>>11954229
>i-i-f w-we just define it as such, i-it all works out!
>Traps aren't gay i-if we just redefine gay!
I believe this is our disconnect. You believe numbers are whatever we say they are, whereas I believe numbers are supposed to be representatives of the universe we experience, and at the very least if we're gonna play with made up concepts like infinity than they should adhere to the same principles.
And again, cosine infinity has no value, it alternates between peaking at 1 and -1. I hope you can picture the parallelism. You can say at some point it does equal zero, but also at any point A either equals 0 or 1, so let's ignore between 0 and infinity. You stretch either out to infinity and neither converges. Defining an answer so our non-infinity brains can make sense of it doesn't make it so., no matter how logical.
Also why choose the word "limit"? Cause like your favorite YouTuber, I too could not think of a better word.
Also I learned the 1/12 tricks well enough to pass the final exam. You can learn so many things and not agree with any them. I'm sorry if that last sentence is new to you this late in life.
>based on nothing
We can go can back on forth on this forever, but why don't we just settle on the middle where we're both half right. Oh wait, that's a not a realistic option is it. But wait, we can just define both of us as neither being wrong nor right! Dude I think we just solved world hunger
>It's an exact value
0.333... is an approximation. It's literally infinitely converging toward a limit that it never reaches, you monobase simp. There's a (mis)understood 1/3 of a digit you're rounding off to make that work in your head.