[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 82 KB, 960x720, slide_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12249437 No.12249437[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I know jack shit about this stuff.

Here's what I wanna know:
What is the medical reason for clamping immediately after birth?
What reason is there to delay it?
What reason is there to clamp and cut the umbilical cord at all (google says it naturally seals and detaches with time)
Is it a universal practice?
Did people of the past (both near and far) do it?
Would ancient people, with no medical consensus or reasoning, have clamped and cut the cord?
Is it instinctual to clamp and cut the cord?

In other words, can we have some actual fucking answers on the topic

>> No.12249446

>>12249437
You don't need to know this. If you were a medic I could tell you, or rather you could ask your master about it, but you're not one. Only those who swear by the sacred oath can know the art of life.

>> No.12249457

You can influence the intelligence of an individual by limiting access to their mother's oxygen at birth. If you do this to all newborns, you can prevent any geniuses from being born and overthrowing you when they get older. You were clamped and mentally taken down a notch by doctors, who were paid to do so by elites, under the guise of it being"general practice". Sorry.

>> No.12249463

>>12249437
They clamp

>> No.12249499
File: 842 KB, 2801x2202, clamp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12249499

>>12249437
Review of palcental transfusion and the process of lung changeover and gas exchange in the perinatal period.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290307/

Essentially, the infants needs the resources in the blood, and it needs the blood for oxygen and CO2 removal because its lungs are not yet functional. Clamping imemdiately is asphyxiating it, then leaving it with far less blood.

Effect of early clamping:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259583/
https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1714258

>> No.12249539

>>12249437
>What is the medical reason for clamping immediately after birth?
The medical reason is to brain damage the infant at birth. The broader economic and organizational reason is to steal the blood and stem cells from the placenta and cord, and to soften him up for his future role in society. Prune his intellect and overall potential.

>> No.12249547

>>12249437
>>12249457
Interesting

I was clamped very early due to complications at birth

Perhaps I could have been another genius, but alas, now I’m an average 130 IQ smart person

>> No.12249551

>>12249547
Remember that IQ is not an absolute scale, it's relative. The mean is always 100. So if you brain damage everyone over time, the average IQ stays 100, and you still have some variation on either side. The absolute reduction is masked.

>> No.12249554

>>12249463
They also vaccinate and circumcise.

>> No.12249558

>>12249457
They spawn camp.

>> No.12249568

>>12249558
Correct. Why wouldn't they?

>>12249547
>>12249551
130 iq is unfortunately just mediocre. You've been led to believe it's something meaningful, but it's really just average at best in a room full of actual people that aren't sub-human.

>> No.12249576
File: 24 KB, 258x387, BraveNewWorld_FirstEdition.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12249576

>>12249437
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World
Read this book.

>> No.12249585

>>12249547
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cndv7JUJrS8

>> No.12249670

>>12249446
??? what? lol
did your sacred oath include speaking in riddles?
BESTOW WISDOM OF THE CLAMP?
ONE MUST BEAR THE STAMP

>> No.12249747

>>12249437
>Can someone explain to me
Single poster with schizophrenia who used to spam anti 5g threads before fixating on clamps
Ask /med/

>> No.12249771

>>12249568
What on earth are you talking about anon. An IQ of 130 is mediocre at Harvard Medical School maybe (https://www.reference.com/world-view/average-iq-harvard-students-1c4c565596442870))

You're way off base with that idea. It's certainly not genius-level 150+ but thinking that it's average in any sense of the word is simply wrong.

That being said, you can have a very above average IQ and still be a spectacularly average person/student/professional/whatever. It's mostly application of what you were born with, and there's a very high ceiling in that regard.

>> No.12249796

>>12249499
Thank you Anon, you actually went ahead and gave a genuine answer + source

>> No.12249938

>>12249771
I'm sorry, but comparing yourself to subhumans is clearly disingenuous. If you want to see if you are truly intelligent, you shouldn't compare yourself to average Joe's.

I would say 130 is above-average, but not by that much. It's just nothing special, sorry.

>> No.12250132

Thread theme:
https://youtu.be/MXNNzUKrtq4

>> No.12250502

>>12249568
People who bring up IQ outside of high school are sub-human