/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11903455]

>soon

[Anonymous No.11903654]

>>11903455
Are you going to make the planet spin faster?

[Anonymous No.11903698]

>>11903455
Time based on Planck time
1 new second = 1E43 Planck seconds = 0.539 old seconds
1 new minute = 100 new seconds = 53.9 old seconds
1 new hour = 100 new minutes = 1.4972 old hours
1 new day = 10 new hours = 14.972 old hours = 0.62384259 old days
1 new week = 10 new days = 6.2384259 old days = 0.8912037 old weeks
1 new month = 10 new weeks = 100 new days = 62.384259 old days = 6.2384259 old weeks = 2.049585519811392 old months
1 new year = 10 new months = 20.49585519811392 old months = 623.8425925925925 old days = 1.70798793317616 old years

So,
>1 new second is about half an old second
>1 new minute is about the same as an old minute (54 seconds)
>1 new hour is about an old hour and a half
>1 new day is about 15 old hours (the time you are usually awake)
>1 new week is about the same as an old week (6 days)
>1 new month is about 2 old months
>1 new year is about an old year and a half (20 old months)

There is no reason to not use this system. The changes are not too drastic and it makes a lot of sense.

[Anonymous No.11903758]

>>11903698
>14 old hours in a day.
What about the rest of the hours? The day/night cycle and seasons? Will it suddenly turn next day in the middle of the day? Will we celebrate christmas in winter one year and in the middle of the summer the next one?

[Anonymous No.11903776]

>>11903455
>IV
faggot

[Anonymous No.11904530]

>>11903758
>The day/night cycle and seasons?
One of those constraints that make less sense as more and more clocks are thrust out of the atmosphere.

Sounds pixel perfect OP, continue

[Anonymous No.11904620]

>>11903776
>faggot
This

[Anonymous No.11904688]

>>11903698
This is retarded. Why wouldn't the year be pegged to a celestial event, and why wouldn't the day, wherever it occurs?