You have 5 days to solve quantum gravity.

[Anonymous No.11901878]

[Anonymous No.11901887]

[Gerbal No.11901912]

U = e/s

[Anonymous No.11901935]

I have a truly marvelous description of it, which this lifespan is too short to explain.

[Anonymous No.11901965]

>>11901878
I'll bite. How long can you stay awake?

[Anonymous No.11901973]

Abstract:
- see IUT

[Anonymous No.11902035]

>>11901965
While playing Total War Attila?
>3days

[Anonymous No.11902341]

>>11901912

Fucking this /thread.

Also I heard that the Redskins are being renamed to the Washington Kike with a profile picture of Dan Snyders giant nose as the mascot, and they're going to have have the Snyder big-nose mascot chase a giant shekel across the field at half time to the dradel song while the crowds chant "Kike kike kike!!!!" They are saying this would be a great way to honor the Jew, what says you Anon?

[Gery No.11902373]

>>11902341
Gary, what?

[Anonymous No.11902374]

>>11901878
Space magic in a simulated environment. Done.
Now suck my astral dick.

[Anonymous No.11902391]

>>11902341
>Also I heard that the Redskins are being renamed to the Washington Kike with a profile picture of Dan Snyders giant nose as the mascot, and they're going to have have the Snyder big-nose mascot chase a giant shekel across the field at half time to the dradel song while the crowds chant "Kike kike kike!!!!" They are saying this would be a great way to honor the Jew, what says you Anon?

Oh I see what you did there, pointing out the hypocrisy of the Redskins by showing how their owner would have flipped his shit if the caricature were directed at him. This is a science forum, Sir. Take that old news bullshit elsewhere

[Anonymous No.11902438]

>>11901878

What's the big deal about Quantum gravity? Nothing realtors to quantum mechanics is correct. Why invent more quantum bullshit. QM violates causality, it's not lorentz invariant, even the simplest electrostatics questions lead to ridiculous results.

[Anonymous No.11902702]

>>11902341
Not him, but extremely based. I would support a team called the Washington Kikes and cheer them on when they rubbed their hands in the end zone.
They could specialise in unexpected, subversive plays, although they would need to be held back during the coin toss.

[Anonymous No.11902752]

So what do I do the other 4 days?

[El Arcón No.11902759]

>>11901878
I did this like eight years ago. The problem of QG is that the type of mathematical objects in quantum theory can't be put to equal the objects from GR in an equation. The problem is that there was no link between the two mathematical languages. Anyone who says the problem is something different than that missed the main thing about why QG is hard.

Pic shows how I exactly followed the protocol of Higgs put forth in Higgs' own seminal two page paper which has been getting name dropped 1000 times a day for 30 years.

People who say "QG means to quantize the Newtonian gravitational Lagrangian," or, "QG means to write the graviton as an analogue of the QED photon," are missing the point of why QG is hard. The point is that a quantum object can't be equal to a relativistic object because the two languages don't support the equals sign between them.

>Quantum Gravity
>https://vixra.org/abs/1506.0055

>Tempus Edax Rerum
>https://vixra.org/abs/1209.0010

>30 Tooker Papers
>https://gofile.io/d/IOOaMw

[El Arcón No.11902773]

I started writing a paper. I put some nice notes in Section 7 if you want to have a look but it is VERY rough draft stuff.
https://ufile.io/huai21yh

[Anonymous No.11902777]

>>11901878
>"solve"
What's the problem?

[Anonymous No.11902779]

>>11902759
>The problem of QG is that the type of mathematical objects in quantum theory can't be put to equal the objects from GR in an equation.
Tooker, you sound like an undergrad. Pick up a physics book. This is not the problem.

[El Arcón No.11902814]

>>11902779
I'm fond of that saying I have: A good person says, "This is wrong and this other thing is what's right." A piece of shit who should be killed says, "This is wrong," without saying why their opinion is that it's wrong or what their opinion leads you to believe is correct. There is no intention to increase knowledge. Your only intention is to detract while hide behind not making yourself vulnerable to be disproven by not saying anything at all.

[El Arcón No.11902824]

ass

[Anonymous No.11902831]

>>11902814
what's wrong with vixra? you didn't unironically fall for the peer review meme did you, took?

[Anonymous No.11902833]

>>11901878
Where is the evidence that gravity is quantum?
It very clearly doesn't for with the other forces. In our dimensions it's an effect, not a force

[El Arcón No.11902845]

>>11902833
If a quantum particle moves in the universe, it should dynamically deform the local spacetime. Even if it's a massless photon, it has energy. GR says space curves in response to local mass-energy. The reason how we know gravity is quantum is that quanta and quantum fields have mass-energy.

I think your question was maybe about the graviton. I agree that the graviton is a hypothetical force carrying particle but Einstein showed that gravity is not a force so there absolutely no good reason to think a graviton exists unless your grant depends on you thinking it does. I think the reason we still haven't seen the graviton is because gravitons don't exist. This makes perfect sense actually when you think of gravity as geometry rather than a classical force like EM or Newton gravity.

[El Arcón No.11902850]

Riemann hypothesis is false too, btw, if anyone is into that sort of thing.

[Anonymous No.11902854]

>>11902850

I like this new Tooker. Stay sober friend, and I will too. We are new beings in every moment. The mistakes of the past need not haunt us.

[Anonymous No.11902858]

>>11902759

I think this Nigger might actually be onto something

[El Arcón No.11902861]

Sobriety is not an issue for me.

[Anonymous No.11902864]

>>11902861

Cool story bro

[Anonymous No.11902877]

>>11901878
>this is obvious
>and left as an exercise to the reader

[Anonymous No.11902881]

>>11901878
We couldn't even solve normal gravity yet.

[Anonymous No.11902888]

>>11902845
>I think the reason we still haven't seen the graviton is because gravitons don't exist. This makes perfect sense actually when you think of gravity as geometry rather than a classical force like EM or Newton gravity.

Basically yeah. Gravity is an averaging of localized energy matter. Simplest way to explain in words is that energymatter averages toward itself. Imagine two planets on a number line, one planet at -10 and one planet at 10. They average at 0. They get pulled toward 0. But because spacetime is not discrete, and furthermore the computations have a speed, c, they are actually getting pulled toward a limiting point in the past. This can result in spiraling formations. as a poster above said, this comes out of u = e / s. The unified equation is a repeating average. E = mc^2 can easily be derived and proven from u = e / s as well. The standard model is a powerful tool but it is not base. E = mc^2 is base and u = e / s is most base. But they still work best as concepts since actually working with those equations is so computation intensive. Anyway, much respect Took! You are clearly a genius! And I wish I understood the Reinman hypothesis well enough to know if you solved it, but if you say you did I bet you probably did.

[El Arcón No.11902907]

>>11902888
ok, thanks trips guy. what is u=e/s?

[Anonymous No.11902917]

>>11902907

Unironically? u = e / s is the unified equation! https://youtu.be/WuXCS_K_8qM

[Anonymous No.11902922]

>>11902907

Tooker, would you be willing to do a podcast episode with Gary? You can explain your Riemann hypothesis to him and he can explain his unified equation to you? No expectation of agreement. You can tell Gary that he is full of it if you want. Gary for his part will be polite even if he disagrees I am sure.

[El Arcón No.11902947]

>>11902917
seems like maybe based Gary would like this matlab code
X = linspace(1,1,1000)
Y= linspace (1,1,1000)
Z=meshgrid(X,Y)

[El Arcón No.11902953]

>>11902922
no, I only spent all day spamming my theory for ten years because i don't want to tell people about it.

[Anonymous No.11902958]

>>11902947
>thinking that Gary using Matlab.

Wingdings and excel bro

[Anonymous No.11902961]

>>11902953

K. How should this go down? Also I might fall asleep mid convo but I'll make sure he gets this.

[Anonymous No.11902963]

>>11902961

As in if I stop replying here it's probably because I fell asleep.

[Anonymous No.11902970]

>>11902922

Human connection is the cure to addiction. Our society is so sick, when people make mistakes they are excommunicated and it becomes a negative feedback loop and exacerbates the undesirable behavior. It's not right.

[Anonymous No.11902972]

>>11902970

And don't assume I'm talking about you, Tooker.

[El Arcón No.11903474]

>>11902961
>How should this go down?
If you mean, "how can I get in touch with you?," I would recommend my email address which is my first name dot my last name at gmail.

[Anonymous No.11903490]

Fluid-like spacetime

That's the answer

[Anonymous No.11903506]

>>11901878
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
T-T

[Anonymous No.11903520]

>>11901878
I think I may have a solution, anyone here with the skills to help me produce a math model?

[Anonymous No.11903533]

>>11902814
Why would I take the time to explain quantum physics to a child? From your statement it's blatantly obvious that you lack proper training in physics and fall for the same problem the vast majority of theoretical physicists also fall for: thinking everything is a mathematical problem.
I say that as a theoretical physicist btw.

[Anonymous No.11905656]

>>11901887
fpbp

[Anonymous No.11905719]

>>11902702
kek

>>11902341
I came for the thread but stayed for this beautiful post.

[El Arcón No.11905902]

>>11903533
From your statement it's blatantly obvious that you won't say anything falsifiable because you don't want to risk being wrong.

[Anonymous No.11906113]

>>11905902
Touché. I just don't see the benefit in doing so. Don't get me wrong. I don't think you're an idiot like others here do. You're just lost in mathematical abstraction and your forté is exactly there, not in physics.

[El Arcón No.11906251]

>>11906113
Your forte is in being wrong. You should try branching out.

[El Arcón No.11906259]

>>11906113
Also, your posi-negs are retarded.

[Anonymous No.11906314]

>>11906251

Top kek

[Anonymous No.11906331]

>>11906251
Nice. Where am I wrong though?

[El Arcón No.11907159]

>>11906331
If you answer my implied question "Where I am wrong?," that I posed here
>>11902814
then I will consider answering your similar question.

[Anonymous No.11908121]

>>11902759
Sure, I thought it was implied, but I'll rephrase it. You said:
>The problem of QG is that the type of mathematical objects in quantum theory can't be put to equal the objects from GR in an equation
That's where you're wrong. That's not the fundamental problem. You're posing this as a mathematical problem, but the actual reason is physical.
You're coming very close in this post: >>11902845, but there are a few misconceptions (or perhaps sloppiness); e.g., space curves in response to energy-momentum, of which mass-energy is a part. There's no need for mass-energy to exist to bend spacetime, as you correctly imply when quoting photons. Quanta and quantum fields do not necessarily have mass-energy.

[Anonymous No.11908366]

>>11901878
I think therefore I am

[Anonymous No.11908411]

>>11906113
>You're just lost in mathematical abstraction and your forté is exactly there
He's a massive schizo, his math papers are just as retarded and do not make any sense.

[Anonymous No.11908413]

>>11902759
So we're 8 years late in shooting John tooker, the racist

[Anonymous No.11908419]

>>11902953
The same hypothesis for 10 years because you can't handle criticism and critique

[Anonymous No.11908428]

I wonder if he's aware of his schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.11908438]

>>11908428
The denial is strong with that one

[Anonymous No.11908448]

>>11901878
The main issue with QG is that the so called "graviton" must interact with space/time and not with any other particle directly.
So how can you draw a fucking Feynman diagram with virtual photons dealing with space/time?
The other issue here is that relativity is just an acceleration theory, not a gravity theory.
So what is the link between GR and QT? The only natural link is the speed of light and the matter/anti matter annihilation process.

[Anonymous No.11908489]

>>11908448
How is that interaction any different from a photon interacting with a charged particle?

[Anonymous No.11908798]

>>11902702
Nearly held out, but lost at the coin toss. Top shitpost, anon.

[El Arcón No.11909533]

>>11908121
>Quanta and quantum fields do not necessarily have mass-energy.
This is stupid. The "m" in the Klien-Gordon free field operator
[math] \widehat{KG} =-\big( \partial^2+m^2) \big)[/math]
is a gravitational mass by the axiom that all inertial masses are gravitational.

>>11908448
The graviton is the hypothetical quantum of the gravitational force. Although Newton found a non-relativistic approximation to gravity as a classical force, Einstein showed real gravity is geometry, not classical force. I think the reason no one has ever observed the quantum of the gravitational force, "a graviton," is because there is no gravitational force. Gravity is 4D Lorentzian geometry, not a force. Then it follows that there is not a quantum of a force that doesn't exist.

[El Arcón No.11909539]

>So what is the link between GR and QT?
Quantum states live in function spaces. The eigenfunctions of observable operators live in a Hilbert space. The states are called "wavefunctions." They have a domain and a range. The range is the probability amplitude. The domain is a position 3-space whose metric is the dynamical object in the 4D GR theory. Even if there is a Hilbert space of states of a non-time dependent potential, the domain of the states in Hilbert space is a constantly changing 3D surface of constant proper time. The link between GR and QFT is to determine how the motion of the quantum states dynamically influences the metric of the 3-space which id the domain of the wavefunctions.

Basically, Mochizuki calls my MCM unit cell "a Hodge theater" and then Scholze says, "You can't have different copies of one object. Any two isomorphic spaces are equal." Styx fails to notice that you can have the position space domains of the various identical copies of Hilbert space be labelled with the value of constant proper time which uniquely identifies a position 3-space, with 3-metric, in a 4D gravitational manifold. Each unique, yet isomorphic, Hilbert space is differentiated from the others by the unique identity of its domain as a slice of Lorentzian 4-space. And that's why Scholze has a Fields and I don't.

>On Mochizuki's idea of Anabelomorphy and its applications
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01890v1

[Anonymous No.11909640]

>>11909533
>This is stupid. The "m" in the Klien-Gordon free field operator
What kinds of particles does the Klein-Gordon equation describe? Are there fields that are perhaps not described by it? Which other field equations do you know?
Hint: Dirac equation.

You said you'd answer my question.

[Anonymous No.11909647]

>>11909539
Modern QFT is formulated on a 4D Minkowski spacetime. SRT is explicitly built in.

[El Arcón No.11909661]

>>11909640
I said I'd answer it if you said why I was wrong, but you didn't.

>>11909647
Minkowski space means that the quantum motions don't dynamically effect the curvature of spacetime. The metric of Minkowski space is a constant so that isn't a full theory of quantum gravity. This is "QFT on a background spacetime."

[Anonymous No.11909666]

>>11901878
Nope, see yah

[Anonymous No.11909738]

>>11909661
>I said I'd answer it if you said why I was wrong, but you didn't.
No, you asked
>>11907159
>"Where am I wrong?,"

>Minkowski space means that the quantum motions don't dynamically effect the curvature of spacetime. The metric of Minkowski space is a constant so that isn't a full theory of quantum gravity
Yes, exactly. You said
>>11909539
>The states are called "wavefunctions." They have a domain and a range. The range is the probability amplitude. The domain is a position 3-space
>3-space
Here:
>The link between GR and QFT is to determine how the motion of the quantum states dynamically influences the metric
the plot thickens. But why does this not work? It's not a dimensional issue or an issue of underlying Hilbert spaces. QFT is formulated on a 4D hyperbolic manifold, so that's fine. What is the actual problem?

[Anonymous No.11909988]

>>11909661
Wait...so all this discussion is about reconcile continuum infinitesimal math with a discrete one?

[Anonymous No.11910081]

>>11909988
>discrete
Where did you get that idea from?

[El Arcón No.11910397]

>>11909738
I guess you or the people who wrote your software think it's cute the way you spin endless yarns of multiply self-referential nonsense. I don't think it's cute.

>>11909988
IMO, the contentious issue is how to reconcile Einstein's equation with Schrodinger's, or Dirac's.

[Anonymous No.11910442]

>>11901878
Big thingy make bigger thingy

[Anonymous No.11910548]

>>11910397
>not addressing the point
Okay then, keep shitposting nonsense. My suggestion to pick up a physics book stands.

[Anonymous No.11910553]

>>11910397
I'm disappointed you're not keeping your word btw.

[Anonymous No.11910970]

OP reminded me of this old sf story:
https://vvforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=4778

[Anonymous No.11911128]

the absolute is the whole and it cannot be measured.

[Anonymous No.11913101]

>>11910970
Very interesting

[Neo No.11914245]

>>11902845
>If a quantum particle moves in the universe, it should dynamically deform the local spacetime.

I have a 3d spacetime model that incorporates the time dimension and takes into account the deformation of spacetime around objects. Wanna trade notes?

[Anonymous No.11914467]

>>11902850
Explain

Have you found a counter example

[Anonymous No.11914474]

>>11914467
youre just new, El Arcon is Jonathon Tooker, hes just a schizo that posts here a ton and invented infinite numbers to find a fake 0

[El Arcón No.11914960]

>>11914245
I've got these very ROUGH notes that I jotted down in section 7.
https://ufile.io/8cunoebh

[El Arcón No.11914979]

>>11914467
I did find a counter example. This one "1906.0237" in the archive is more in depth and rigorous than pic related.

30 Tooker Papers
https://ufile.io/jepugi5m

[Anonymous No.11915019]

im might not be correct so please refer to my documnetaries and police interviews

i modified a laptop for security and it turned into a moisture evaporation machine into the head the beam went. when this happened the labratory in China have the quantumn partner laptop which generated a lot of black matter from the gravity disturbance on my behalf

[Anonymous No.11915256]

>>11915019
Do bots learn from schizos, or vice versa?

[Anonymous No.11915305]

>>11915256
does the "human" standard for the Turing test include schizos?

[Anonymous No.11915317]

>>11914979

Legend

[Anonymous No.11915321]

>>11915305
Whoa, good point. I guess not, bots that produce semi-coherent ramblings already exist and it's difficult to differentiate schizos from those bots for humans. I guess schizos wouldn't pass the Turing test?

[El Arcón No.11915322]

>>11915317
>Legend
yes

[Anonymous No.11915327]

>>11915322

I like that logo more than the other one. We can just talk here Took. U know who it iz. Or feel free to reach out to talk private, no homo. I'm not feeling podcasts these days. Something weird about talking for the whole world to hear... doesn't feel very gangster

[Anonymous No.11915331]

>>11915322
>>11915327

But what do I know

[Anonymous No.11915333]

>>11915327
It's stolen from John Titor though.

[El Arcón No.11915339]

>>11915327
I don't know. Post face.

[Anonymous No.11915343]

>>11915339

Thats a good looking beard, brother.

[El Arcón No.11915347]

>>11915343
Calling me your brother makes me think you think I'm like you.

[Anonymous No.11915348]

>>11915333

The best artists steal.

[Anonymous No.11915350]

>>11915347

You're better at math. I'm more of a big picture guy.

[Anonymous No.11915353]

>>11915339

I cannot believe someone made a faceswap of you saying the n word on video. What a ridiculous troll. I wonder what asshole they got the original video from before putting your face on it

[Anonymous No.11915358]

>>11915353

Anyway good thing STEM transcends the ridiculous "culture wars".

[El Arcón No.11915366]

>more of a big picture guy
...says the guy who does game theory in 3D and threw away the lives of the children of everyone who ever trusted him. You're more of a big liar, is what you are, and if your so focused on the big big picture, then how did you not notice your place on the bottom of the pyramid makes you DEFINITELY not the brother of me up here at the top? Your more of a big gaze into the mirror lovingly guy is what you are.

[Anonymous No.11915369]

>>11915353

But what do I know.

[Anonymous No.11915370]

>>11915366
>Your more of a big gaze into the mirror lovingly guy is what you are.

I wish.

[Anonymous No.11915373]

>>11915366

I'm sober right now. I'm proud of that much.

[El Arcón No.11915380]

>>11915370
And you gaze into the mirror and see my brother?

[Anonymous No.11915382]

>>11915366

I don't see you as the Terry Davis type. And who would want that anyway.

The system is fucked. Hierarchies are fucked. I hate the pyramid. Say one wrong thing and they kick you to the bottom and it doesn't matter what you do then. You could cure cancer or unify physics, Arcon, and the world wouldn't care because its zero-sum. You win they lose. You lose they win. It's sick. It doesn't have to be that way. It's tearing our people apart.

[El Arcón No.11915383]

This is me.

[Anonymous No.11915386]

>>11901878
AYO SQUEZE IT NIGGA

[Anonymous No.11915393]

>>11915380

I was thinking about you the other day, I visited your site and saw that you took out Google ads for your own name (smart!) and showed my girlfriend your video. I think you are a good person, but our system is fucked up. It's like a boiler room at the moment.

[El Arcón No.11915394]

>>11915382
>our people
There you said one wrong thing again. I don't kick you to the bottom of the pyramid for it though, man. I kick you to the bottom of the pyramid because you forsook me, in the most evil possible way.

[El Arcón No.11915399]

And now you mock me. You are evil.

[Anonymous No.11915403]

>>11915383

God tests good people the most of all. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Righteousness is always opposed by evil. But no matter what happens, God's will is perfect.

[Anonymous No.11915410]

>>11915399

Not at all. Tone doesn't carry well online. Like I said, we can talk on the phone or video chat privately if you want. Sci doesn't need another Terry Davis. Www.optimuminstitute.org/scholarship

[Anonymous No.11915435]

>>11915399
>>11915410

You can fill out the contact forms there if you are interested in talking, Arcon. No charge. It's $40 usually.

[Anonymous No.11915437]

>>11915435

But if we do I'm not interested in any racist bullshit. Cheers.

[Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886) No.11915440]

>>11901878
Graviton frequency = (big G * graviton density)^1/2

Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886)

[Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886) No.11915459]

>>11901878
>>11915440
G=2/c, c=2/G. G*c=2 (natural units)

Magna cum Laude
Summa cum Laude
& cum Laude (1888)

Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886)

[Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886) No.11915491]

>>11901878
>>11915440
>>11915459
Energy = h * (big G * graviton density)^1/2

Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886)

[Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886) No.11915498]

>>11901878
>May the power be with you.
G=c^5/graviton power

>>11901878
>May the force be with you.
G=c^4/graviton force

Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886)

[Anonymous No.11915521]

>>11915498
CORRECTION - (Original Publication)
>G=2/c, c=2/G. 2=G*c (natural units)
G=2/c, c=2/G. 2=G*c (natural units)

Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften (1886)

[Anonymous No.11915532]

Oh great, this turned into /SChIzo/ central. Can we please banish these types to a containment board like /hzo/ or something?

[Anonymous No.11915572]

/thread >>>/x/
/thread >>>/k/

[Anonymous No.11915579]

>>11901878
>>11915572

[Anonymous No.11915580]

Suck my quantum dick.

[Anonymous No.11915583]

>>11915532
>>11915572
>>11915579
/thread >>>/k/ weapons

[Anonymous No.11915586]

>>11915532
>>11915583
we agree /thread not /sci/

[Anonymous No.11915595]

>>11915572
>>11915586
Thread isn't over yet. He gave us 5 days, not 4 days.

[Anonymous No.11915599]

>>11915586
>>11902035
>>11902752
>>11902877
>>11903490
>>11909666
666 these

[Anonymous No.11915611]

>>11915595
Brenna constant = e^2*z0
Brenna constant = (1.602176634 x 10^-19 A-s)^2 * 3.767303134 x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3
Brenna constant = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

Brenna constant = e^2/e0*c
Brenna constant = (1.602176634 x 10^-19 A-s)^2 / 8.854187817 x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3 * 2.997924580 x 10^8 m/s
Brenna constant = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

Brenna constant = e^2*u0*c
Brenna constant = (1.602176634 x 10^-19 A-s)^2 * 1.256637061 x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2 * 2.997924580 x 10^8 m/s
Brenna constant = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

That's true, we haven't angled
Planck constant yet, 4 days.

[Anonymous No.11915624]

>>11915532
/hzo/, separate /sci/ from schizo.

[Anonymous No.11915668]

>>11915624
Hey, thread derailer's back. Where you been?
Welcome back, Science & Math contributor.

[Anonymous No.11915681]

you gotta love our thread derailers who know nothing about science or math, travel from thread to thread, contributing nothing. kinda sad they have no life, but we enjoy laughing at them, so we keep them around. :-)

[Anonymous No.11915914]

>>11915681
>>11915668
>>>/hzo/

[Anonymous No.11916119]

>>11915611
In 1899, when Planck copied 1886 Kaiser Wilhelm Society (KWS) Laude Denke
files Planck missed the KWS radiant (2 rad/sr * 7.297352566 x 10^-3 sr)
> Energy = Brenna constant * (big G * graviton density)^1/2
> Energy = Brenna constant * graviton frequency
Brenna constant = (2 * Planck constant) * alpha
Brenna constant = 2 rad/sr * 6.626070150 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad * 7.297352566 x 10^-3 sr
Brenna constant = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

In 1899, when Einstein copied the 1886 Kaiser Wilhelm Society (KWS) Laude Denke
files Einstein missed KWS steradiant (2 rad/sr * 6.626070150 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad)
>big G= c^5 / graviton power , G=2/c, c=2/G, 2=G*c (natural units)
>big G = c^4 / graviton force , G=2/c, c=2/G, 2=G*c (natural units)
alpha = Brenna constant / (2 * Planck constant)
alpha = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s / (2 rad/sr * 6.626070150 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad)
alpha = 7.297352566 x 10^-3 sr

In 1899, when Planck copied 1886 Kaiser Wilhelm Society (KWS) Laude Denke
files Planck missed the KWS radiant (2 rad/sr * 7.297352566 x 10^-3 sr)
>Energy = Planck constant * [(big G * graviton density)^1/2] / radiant
>Energy = (Planck constant * graviton frequency) / radiant
Planck constant = Brenna constant / (2 * alpha)
Planck constant = 9.670554000 x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s / (2 rad/sr * 7.297352566 x 10^-3 sr)
Planck constant = 6.626070150 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad

[Anonymous No.11916213]

>>11916119
"1899 spielte Gott Wurfel."

[Anonymous No.11917402]

>>11901878
>You have 5 days to solve quantum gravity.

>Quantum Gravity
frequency = (G*d)^1/2 - Denke formula
current = [(G*d)^1/2]*charge - Lucifer formula
force = [(G*d)^1/2]*momentum - Devil formula
energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*action - Satan formula
power = [(G*d)^1/2]*energy - Iblis formula

>Quantum Gravity
Energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*2h*alpha - Krishna formula
Energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*hbar - Moses formula
Energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2*z0 - Aaron formula
Energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2/e0*c - Laozi formula
Energy = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2*u0*c - Gautama formula

>Quantum Gravity
mass = [(G*d)^1/2]*2h*alpha/c^2 - Jesus formula
mass = [(G*d)^1/2]*hbar/c^2 - Muhammad formula
mass = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2*z0/c^2 - Ali formula
mass = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2/e0*c^3 - Smith formula
mass = [(G*d)^1/2]*e^2*u0/c - Moroni formula

OP, quantum gravity four (4) days early.

[El Arcón No.11917403]

>be Einstein
>solve some very nice stuff
>think you're qualified to evaluate God

[Anonymous No.11917425]

>>11917402
Note: hbar is Brenna constant
KWS quantum of action 1886

[Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886) No.11917491]

>>11901878
>You have 5 days to solve quantum gravity.
>Anonymous 07/14/20(Tue)18:49:34 date.
>>11917402
>OP, quantum gravity four (4) days early.
July 14th plus 5 days = July 19th, today.

Kaiser Wilhelm Society (1886)