/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12099225]

Why are Northern Europeans so tall?
Weightlifting? Milk? Protein?
How is their genetics superior in this regard?

[Anonymous No.12099230]

You assume being tall is superior to being short. That's incorrect.

[Anonymous No.12099266]

>>12099230
Thats not what OP said you brainlet. Read the poast again.

[Anonymous No.12099268]

>>12099225
Descendants of Neanderthals vs Homo sapiens

[Anonymous No.12099271]

>>12099266
>How is their genetics superior in this regard

[Anonymous No.12099286]

>>12099225
"Northern Europeans are tall" is an objective statement (or at least can be with some numbers).

"Their genetics are superior" is a subjective statement that has absolutely nothing to do with the above objective statement.

Don't confuse the two and stop using broken logic to peddle said confusion.

[Anonymous No.12099287]

>>12099268
The average viking used to be 5'7

[Anonymous No.12099296]

Maybe you could do some research on the main diet those people have nowadays, the geographic position and some studies on northern european antropoly idk.

Genetics? You could study the hystory of some of thos countries and see which indo-european groups stablished there

That should be an objective way to find out what you're asking anon

[Anonymous No.12099305]

>>12099271
Superior to produce tall humans, baka bitch boy

[Anonymous No.12099311]

>>12099286
>"Their genetics are superior" is a subjective statement that has absolutely nothing to do with the above objective statement.
You forgot the
> in this regard?
part, which invalidates your whole argument and makes you look like a retard

[Anonymous No.12099339]

Seething manlets itt

[Anonymous No.12099346]

>>12099225
The genes are copied twice and are commonly reproduced and repeated and so one because being taller is more favorable to females.
thus the tallest ones win.
And the only reason short people exist to today is because rape used to be legal, or because they bought their wives, or because they lived on some shitty place with shit recourses.

[Anonymous No.12099350]

>>12099311
You just repeated the very statement I asserted is wrong.

Taller does not mean you are superior. It is a number to describe your height. What the fuck does "my height is superior to yours" even mean? Superior for what, grabbing things off the top shelf? Having shorter door frames?

[Anonymous No.12099359]

>>12099350
More attractive to females, better at fights, better at basketball, can sweat more

[Anonymous No.12099364]

>>12099225
Bergmann's rule

Animals in the cold are bigger than animals in the tropics as a way of conserving heat. The bigger the volume the less heat you would lose.

>genetics superior
We've seen you folks literally pass out in a 30C

[Anonymous No.12099367]

>>12099339
12 billion pygmies would use less resources than the world's current population. There is a lack of political support for state enforced pygmie crossbreeding policies but it's the only way to endure climate change while ensuring a decent living standard for everyone.

[Anonymous No.12099372]

>>12099364
>Animals in the cold are bigger than animals in the tropics as a way of conserving heat. The bigger the volume the less heat you would lose.
How does this explain the Inuit people who evolved in extreme cold and are generally shorter and stockier than other ethnic groups?

[Anonymous No.12099376]

>>12099372
The came from East Asia and migrated via landbridge

[Anonymous No.12099378]

>>12099359
>More attractive to females
More subjective nonsense. White, western women "tend" to prefer taller men. This is not true globally and does not support your claim.

>Better at fights
Also subjective, see Bruce Lee

>Better at basketball
First true statement, still does nothing for the claim "taller = superior". If the claim was "Northern Europeans are better at basketball because they tend to be taller" then you'd have something.

>Sweat more
what?

[Anonymous No.12099379]

>>12099364
tall people are skinnier than shorter people so they would freeze quicker

[Anonymous No.12099390]

>>12099378
>Better at fights
>Subjective
In hand-to-hand combat, height is an advantage. Your kicks will have more power, and you have longer reach. Even armed, you still have these advantages.
Skill also provides advantages, and an experienced short fighter can overcome his disadvantages against taller opponents. That doesn't mean that height isn't a strength.

It's only with gunpowder that height became a disadvantage. When shrapnel bombs go off, the smaller guy is more likely to come out safely. Being a smaller target is a lot more useful at that point.

[Anonymous No.12099392]

>>12099378
>Subjective
The percentage of taller people who are rated high by women and win fights are higher than the percentage of shorter people who do the same. Bruce Lee is just one person

[Anonymous No.12099397]

>>12099350
Lmao, having reading comprehension problems bro?

When OP says
>How is their genetics superior in this regard?
He's obviously saying how is their genetics superior TO MAKE TALL EUROS, not preferable from an appreciative standpoint.

Now go buy yourself neurons

[Anonymous No.12099398]

>>12099392
Which is a perfectly valid and likely true claim on its own. "Taller people are superior because they can win fights" is not.

[Anonymous No.12099404]

>>12099397
That wasn't the claim. Inventing interpretations of other people's posts to substantiate your point only advertises your ignorance to others.

[Anonymous No.12099405]

>Retards
Physical prowess is not a hereditary trait
Evolution does not care about fighting, only survival of the genes.
Humans evolved to be persistent hunters not fighters.

Being taller or smaller is an adaptation to climate and landscape. Being taller gets you bogged down in mud and swamp. Being shorter gets you killed by winter.

[Anonymous No.12099406]

>>12099390
Until Mike Tyson knocks you the fuck out.

Dude's a legend for knocking out heavyweight giants yet still only being 5'11. In his case, the stockiness (especially in the neck and thighs) lead to some immense striking power.

[Anonymous No.12099410]

>>12099230
this desu. height is the ultimate lifelet cope.

[Anonymous No.12099413]

>>12099390
I'm not debating about whether or not being taller can be useful in fights, I'm asserting that whether or not this is true does nothing for the claim "being taller makes you superior", with no further context provided by the claim.

[Anonymous No.12099417]

>>12099404
>herp a derp durr durrr houba hop
Welp. I guess the words "in this regard" were put there purely accidentally and were meant to be discarded. My bad, Einstein.

[Anonymous No.12099424]

>>12099404
>Inventing interpretations of other people's posts to substantiate your point only advertises your ignorance to others.
Oh the irony.

[Anonymous No.12099454]

>>12099406
I haven't watched enough boxing to comment on the matter, but the rules could affect things.
Also, as you said, Mike Tyson is a legend. He's not the average person, and is capable of winning, using his strengths to his advantage.

>>12099413
>I'm not debating whether or not being taller can be useful in fights
The anon you responded to claimed that height is an advantage in fighting, and you said that it's subjective.

[Anonymous No.12099504]

>>12099454
>The anon you responded to claimed that height is an advantage in fighting, and you said that it's subjective.

Close. The anon claimed that being taller was superior, and that being tall can be advantageous in a fight is evidence for this claim. I said it was subjective because not because I disagreed that it was useful in a fight, but that it was subjective whether not being good at fights fulfills the criterion of "superior". I added Bruce Lee a counterexample as well, but that only further muddied the waters is seems.

The beef I have is with the completely meaningless word "superior" when devoid of context. Superior could mean anything. You could even clarify by saying "superior at losing fights". It was my mistake not to clarify what I meant by "subjective" in that context, but I stand by my argument - saying "being taller is advantageous in a fight" does absolutely nothing to support the claim "being taller makes you superior" because the word "superior" means nothing by itself.

[Anonymous No.12099518]

>>12099417
You're digging yourself into a hole and claiming I'm the idiot for not bringing a shovel.

Your position is indefensible. "In this regard" provides no further context to the word "superior". Superior at fighting? Superior at squeezing into tight spaces? Superior at being able to afford less food? It's completely devoid of context. "In this regard" *wants* to point to the context to which a reasonable argument could be made, but it doesn't because there is no regard being referenced.

Call me retarded all you want, it doesn't make you right, it just makes you look like a child in addition to being wrong.

[Anonymous No.12099531]

>>12099518
Calling you a retard would serve no purpose because you proved you're to retarded to actually understand what people write.

[Anonymous No.12099540]

>>12099424
Explain the irony? Since everyone seems to think OP's post means whatever they want it to mean, I'll copy and paste it:

"Why are Northern Europeans so tall?
Weightlifting? Milk? Protein?
How is their genetics superior in this regard?"

>Why Why are Northern Europeans so tall? Weightlifting? Milk? Protein?
A fair enough question. I don't know but I don't really care for what we're discussing.

>How is their genetics superior in this regard?"
And this it the fucking leap. First of all, none of the above possibilities has jack shit to do with genetics. But that aside, superior to what? To what regard? Nothing is stated. Could it be they are superior at fighting? Possibly - as we've discussed, height can provide an advantage. But You could come up with anything. Superior at jumping jacks? Superior at eating ass? Perhaps superior at getting sunburns?

I am not inventing any context. I am not assuming anything in OP's post. I am taking the words exactly as they are and claiming there's no argument to be made without further clarification.

Hopefully being spoonfed what I thought was blatantly obvious has finally helped some of the smooth brains in this thread with basic fucking reading comprehension. If you have any more questions, like what the word "superior" means, I'd be happy to point you to a dictionary.

[Anonymous No.12099545]

>>12099531
Oh it serves no purpose alright. Are you done or do you want to shit in your hand and throw it at me again?

[Anonymous No.12099546]

I thought OPs image was MC Ride in the catalog kek

[Anonymous No.12099549]

>>12099225
Genetics plus dairy protein. Reliance on plant protein leads to shorter societies.

[Anonymous No.12099583]

The real question is, why is his axe so impressively blunt? At least grab a real-looking axe for the close-up shot.

[Anonymous No.12099987]

Fuck nordshits and fuck niggers.
Im Mexican, im 175 cm tall, im incredibly tall compared to my country men, my parents are like 140 ans 160, I always thought I was blessed with a rare height gene until I visited America and saw whites and blacks three heads taller than me.

[Anonymous No.12100014]

>>12099268
Are you trying to imply that Neanderthals were tall?

[Anonymous No.12100086]

>>12099225
Fact: Rollo is a sexy beast

[Anonymous No.12101033]

>>12099225
All great people in history were manlets, with dark hair and brown/hazel eyes. Northern Euros are nigger tier that were lucky enough to live amongst superior latin/celtic people

[Anonymous No.12101046]

>>12099225
>>12099266
>>12099268

Sexual Selection, high fat/protein diet and survival of the fittest. Scandinavians also have the highest verified IQ average in the world at 115 to 120 IQs depending on the region.

[Anonymous No.12101051]

>>12101046
Lol scandis are amongst the dumbest euros specially for their GDP per capita. The smartest euros are Italians, jews ,French and Britbongs

[Anonymous No.12101062]

>>12099406
Rocky Marciano is more impressive than Mike tyson and at 5'9 most of his wins were knockouts. He knocked out people Ali got his ass kicked by. Mike tyson fought in fixed fights too you idiot. On the other hand Rocky was killed for not fighting in fixed fights.

[Anonymous No.12101065]

>>12101051
>coping dumbass loser
cry more leftard

[Anonymous No.12101078]

>>12101065
Name one single tall, blond and blue eyed scientist that made any contribution equivalent to short, dark hair and brown eyes scientists like Newtown, Einstein, Maxwell or Feynman

[Anonymous No.12101096]

>>12101078
Einstein was born with white hair, you fucking dumbass.

[Anonymous No.12101103]

>>12101096
>Babies have lighter and weaker hair
Wow you must be a genius. Let me guess are you a northern European with blue eyes and blond hair that is a massive brainlet as literally 80% of blonde people?

[Anonymous No.12101106]

>>12101103

[Anonymous No.12101107]

>>12101103
What with people's inability to sense irony?
Do you also act like a fucking humorless robot in real life?

[Anonymous No.12101116]

>>12101046
There's no way the standard iq is that high, everyone's fucking retarded up here. If it's actually the case, I would've offed myself already if I lived anywhere else.

[Anonymous No.12101121]

>>12101046
>>12101116
Quote sources, not your opinion, goddamn retards.

[Anonymous No.12101144]

>>12099364
This is 100% a lie though, where'd you ever read this? Bigger volumes equal more surface area for the heat to escape from. Bigger also equals more energy demanding bodies in an already starved environment, which is never good. Even the reindeer gets smaller the further north you move, their top tier fur isn't enough even for them. At Svalbard, all the reindeer have small, stubby legs and a compact body for increased insulation. It's heat and resources that allow animals to grow big, you got it the other way around.

[Anonymous No.12101164]

>>12099225
Chromium deficiency.

[Anonymous No.12101170]

>>12101121
Wtf do you need sources for every argument for? Does an average iq of 15-20 points above the world average seem plausible to you? Have you never seen an iq chart before, is your reference point all fucked? "The only way to argue is by citing others" Have your source anyway, spitlicker

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country

[Anonymous No.12101176]

>>12099406
yeah and you forget to mention that mike tyson was 100kg naturally without lifting and just training for boxing and he was 85kg of muscle when he was 12 that's why he could compete at heavyweight because most heavyweights were 95-105kg at the time he was fighting and he had a huge frame he had a shoe size that most people have when they are 6'5 (14 iirc) huge hands huge muscles basically huge everything except his height

less than 5% of 5'11 people could be 95kg of mucles and still not be slow as fuck and have a decent stamina most 5'11 people would have like 80-85kg as fight weight and would get knocked out by heavyweights

[Anonymous No.12101191]

>>12101121
Why are you a slave to "sources" and cannot think for yourself, if you have such superior intelligence?

[Anonymous No.12101194]

>>12101144
>Bigger volumes equal more surface area for the heat to escape from
The opposite.

[Anonymous No.12101197]

>>12101144
Why do you think small warm blooded mammals don't exist in the cold oceans? Temp regulation is intimately related to metabolism, and small mammals cannot undergo enough metabolism to generate the heat required to stay alive.

[Anonymous No.12101200]

>>12101197
>Related graphic

[Anonymous No.12101207]

>>12101144
Bigger volume = less surface area to volume ratio
Yes they have higher surface but at the same time, their internal organs are capable of storing and insulating more heat

Kind of like a potato vs a french fry.
The fry cools down fast because it is small
The potato surface cools fast but the inside is guaranteed to be hot

Yes, bigger organisms also need more energy but smaller organism have a massive metabolism which makes them eat more of their own weight than any animal
Heartbeat of a mice is 10x that of a human at rest.

Some animals do get smaller in cold regions but they are known as the exceptions to the rule.
Polar Bears are bigger than black bears,
artic wolves are bigger than desert wolves,
Siberian tigers are bigger than Bengal tigers

The Bergmann's rule apply mostly to predators

[Anonymous No.12101209]

>>12101170
>>12101191
Shut the fuck up you absolute baboon.
It's my right to ask for proofs and actual studies rather than your meaningless opinion.

> just think for yourself maaan
Get fucked in the ass, subhuman. I'm not wasting my time conducting surveys that have already been done.

[Anonymous No.12101213]

>>12099225
I think the current theory was the population that settled there were already taller than average and from then on it was selected as a positive trait with the genes associated with decreased height simply eliminated as being inferior for that environment and it's hard to say it wasn't given the advantage height gives in physical ability

[Anonymous No.12101220]

>>12101209
You will always be a mental slave to those who are telling you "the truth">>12101213
.

[Anonymous No.12101223]

>>12101209
You will always be a mental slave to those who are telling you "the truth".

[Anonymous No.12101226]

>>12101223
At least I'm not a slave to your meaningless opinion.
Have higher standards, and cope.

[Anonymous No.12101260]

>>12101226
>I am smart. I know who to ask to tell me what to think.

[Anonymous No.12101279]

>>12099225
Nordics are manlets when compared to Adriatics

[Anonymous No.12101542]

>>12099230
>>12099410
>>12099378
You manlets know you'd trade a measly 4.95 years for an extra 5 inches in a heartbeat. That slight difference in lifespan is because tallies are more likely to be involved in social drinking/smoking cultures instead of being a sedentary gnome in mom's basement, vegetizing to the glow of his favorite japanese cartoons.

Being tall provides an incredible advantage for attracting women, it's a trait universally favorable in every culture in the world. No it's not subjective you midge

[Anonymous No.12101551]

>>12099390
In MMA, the shorter fighter has a 2% higher chance of winning across all weight classes.

[Anonymous No.12101566]

>>12099225
Unironically its the high amount of protein and fats in their diets, mostly it came from milks and cheeses being so popular there, but also a lot of meat eating.

[Anonymous No.12101574]

>>12101542
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781963/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474915/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018442X15000384

Women's attraction to height is socially conditioned and cultural.
I unironically prefer being shorter because I am more efficient (I will live longer and healthier and I require less resources to live) while in my life I have not struggled to have girlfriends so there is no negatives to it.
in the future, all men will be short.

[Anonymous No.12101608]

>>12101121
>>12101209
>>12101226

[Anonymous No.12101636]

>>12101574
Hmm, let's see... yep, your sources are retarded because they only include tribes of unevolved proto-people. You're really gonna use a group of a hundred cannibals as a control against the rest of the world? I understand the need to cope but that's just desperate.

>In the future, all men will be short.
Highly (pun intended) improbable.

[Anonymous No.12101644]

>>12101636
>Hmm, let's see... yep, your sources are retarded because they only include tribes of unevolved proto-people
Indonesia is not "unevolved proto people". and genetically, none of the people in the two tribes are distinct from any other modern homo sapien.
You are wrong and denying evidence. There are more studies I could link as well (for example, girls born in households where their mother is taller than their father develop preference for men shorter than them).
>Highly (pun intended) improbable.
False and cope. There is no reason moving forward to waste resources and physically large bodies.

[Anonymous No.12101645]

>>12099225
arent dindus higher?

[Anonymous No.12101783]

>>12099225
>Weightlifting? Milk? Protein?
Nope. Genetic mutation. It was noted even during the time of Caeser.

[Anonymous No.12101798]

>>12099372
They get slightly rounder but short, which does the same in filling up the volume.

[Anonymous No.12101898]

>>12099225
They had to walk through 5 feet of snow daily

[Anonymous No.12101954]

>>12101644
>Indonesia is not "unevolved proto people"
Slant-eyed no sex-having mega seether detected
>and genetically, none of the other people in the two tribes are distinct from any other modern homo sapiens.
You know this is false & I won't waste time sourcing something so abundantly obvious
>False and cope. There is no reason moving forward to waste resources and physically large bodies.
For the same reason behind higher sexual preference for men with bigger jaws and women with bigger cheekbones, tall height is a sign of a male more capable of amassing resources. And explain why even in your studies – where taller-male couples still comprise ~90% of all couples – men are universally much taller than their female counterparts? Surely there must be some reason why men tend to be taller than women.

Enjoy breathing the air where my balls hang, midge

[Anonymous No.12102022]

>>12099350
Nigga no one says "oh boy, I'm only 5ft tall!". Name one useful activity a short person can dominate a tall person in.

[Anonymous No.12102025]

>>12102022
persistence hunting without knee damage

[Anonymous No.12102028]

>>12101898
They got really good at boat making to avoid this

[Anonymous No.12102040]

>>12102025
Wow, super sexy. I'm sure the ladies are just dying head over heals to find out which hunter will have the longest lasting knees before selecting a mate.
Or maybe they'll just settle for the guy walking in with a cougar draped over his shoulder.

[Anonymous No.12102247]

>>12101078
niels bohr and Lie

[Anonymous No.12102674]

>this thread
You guys are not just retarded.
It's also clear you're all from /pol/

It's so obvious the both of you virgins and dreadfully insecure about it. All because you oversimplifies the necessary qualities needed for having a gf and are far too lazy to work on it.

[Anonymous No.12102725]

>>12099230
Maybe for survival and functionality, but unless you live in Sub-Saharan Africa, your genetic fitness will be determined almost entirely by prospective mates. Of course, this means aesthetic traits (such as height, at least if you’re a male) will be selected for over invisible, functional traits. Yes, there’s social dynamics, and other success indicators that come into play, but ultimately being a taller male means being a more genetically fit male, which is, at least in some sense, “superior”.

[Anonymous No.12102748]

Stop oversimplying things, the lot of you
Height maybe the first thing a girl sees but it's also the least thing she would care about
>social skills, security, paternal skills
These are what matters. Getting so worked up over height is ridiculous

Kindly return back to /pol/ with your retardedness.
/sci/ is a board of asexuals and celibates

[Anonymous No.12102860]

>>12101170
>Does an average iq of 15-20 points above the world average seem plausible to you?
For an entire country? No.

[Anonymous No.12102905]

>>12099305
Retarded?

[Anonymous No.12103076]

Literally just genetics. Also the difference isn't huge. The US is sitting at 1.77m on average.

[Anonymous No.12103082]

>>12102748
>Height maybe the first thing a girl sees but it's also the least thing she would care about
This is either manlet cope or roastie delusion.
>muh /pol/
Reddit is that way kind stranger.

[Anonymous No.12103103]

>>12099987
their food have growth hormones, my brother is mexican and as adult kept growing when he started his uni in the US.

[Anonymous No.12103309]

To the manlets who are defending being short, you have no idea what it feels like to be 6’4”, walk through a mall and watch all the shitheads eye up my 6’2” wife.

[Anonymous No.12103311]

>>12103309
>you have no idea what it feels like to be 6’4”
Just about every man in my family is significantly taller than that.

[Anonymous No.12103324]

>>12103082
Do you have money?
Can you make her laugh?

This are the questions that would make her stay. Your height is irrelevant - ask the Asians

[Anonymous No.12103349]

>>12103076
>tallest people in the world
>also the slowest population growth

Meanwhile Asians are short but fucks like rabbits
>muh master race

[Anonymous No.12103357]

>>12099225
simple: self reported.

[Anonymous No.12103359]

>>12099390
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL2a2-8OHdg

[Anonymous No.12103361]

>>12101062
Rocky also had a shorter reach of I'm not mistaken.

[Anonymous No.12103362]

>>12099987
i am mexican from chiapas and i am 5'4. so stop complaining.

[Anonymous No.12103364]

>>12101542
Aight nigga u aint gota be mean bout it

[Anonymous No.12103368]

>>12101062
I used to see a bare ass when I first saw this picture but now I clearly see the guitar no matter how hard I squint. I think I am getting more mature as a person.

[Anonymous No.12103739]

>>12101542
>a sedentary gnome
Fucking destroyed

[Anonymous No.12103900]

>>12103739
It was an alright insult. Nothing topkek worthy

[Anonymous No.12103926]

>>12101645
Yes.

[Anonymous No.12103966]

>>12099287
They just found a field with 2000 graves from around year 1000 or early 1100 and they were all 180-190 cm tall.
https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/9vjAdd/hittade-unik-kyrkogard-med-tusenariga-skelett

[Anonymous No.12103969]

>>12101645

Some are, African Americans and Maasai Tribe are the main two populations. Also the Maasai Tribe throws the Bergmann's rule into the trash.

[Anonymous No.12104053]

>>12103966
I've seen taller.

[Anonymous No.12104879]

>>12103311
I'll give you forty bucks for a serum sample and three fiddy for a biopsy

[Anonymous No.12104924]

>>12102247
>niels bohr
Brown hair.
>Lie
Brown eyes and brown hair
Blondes are fucking dumb and the only scientists in northern Europe are mutts with celtic, jewish, slavic or latin geritage. Blondes were 60% of Europe's population and contributed 0% in terms of science, engineering, mathematics, art or philosophy. The genetic stock of northern Europeans would be nigger tier without the immigration to those lands of superior people from the west and the south of Europe

[Anonymous No.12106067]

>>12103966
Thats nothing compared to the ecuadorian giant skeletons

[Anonymous No.12107521]

>>12099225
Tall is not superior, it's harder to escape in spaceship, if you're tall.

[Anonymous No.12108185]

>>12101062
what are you talking about marciano and ali only have one opponent in common and marciano got knocked down by that opponent and took 9 rds ot beat him ali took 4 rounds to beat him

[Anonymous No.12109251]

>>12101226
based

[Anonymous No.12109311]

>>12099410
Imagine wanting to continue to live 4.95 more years as a >190cm dwarf

[Anonymous No.12109322]

>>12104924
This must be one of the most retarded things I've read this week
which sadly enough is saying something.

First of all, do you think all Nordics have blonde hair, nope light brown
is also very common and well I don't really feel like even responding
to this bullshit seriously but ok then I believe Alfred Nobel should
suffice.

[Anonymous No.12109333]

>>12106067
>brushes off Nordic superiority with some genetic anomaly without even mentioning the amount of normally sized people (tall for other places)

[Anonymous No.12109343]

>>12103076
You have to account for all the midgets that have been moving up here during the ages that have lowered the average and the US had a lot of immigration from Nordic countries (you're welcome btw) which should have upped your average a whole bit but I do still hate that even in Nordic countries almost every communal place is built for ≈180cm dwarfs

[Anonymous No.12109354]

>>12109322
>First of all, do you think all Nordics have blonde hair, nope light brown
78% of Swedes, 68% of Danes and 75% of Norweians are blonde. The rest are mutts which are the few that are not absolutly fucking retarded. Nordics are nigger tier and without the mutts that rule them over they would still be eating cowshit cookies

[Anonymous No.12109379]

>>12102725
You still have to survive to reproduce. Ever see a tall helicopter pilot?

[Anonymous No.12109570]

>>12101542
I'm 5'5 and I wouldn't trade a month for one extra foot, my man.

[Anonymous No.12109573]

>>12109570
Either a complete lie or a woman

[Anonymous No.12109574]

>>12099225
It's literally diet, they had more animal protein on average than most other places. And even then, Dutch people, who are the tallest in the world nowadays, used to be known for being very short back in the 1900s until the quantity and quality of their diet improved.

[Anonymous No.12109591]

>>12109573
I'm a guy. I'm not going to deny there are disadvantages to being this short, but it's also motivated me to do better in some areas other people slack off in. I'm built like a fantasy dwarf, complete with a beard, because it was either that or be bullied by dumb lanklets in school. Other than that my life is pretty normal for a 4chan loser and I'm content with it.

[Anonymous No.12110055]

>>12099364
what about african proohlephants wich are bigger than indian ones ? indian climate is worse since hot + humid is worse

[Anonymous No.12110085]

Need help my bro had a dna test and got 1% jewish, does this mean I will definitely have jewish in me too or could it skip me?

[Anonymous No.12110307]

>>12110085

[Anonymous No.12110362]

>>12110055
Taller
It was hypothesized that they are taller and leaner as a way of being able to look above the grassy savannah

[Anonymous No.12110385]

>>12099987
mexican-americans are taller than mexicans and west africans are not very tall

[Anonymous No.12110850]

>>12099225
What’s the tallest nation in the world?
>Netherlands
Were they Always tall
>No
When did they start being tall?
>when they guzzled milk like a Northern European white slut does black cum

Not really that complicated brainlets will tell you to ignore nutrition cuz muh genetics when they don’t know what genetics makes your fart smell