[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 632 KB, 1920x1080, 1572718355750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11696433 No.11696433 [Reply] [Original]

Is the event horizon always exactly the same size as the schwazschild radius of its mass?

>> No.11696452

>>11696433
no, only for schwarzchild black holes - uncharged unspinning ones

>> No.11696453

>>11696452
Does the radius get smaller or bigger when they spin?

>> No.11696454

No it is also dependent on the spin of the black hole and it's charge. Start reading this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_metric

>> No.11696463

If only real black holes looked this cool. Why is reality gay

>> No.11697407
File: 1.41 MB, 872x10000, 1564674542752.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11697407

>>11696433
>schwazschild radius
Not a radius.

>> No.11697417 [DELETED] 
File: 89 KB, 558x364, ''black hole'' believers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11697417

>>11696433
Stop with this silly schizo "black hole" garbage. And yes the belief in "black holes" is truly schizo.

"Black holes" violate Einstein's Relativity theories (let's just pretend they're correct), yet in the institutionalized "settled science" dogma, they simultaneously believe in Relativity. And "black holes" (as defined by the "black hole" believers themselves) can't exist in a Big Bang Universe, yet they simultaneously believe in the Big Bang. And by the official "black hole" """science""" there can't be /multiple/ "black holes" in the same universe simultaneously, yet they believe there are. It's 100% schizo and idiotic.

Institutionalized "settled science" followers are basically religious - they ignore any science and facts which contradicts their belief system.

To everyone who wish to learn and educate themselves, here's an excellent scientific paper describing the problems and contradictions with "black holes" and Relativity: https://files.catbox.moe/b3aur6.pdf

And here are great educational videos for those who don't want to read (all the following is based on /real science/ and observations of reality, as opposed to the "settled science" dogma):

https://youtu.be/kI14fpM3ouU

https://youtu.be/Iz8RRN8rY00

https://youtu.be/yc9PB_4F-OU

https://youtu.be/J4NffTr_GMk

https://youtu.be/Dk2-lH9ewuA

https://youtu.be/ev10ywLFq6E

https://youtu.be/I8y3VrrVEpI

https://youtu.be/Dz2A4qXJQjc

https://youtu.be/-FdWTH08u30

https://youtu.be/Q185InpONK4

https://youtu.be/CHZ5O0jTH8A

https://youtu.be/nLC4MA6_Oq0

https://youtu.be/GfyNOEMjzI4

https://youtu.be/lmROfjgViLE

https://youtu.be/TiKYvUtpJXA

https://youtu.be/MvNCWMD6so4

https://youtu.be/TdYrgJrBFr0

https://youtu.be/-03lh_tHMJ0

https://youtu.be/FIgmsQOKnmk

https://youtu.be/ot-9R2GZxp8

https://youtu.be/p8lKQMEYYLw

https://youtu.be/_c9M33FLH40

https://youtu.be/SeIHTCdOGWs

https://youtu.be/4IdMz8PkGZM

https://youtu.be/kz-Bwi5xTTs

https://youtu.be/xUC_a-IMmGs

https://youtu.be/hC_KkLvG22A

>> No.11697428

>>11696463
The reason plasmoids and "black holes" look very different is because they are very different, and importantly plasmoids are real while "black holes" are imaginary fiction. So naturally, "black holes" don't look like /anything/ in the real world - as they only "exist" outside of the real world.

>> No.11697534

>>11697428
What does happen when a body's escape velocity exceeds c, Mr. No black holes man?

>> No.11697613

>>11696453
Smaller. There are also two event horizons in a spinning (Kerr) black hole.

>> No.11697640

>>11697428
>>>/x/

>> No.11697643

>>11697417
>scientific paper
Sorry to disappoint you. But the link leads to a pseudoscientific "paper" written by a known crackpot.

>> No.11697650

>>11696463
That is more or less how they look when not surrounded by an accretion disk

>> No.11697707

>>11697417
10/10 pasta made me angry for a second.

>> No.11697733
File: 490 KB, 449x401, 1585978475252.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11697733

>>11697643
>i cant deal with the science nor defend my theories which real science debunks, so i have to resort to attacking the messenger
Ahhh, the sweet taste of absolute victory.

>> No.11697883

>>11696433
nah, schwarzchild black hole is an uncharged, non-spinning black hole in an otherwise empty universe that existed since the beginning of time.

more realistic black holes, assuming they're not spinning at an enormous rate, are likely to have a radius similar to but not exactly the same as the schwazchild radius