Debunking "Debunkers"

[Anonymous No.11911824]

I have stumbled into people that eat the shit they read on social more in this last 6 months that I think should have in two lifetimes.

I know much of it is trollbots from Russia and China starting a snowball on social media nevertheless I want to find easy ways to break down shit to normies without triggering a backfire effect or a boomerang one.

So I want to dedicate this thread to sharing easy to digest evidence of things like:

* flat earth
* global warming
* antivaxx
* White supremacist cops
* wage gap
* Covid not existing/no mask

I'm really interested rn in trying to prove the existence of Covid to a friend of mine but I don't know how the fuck to do that.

I do know that every conspiracy theorist has the exact same old points and his reasoning has to be linear x->y->z->.... And sometimes relying in a "mysterious entity". Or else it breaks down unlike a guy that knows his shit.

Eg, flat earthers: Earth is a disc
If it was the case people closer to (pole that has the wall) would be tossed into space if buildings weren't built almost horizontally

[Anonymous No.11911828]

>>11911824
Here's one on global warming that always shuts up the denialists. Short and on point.

spectroscopy proves AGW beyond any shadow of a doubt.

>The final piece of evidence is ‘the smoking gun’, the proof that CO2 is causing the increases in temperature. CO2 traps energy at very specific wavelengths, while other greenhouse gases trap different wavelengths. In physics, these wavelengths can be measured using a technique called spectroscopy. Here’s an example:

>Spectrum of the greenhouse radiation measured at the surface. Greenhouse effect from water vapor is filtered out, showing the contributions of other greenhouse gases (Evans 2006).

>The graph shows different wavelengths of energy, measured at the Earth’s surface. Among the spikes you can see energy being radiated back to Earth by ozone (O3), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). But the spike for CO2 on the left dwarfs all the other greenhouse gases, and tells us something very important: most of the energy being trapped in the atmosphere corresponds exactly to the wavelength of energy captured by CO2.

[Anonymous No.11911851]

>>11911828
the greenhouse effect is real but that doesn't mean what climate change activists are claiming is real

[Anonymous No.11911853]

>>11911824
Is it not clear to you that these people are not interested in truth or learning? That facts, evidence, logic, and rational thought are absolutely irrelevant or incomprehensible concepts to them?
No. They all fall into the categories of the willfully ignorant, the actually mentally retarded, the batshit insane, those spreading deliberate misinformation ( for whatever purpose ) and the mere trolls.
Many of the above love arguing just for the sake or arguing and wasting your time. You serve merely as a tool for their passing entertainment.

[Anonymous No.11911864]

>>11911824
there are reasonable arguments against forced vaccination
giving it a scary name like antivaxx and comparing it to flat earth is peak retard

[Anonymous No.11911867]

>>11911824
wage gap is a meme. its "real" but its a misunderstanding of the data. if you wanted to actually get data if people are paying women less then males for the same job then what you want is you need to compare like positions to other like positions. it gets even more complicated because you can look at the wages of computer science males vs females. but then youd also have to worry about what they are doing in the computer science field. this could also cause difference in wages. ie high paying bleeding edge shit like machine learning vs low level crud web stuff will have pay gap. there might be a difference in the females and males ratios in these positions. however over all the more you zoom in on the actual jobs the wage gap slowly goes away.

[Anonymous No.11911879]

>>11911824
>>11911828
Putting together research with an agenda is not science, it's propaganda.

[Anonymous No.11911898]

>>11911864
ok retard

[Anonymous No.11911899]

>>11911879
It wasn't put together with an agenda, it's a study from 2006 before the rabid AGW denialists became a thing.

[Anonymous No.11911901]

>>11911899
>>11911879
https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm

[Anonymous No.11911904]

>>11911828
>Greenhouse effect from water vapor is filtered out

Heh. Will increased CO2 increase or decrease cloud formation?

[Anonymous No.11911908]

>>11911824
The irony.
>thinking its all so simple
>taking ignorance to new heights
You going need oxygen tanks up there.

[Anonymous No.11911909]

>>11911867

Men on average work more hours than women.

Men are 9 times more likely to die on the job than women, due to working riskier jobs.

Feminism is trying to destroy men.

[Anonymous No.11912316]

>>11911909
Feminism isn't insisting men work high risk jobs. The opposite in fact.

[Anonymous No.11912337]

>>11911909
Toxic masculinity makes men willing to risk their lives for $10/hr because its "manly"

[Anonymous No.11912343]

>>11911828
Well all I see is that by the year 2000, the impact of CO became meaningless and that CO2 maybe was something 1400 years ago but not any more.

JK, but seriously that is the level of idiocy you are dealing with - like this guy who thinks 9/11 means September 2011.
https://youtu.be/eFQhw3VVToQ?t=3m25s

[Anonymous No.11912470]

>>11911824
It's going to keep getting worse and do you know why? Because you fucking shitlibs refuse to stop encouraging human overpopulation. Did you honestly believe you could increase human population endlessly without consequence? That quality wouldn't suffer for quantity? What on Earth were you expecting?

[Anonymous No.11912474]

>>11912470
>refuse to stop encouraging human overpopulation
libs are all for contraceptives & women's rights
you're an idiot

[Anonymous No.11912483]

>>11911828
Yes, yes, well done, global warming alarmists. However, I want the planet to get warmer.

[Anonymous No.11912488]

>>11912474
No they're not. They're for capitalism. And capitalism encourages overpopulation because it means more slave labor and more customers. An ever-expanding market/labor pool is the constant goal of capitalist shitheads.

The worst part, however, is that the socialists won't save us either because they drank the CIA's cum that curbing human overpopulation is "racist".

[Anonymous No.11912492]

>>11912488
So, in order to fight the "shitlibs" that are for contraceptives and abortion, you support conservatives that are actually funding abstinence as a "birth control" method in Africa? Am I reading this right?

[Anonymous No.11912494]

>>11912488
Capitalism radically decreases birth rates though. If you have to name the 2 biggest killers of babies of all time they would be play station and xbox

[Anonymous No.11912499]

>>11912492
Shitlibs are NOT for population control. Alex Jones has simply rotted your unfolded brain.

[Anonymous No.11912507]

>>11912499
>Shitlibs are NOT for population control.
I didn't say they were. Not enough of them anyway. I was just trying to follow the other anon's reasoning.

Liberals support policies (at home and abroad) that tend to lower birth rates (sex ed, abortion, birth control), whereas conservatives support policies that go against this (abstinence instead of birth control, opposing sex ed, opposing abortion, supporting religious education) and actively fund such policies in places like Africa or Central America.

If anon is worried about overpopulation he is looking at the wrong side of the equation.

[Anonymous No.11912531]

how can we reduce overpopulation?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Same way as it was done in the 1st world
- women get political rights (voting, standing as a candidate)
- women get economic rights (divorce, inheritance)
- women get judicial rights (equal to men as witnesses etc.)
- functioning pension system (so children aren't the only insurance for old age)

It's the only way that has worked, in all of human history.

[Anonymous No.11912534]

>>11912337
source?

[Anonymous No.11912612]

>>11912507
American conservatives ARE liberals. Americans don't seem to grasp what the word liberal means. And liberals serve capitalism before any other god.

[Anonymous No.11912614]

>>11912531
We don't have enough time for liberal """solutions""". Mankind must be destroyed via natural disaster, war, famine, social collapse and plague.

[Anonymous No.11912674]

>>11912614
grow up

[Anonymous No.11912711]

>>11911864
The CIA does shit like that to silence opposition of the narrative. You pair shit like Holocaust questioning with extradimensional lizard people and both are considered nuts.n

[Anonymous No.11912713]

>>11912470
>>11912474
No no, they're only against WHITE overpopulation.

[Anonymous No.11912724]

https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

[Anonymous No.11912732]

>global warming
>white supremacist cops
>wage gap

These three are extremely nuanced subjects that can't be divided into "hoax/non-hoax" or whatever. Also, non-climatologists need to shut the fuck up about global warming, whichever position they take. It's always pseuds arguing with pseuds, both of whom are pretending to have a deep grasp of a field they know zero about. I've been guilty of it myself since outright deniers (people stating there's *no* effect) are so annoying, but the whole thing is futile since it's not only a complex technical subject, it's also concerned with projecting the distant future.

But yeah, I agree that conspiracy theory thinking has a pretty good chance of eventually leading to the death of humanity. You can see the effect it's had just on this website alone. Or even from looking at this board, or just this thread. It's painful to look at.

A high percentage of people reading this have a set of beliefs about the world which are basically 80%+ completely false, and they're living like everyone else is filled with 80%+ completely false beliefs. The "two movies on one screen" phenomenon is very real.

[Anonymous No.11912735]

>>11912711
To rephrase your post:

"The CIA does shit like promoting use of the term 'antivaxx' so that Holocaust denial can be grouped together with belief in extradimensional lizard people."

Those are some delicious layers. This is the brain of the /pol/tard, folks. This is how they're actually wired.

[Anonymous No.11912736]

>>11912713
>No no, they're only against WHITE overpopulation.
Nope, it's the opposite. They have huge efforts to reduce birth rates in poor countries, most of which are predominantly non-white. It's religious fundamentalists who go to those countries and tell them contraceptives are the devil.

Reducing birth rates is one of the best ways to lift people out of poverty. To do that you need better healthcare and education, though - one of the reasons for high birth rates is hedging against the risk of children dying young.

[Anonymous No.11912745]

>>11912735
there is grounds for dispute on the holocaust narrative.

[Anonymous No.11912754]

>>11911824
The problem is that the internet, for as good as it is, disseminates bad ideas and people who are less educated about a subject easily get trapped an confused by conmen. Once trapped by conmen they trust no information from any source but the con who first gave them the information. You may as well argue to a block of cheese.

[Anonymous No.11912756]

>>11912754
For example David Icke.

[Anonymous No.11912760]

>>11912732
>It's always pseuds arguing with pseuds
No, it may shock you but there are actually scientists on /sci/. You seem to be trying to say that deniers are reasonable by saying 'it's also concerned with projecting the distant future'. No it isn't. The fact that you think it is is evidence that you've been misled. Man made global warming is so simple you can teach it to teenagers.

https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~eps5/lectures_2010_F/lectures_3-4_radiation_2010_F_update.pdf

[Anonymous No.11912762]

>>11912735
>To rephrase your post:
you mean distort it?
whats wrong with you types

[Anonymous No.11912885]

>>11911867
>like positions to other like positions
If women have on average lower paid positions than men, and that causes the wage gap, wouldn't that still a bad thing? It still means that women are paid less than men overall, despite being of equal capability to them in almost all jobs. There are some jobs where the superior physical strength of men (on average) would mean fewer women would do them in a totally equal world, and that would be fine. However, jobs requiring physical strength tend to be considerably less well-paid than professional jobs in which men and women are equally well equipped. Indeed, it's been well established that women attain fewer and fewer of the proportion of roles as they increase in seniority.

Regardless, the adjusted gender wage gap does take this into account, along with a number of other factors:
>The adjusted pay gap takes into consideration an employee's age, education level, years of work experience, occupation, industry, location, company and job title and the calendar year of the reported salary.
The adjusted gap is considerably smaller than the unadjusted gap. For example, in the US the unadjusted gap is 21.4%, while the adjusted gap is 4.9%. But that's still a 4.9% advantage in male wages over female wages that isn't explained by any of those factors.

[Anonymous No.11912907]

>>11912885
because every single study shows men and women prefer different jobs

[Anonymous No.11912968]

>>11912907
If that wholly explained the gender pay gap (which of course it doesn't) we would still have to ask ourselves women prefer to do lower-paid jobs than men? Are those jobs female-dominated because they're lower-paid, or lower-paid because they're female dominated? Do we value female-dominated jobs less than male-dominated jobs and if so is it because women do them, or because they are easier/safer/require less education? What makes women and men prefer certain careers? Do women prefer less senior roles then men and why? Are women discouraged from applying to senior roles? Are they as likely as men to obtain them? What amount of career preference can be attributed to biological differences between men and women and what can be attributed to society influencing people to enforce gender roles? What proportion of the pay gap can be attributed to career choice?

You can see that this is a complex and multifaceted topic, and an explanation like "men and women prefer different jobs" doesn't really explain anything, just raises more questions.

[Anonymous No.11912975]

What is the functional form of climate sensitivity and how do we know?

[Anonymous No.11912981]

>>11912968
As I understand it men are just much more likely to move to another job or fight for a raise.

personally the biggest discrimination I want to campaign against is the low ratio of female refuse collectors or sewer technicians. I feel this is an ugly oppressive act of male supremacy that must be rectified before we discus other fields, the differences in employment are stark.

[Anonymous No.11912982]

>>11911851
https://www.ipcc.ch/

[Anonymous No.11912987]

>>11912982
>IPCC
no

[Anonymous No.11912992]

>>11912987
god how can you not trust the IPCC. Take off your tinfoil hat and trust the damn institution brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11912995]

>>11911904
There is a small positive feedback between clouds and temperature, so more CO2 will increase cloud formation.

[Anonymous No.11912997]

>>11912992
because of what they stand for and their financial connections.

[Anonymous No.11913002]

>>11912997
With who/what?

[Anonymous No.11913020]

>>11912614
>we have to save humanity from natural disaster, war, famine, social collapse and plague by subjecting it to natural disaster, war, famine, social collapse and plague

[Anonymous No.11913025]

>>11912745
>there is grounds for dispute on the holocaust narrative.

[Anonymous No.11913026]

>>11912997
>I don't trust this scientific group because they take money from governments or something
>I trust climate change denialists, who take money from major industries because they can't get government money because muh conspiracy or something

[Anonymous No.11913027]

>>11912975
what do you mean by functional form? Feedback loops?

[Anonymous No.11913032]

The whole gender pay gap thing is pretty much a self defeating issue. If you assume it to be true it turns the world into a clown world and requires massive mental gymnastic to make it work
So women do the same work for less pay, why aren't companies hiring exclusively women?
>well they are all of course lead by racist men!!
Surely couple companies would put money before their egos? Maybe some middle manager might be blocking women out of personal reasons but some jewish share holder would love nothing more than demote men and make more profit
>I have literally no explanation
Even if we pretend share holders don't want money (which is absurd) women could simply make companies themselves, being more efficient they would quickly out compete companies with male workers even if the starting point was some how lower thanks to patriarchy or what ever. The only way this wouldn't happen is there was some massive global conspiracy intended to keep women down and if you actually think men are all in on some big brotherhood thing against women then I don't know what to say.

Basically you have to be schizophrenic to think women categorically get compensated less for the same work.
The reality is actually the other way around where women do less work for the same amount of compensation and the reason why that can happen is because men think with their dicks and overcompensate women which is entirely self consistent position and requires exactly 0 global cabals of men conspiring against women.

Well it's actually pretty unfair to say that, the fact of the matter is that most people (including men) aren't fairly compensated since people don't get paid by the fruits of their labor but rather some kind of fixed salary. A male warehouse worker sorting trough 50% more mass than a woman will be paid the same as the male that goes trough double even though that's not fair. Reason being obviously that it's simpler to just pay everyone pretty much the same saving money overall.

[Anonymous No.11913033]

>>11912987
>retarded anon
no

[Anonymous No.11913049]

>>11912968
>why do women prefer lower wage jobs
They don't explicitly, but many of them want kids and to care for them - so there goes 5-10 years work experience.
Also women are more interested in people/ social aspects of work than hard engineering/ science.
>Are the jobs lower paid because they are female dominated?
No. They are lower paid because they are not as hard.
>What makes men women prefer certain careers?
Biology. Personality types differ between men and women (agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism...), as does the IQ distribution- and again the fact women want kids.
>Are women discouraged
No they are actively encouraged. Take the nordic countries. They have done the most to attempt to equalise equality of outcome between the sexes and it HEIGHTENED sex differences instead of diminishing them.
>enforced gender roles
heritability of the above traits crystalises out by age 24. Also as above with scandanavia, removing the stereotypes HEIGHTENS sex differences.

Women also work less hours per year on average, so its not just job type, but working less.

At the end of the day most women have to choose - do they want a healthy family or a stellar career. They can have one but not the other.

So yes they prefer different jobs for biological reasons and this explains a majority of the variance.

[Anonymous No.11913054]

>>11913027
I mean functional form.
https://cmapskm.ihmc.us/rid=1052458916298_870839951_7777/Functional+form
Mathematical relationship. "the equation". It may contain feedback loops- it may not- i just want to know what it is.

[Anonymous No.11913068]

>>11911824
>antivaxx
>coronavirus being false
this doesnt fit in the same cathegory tho. fuck you
Ironically most of the retards that go apeshit if you question anything ""science says"" according to popsci/media never go to university or if they do, they dont study stem.

[Anonymous No.11913110]

You can't use logic to convince people who have none

https://youtu.be/3EspZtA7C3o

[Anonymous No.11913153]

>>11911824
God damn I hate normies like you

Settled science does not exist, retard

You are the type of people causing distrust and resentment towards science

Maybe not being arrogant and listening to those retarded ‘conspiracy theorists’ instead of insisting on your own superiority will decrease the growing influence of conspiracy theorists. Maybe you’ll even learn something

But retards like you won’t. Because the system we live in is inherently fucked up, but you are profiting of it. Normal people can sense this and need alternatives to believe in, because types like you snobistically lie.

Settled
Science
Does
Not
Exist

Maybe read Plato or Kant

[Anonymous No.11913182]

>>11913026
>I trust climate change denialists
I don't

[Anonymous No.11913199]

>>11913049
You're regurgitating the same shit that Jordan Peterson says

[Anonymous No.11913208]

>>11911824
>flat earth
Eclipses can not exist on a flat earth model
>global warming
"If I fill your room with hot gas it will make your room hotter".
>antivaxx
Herd immunity is required for society to function
>White supremacist cops
There are recordings of cops saying racist things, even outright saying that they will kill black people.
>wage gap
Does not exist.
>Covid not existing/no mask
There are hundreds of thousands of deaths from it that prove it exists.

[Anonymous No.11913218]

>>11911828
This is super helpfull cause i tryed to do the math, but because of some magical reasons i coudnt find anythinkg about the potence, of CO2 post it more often so other people can do the math as well.

[Anonymous No.11913220]

>>11913153
> Normal people can sense this and need alternatives to believe in,
You mean the alternatives to facts and the truth?

Just because you can mention "Plato or Kant" doesn't make you smart anon.

[Anonymous No.11913231]

>>11913153
>Kant
...really?

[Anonymous No.11913242]

>>11913054
Relationship between what though? You're not making any sense. For example, the equation describing the relationship between the change in steady state surface temperature (ΔTs), equilibrium climate sensitivity (λ) and radiative forcing (ΔF) is simply

ΔTs = λ ΔF

But I have no way of knowing if this is the equation you want since you just said "climate sensitivity"

[Anonymous No.11913251]

>>11913208
>There are hundreds of thousands of deaths from it that prove it exists.
when frogs in a pond start dying do you assume that there is a virus killing the frogs, or someone poisoned the water?

[Anonymous No.11913253]

>>11913208
>There are recordings of cops saying racist things, even outright saying that they will kill black people.
you can find any number blacks making those same claims.

[Anonymous No.11913267]

>>11913251
I assume something abnormal killed the frogs and the water was dangerous. I don't ignore the fact there are dead frogs and then go swimming in the pond to prove I can't be told what to do..

[Anonymous No.11913285]

>>11913068
>muh conspiracy garbage is special and different from the other garbage

[Anonymous No.11913329]

>>11913049
a lot of bold claims but not a lot of sources

[Anonymous No.11913335]

>>11913153
The Sun will rise tomorrow and we should act accordingly
>Reasonable, fair assumption

Greenhouse gas emissions are increasing the temperature and we should act accordingly
>REEEEEE no such thing as settled science REEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.11913358]

>>11912885
Okay so the wage gap is a big meme. You just agreed the 70% or whatever meme number is a retarded. Women don’t make 70 cents for every dollar a male make or whatever for the same work like Obama said. Also I can’t find your 5% figure I found there is a 2% figure on this website. https://www.payscale.com/data/gender-pay-gap.. Now we are picking hairs. What causes this 2 percent wage gap? I can think of a couple reasonable reasons why. Women get pregnant have to leave work. You can probably look at the amount of time work and maybe men make more hours so bosses are more likely to give them bonuses. Men are more likely to negotiate wages. etc. these things are impossible to control for. This is moving the goal post. So to look at the bigger picture. Why do we value if one sex over all makes more money then a different sex, why should we value this? Why do we need equality? You’d have to show a greater “equality” makes for better outcomes. Currently women are happier then men by a huge amount over all and they make less money. They are so oppressed they are way happier then men on average. This does not follow.

[Anonymous No.11913429]

>>11913020
Who said anything about saving humanity?

[Anonymous No.11913435]

>>11912674
Eat shit.

[Anonymous No.11913603]

>>11912316
>Feminism isn't insisting men work high risk jobs. The opposite in fact.

Someone has to work them, and Feminism certainly does not care about gender imbalance in such sectors.

>>11912337

No, Feminism degrades Men's self-esteem, so they lose their instinct for self-preservation.

[Anonymous No.11913617]

>>11911824
>I know much of it is trollbots from Russia and China
You are a retarded conspiracy theorist.

[Anonymous No.11913618]

>>11912735

>Intentionally misconstruing his statement

This is the anti-/pol/ people, folks. They lie out their ass and you cannot trust them to even read correctly, let alone tell the truth.

[Anonymous No.11913623]

>>11913335
This is the dumbest false equivalency I have ever heard in my life...

[Anonymous No.11913630]

>>11912885
>professional jobs in which men and women are equally well equipped.


Why are there NO females in professional E-sports? There are more famous Man to Woman trans in e-sports than biological females. This is a task that does not favor physical strength.

[Anonymous No.11913640]

>>11912968

>All of this sophistry

You are trying to confuse the topic by avoiding the obvious.

Women prefer lower stress jobs. Women prefer jobs with less travel. Women prefer more vacation. Women prefer to work fewer hours.

None of these things are bad. In fact, you should probably ask why Men don't want more of these things.

But all of them explain lower pay. You avoid discussing these things because you care more about your agenda than the truth or improving society.

[Anonymous No.11913646]

>>11912995
>so more CO2 will increase cloud formation.

And clouds reflect thermal sunlight before it even reaches the lower atmosphere for CO2 to have it's greenhouse effect....

[Anonymous No.11913660]

>>11913199

Better than regurgitating the menstrual fluids of feminists.

[Anonymous No.11913666]

>>11913242

Well, a reasonable person probably would assume he's asking for Lambda there....

[Anonymous No.11913668]

>>11913630
probably because gaming is a very toxic community full of incels who throw a tantrum every time a developer puts a female character in their video games.

[Anonymous No.11913683]

>>11913668
>incels who throw a tantrum every time a developer puts a female character in their video games


This is why women are useless for science, they lie shamelessly to protect their position.

I bet you have exactly zero contact with the e-sports community. Because if you did you would see the women that go to tournaments, narrate games, etc...

[Anonymous No.11913689]

>>11913242
I didn't know there were other kinds of climate sensitivity? As far as I understood things, climate sensitivity was just temperature increase per unit [insert variable] (Usually CO2 concentration).

You're suggesting it is linear wrt radiative forcing? How do we know that?

As far as i understand climate sensitivity is the key parameter not CO2 concentration. As the relationship to back radiation is logarithmic (ie running through the calcs you get a 0.3% increase in back radiation from doubling current CO2 levels. Knowing the actual temperature increase is very dependent on climate sensitivity (is it a number? A variable dependent on one thing? many things?). And how do we test our climate sensitivity predictions?

idk why but intuitively linearity seems 'off'.

[Anonymous No.11913697]

>>11913668
>toxic community

>plenty of trannies

Are you implying that women are more ostracized than transsexuals? How out of touch with reality are you?

[Anonymous No.11913745]

>>11913689
>intuitively linearity seems 'off'.

It's not linear. He posted a differential equation. Lambda clearly must depend on T itself, for all the feedback loops (loss of ice sheets for example) to be included.

[Anonymous No.11913748]

>>11913199
It's correct. The science is settled.

[Anonymous No.11913777]

>>11913745
It is a linear ODE. and no, there isnt a feedback loop there. dT/dF = (lambda)
And if lambda does depend on T shouldn't it be of the form
dT/dF = L[f(T)] or similar?

[Anonymous No.11913781]

>>11913745
And ok, if this is the case, what is the form of lambda wrt T ,f(T) - which i think fits my original question?

[Anonymous No.11913790]

>>11913683
I'm not talking about the esports community, I'm talking about the wider hardcore gaming community. I'm sure the esports community is considerably less toxic. The esports community draws its uh, 'athletes' from the hardcore gaming community so it's no surprised there are few women.
>>11913697
Not implying that at all. I think you'd find most transgender women in the gaming community were gamers before they transitioned, so were able to exist in that community and become familiar with it without the hostility before they came out as transgender. I have no doubt they experience more hostility within the gaming community than cis women, but unlike cis women they haven't experienced that hostility from the very start, i.e. the moment at which they would most likely give up gaming as an interest because they're not yet invested in it.

[Anonymous No.11913799]

>>11913790
Mish mush mush mush mush mish mish mish mush mish

[Anonymous No.11913803]

>>11913777
tttrips

[Anonymous No.11913882]

>>11913110
This video triggers me so hard. Eratosthenes experiment doesn't prove anything about the Earth being round, it just allows you to measure its size ASSUMING the sun is very far away with parallel rays. It works just the same on a flat Earth with a sun around 6,000 km away.

But every time its posted anywhere a million normies are like HURR DUR STUPID FLAT EARTHERS BELIEVE ANYTHING when they've just done the same thing themselves.

[Anonymous No.11913883]

>>11913799
good argument, did you get that one from Ben Shapiro?

[Anonymous No.11913887]

>>11913883
im not arguing, see>>11913799

[Anonymous No.11913889]

>>11913335
>The Sun will rise tomorrow and we should act accordingly
>>Reasonable, fair assumption
not so fast

[Anonymous No.11913978]

>>11913285
Glow harder

[Anonymous No.11914088]

>>11913777

It's linear if you assume Lambda constant. Lambda should absolutely depend on T, and CO2, and literally hundreds of other variables.

It's also highly dependent on initial conditions, as chaotic systems tend to be.

I'm not the original anon that posted the equation, I just understood what that anon posted, and basically he jammed a bunch of complicated shit that is NOT agreed upon into a single Greek character.

A trick of a charlatan trying to awe his audience into dumbfounded silence.

[Anonymous No.11914110]

>>11913790

You realize gaming has attracted a lot of women, too?

You are claiming women are so weak that they can be oppressed invisibly over the internet in games that completely anonymize the player, including masking sex. It is nearly impossible to play a game like DOTA and only play sex matched characters. As a male player, I didn't look at the character's gender at all, it was about mechanics, fun, and competitive advantage. And this discussion ignores games like RTS's that completely remove sex nearly entirely.

You are making up bullshit out of thin air. Let's put it this way, I played WoW in high school. One of my high school girlfriends now plays WoW after marrying someone after college.

You cannot appreciate how many women play these games at a casual level, because they are invisible. This proves your entire argument baseless, as this same invisibility is perhaps the best defense against hostility.

Your thesis is that women are strong enough to endure the hostility of internet arguments, but not strong enough to endure the hostility of being told, "GG NERD!"

[Anonymous No.11914117]

>>11913889
Based. I wish more people would read Hume and Popper

[Anonymous No.11914135]

>>11913220
You are exactly as arrogant (hurr durr my opinion is fact and truth) as described and using debating techniques such as conflating flat earth nutjobs with people that question the narrative about climate change is intellectually dishonest and causes resentment, exactly as described.

[Anonymous No.11914144]

>>11913231
Yes, Kant.

Are you aware of the concept of the noumenal and phenomenal world and the impact it had on science?

You understand what models really are, I hope?

[Anonymous No.11914177]

>>11914110
>He doesn't exclusively play his waifu

[Anonymous No.11914329]

>>11914117
I'd probably get on much better with Popper, but I tried reading Hume once, that shit is too difficult for me, and the guy quotes large passages in Latin for no reason.

[Anonymous No.11914446]

>no taxes nigger ITT
nice

[Anonymous No.11915246]

>>11914446
?