[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 34 KB, 975x590, x54cky6bjll01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

12248790

Anonymous Mon Oct 19 07:06:03 2020 No.12248790 [Reply] [Original]

>how does an RBMK reactor explode?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 07:13:23 2020 No.12248798 >>12248790 It doesn't. You're delusional.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 07:20:27 2020 No.12248807 File: 37 KB, 384x384, CTE7eqXU8AYdXJFe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>12248798 But I saw it, anon....

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 08:34:08 2020 No.12248929 File: 410 KB, 900x676, 1558590367843.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>12248807

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 09:02:56 2020 No.12248968 RBMK reactors are superior to most in use today. There is no inherent design flaw to them.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 09:18:42 2020 No.12248989 >>12248968 Id say having a nonzero probability of fucking exploding is a pretty big design flaw.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 09:51:13 2020 No.12249040 >>12248989 Other designs are flawed in that regard as well. RMBK wouldn't have failed if it wasn't for Soviet work culture and shortcuts.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 10:05:50 2020 No.12249081 >>12248790 Here's a slightly different explanation than the one usually given https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00295450.2017.1384269

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 10:42:22 2020 No.12249161 >>12248790 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCbms6umE_o

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 19 15:46:03 2020 No.12250085 >>12248968 >There is no inherent design flaw to them. negative temperature coefficient