/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11698721]

Clamped and bluepilled.

[Anonymous No.11698724]

>>11698721
>another schizo thread

[Anonymous No.11698734]

>>11698724
Immediately clamped as well as thoroughly, utterly bluepilled.

Unclamp and transcend pills.

[Anonymous No.11698772]

CLAMPED LATE

[Anonymous No.11698817]

>>11698772
https://www.dovepress.com/delayed-umbilical-cord-clamping-after-childbirth-potential-benefits-to-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PHMT
Long-term health benefits associated with late cord clamping

It is now well established that delayed cord clamping improves total body iron stores for up to 6 months of age and reduces the need for blood transfusion for anemia. Within the brain, iron is important in myelin production in oligodendrocytes, and decreased availability leads to hypomyelination. Iron deficiency in children most commonly presents with poor school performance, decreased cognitive abilities, and behavioral problems. These clinical outcomes in iron-deficient children can be traced to hypomyelination, and have been shown to persist despite subsequent iron supplementation.20 Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in infancy are associated with cognitive motor and behavioral deficits as well as persistent neurophysiological differences.21

[Anonymous No.11698822]

>>11698817
Preterm babies have been shown to suffer fewer intraventricular hemorrhages when they have delayed cord clamping compared with immediate cord clamping. This begs the question whether these preterm babies are acting like canaries in the coal mines, with their more fragile bodies showing the damage that occurs to a delicate developing brain when subjected to immediate cord clamping. It is possible that in a more robust full-term infant neurological damage may go unnoticed, despite still occurring.

Many parents today are choosing to bank their baby’s cord blood, either privately or altruistically, for organizations such as the Anthony Nolan Trust. Private cord banking facilities attract clients based on the promise of the potential future benefits to their baby or family from the stem cells contained within the cord blood. Marketing phrases include “your baby’s cord blood may hold the key to their long-term health”,22 “a simple and safe procedure”,22 and “stem cells must be collected shortly after birth, and carefully stored, or they’re lost forever”.23 These cord blood stem cells have properties that have been shown in the laboratory to help the body repair itself.24 Currently, trials are underway looking at the potential benefits of cord blood stem cells in the treatment of many different conditions, including cerebral palsy,25,26 autism,27 pediatric stroke,28 traumatic brain injury,29 and type 1 diabetes.30

[Anonymous No.11698824]

>>11698822
A study currently being conducted in children with cerebral palsy at Duke University is one of the first placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover clinical trials of its kind.31,32 It has been started to determine whether a single intravenous infusion of a child’s own umbilical cord stem cells will cure or reduce the severity of their disease. They aim to show improvements in functional status of the children, aged 12 months to 6 years, looking specifically at their cognitive, language, motor, and functioning capabilities. The authors have been quoted as saying that “If this study shows that cord blood is beneficial, it will have a huge impact on the practices of cord blood collection and banking at birth.” They also state that they hope as a result of their work that “… more parents will choose to bank their child’s cord blood at birth and that public cord blood banks will hold the child’s blood long enough to treat the child (if needed) before being made available for public use”. They hope to find out whether cord blood can be used as a treatment for cerebral palsy and also determine the beneficial effects of cord blood, such as reducing inflammation in the brain, repairing damaged brain cells, and evolving of new brain cells to replace damaged ones.31,32 Another trial also being conducted at Duke University is looking into the use of cord blood for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.26 This study is examining the use of autologous umbilical cord blood infusions in term newborns up to 14 days old who have signs of moderate to severe encephalopathy at birth.

[Anonymous No.11698826]

what the fuck is going on in here

[Anonymous No.11698829]

>>11698824
Etc.

They brain damage us deliberately because we're living in Brave New World. We are the deltas and epsilons.

[Anonymous No.11698860]

>>11698817
iron deficiency is literally the easiest thing to treat and the umbilical cord is usually not clamped the second the baby comes out, unless they take the blood for stem cells. anyway iron deficiency is better than dying or getting a chronic disease that could have been prevented with those stem cells later in life.
waiting for the cord to turn white and dry off brings a lot of problems. it might have been useful before but now it's not. almost all mothers take a shit ton of supplements and infants health is constantly monitored in developed countries.

[Anonymous No.11698929]

>>11698826
OP is brain damaged retard who constantly spams this thread over and over again.

[Anonymous No.11698934]

>>11698860
Shaking my head.

[Anonymous No.11698969]

>>11698934
better shake your medication, schizo

[Anonymous No.11699010]

>>11698826
Clamp schizo is in a maniac phase

[Anonymous No.11699036]

I’m not the OP but I’ve noticed a lot of /sci/ tards just reply “schizo” whenever the clamping subject comes up without addressing any of the arguments or evidence presented by the OP, which I found very interesting and at intuitively plausible. I guess this phenomenon (knee-jerk herd mentality or rejection of the unfamiliar?) supports the old saying that mediocre brains can only ridicule but not elucidate.

[Anonymous No.11699046]

>>11698860
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835342/

[Anonymous No.11699053]

>>11698860
>cripple yourself at birth so *maybe* you might be able to use some of the blood decades later
dumbest take ive seen on /sci/ lately

[Anonymous No.11699059]

>>11698860
>brings a lot of problems
Which ones?
> it might have been useful before but now it's not
Literally the opposite. Recommendations are shifting towards delaying clamping.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/cord-1.3908635
https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/03/health/umbilical-cord-cutting/index.html

[Anonymous No.11699073]

>>11699036
On the off chance you're not concern trolling, OP is well documented as a complete crackpot spammer

[Anonymous No.11699103]

>>11699073
>crackpot
So
>>11699046
>>11699059
>>11698817
>>11698822
>>11698824
is bullshit? The Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is promoting bullshit too?

[Anonymous No.11699111]

>>11698824
GIVE US THE CORD BLOOD!

[Anonymous No.11699637]

>>11699059
mainly jaundice and it taking much more time (take into consideration that both the baby and the mother have gone through labour). anyway doctors already let most of the cord blood get to the infant (sometimes even milking the cord to make it happen faster), what are even arguing for? The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists already advises waiting 30-60 seconds before clamping. waiting for the cord to dry off on its own instead of clamping after 60 seconds brings 0 benefit