Based

[Anonymous No.12272771]

Which scientific field attracts the most/least based people? I feel like biologists are the biggest normies. As for the most based I'm not sure; maybe Mathematicians?
What does /sci/ think?

[Anonymous No.12272831]

>>12272771
the further from numbers and complex math you get, the higher concentration of normans, but the more concrete the math, the higher the concentration of spergs and unbearable coworkers. based equilibrium gradient i guess, youre damned either way

>t.chemist

[Anonymous No.12273024]

>>12272771
>biologists are the biggest normies
only half are normies, the other half are just boring af. they remind me of peahens
Chemists are based though

[Anonymous No.12273223]

>>12272771
Data scientist or Computer Scientist.

[Anonymous No.12273226]

>>12272771
Biology is hardly a science. If it can't be reduced to chemistry/physics, it's most likely pseudoscientic bullshit.

[Anonymous No.12273235]

Military r&d

[Anonymous No.12273627]

>>12273226
Ironic. Biologists still perform actual empirical experiments and use the scientific method

[Anonymous No.12273637]

>>12272831
That's a good way of putting it anon. I also feel as though a lot chemists have similar personalities-or the good ones anyway. They tend to be very pedantic and serious; and don't suffer fools. Whereas physicists and mathematicians are more fun and have a sense of humour

>t.physicist

[Anonymous No.12273645]

I agree. Biology is definitely a real science. And can definitely be reduced to chemistry/physics unlike what the other anon said

[Anonymous No.12273649]

>>12273645
Meant to reply to >>12273627

[Anonymous No.12273658]

definitely biology. I'm studying biomed science and had experience working in a lab, all of my colleagues were normies and primarily female

[Anonymous No.12274280]

>>12272771
Biologists are not inherently normies:
Dawkins and Watson are based as can be.
The problem is more that a larger feminine presence in a field has a castrating effect, for lack of a better term. So yes, if you are very based and enter biology, you get ostracized as punishment. But this state of affairs can't last forever, there must be other ways for autistic men to do science than to congregate in a circle jerk of the hardest disciplines. Maybe getting through school while constantly hiding your power level will be painful, but then you will have a more open field in terms of actual based research that the normies daren't touch. It just has to have more practical applications so that you can be financed by private or military capital rather than general academia which seems non salvageable.

[Anonymous No.12274520]

>>12274280
>Dawkins is based
Ahahahaha
Back to plebbit r/atheism you fedora tipping gaylord
This pseud nonce is anything but based.

[Anonymous No.12274650]

>>12273024
>Chemists are based though
thank you as a chemist I agree

[Anonymous No.12275622]

>>12272771
The fluid chads

[Anonymous No.12275683]

>>12273627
>science
>uses scientific method
pick 1

[Anonymous No.12275709]

>>12273226
>can't be reduced to chemistry/physics
>biochemistry
>biophysics

You okay there friend?

[Anonymous No.12275722]

I am a biologist and i would say that yes, its full of normalfags sadly. Lots of "dude weed lmao" people, retarded treehuggers and Steve Irwin wannabes. Also, lots of lefty women. The most based biologists are in evolution, genetics, molecular biology, paleontology and maybe microbiology. The good part is that you can get a lot of pussy.

[Anonymous No.12275759]

>>12272771
“Finally, synthetic watermelon”

[Anonymous No.12275807]

>>12272771

Engineers are based as fuck most of the time, except for EEs where its like a 30/70 split (I'm EE and I fuckin hate most EEs)

I don't know any mathematicians but people I know who have degrees in math are generally pretty based.

Physicists (at least undergrad) are the least based people I've ever met, everybody I knew who studied physics was either a major sperg who barely got Cs or a leftist dork.

CS is mostly based

Chemistry is based as all fuck (my grandpa was a chemist and he was the greatest man I've ever known)

Biologist are not based

Economists are based as fuck

[Anonymous No.12276033]

chemistry is based
the field is cool as well as the people. from my experience they're pretty laid-back but once they start talking chem they'll kick ass

[Anonymous No.12276141]

Manufacturing engineers are the most based. 100% white men making factories work, healthy mix of hands on work and theory. Especially in aerospace.

[Anonymous No.12276310]

>Be me
>Chemistry Grad Student
>This Thread "Chem is based"

I-I... chose correctly? Well dang... Thought I was fucked.

[Anonymous No.12276343]

>>12273226
Imagine being this retarded. I'm actually surprised you are able to use a computer, fren.

[Anonymous No.12276364]

>>12273226
I'm pretty sure a chemist doesn't know about immune systems

[Anonymous No.12276580]

>>12275807
sorry to break it to you but 1) economics is not a science and 2) i studied grad econ at a top school, and it's the least based area ever; everyone is a lefty cunt

[Anonymous No.12276642]

chemists and molecular biologists are based as fuck
mathfags are pseudo-based but they smell weird
physicists are insufferable cunts
engineers are based most of the time, especially plant engineers

[Anonymous No.12277005]

EE & CS have the biggest normies, its as bad as biology

Most other engineers are also kinda normies

Only chemists i can think of are walter white (based) and that weird guy Gale that got shot (not based) so they cancel

Newton died a virgin for his work, Einstein and Schrodinger were chads, so physics is lowkey hella based

[Anonymous No.12277014]

>>12276364
they could easily learn it, while most biologists couldn't easily learn most chemistry concepts

[Anonymous No.12277025]

>>12273223
Literally R*ddit

[Anonymous No.12277035]

Pharmacy is most based
CS is normie tier

[Anonymous No.12277506]

>>12272771
Nice file name.