Scientific literature about dating

[Anonymous No.12266773]

Hey, you
Lately I have been quite interested in dating/relationships, especially in modern times with the introduction of the birth control pill and (now) socially acceptable dating apps.

I have been visiting different communities ("manosphere" types mainly) and I think there are two grop of men. Those who believe that the right set of mind is enough to attract most women and those who believe that looks/money and, in a lesser extent, status are crucial to get pussy.

What does /sci/ thinks about this? Do you guys can recommend me some scientific papers or books? Men's stories are funny to read but I want a more scientific approach to it.

[Anonymous No.12266824]

Pump

[Anonymous No.12266841]

absolutely not science but just to help you out its like 70% your charisma and the rest of it looks. If you are not a deformed no jaw incel you will do fine. Now fuck off

[Anonymous No.12266847]

>>12266841
Nigger, no sources? lame.

[Anonymous No.12266850]

>>12266773
Any take on the matter will be inherently skewed, since the topic is almost entirely defined by one’s personal beliefs and experiences. There’s too many variables at play to precisely define correlation between various traits.
I’ve spent a lot of time trying to research this, and in the end I’m always left with more questions than answers. If you look at celibacy percentages by gender over time, something in the past decade created a massive social black hole that continues to suck more and more men in each year. I have my own theories, but as far as I know, no one actually knows what’s causing it. It’s fucking bizarre and it’s going to become a problem soon.

[Anonymous No.12266861]

4chan is rammed to the gills with bitter young men who think women mentally work the same way as them.

[Anonymous No.12266873]

>>12266861
>lifting for girls
also people IRL aren't still pictures of themselves, there's situations, interactions, exchanges where a bigger, stronger, more dominant male certainly is more attractive even if not preferable in the looks department

[Anonymous No.12266878]

>>12266873
Looks like I've got you bang to rights.

[Anonymous No.12266913]

>>12266861
have none of you fucknuts ever done statistics. 2.58 t.statistics is quite high and represents only a 1% chance of zero mean.

[Anonymous No.12266978]

>>12266841
This. It's true that there are some people who are hopeless, (ie people with no jaw, below 5'9, etc) but the vast majority of men just need to stop being a fucking beta and have some confidence.

[Anonymous No.12267085]

>>12266773
the reason there is no "science" regarding this topic is because it is pure autism to be concerned with these things. if you're wondering what's going on in your life that you can't interact with women and have sex, you've completely dug yourself a hole. the average person isn't concerned with these things because they have a clear mental picture of how all this stuff works, if you don't then you are legitimately autistic.

[Anonymous No.12267152]

>>12266861
>going to gym to fuck roasties
You are 100% not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.12267987]

>>12266978
>It's true that there are some people who are hopeless, (ie people with no jaw, below 5'9, etc)
You described a majority of men on earth, ouch

[Anonymous No.12268031]

>>12266773
>Those who believe that the right set of mind is enough to attract most women and those who believe that looks/money and, in a lesser extent, status are crucial to get pussy.

Both can work but you'll attract two distinct type of females. There's no recepie unless you are like Top 1% in looks/status/fame/what ever

[Anonymous No.12268168]

>>12266850
More women taking high paying jobs. Thus men cannot hold those jobs and are also unable to attract women who make more money than him (the fucking woman who stole his job). Now both men and women will be lonely, but women will hold the money

[Anonymous No.12268198]

>>12266850
>it’s going to become a problem soon
problem for whom?

[Anonymous No.12268377]

>>12268198
obviously the men. everything's a problem for you men. women, women, women, women, sex, height, jawline, must lift. honestly rent free at this point. I thought this was science and math but apparently it's /r9k/ but with the word "scientific" an utmost requirement for every thread.

[Anonymous No.12268827]

>>12267152
you go to the gym because you're insecure about what men on the internet think of you

[Anonymous No.12269193]

>>12266850
I agree but even if we can not clearly define correlations we can establish some trends. One of them is the increase in virgin men in the last decade.

Do you recommend some good papers/books? My idea is to have a general idea and then dwell deeper into specific subjects

[Anonymous No.12269212]

>>12267085
Dude. Come on. There are a lot of guys who are virgins or havent had sex in years. They can't all be autists right?

[Anonymous No.12269215]

>>12266861
Holy shit haha. I don't believe it man.

[Anonymous No.12269227]

>>12268031
Probably. Also my description can be too simplistic and other variables could be playing an important role in sexual dynamics too. I'm not looking for tips or a magic formula to get hot girls. I just want to know what science says about attraction and the sexual dynamics in the last few years.

[Anonymous No.12269231]

>>12269193
only about 40% of men who have ever lived reproduced

[Anonymous No.12269232]

r/BlackPillScience

[Anonymous No.12269238]

>>12269215
you've spent too much time on /r9k/ and too little getting to know women

don't get me wrong - a lot of women are promiscuous and hypergamic, but it's not "hurr muh arms muh abs" they are drawn to

[Anonymous No.12269245]

>>12269232
In which nobody reads the studies.

[Anonymous No.12269247]

None of you have ever had sex

[Anonymous No.12269371]

>>12269238
>don't get me wrong - a lot of women are promiscuous and hypergamic, but it's not "hurr muh arms muh abs" they are drawn to

True. I dont blame women. They are just reacting given the current social/technological conditions. I just want to know what the science has to say about it.

[Anonymous No.12269381]

>>12269232
Cheers mate. I'll check it out

[Anonymous No.12269385]

>>12269381
it's a load of bullshti claims by incels obsessed with the lifting-mewing-meditations cope trivium

[Anonymous No.12269388]

>>12266773
You wanna know how I know that your gay?

[lianot mozej No.12269388,2]

difficult to make online dating