[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 51 KB, 408x766, 85DVqerg8b6wLduQr6pRevqZRX8u3138HpHXWRSBj-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11899628 No.11899628[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Scientifically speaking, at what point should you give up on tinder? As in what timeframe vs matches vs successful rl meets
Say if you're 23

>> No.11899657

Wtf is /sci/? Are we being raided? Not science nor math.

>> No.11899669

>>11899657
>Not science nor math.
You must be new here. Welcome.

>> No.11899685

>>11899628
The only winning move is not to play

>> No.11899704

>>11899669
The race/IQ threads are more science and math than this.

>> No.11899711

>>11899704
Shhhh you’ll attract the redditors.

>> No.11899729

Tinder is 100% looks. It's only for Chads. As an unattractive man (and from a woman's point of view this includes average men) you'll have absolutely no chance there.

>> No.11899754

>>11899628

Do... do you actually want help getting a girl? I can speak to you OPTIMUMly as someone who basically fks consentually at will... seriously.

>> No.11899757

>>11899628>>11899754

I literally TURN DOWN grade A azz, daily... I can help you if you actually want to OPTIMUMly understand the reality... few do...

>> No.11899779

>at what point should you give up on tinder?

After your new matches dry up ie. a few days after you made your profile you'll begin a downward spiral in 9/10 cases, basically meaning that you belong in 80% that women don't find attractive enough.

>> No.11899798

>>11899628
This isn't science. IT'S AN OPINION.

I'm straight, 29m and I've given up on anything to do with relationships just from reason and logic.

speaking in generalities, there are two kinds of girls that I could potentially pair
with. These are as follows:
1. Girls who are the same age or older than myself.
2. Girls who are younger than myself.
At my age now, point 1 corresponds to girls who are “used goods” as they have been tricked by society
into thinking that having a successful partnership is primarily a numbers game. As this is the case, they
treat dating in this regard. The girls that point 2 refers to are of no interest to myself really. Although
they are statistically more likely to be sexually attractive, the chance of me deriving anything
meaningful from bonding with them is pretty minimal as most younger girls have not read anything or
experienced anything and so would not be able to contribute anything to a potential partnership with
myself. Both sets of these types of girls don’t really interest me.

>> No.11899812
File: 121 KB, 241x234, Screenshot_214.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11899812

fucking normies I swear to god

>> No.11899878

>>11899798
My only requirements are that they not be fat, have a 4/10 face and are happy watching paint dry so long as they're resting themselves on a living breathing 6'1 male next to them with a decently attractive face
>>11899754
What advice can you give me? I'm interested to hear it

>> No.11899884

>>11899878
That's a pretty low bar. Maybe you should be a bit more selfish and think about what it is that you want/will get from it.

>> No.11899887

>>11899729
Tinder is a scam.
Girls receive 99+ likes within minutes of signing up.
Every guy is trying it with every girl.
The profiles have zero substance.
So the girls are matching based entirely on looks, so if you are not not top 15% you are not going to get any attention.

Then if you get a match you have to do a lot of work to stand out with your texting.

It's like extreme simping.
Even Chads are simping on there.
It's disgustingly degenerate.

>> No.11899888

>>11899884
>Maybe you should be a bit more selfish and think about what it is that you want/will get from it.
My personality is a black hole because of level 1 asd, I'll be lucky to get that and when I try to improve its like building on quick sand because of my mental issues

>> No.11899902

>>11899888
I'm sorry to hear that, I have a severe brain injury. It just made my personality way more extreme than it was originally haha. Try not to forget that there are many ways in which to derive meaning from your life and romance is only one of them (and an incredibly overrated one in my opinion.)

Also understand that it it is a rigged 'game'. You could model it on the classics "prisoner's dilemma" mathematical problem and related studies which suggest that humans for the most part are not altruistic and should always look to do what's best for themselves.

>> No.11900570

>>11899628

>> No.11900580

>>11899729

I'm pretty ugly and got 45 likes In less than 12 hours

>> No.11900585

>>11899628
>Timeframe
2012. The year when it came out it was a novelty thing and everyone was trying it. Guess you will have to wait for the next thing.

>> No.11900591

>>11900585
this its been relatively worthless to the average man for half a decade now

>> No.11900820

>>11899902
>You could model it on the classics "prisoner's dilemma" mathematical problem and related studies which suggest that humans for the most part are not altruistic and should always look to do what's best for themselves.
Go watch Golden Balls, a game show where the end is a variation on the Prisoner's Dilemma. Contestants choose to share their winnings more often than stealing them. As a thought experiment, the Prisoner's Dilemma exists in a vacuum, you shouldn't base your life off it.

>> No.11900901

>>11899628
at the point where you're using "scientifically speaking" with zero self awareness about how demented you are. you should give up anything related to relationships with the opposite sex while you're at it

>> No.11901039

>>11899628

>> No.11901303

>>11899628

>> No.11901340

>>11899628
Immediately. I wouldn't want a girl who had tinder. Especially if she was getting dozens or hundreds of hits. That attention is a hard temptation for women. Some keep it and pretend like it's ok because they don't meet up with guys.

>> No.11901461

>>11901340
What if you just wanted to meet up with her a few hours a month and have her genuinely care about you?

>> No.11901470

>>11899888
People with level 1 autism have noticeable issues with communication skills and socializing with others. They can usually have a conversation, but it might be difficult to maintain a back-and-forth banter.

Damn, just googled that.
No banter, no pussy. Not even memeing
Your only hope is another level 1. But far fewer women are spergs so even that is a thin hope.
Unless you are tall and rich

>> No.11901472

>>11901470
That first paragraph was meant to be greentext. Sorry.

>> No.11901475

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_problem

>> No.11901503

>>11899628
>richer than wealth
AKA be able to type down at least 1 coherent sentence. have a personality
>interests
yeah shes not a gamer girl
>not materialistic
ignore unless youre into it
>smoking
smokers taste and smell like shit
>hate drama
reasonable but everyone hates that, so i'd question (indirectly) why she included that
>time wasters
shes not a one time stander

this girl seems fine

sorry that you're an incel OP

>you give up on tinder?
if you can't talk to anyone not even behind a keyboard then you should give up in life

>> No.11901512
File: 689 KB, 1221x1080, 1444653406125.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901512

MGTOW
G
T
O
W

No joke op, this stuff will change your life and in a few years the women will be beating down your door.

>> No.11901524
File: 855 KB, 1284x7572, k790h7bwv3731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901524

>>11899628
long live catfish man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDWC8U36S8k&t=18m18s

>> No.11901569
File: 81 KB, 1000x558, GcGihfg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901569

>>11899628

>> No.11901641

>>11899628
If you are a regular here?
Immediately!

>> No.11901651

>>11901569
This makes me murderously angry

>> No.11901697

>>11901475
I perused this but could I get a quick rundown?

>> No.11901757

>>11900580
What is your race and your liker´s race(s)?

>> No.11901809
File: 100 KB, 500x324, strangegame.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901809

>>11899685

>The only winning move is not to play

^this

Tinder and OKcupid straight up admitted that women by default have the advantage on both platforms meaning that the playing field isn't leveled.

There's also the fact that the type of women who go on these dating sites are skewed towards certain personalities on average. If there was a moderately attractive woman who didn't care about chads or money she would 8 times out 10 not be using the dating sites in the first place.

This isn't even about MGTOW bullshit, dating sites are a setup. You are unironically better off getting fit on your own and picking a woman off the street or grocery store.

>> No.11901814

>>11899757
> I literally TURN DOWN grade A azz, daily
Your mom doesn't count.

>> No.11901827

>>11901651
Why? Of course a hypothetically more attractive person gets more attention.

>> No.11901828

>>11899798
> girls who are “used goods”
Battle cry of the /incel/.
How are those wizard powers coming along, coomer?

>> No.11901837

>>11901809
Women inherently have the advantage in courtship & sex and always have - and probably always will, absent synthesis of convincing fakes. Even in societies where women are chattel the attractive ones are concentrated disproportionately in the possession of the wealthy & powerful, and such cultures enact brutal punishment regimes to stop women from wandering from sub-par men.

The only reason why it causes such enormous social angst in modern western society is the decline of prostitution. Which you can blame on syphilis more than anything. There's nothing much you can do about it so you may as well not let it drive you insane.

>> No.11901841

>>11901827
Because the guy went so far out of his way to show that he was a total piece of shit pedo rapist and the women did not even care.
Does that not seem like a big deal to you?

>> No.11901857

>>11901841
Not really, men too are willing to ignore some horrifying danger signs for the promise of 'frequent sex with an attractive woman.' I mean 'don't stick it in crazy' is a cliche for a reason.

It's the nature of the human brain to make excuses for or minimize the faults of an attractive person. And yeah, sometimes the result is exceptionally ugly.

>> No.11901889

>>11901809
> If there was a moderately attractive woman who didn't care about chads or money
You care about looks, but criticize women for doing the same?

>> No.11901903

>>11899628
The key to succes on tinder is
1. Buying it, way more exposure, yes costs money but its pennies per girl
2. Not always swiping right
Tinder actually has pretty complex algorithms for who gets to see your profile, it has internal scores. Someone who swipes right on ugly women is assumed to be more ugly, gets a lower score, and is showed less to atractive women

>> No.11901915

>>11901903
Jesus.

>> No.11901920

>>11901757

Prob a chink, girls love chinks because of kpop

>> No.11901925

>>11901915
What about it?

>> No.11901949

>>11901925
Last bit.

>> No.11901959

>>11901503
>Falling for a facade
>Calling others incel
Not gonna make it brah

>> No.11901989

>>11901959
>Falling for a random tinder profile that lacks anything cringe or exceptional
kys

>you must assume every wom*n is a whore cause they get more hits than m... (you)
kys

>> No.11902146
File: 41 KB, 502x474, 1507989207547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11902146

>>11901989
Those hits they get are from men that are out of their league often. Men who will sleep with them but would never date or marry them.
So they often think they rate a guy that is 3 points higher than they are. They then end up in this cycle where they are constantly getting pumped and dumped by attractive men but dont realize its because they are just cheap and easy.
Women stuck in this cycle( and there are a lot of them) are absolute fucking whores. Yes