/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11876931]

Why are females so fucking dumb?

[Anonymous No.11876938]

>>11876931
Because thats how women are, doesnt make me want to breed them any less. A thread died for this garbage
>>>/r9k/

[Anonymous No.11877063]

Take your garbage elsewhere

[Anonymous No.11877233]

>>11876931
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSKizLRFbTo

[Anonymous No.11877266]

guys did you also get molested in high-school buy girlys? I dont know why they are like this but all that attention was really annoying. Woman are that stupid. I am one of you! Talk with me.

[Anonymous No.11877271]

>>11876931
Fuck off Goldblatt. Go choke to death on some baby foreskin.

------------------------------------------------

Quote by SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler (1937):

> The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical (((Christian))) attitude, and we also who have been Nationalsocialists up to this day – many even who are strict heathens – have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas.

> I recently said to a Hitler Youth leader:"You are usually so un-Christian, but your attitude toward women is the purest Christianity that is at all possible.”

> Christianity is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women. The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is an erotic union of men for the erection and maintenance of a 2000-year old Bolshevism. I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. The Roman emperors, who eradicated the first Christians, did exactly the same thing we are doing with the Communists. These Christians were then the worst yeast which the great city contained, the worst Jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were.

Source: https://archive.is/JlkBd

--

> "Women are Evil!"
https://files.catbox.moe/z7xiru.webm

> About Women
https://files.catbox.moe/nmz272.webm

> About the Sterilization of European Women
https://files.catbox.moe/mk7ahs.webm

> How to attract THE RIGHT type of women!
https://files.catbox.moe/gkvxxo.webm

> The Key to good Women's Hearts
https://files.catbox.moe/9fvdgt.webm

> No Good Women Left?
https://files.catbox.moe/sw3i2w.webm

> Natural Blonde Women
https://files.catbox.moe/904n2d.webm

> Should Women Train Hard?
https://files.catbox.moe/19v1n8.webm

> The Role of Women
https://files.catbox.moe/8gp5wf.webm

[Anonymous No.11877297]

>>11877271
That's why islam is morally superior with respect to women's rights

[Anonymous No.11877308]

>>11877266
Oh and also,did woman who date you also never invite you to a drink?
And whats most silly is get offered free fuck by as 7, a 7 as if dont have games at home which have to be played. I understand why you think woman are silly.

[Anonymous No.11877317]

>>11877308
Not that i ever payed 4 a woman, i dated, but cant they think ones about me, do i look rich or what? Cant they just buy me stuff 4 my attention?

[Anonymous No.11877324]

>>11877317
i really suffer with you guys woman's are silly and evil, and unfair.

[Anonymous No.11877335]

>>11877297
>t. Cohen Goldblatt
Islam is a type of Judaism, just like Christianity.

[Anonymous No.11877339]

>>11877297
>>11877335

[Anonymous No.11877385]

>>11877335
>>11877339
Why is capitalism not on that list?

[Anonymous No.11877394]

>>11877385
A agree with you, only people who love there job should do there job there for we dont need capitalism. Sadly 90% of all people are driven by greed and we need to shoot all this 90% before that.
But on the flip side you can abuse greedy people if you know how. And push theme forward to take the risk you dont like.

[Anonymous No.11877416]

>>11877385
Because Capitalism isn't a religion, it's not a flavor of Abrahamism. Capitalism and Communism are of course both Jewish, though.

> About Capitalism
https://files.catbox.moe/t0pn97.webm

> "It's NOT Capitalism!"
https://files.catbox.moe/3j3pl8.webm

> VR to Stefan Molyneux
https://files.catbox.moe/radm4u.webm

> The Total Annihilation of Stefan Molyneux
https://files.catbox.moe/8kc317.webm

> Comment to "The Total Annihilation of Stefan Molyneux"
https://files.catbox.moe/9ppk8s.webm

[Anonymous No.11877453]

>>11877271
cringe

[Anonymous No.11877474]

>>11877271

‘From the earliest times, women in Germanic law were accorded a different status from that enjoyed by men.
This distinction was based, not on religious or philosophic grounds, but on their differing military and biological functions.
From the moment of her birth, when the symbolic ceremonies attributed a lesser value to her than to a male child, and in matters of law and inheritance, a girl was treated less favorably.

Key ideas:

I. Law excludes her from succession to the throne.
II. Widow required a male guardian to act in court and administer her property.
III. Husband has a right to use physical force on her. Bavarian common law 1756 states that woman ‘is not merely subordinate and subject in domestic matters, but has an obligation to perform customary and proper personal and household services, as may be demanded of her by her husband, who may, if need be, chastise her in moderation. ‘

IV. The authority of a mother over her children was lesser than that of a father. Only in the Prussian Civil Code of 1794 do they lend her more power, but still not on equal terms with that of a man.
V. Socially they did bode well, I’ll give you that, although still not on equal terms.
VI. Restrictions on women’s liberty remained in force longer in Germany than in most Western Countries.

Give me a few minutes or an hour, I'll try going in depth, with Germany alone. But the point is that they've always been seen, throughout history, by many societies and beliefs as being beneath men.

------------------------------


https://archive.org/details/socialhistoryofg0000saga/page/404/mode/2up

A social history of Germany, 1648-1914
Eda Sagarra (SAGARRA, Eda was born on August 15, 1933 in Dublin. Daughter of Kevin O’Sheil and Cecil Smiddy.)

[Anonymous No.11877513]

>>11876931
You probably watch porn. How dumb is that.

[Anonymous No.11877744]

>>11876931
Women were designed to make babies not to philosophize

[Anonymous No.11877753]

Reported, you forgot to say “scientifically speaking”

[Anonymous No.11877761]

>>11877271
Too based for /sci/.

[Anonymous No.11878118]

I'd be okay with women having a more coddled position in society if it weren't for the fact 99% of them reject the notion that they do. Especially when convenient.