Reference convention for an array of women

[Anonymous No.12148438]

In a photo of a line of women its widely accepted that you go from left to right e.g. if the first one is the hottest you'd refer to her as 1.

The problem is when we generalise to arrays of women I'm not sure what the convention is for example if I think the 3rd one in the row below the top do we:
1) regard them as matrix entries and say she's (2,3)
2) view them as points on [math]\mathbb{N}^2[\math] and refer to her (3,3)

TL;DR are women matrix entries or points on [math]\mathbb{N}^2[\math]

Pic related

[Anonymous No.12148443]

please dont blow up the school Mark those girls didnt know what they were talking about

[Anonymous No.12148446]

>1) regard them as matrix entries and say she's (2,3)
>2) view them as points on [math]\mathbb{N}^2[\math] and refer to her (3,3)

>TL;DR are women matrix entries or points on [math]\mathbb{N}^2[\math]

Fucked up the latex the corrected version should be [math]\mathbb{N}^2[/math]

[Anonymous No.12148489]

even the old one

[Anonymous No.12148493]

>>12148438
Matrix doesn't mean a table of values you retard. Matrix specifically refers to a equation where the rows are equations of the form ax + by + cz...

[Anonymous No.12148545]

>>12148438
for me it's furthest left on the bottom row