Calculus

[Anonymous No.11862339]

Since Integration is just "fancy addition" and Differentiation is the inverse of Integration, does that mean Differentiation is just subtraction?

[Anonymous No.11862375]

No. It represents the change in time at a specific point.

[Anonymous No.11862389]

>>11862339
If you simplify it enough, all math is, is just a list of symbols.

[Anonymous No.11862401]

>>11862375
Do you even know Calculus?

>>11862389
You're no help at all.

[Anonymous No.11862404]

Not really, it’s fancy division

[Anonymous No.11862407]

The integral is the addition of multiplications, the derivative is the division of substractions

[Anonymous No.11862456]

I can't endorse the view that differentiation and integration are inverses of each other. I mean there is one specific and limited sense in which they sort of are... but it shouldn't be how you think of either operation generally.

[Anonymous No.11862504]

Differentiation is just (f(x)-f(0))/(g(x)-g(0)), but gayer

[Anonymous No.11862715]

>>11862339
It's all just an array of numbers anon

[Anonymous No.11862718]

>>11862407
/thread

I mean, just look at the prompt, that's exactly what's going on

[Anonymous No.11862747]

>>11862456
FUCK YOU
They are normal algebra operations i use to solve my differential equations on my ODE course
I fucking split the Leibnitz notation like its a fraction, dgaf whats going on with chain rule add the calculus swoosh and boom i have the solution. Seethe harder.

[Anonymous No.11862751]

>>11862456
lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiderivative

[Anonymous No.11862774]

>>11862751
Yeah? Is this supposed to be some kind of a "slam dunk"?

[Anonymous No.11862778]

>>11862407
I'm gonna keep that one in my back pocket for when I tutor

[Anonymous No.11862781]

>>11862715
Based and CSpilled

[Anonymous No.11862783]

>>11862751
>he thinks all integrals are anti-derivatives
actual know-nothing brainlet faggot get the fuck off our board nigger

[Anonymous No.11862787]

>>11862783
ooh, got a live one here

[Anonymous No.11863010]

>>11862747
Based

[Anonymous No.11863024]

>>11862751
>lol
joke's on you, pal

[Anonymous No.11863034]

>>11863024
cool citation, pal

[Anonymous No.11863038]

>>11862389
An array of numbers, if you will.

[Solivagus No.11863058]

>>11862339
Differentiation = Recursive subtraction

[Anonymous No.11863101]

>>11863058
[math]
\begin{array}{crr}
& &18 \\
- & &9 \\
&& ---- \\
= & 1&-1 \\
= & 0&10-1 \\
= & 0&9 \\
\end{array}
[/math]

[Anonymous No.11863125]

differentiation
(f(x+i)/i) - (f(x)/i) = i(f(x)-f(x+i))
as i -> 0

[Anonymous No.11863931]

Bump

[Anonymous No.11863960]

>>11862339
Addition isn't the "inverse" of subtraction.
Addition and subtraction are the same thing.

[Anonymous No.11864100]

>>11863960
>my mouth and asshole are the same thing
indeed they are anon, indeed they are

[Anonymous No.11864103]

>>11862339
>Differentiation is the inverse of Integration
This is false. Differentiation is the inverse anti-differentiation, which is not the same as integration even though the fundamental theorem of calculus establishes>>11862339
a link between the two.

[Anonymous No.11864942]

>>11863960
based
>>11864100
cringe

[Anonymous No.11865131]

>>11862401
How am I wromg with my comment? Maybe I worded it differentlybut it is correct. Do you know calculus?
All I know is I past both Calculus 1 and 2 with best grades in class.

"Differential of a function, represents a change in the linearization of a function"

Depending what attribute you look at it could also mean the change of sometinh in time. You will then usually see this in Differential equations.
Instead of being one of those faggot STEM faggots who I have to deal with day to day and who consider themselves above everyone else, yet get lesser grades than me start learning brainlet.

[El Arcón No.11865149]

>>11864942
yeah, wow.

[Anonymous No.11865153]

>>11862407
Can you explain further to a novice such as myself?

[Anonymous No.11865156]

>>11862751
posting wikipedia links should be banned on /sci/ ! who's with me ?!

[Anonymous No.11865209]

>>11865131
>mfw spent 50 hours per week studying, 30 of it only and solely calculus
>work and rework through all homework papers several times
>still pass calc 1 only in the second and calc 2 only in the third try, with bad grades on top of that
>literally be behind everyone else because I autistically focused on math only

If yo have to try, it's over.

[Anonymous No.11865224]

>>11865131
>>11865209
it's not really that hard. Maybe at first it takes longer because it is a new view on things. But soon becomes handy when trying to approximate functions using the taylor-reihe

[Anonymous No.11865227]

>>11865224

[Anonymous No.11865244]

>>11865224
>Taylor-Reihe
Ah, a fellow German. Also no, if I tried HARD and only passed in my third try and even then barely, you can be pretty sure that it doesn't become easier unless you are high iq/have a special talent for it.

[Anonymous No.11865271]

>>11865156
reddit upvote! gold coin!
>fuck off retard

[Anonymous No.11865272]

>>11865244
Talent is a lie to deter those from ever achieving greatness.
Hard work is all that is needed.

Maybe your fundamental knowledge or the basics of math was taught to you incorrectly or sloppily. You need to find that problem and fix it to then continue on the path of mathematics.

Same thing happend to me in physics. For some reason my grades in math were always excellent but physics were close to failure bsp. Systemdynamik in der Physik by Kurt Studer
https://www.orellfuessli.ch/shop/home/artikeldetails/ID42286654.html
Even the simplest things in this book I didn't understand

One Sommer vacation I decided to literally start my physics knowledge from scratch. Started with physics books meant for children etc.. Degrading at first but finally I excelled. In those weeks I finished all examples in that book without fail aswell as fixed the reason for sucking at Vektorgeometrie.
Now have no problems in my engineering courses what so ever and can easily get the best grades.
All you have to do is find the small problem that is giving you a false view on things. Maybe it was something you understood incorrectly at the time.

[Anonymous No.11865279]

>>11865272
>a fucking blog
tourist

[Anonymous No.11865295]

>>11865272
Ye, I know what you mean. I took Calc 2 twice without even passing Calc 1 cause I thought "Why should I need it, I write it after it" only to fail it twice cause I didn't understood the fundamentals.

But:
I still bust my ass off and be worse than those who barely try
I am also "only" on an FH, which means a lesser uni and I still suck. I always read online how people who failed uni excelled in the same subject in a FH, I don't wanna be in a uni if that is even harder than that.
I am also near 30, which essentially means that I have a harder time understanding new stuff on top of that.