Is telegony legit?

[Anonymous No.11813411]

We're having an argument over at /pol/

>"We found that even though the second male sired the offspring, offspring size was determined by what the mother's previous mating partner ate as a maggot," says Dr Crean.

>Despite major advances in genetics, many questions remain about how some traits are inherited.

>"We know that features that run in families are not just influenced by the genes that are passed down from parents to their children. Various non-genetic inheritance mechanisms make it possible for maternal or paternal environmental factors to influence characteristics of a child," says Dr Crean.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141001090238.htm

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282758/

[Anonymous No.11813415]

>>11813411
no, but bugonia is

[Anonymous No.11813418]

should be an immediate and permanent shadowban for people who admit or imply they use /pol/

[Anonymous No.11813422]

>>11813418
Why?

[Anonymous No.11813423]

>>11813411
No there's no reasonable mechanism proposed
>>11813418
>shadowbanning
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

[Anonymous No.11813432]

>>11813423
So does that mean these guys were wrong about the flies offspring size trait being dictated by the first sexual partner?

Or that we don't have an explanation for how it happens?

[Anonymous No.11813433]

>>11813418
Pol is unironically better than this shit hole. 1 year later and you niggerfaggots are still talking about 0.9999...=1 and retarded bullshit such as quark stars, meanwhile there is actual action going on pol
t. sci/int emigrant to pol
I never use the former two cesspools anymore

[Anonymous No.11813435]

Dumping incel science from /pol/. Time to get woke /sci/

[Anonymous No.11813439]

Wow, I never knew that science proves that women are inferior.

[Anonymous No.11813440]

wow feminism bad it's caused by oxytocin problems. Look at all the pictures showing this to be the case

[Anonymous No.11813441]

[Anonymous No.11813443]

>>11813435
>>11813439
>>11813440
>>11813441
SOMEBODY STOP HIM SHADOW BAN HIM NO NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.11813444]

>>11813440

[Anonymous No.11813445]

>>11813440
This place is actually Reddit, look at this faggot mass spamming others’ opinion and retorting with “haha so dumb look at this”
This doesn’t help your case at all, but you’re too unintelligent to realize

[Anonymous No.11813446]

i don't really understand this image but it just proves we have science on our side and feminism is a biological problem like retardation

thanks for reading

[Anonymous No.11813447]

>>11813411
Stop niggerposting. It's revolting.

[Anonymous No.11813448]

>>11813443

[Anonymous No.11813450]

>>11813446

[Anonymous No.11813451]

>>11813447
I was trying to be subtle.

[Anonymous No.11813453]

>>11813450
Holy fuck, is it actually called the femin virus? That's based.

[Anonymous No.11813457]

>>11813432
generally speaking insects, worms, and plants have weird dynamics to their epigenetics that don't seem to be present in humans.

[Anonymous No.11813458]

>>11813422
Their 'memes' are not science, and they are not funny.

[Anonymous No.11813463]

>>11813418
spbp

[Anonymous No.11813465]

>>11813418
Oh, come on. Right-wing speech are being censored by the second and stretched thin across the world as is.

[Anonymous No.11813466]

[Anonymous No.11813467]

>Oh, come on. Right-wing speech are being censored by the second and stretched thin across the world as is.

[Anonymous No.11813469]

[Anonymous No.11813472]

[Anonymous No.11813473]

>>11813445
Okay, let's step out of the science for a bit.

How do you prove feminists are deficient in secreted oxytocin? Do women who identify as feminist or radical feminists typically show a loss of many behaviors regulated by oxytocin?It makes a piss poor case for why feminism is caused by a virus that inhibits secretion of oxytocin. It literally begins with claims that aren't backed by any forms of evidence.

[Anonymous No.11813477]

>>11813472

[Anonymous No.11813480]

>>11813473
>Do women who identify as feminist or radical feminists typically show a loss of many behaviors regulated by oxytocin

[Anonymous No.11813482]

>>11813457
Yeah I guess that makes sense. This one is in humans but I'm not sure what the implications are really.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592#pone.0045592-Lambert1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/

[Anonymous No.11813484]

>>11813472
Are you implying that this isn't based?

[Anonymous No.11813486]

>>11813453
>Not knowing about Frank H Slauenwhite IV

[Anonymous No.11813487]

>Civilization is a social construct
At least it's not a virus.

[Anonymous No.11813490]

>>11813484
oh women are based alright. white women.

[Anonymous No.11813492]

>>11813486
It's been so long

[Anonymous No.11813499]

>>11813490
you can clearly see that since only 76% of black females refuse white male partners that black women are mathematically 300% more thirsty for Colonizer Cock™ than white women are for aids dick. so why the BBC spam? well look at what the other women are up to:

[Anonymous No.11813500]

>>11813418
people from /sci/ are clearly brainlets. not a single debunk in this entire thread and they even have to shadowban the competition to avoid being btfo

[Anonymous No.11813506]

>>11813499
this of course means that white women are the most racially loyal ethnicity of female. look where it's gotten them, american whites are more purebred that whatever remains of europe:

so here where are, if americans whites are the 92/98 demigod ethnicity then of course they are under attack from all sides, and all angles, and that's all the male/female divide and conquer really is.<---- that's pol science, it has to be properly narrated

[Anonymous No.11813510]

[Anonymous No.11813513]

but why are white women so attracted to white males, and why are the other women attracted as well? here we go:

[Anonymous No.11813517]

>>11813490
>>11813499
>>11813506
>>11813510
>>11813513
if you're clearly the best and all the world's women know it, then is it really racism?

[Anonymous No.11813519]

the matchmaking on this board sucks, there is no one here to fight. guess I win. send your reparations to the Fascist American Empire.

[Anonymous No.11813524]

[Anonymous No.11813528]

Alright boys these pussies have no arguments. I'd even go so far as to say they fear us. Time to go back to basedville. >>263660354

[Anonymous No.11813530]

you also have to learn to pivot the data back to politics or the memes went nowhere. like this one.

[Anonymous No.11813531]

>>11813524

[Anonymous No.11813532]

>>11813528
fuck
>>>/pol/263660354

[Anonymous No.11813716]

>>11813517
>t. has never read a word of Marx

[Anonymous No.11813769]

>>11813418

>BAN THINGS THAT I DONT LIKE

How typical of modern left.

[Anonymous No.11813775]

>>11813482
>first study
>The most likely source of male Mc in female brain is acquisition of fetal Mc from pregnancy with a male fetus. In women without sons, male DNA can also be acquired from an abortion or a miscarriage [22], [23], [38]–[40]. The pregnancy history was unknown for all but a few subjects in the current studies, thus male Mc in female brain could not be evaluated according to specific prior pregnancy history. In addition to prior pregnancies, male Mc could be acquired by a female from a recognized or vanished male twin [41]–[43], an older male sibling, or through non-irradiated blood transfusion [44].
Its interesting but that's not what you're talking about is it?
>second study
discussing fetal microchimerism. I'll read it later but again not what you are talking about I presume.


I'm wondering how sperm are supposed to induce significant genetic and physiological changes in a woman's body desu. There is no constant exchange of genetic material between the vagina and the rest of the body purely from insemination.

[Anonymous No.11813781]

>>11813411
This is interesting, but far from conclusive. I think you should refrain from taking this as the final word on telegony, at least for the time being. At the very least it should be replicated and proved beyond doubt that it is specifically the first mate which really is influencing size of offspring.

[Anonymous No.11814276]

>>11813418
Lefty cucks who can't stand diversity of opinions should be permavanned.

And I do mean vanned.

[Anonymous No.11814283]

>>11814276
>it's not horseshit, it's a diverse opinion

[Anonymous No.11814293]

>>11813418
You want to see what a """shadow""" ban looks like on this site, try and post with "Indexer" in the name field on /co/

[Anonymous No.11814358]

>>11813450

>open image

>see random virus related pictures from google images and text talking about the "femin virus"

>geddit because fem=female and female bad xdd

>says the femin virus is spoopy AF and makes you do everything that does everything /pol/ doesn't like

>no links to any papers or anything in the image to prove this shit is real

>search for it on the internet

>first result is a Wikipedia page for geminiviridae, a virus that effects corn and a pastebin for shit "DA REPTILLIANS ODNT WANT U TO KNO!1!"

You're going to have to step up your game if you want to compete with Jyrome, Bubba.

[Anonymous No.11814701]

>>11813418
Christ, what a faggot

[Anonymous No.11814707]

>>11814701
/pol/cel spotted. You are a disease.

[Anonymous No.11814714]

>>11814707
I'm not saying I agree with anything the OP said about telegony or it being real. But people who want people because other hold a view they don't like deserve to get the bullet

[Anonymous No.11814740]

>>11814714
Remember when ponies got banned? We need another one of those, but for /pol/ content. It's not about opinion, it's about unscientific nonsense spammed constantly.

[Anonymous No.11815779]

>>11813418
>WAAAAA WAAAAA I DON'T LIKE IT BAN IT BAN IT BAAAAAAAAAAN IT
Shut the fuck up faggot and go back to pleddit

[Anonymous No.11815787]

>>11814707
Leftism is a mental disease

[Anonymous No.11815842]

>>11813499
>Asian/Indian
That's a pretty broad and arbitrary category probably used because someone just lumped geographic groups together.

[Anonymous No.11815918]

>>11813411
>in flies at least
did you really make a thread about this retarded crap?

[Anonymous No.11816605]

>>11813499
oof this chart is going to ruffle some feathers

[Anonymous No.11816663]

>>11815787
>Phoneposter
>>>/r/eddit

[Anonymous No.11816680]

>>11815918

Just leave the retards alone. It's clear as day this is a bait thread. Ultimately on the jannies to do their job and get rid of it.

[Anonymous No.11816682]

>>11816680
If the jannies did their job, this board wouldn't have been turned into a /pol/tard colony.

[Anonymous No.11817036]

>>11813418
I don't like censorship, but I would definitely support a permanent label for those people. (Though it's probably not necessarily since it usually seeps through every post.)

[Anonymous No.11817045]

>>11813433
>Pol is unironically better than this shit hole. 1 year later and you niggerfaggots are still talking about 0.9999...=1 and retarded bullshit such as quark stars, meanwhile there is actual action going on pol
The Planck star thread (>>11809510) is unironically more interesting and more tied to reality than nearly every thread ever posted on /pol/ since its inception, though I suppose that's a low threshold.

I've tried having actual conversations on /pol/ occasionally, for some reason, and if you all think the schizos are bad here (and they are), there are at least 50x more of them on /pol/. (Naturally, they come here from there.)

[Anonymous No.11817160]

>>11817045
Remember when threads like those used to be the norm on /sci/?

[Anonymous No.11817226]

>>11813418
Why?

[Anonymous No.11817242]

>>11817226
To infinitely improve the quality of every board.

[Anonymous No.11817509]

>>11817242
>Projection: The Post

[Anonymous No.11817528]

>>11813499
>>11813490
>>11813506
>>11813510

I believe it, I was a dating coach for 10 years. Every single non-white wanted White male or White female. White females just don't respond to non-white males they often think they are creepy and I didn't have to convince blacks and asians to go for any girl not White because they always found out that its a waste of time, White girls would flake as soon as they saw their date was non-white even if their friend was already there. Some of the black guys were legit 9 and 10s an had White girls that were 5s call them ugly or too "alien" after the date.

The White girls that one of my client did bag well he tried to make her his girlfriend until he found out the rash was a std, she was kinda gross anyway. White girls that date non-white basically don't have any options or they will take any option.

White males I coached were easy even if they were aspies, once their appearance was more refined. White girls would approach them. But the non-white girls would be chasing them a White guy thats at least a 6 and not under 5'8 can date any non-white 10s without much work.

[Anonymous No.11817533]

>>11817528
>dating coach
do americans really?

[Anonymous No.11817539]

So all the bullshit threads come from retards who "argue" on /pol/

[Anonymous No.11817543]

>>11813490
>2011
yeah, try getting that statistic now with every white girl posting black propaganda