
This completely fails to show any lies. The NTP study didn't show a link to cancer.

https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/health-council-netherlands-5g
This is simply lying about the source it's citing. It claims that it recommends not using 5G when it says this nowhere. It also says to follow ICNIRP guidelines. Your source is both lying and selectively citing sources.

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/
Calling ICNIRP "industry loyal" is a lie. Not reading this bullshit.

[Anonymous No.12330689]

>>12330540
Good job discrediting 5G schizos.

[Anonymous No.12330724]

It's below satellite frequently. It's below microwave frequency.
It may move some water molecules a bit faster but otherwise there's nothing that will affect your body.
Brain waves are only 10s of Hertz so there's no way 5ghz will interfere with that.

[Anonymous No.12331314]

Are none of you scientists going to propose a scientific experiment. Literally just place a few plants next to your wifi router and another few plants in a control area. People have done this and document that the wifi kills plants. Another good experiment is how quickly food rots next to a wifi router compared to a control location. And if you don't trust the youtube videos and gardening forums documenting this it's an easy experiment to run yourself. And if you are skeptical maybe you should consider how much money is behind the cell phone industry.

[Anonymous No.12331337]

>>12322537
More studies needed but effects are noticed and suspected issues have been drawn out.

Non-biased updates on 5g and studies: https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/

They threw this technology out for money and bummed off health laws with old dated principles of radiation and limits.

[Anonymous No.12331595]

>>12330681
False.

>>12330689
Priming / bandwagoning, substanceless response. Disregarded.

[Anonymous No.12331797]

>>12322737
go stare at a headlight genius

[Anonymous No.12331818]

>>12329933
humanity is doomed
literally building the eye of sauron because this retard wants to play video games

[Anonymous No.12331832]

>>12330184
that is literally the tactic they used to convince everyone about climate change
pretty sure it still works lmao

[Anonymous No.12331861]

>>12331595
>schizos
I like how all the "evil" engineers want to harm us and how nobody working in the field is going like "um... you do realise if they find out about this, they're going to sue the pants off us right?"
This is what happens when you breathe your own farts for too long.

[Anonymous No.12331895]

>>12331861
>evil
That's really what you think is going on here? You have a very childish way of viewing the world.

[Anonymous No.12331900]

>>12324493

People are zombies because of SSRIs and phones/social media.

[Anonymous No.12331902]

>>12331832
correction: this is what they did to DENY climate change, to convince people that smoking is harmless, to allow asbestos to be used as an insulator, allow radioluminescent paint and many others.

[Anonymous No.12331906]

>>12331900
There are a number of factors.

[Anonymous No.12331916]

>>12331906

ssris should be banned

[Anonymous No.12331925]

>>12331916
Don't get in the way of progress you pretentious kid

[Anonymous No.12331930]

>>12331916
A large chunk of modern medicine is a narcissistic and psychopathic religion masquerading as evidence based and scientific, and it needs to be torn down and rebuilt.

>>12331925
>Progress
Progress is relative. You cannot just "progress", you must have progress from somewhere, to somewhere else. You truly are a fool.

[Anonymous No.12331936]

>>12331930
We're going to have progress from slower internet to faster internet. By any means necessary. Even if it means shorter life spans

[Anonymous No.12331945]

>>12331936
Then you're insane, and so our only option is to put you and your fellow cultists under the boot. Natural law, natural economy, always been this way. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.12331961]

>>12331945
You can try to stop us by voting with your wallets but I don't think we'd miss rural redneck money. You're not our customers. You don't need or want our internet.
You can also keep voting in your orange hitler as but he cannot stop the population from funding technology.

[Anonymous No.12331979]

>>12331961
Partially correct. The big picture gist of it is accurate though.

[Anonymous No.12332056]

>>12331930

The majority of mentally ill people i see have just been gaslighted. Especially these rainbow hair self diagnosis autistic leftist.

[Anonymous No.12332086]

>>12332056
Yep, probably. Whether it be parentification etc or adaptation to unyielding narcissitic abuse. There's a fairly broad transgenerational component.

[Anonymous No.12332140]

>>12331902
And how do you know any of those are false? You don't just believe whatever the consensus is at the moment do you? That doesn't work and makes no sense!!!!

[Anonymous No.12332147]

>>12331595
>False.
You lose.

>Priming / bandwagoning, substanceless response.
Keep projecting, schizo >>12330305

[Anonymous No.12332151]

>>12322572
kekd

[Anonymous No.12332160]

>>12332147
There's nothing to say. It's self evidently false.

>You lose.
I see we have a masturbator debater here. Muh winz.

[Anonymous No.12332162]

>>12324595
Literally every person who ingested dihydrogen monoxide in his life, died or will die; and you know this, globohomo shill

[Anonymous No.12332165]

>>12328702
Based schizo retard

[Anonymous No.12332171]

>>12329665
(((they)))
*they are the chemotherapy drug pharma companies

[Anonymous No.12332188]

>>12330341
5G is the signal that activates vaccine nanorobots to mindcontrol you into becoming communist and welcoming brown muslim immigrants

[Anonymous No.12332194]

>>12331900
>i am a medicated schizo, so everyone else must be taking SSRIs too

[Anonymous No.12332195]

>>12332171
I wasn't aware that they are that powerful!

[Anonymous No.12332196]

>>12330341

[Anonymous No.12332199]

>>12331337
>non-biased
>newest post is the author getting excoriated for making ridiculous statements and loaded questions
Uhuh.

[Anonymous No.12332205]

>>12332160
>There's nothing to say.
We already know you have nothing to say. You lose.

[Anonymous No.12332207]

>>12332205
>got em!

[Anonymous No.12332598]

>>12332188
i love how this post could be right wing exaggeration, left wing sarcasm or a troll and there is no way of knowing

[Anonymous No.12332614]

>>12332162

Kys

[Anonymous No.12332616]

>>12332194

Ssris are of no benefit to the general population . How's that erectile dysfunction btw?

[Anonymous No.12332911]

>>12325205
>>12327941

>>12327864 probably just means that a lot of it is based on trade secrets

[Anonymous No.12332945]

>>12322537
maybe

[Anonymous No.12333032]

>>12330138

https://www.gq.com/story/cia-investigation-and-russian-microwave-attacks

[Anonymous No.12333060]

>>12327839
https://www.grandmetric.com/2019/03/26/5g-health-issues-explained/

Those don't seem like realistic conditions.

[Anonymous No.12333554]

>>12333032
See >>12330138

[Anonymous No.12333588]

>>12333032
https://www.www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/the-real-story-behind-the-havana-embassy-mystery/

[Anonymous No.12333600]

>>12322537
it has acess to high frequencies and it just so happens that 60gm frequency interacts with oxygen molecule making it harder to us to absorb it to red cells
just research it it's simple

[Anonymous No.12333621]

>>12333060
You ever notice how it's always cancer people talk about? That was a deliberate move on telecom's part in the late 90's. Cancer epidemiology is notoriously difficult.

Hey guys, look, so, okay. Like, uh... I took this animal, strapped it down, hit it in the head with a hammer, sawed off ALL 4 limbs (we're leaving nothing to chance here), then we left it for 6 months and yep, sure enough. After taking samples from a wide variety of tissues we see NO evidence of cancer, NO DNA damage. There is NO EVIDENCE of a harmful effect. It doesn't cause cancer, therefore it's safe and effective. Clearly nothing bad can be happening to you if you don't get cancer, right?!?

Seriously how fucking stupid do you people have to be?

[Anonymous No.12333665]

>>12333600
>60gm frequency

[Anonymous No.12333673]

>>12333665
gh
i'd link you pdf but i can't find it
i found it
https://stop5g.cz/us/5g-60ghz-wireless-network-oxygen-absorption-unable-to-breath/
https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1759078711000122

[Anonymous No.12333690]

>>12333060
the EMF exposure is was within the existing safety guidelines

[Anonymous No.12333694]

>>12333060
the EMF exposure was within the existing safety guidelines

[Anonymous No.12333702]

>>12333665
>gigamutt

[Anonymous No.12333718]

>>12333702
>gigaclamps

[Anonymous No.12333723]

if certain frequencies of sunlight can trigger vitamin d productions, wouldnt it stand to reason that other frequencies of shit could potentially fuck your shit up?

[Anonymous No.12333727]

>>12333723
Only if you're not retarded.

[Anonymous No.12333728]

>>12333723
right, and 630 hz triggers NO production in mitochondria

[Anonymous No.12333730]

>>12333728
Time to nitrosative stress its shit right up.

[Anonymous No.12333755]

>>12322653
Literally nobody needs this bullshit. Give me a single real application of this shit that is not "MUH BACKT TO THE FUTURE CARS".

Society is working well enough. We don't need this shit.

[Anonymous No.12333766]

>>12333755
Television nation, don't turn that station! No need for reason, when logic is treason. Complacent nation, this is your salvation... There's no need for exertion, when your God is, coercion.

Their God is "progress". Without it, they are lost and aimless. It is unfillable void. Without their God they are and have absolutely nothing.

You're not going to listen to what I'm saying, but I'm saying it anyway. Know your enemy. They have the shape of a human being, but the essence is not there. These are not sane human beings you're dealing with.

"There's no use in reasoning with them. That's reason, enough."

[Anonymous No.12333803]

>>12333766
based schizo retard

[Anonymous No.12333807]

>>12333803
More like based based and thoroughly and utterly based Based McBasedman.

[Anonymous No.12335146]

>>12333755
you wouldnt get it, compute harder