[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 898 KB, 2703x1407, IMG_20200526_134726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11780511 No.11780511 [Reply] [Original]

Does physics actually explain the world? Does the universe really care about your "laws" of "reality"? Do you think finding another paricle will suddenly bring meaning to your life?

>> No.11780551

>it's another goofball that doesn't understand what science is episode
Stay in school kid.

>> No.11780699

What the fuck is the reasoning in the image
>Presented with a host of knowledge accumulated by objective observation and experimentation
>"But what if it isn't like that?"
Logic of a fucking toddler how was this even published.

>> No.11780757

>>11780511
>>>/x/

>> No.11780772

>>11780511
>Does physics actually explain the world?
Yes
>Does the universe really care about your "laws" of "reality"?
The universe isn't alive, it doesn't have the ability to care.
>Do you think finding another paricle will suddenly bring meaning to your life?
No, but it would help humanity a lot.

>> No.11780783

>>11780772
>it would help humanity a lot
Has the Higgs-Boson been applied to anything?

>> No.11780800
File: 11 KB, 259x194, index_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11780800

>make up gravity to explain shit
>it doesn't
>come up with magical "dark matter" so it works
Phew that was close

>> No.11780822

>>11780772

>does physics explain the world?

Nope in the sense that it can't give you true or false statements about the world, but serious philosophers of science don't generaly make that claim. Scientism and scientific realism are still found in pop-sci and media in general, not in serious academic discussion.

>Does the universe really care about your "laws" of "reality"?

No idea

>Do you think finding another paricle will suddenly bring meaning to your life?

nope, but probably will be expensive as fuck.

>> No.11780851

>>11780783

>Has the Higgs-Boson been applied to anything?

No. But that's not even scratching the surface. Most modern theoretical physics has 0 application, it's basically mathematics but less devoid of relation with reality. Mathematics is in much worse shape, literally a bunch of high IQ schizos discussing first order logical implications of assumptions they make about abstract crap that need to be phrased in a very specific language that only allows for the words "set" and "belongs". It's basically applied autism. Don't tell this to the scientists tho, or else they'll cry saying you're trying to steal them the "right" to receive government welfare.

>> No.11781163

>>11780511
>Does physics actually explain the world?
Only approximately so.
Science is fundamentally unable to determine truth.

>Does the universe really care about your "laws" of "reality"?
Probably yes, since it seems to behave quite consistently.

>Do you think finding another paricle will suddenly bring meaning to your life?
Obviously not.

>> No.11781171

>>11780783
>Has the Higgs-Boson been applied to anything?
At any given time theoretical science has to be drastically removed from interests of the consumer market.

Imagine a world where of every physicist it was demanded that he invents a possible consumer product before he gets to investigate a phenomenon.
We would literally be still sitting in the stone age...

Newtonian mechanics was at one point just mental wanking by a crazy virgin. Now it is literally the backbone of civilization as we know it.
And even if the Higgs-Boson would literally never find any application, so what?
Understanding the world should be motivation itself.

>> No.11781186
File: 1.24 MB, 1800x2520, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11781186

>>11780783
>>11780851
>Higgs-Boson

>> No.11781189

I'm a brainlet however I'm pretty sure Godels incompleteness theorem would make it so that you couldn't really prove mathematically the true nature of the universe

>> No.11781191
File: 3.82 MB, 6250x8750, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11781191

>>11780800

>> No.11781209

>>11781186
>>11781191
where do these propaganda posters originate from? you seem to have one for every topic and post them in every thread

>> No.11781516
File: 157 KB, 1269x535, 510B0E40-2CD0-47BF-92F0-C026B1DA3A20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11781516

>>11781209
You need to go back

>> No.11781601

>>11781516
did they just appear out of thin air?

>>11780972
>>11768268
>>11776903
There are multiple threads up at any given time with these images that are all made in the same style, reverse image search brings up nothing

What are you up to?

>> No.11781613

>>11781601
If you have to ask you don’t belong,
Want for cnn to update and someone to post a link on r/scienceiscool

>> No.11782192
File: 43 KB, 850x400, quote-i-consider-my-greatest-accomplishment-to-be-lifelong-celibacy-isaac-newton-61-0-003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11782192

>>11781171
>crazy virgin

>> No.11782227

>>11780822
>Nope in the sense that it can't give you true or false statements about the world
a scientific theory, or any theory, is a description of our phenomenal world. trivially, a theory describes what we experience. this is a non negotiable definition.

a theory of x provides you with a description of x, and therefore provides you with the method to know if x exists or not. statements can have no truth value at all if they do not have a meaning (i.e if they are literally unreadable), and the only way to know the meaning of x is to have a theory(i.e concept) that describes it x.

>> No.11782349

>>11782227
Point to one thing science has proven.
And no existence claims are never proven as philosophy 101 should tell you...

>a theory of x provides you with a description of x
An imperfect one. As basically every scientific theory has been disproven or is in the process of being disproven.
See e.g. Newton's laws, geocentrism, the aether, etc...

>> No.11782373

>>11780822
>philosophers of science
>>>/x/

>> No.11782381

>>11782349
>Point to one thing science has proven.
Earth is round

>> No.11782392

>>11780822
>Scientism and scientific realism are still found in pop-sci and media in general, not in serious academic discussion.
Scientism is just PR by scientists, they obviously do not believe that their efforts are the solution to the worlds ills, but pretending that they are is a fucking great PR strategy.

>> No.11782401

>>11782381
Looks flat to me, at least from my window.

But let's not be hasty here, start by proving that the thing you are the most surest of.
Prove to me that you actually exist.

>> No.11782415
File: 243 KB, 1200x525, heid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11782415

>>11780551
>>11780699
>>11780772
It's nietzsche. all these subhuman g*rm and fr*nch philosophers hate science and reject objective reality. truly disgusting people. and yet their thinking is the foundation for major social and political movements in our time. I say we burn their works and shut anyone inspired by them out of academia. what claim do you have to respect when you reject truth?

>> No.11782416

>>11780851
>most modern theoretical physics has 0 application
qualify this specifically because medical science has had a huge fucking boon thanks to physics discoveries over the last 100 years. Don't tell me medical science isn't useful, either.

>> No.11782434

>>11782415
The French, who committed treason against their king, caused the French revolution and with it the creation of all the political abominations like Fascism, communism and worst of them all liberal democracy. We Germans are innocent of that crime against humanity.

>hate science
Based.

>reject truth?
What truth?

>> No.11782440

>>11782416
One particular phenomenon being applicable is not a refutation that most of it had no application.
Go to arxiv and read a paper on theoretical physics...

>> No.11782463

>>11782415
>t. cohen

>> No.11782464

>>11782349
in your confusion you now bring up proof to bolster your claim about description and truth. i must now teach you what proofs are.
a theory describes the world. theories describe the world in terms of rules. proof is an inference made about theories by applying their rules to describe some thing.

this is what happens when you treat proof and knowledge as synonymous. you reveal your confusion. note how i can just define all my terms instead of using them as emotional associations. this is how philosophy looks like after 101

>> No.11782467
File: 39 KB, 649x489, 1576214648936.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11782467

>>11782381
>>11782401

https://share.dmca.gripe/HE7BdxlFGC9Em1GU.mp4

Saying science has proven the Earth is round is like saying science has proven that humans breathe air, or that water is necessary for us to live.

>> No.11782473

>>11782464
>a theory describes the world. theories describe the world in terms of rules. proof is an inference made about theories by applying their rules to describe some thing.
So predictions by Newton's laws, which almost always contradict observation is "true" to you?
LMAO

>> No.11782477

>>11782467
>Saying science has proven the Earth is round is like saying science has proven that humans breathe air, or that water is necessary for us to live.
All of which are in fact not proven at all, but are derived from observation together with conjectures about the nature of reality.

>> No.11782495

>>11782401
Lol ok schizo
>>>/x/

>> No.11782507

>>11782467
>>11782495

>> No.11782508

>>11782495
Where is the proof that you exist?

Side not, I do not believe that the earth is flat, only that the statement in unprovable.

>> No.11782513

>>11782508
>I do not believe that the earth is flat, only that the statement in unprovable.
>>>/x/

>> No.11782514

>>11782513
Prove the earth is flat.

>> No.11782519

>>11782514
>>>/x/

>> No.11782520

>>11782519
Not a proof.

>> No.11782524

>>11780511
the universe doesnt care

>> No.11782525

>>11780511
yes they do you retard. it explains how reality works thats the point of science you meta physical pseud mathemagics believing cuck faggot

>> No.11782717

>>11782525
Mathematics are not useful or relevant. They are just word games and puzzles. Mental masturbation. Netflix and recreational sex for high IQ people. We just fool normies to think mathematics is useful so they will wagie slavie and pay taxes to support our hobbies.

>> No.11782773

>>11781171
Physicists have done virtually nothing positive in the world. Engineers are who you're thinking of that move technological levels.

>> No.11782815

>>11782473
as your confusion grows you direrect attention towards more and more lines of thought. do you notice how i'm able to resist getting caught up in those fruitless arguments with you, because i'm not willing to let go of the fact that you have not defined a single term? what wonderful self restraint i have, i can't help but admire cool temperament.

>> No.11783504

>>11782773
>Physicists have done virtually nothing positive in the world.
Engineering is downstream from physics.
You can't do engineering without the byproduct of physics...

>> No.11783517

>>11782815
You made zero arguments you just put your fingers in your ears and tell LALALA.
And you just got seriously BTFO as your claim was demonstrated to be clearly absurd.

Are you actually trolling?

>> No.11785108 [DELETED] 

>>11780511

Drop two different large rocks on your toe and record how long each takes to smash toes.

Both will be same
t=(2gh)^0.5

>> No.11785134

>>11780511

Drop two different large rocks on your toe and record how long each takes to smash toes.

Both will be same.

>> No.11785790

>>11780851
>No. But that's not even scratching the surface.
so then why is 1 other particle any different retard?

>> No.11785855

Physics confirm that human created math conforms to reality. When we see that nature's behaves as if the math is real that confirms that human created logical systems have some degree of truth to them.

>> No.11786118

>>11781613
jesus christ