Is IQ research psuedoscience?

[Anonymous No.11953668]

[Anonymous No.11953678]

No, although IQ only determines your reasoning ability and it changes with age and education.

[Anonymous No.11953683]

>AI is just synthetic IQ

[Anonymous No.11953712]

>>11953668
As much as anything dealing with sociology/psychology is

[Anonymous No.11953754]

Only /pol/tards claim it's a pseudoscience

[Anonymous No.11953785]

>>11953754

What? Poltards are all over race and IQ

[Anonymous No.11953948]

all of psychology is pseudoscience especially psychology that tries to branch out to actual science.

[Anonymous No.11953963]

Iq test are not complete

[Anonymous No.11954071]

>>11953668
yes, for the most part

[Anonymous No.11954079]

It's a perfectly testable, demonstrable and reproducible phenomenon, so in that sense it's scientific.

It is also fairly subjective and you're always going to get pilpul of what G is though so it's hardly concrete. Regardless, it's clearly a trait with strongly heritable elements and also a decent enough indicator of life outcomes that groups like the military use their equivalent to filter tards. People get assmad about IQ because they either want to demonstrate their own racial superiority or conversely want to pretend that everybody is equal and there's no such thing as groups that are smarter than others despite there being a clear genetic component to intelligence.

[Anonymous No.11954088]

It's basically the only thing in psychology that's actually scientific. Literally every argument against IQ (it only measures your ability to take a test, it's racially biased, it doesn't correlate to real life results, etc) has been conclusively refuted. Check out the book "Intelligence: All That Matters" if you want to read more about it in detail.

[Anonymous No.11954127]

IQ is a valid psychometric that can be used to predict certain outcomes quite consistently.

[Anonymous No.11954281]

No, see pic related. The problem is many white supremacists and weirdos use this studies to justify their retarded views.

[Anonymous No.11954322]

>>11953668
As it falls under psychology that isn't also under neuroscience, yes

[El Arcón No.11954325]

I know at least one absolute retard who has a MENSA-official IQ. I guess it's important to distinguish the many ways one can be stupid as fuck, only one of which is being a dimwit.

[Anonymous No.11954350]

No, it's not. It is measurable that if a person does well on one kind if intelligence test, they do well on them all. This is called the g factor
https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1998generalintelligencefactor.pdf

[Anonymous No.11954483]

>>11954281

The Neuroscience of Intelligence: Dr. Richard Haier & Jordan B Peterson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY4sShDt9to

[Anonymous No.11954719]

>>11954483
Don't know if you are trying to delegitimize the author just because he had a interview with Peterson, but Peterson has a lot of interviews with all kind of physiologies and researches.

[Anonymous No.11954731]

>>11953668
It's not pseudoscience, but it's an entirely pointless metric that only measures pattern recognition and information processing speed
In the real world, in any job(unless you're some autismo wizard coding alone in your room), how you interact with people is far more important, and charismatic, determined, confident 100iq brainlets will get ahead of 120-130iq 4chanposters every time.

[Anonymous No.11954745]

>>11953668
You can study for IQ tests. Make of that what you will.

[Anonymous No.11954994]

>>11954745
You are retarded, make of that what you will

[Anonymous No.11955004]

>>11954994
I score highly on IQ tests. I still think they're shit.

[Anonymous No.11955339]

>>11953668
pretty much lol
i mean cmon man
maybe it works tho.. i seem like an idiot to you
but maybe im super fuckin smart
its wild boi and all you can do is fucking observe this shit
we are between 0 and 1 and i love every second and everyone