/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11972263]

How does it feel to be wrong, bigot?
2+2=5

[Anonymous No.11972266]

>>11972263
/sci/ cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.11972267]

>>11972263
hey dipshit, try to keep it in one thread
>>11972246

[Anonymous No.11972282]

>>11972267
kys we work together with that guy

[Anonymous No.11972284]

>>11972263
so the thread yesterday (which got deleted after getting mass reported) was all true
powerful...

[Anonymous No.11972285]

>>11972267
to make /sci/ bigot free

[Anonymous No.11972289]

None of these people understand what it means to construct an algebra

[Anonymous No.11972311]

>>11972263
and 1+2= gay sex. get educated bigot!

[Anonymous No.11972362]

>>11972263
This is retarded. People keep saying 2+2 and then add in other factors.

[Anonymous No.11972365]

>>11972263
>2+2=4 (mod 3)
shouldnt that equal 1 since it is mod 3? or am i missing something

[Anonymous No.11972375]

>find a twitter retard who vaguely adheres to the other political side
>screenshot it and post it on 4chan(nel)
>libs btfo

[Anonymous No.11972384]

>>11972375
>find a twitter retard who vaguely adheres to the other political side

[Anomynous No.11972389]

[Anonymous No.11972395]

>>11972365
4=1 (mod 3)
They are retarded though cause they could have used 2+2=1 (mod 3) or 2+2=7 (mod 3)

>>11972289
Also no one understands other bases. I have heard irl in a similar discussion that 1+1=10 in binary. The girl who said it actually belived 10 in binary is ten and she is studying economics lmao. Of course, no one had a counter argument for that and that won the debate... (As a sane person I would not intervene)

[Anonymous No.11972396]

>>11972365
4 = 1 mod 3, as every 3n+1 for every natural n

[Anonymous No.11972408]

>>11972396
>for every natural n
And for every interger n
-2=1 (mod 3)

[Anonymous No.11972413]

>>11972263
Try tell that to your landlord and see how they charge your next rant fee.

[/sci/ No.11972416]

>>11972311
>>11972266
ok, guess I was wrong

[Anonymous No.11972419]

[Anonymous No.11972475]

>>11972395
10 in binary is 10, unless you're saying the conversion of 10 from base 10 (an ambiguous statement; see: every base is base 10) to base 2 is also 10.

[Anonymous No.11972488]

>>11972384
von Neumann aggressively promoted bombing Soviets and worked out how to maximize the Hiroshima blast radius.
Just because someone is mathematically smart doesn't mean they are good people politically moral

[Anonymous No.11972500]

>>11972395
>> as a sane person wouldn't intervene this is 95% of my life desu.

[Anonymous No.11972548]

>>11972263
Btw here is proof that 2+2=5. The /sci/ncels will immediately dispute this.
Consider [math]a[/math] and [math]b[/math] such that:
[math]a=b=\frac{1}{4}[/math]
and call [math]2+2=u[/math], the quantity we want to investigate.
Then
[math]a=b\implies[/math]
[math]a+b=2b\implies[/math]
[math](a+b)^2=4b^2\implies[/math]
[math]a^2+b^2+2ab=4b^2\implies[/math]
[math]a^2-b^2+2ab=2b^2\implies[/math]
[math]a^2-b^2=2b^2-2ab\implies[/math]
[math](a-b)(a+b)=2b(b-a)\implies[/math]
[math](a-b)(a+b)=-2b(a-b)\implies[/math]
[math]a+b=-2b\implies[/math]
[math]a+b+u=u-2b\implies[/math]
[math]a+3b+u=u[/math]
Substitute and we get:
[math]\frac{1}{4}+\frac{3}{4}+2+2=2+2\implies[/math]
[math]5=2+2[/math]
[math]Q.E.D.[/math]

[Anonymous No.11972558]

>>11972263
>2+2=4 is cultural and because of western imperialism/colonization
>if someone says 2+2=5 the correct answer is not about the decline of western civilization

[Anonymous No.11972562]

>>11972548
>a+b=2b⟹
>(a+b)2=4b2
wat

[Anonymous No.11972573]

>>11972475
If you read the context you would understand that she obviously did not think 10 in binary is two. Anyway what I meant was that she thought 10 in binary represented the number of ten objects. Ten is number distinct from two, regardless of base. 100 is "four" in binary, not "one-hundret". I even used the name of the number to try and make it clear in my post.

[Anonymous No.11972582]

>>11972263
Ah well. The West had a good run. Here’s to hoping the Chinese don’t ever fall for this crap.

[Anonymous No.11972606]

>>11972582
The chinese also have self-destructive pulsions, only more brutal. See the cultural revolution or the one-child policy.

[Anonymous No.11972616]

>>11972263
Okay. Go build an advanced civilization using that newly defined math.

[Anonymous No.11972705]

>>11972548
lol u get it? he divided by ZERO lol

[Anonymous No.11972717]

>>11972263
>what’s 2+2?
>2020: well actually you need to consider the context of western colonialism and racism....
it’s fucking over

[Anonymous No.11972724]

>>11972375
>Gowers
>retard

[Anonymous No.11972727]

>>11972488
Bombing the soviets in 45 would have been pretty smart, by 49 the window passed though

[Anonymous No.11972749]

>>11972606
Ok fine, the Indians then.

[Anonymous No.11972760]

>>11972263
These people should be shot.
Specially Gowers, Gowers should be shot twice.

[Anonymous No.11973118]

>>11972548
you divided by 0

[Anonymous No.11973122]

The internet was a mistake. Letting normies and women on the internet was a mistake.

[Anonymous No.11973139]

For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that?

[Anonymous No.11975606]

2 + 2 = 5 can only be true if you literally redefine mathematical axioms.

And here, you see exactly what the "progressive" left is doing. They are trying to convince you that ideas such as gender, racism, masculinity, immigration, etc. can be redefined and that their retarded new definitions are valid.

[Anonymous No.11975614]

>>11972263
#AbolishWhites #DecolonizeSTEM

[Anonymous No.11975637]

>>11972263
>womxn
that's a new one, what does it mean?

[Anonymous No.11975650]

>>11972263
jfc
woketards need to be gassed before it’s too late

[Anonymous No.11975655]

>>11972488
...what's wrong with that?

[Anonymous No.11975664]

>>11975606
based

[Anonymous No.11975672]

>>11972606
China learned its lesson from the chaos and destruction of the Cultural Revolution which is why “orderliness” has been restored as a cardinal social objective and the CCP itself promotes Confucian values.

[Anonymous No.11975676]

>>11975637
It means feminism has been cast aside and the woke cult has a new shiny toy to play with.

[Anonymous No.11975684]

I don't even get upset over this anymore I just enjoy myself. White people had a good run, I guess it's time to let the darkie children learn the hard way. My only hope is that enough whites remain to survive