/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

Can you prove otherwise without using limits or derailing the conversation by saying something about rings or wheels?Also does putting an anime girl on the image make it so people will look at the post?

>>116880670/0 is undefined.

>>11688067christ just use the definition you dumbfuckax = bif a = 0 then x can be any number in R not just 0 so their is no one solution

>>11688067>0/0 is 0 and so is 1/0In which wheel?

>>11688067You're a fucking retard.

>>11688080Let me find the contradiction to that give me a minute, i already wrote out the funny thing.>>11688076A classic, "you are wrong because I am right">>11688081I am going to say the normal one

>>11688086its a contradiction that you can have so low IQ and still breath

>>11688080Contradiction if its any number but 0

this idiot doesn't know about l'hopitals rule

>>11688096No i don't, care to explain? I specifically asked for NO LIMITS though. Can you disprove it via contradiction?>>11688090>>11688085You're clearly dumber if you can't refute my point and are just hurling insults because your too stupid to actually prove me wrong/

>>11688086>A classic, "you are wrong because I am right"No idea what that means. I just stated an axiom that OP ignored.

>>11688106Care to prove that axiom?

*ahem* let me introduce you to null numbers[math]\frac{1}{0} = n[/math][math]\frac{x}{0} = xn[/math]Every "contradiction" that comes after this is pure distilled cope. This is objective reality.>b-but what's [math]n[/math] supposed to be then?what's [math]i[/math] supposed to be then?

>>11688136You are a goon and a dumbfuck. i is the square root of negative 1, it has useful properties. What is 2*1/0? You literally showed jack shit, just put a random symbol to represent 1/0 that nothing supports. My proof doesn't even NEED 1/0

>>11688141>What is 2*1/0? ummm bro hello it's [math]2n[/math]?? 90 IQ post lol

>>11688144So logically, (1/n)*n = 1 correct? And I assume 2n*0=2 yes?

>>11688102no, and I'm not going to. you have a phone in your hands dumbass or better yet learn calc

>>11688144based nullposting[math]sqrt{-4/0}=2i*n[/math]

>>11688158Apply it to what i am saying please

>>11688163apply my balls down your throat please

>>11688193No thank you

>>11688141take your meds anon

>>11688067Nothing divided by nothing is nothing.If one doughnut exists but no one takes it, one doughnut still exists.

>>11688107>proving an axiomYou are either a non-STEM undergrad or never visited a university apart from getting shit faced with your cousin phil and his trashy gf

>>11688067assume 1/0=0=0/0, 1/0=0/0, 1=0

>>11688067This is why everyone thinks math majors are space spergs

>>11688067>Can you prove otherwiseIt's literally trivially easy.0/0 = 01/0 = 01 = 0Oops! We have a problem! Both can't be true.

>>11690863>>11690915You can't just substitute them nigs because they are both undefined.

>>11688067>Can you prove otherwise without using limits or derailing the conversation by saying something about rings or wheels?If you think 1/0 equals 0, you probably have down syndrome. Whatever 1/0 is, it's obviously bigger than 1/1

>>11688067Please don't post my wife ever again.

>>11688067The /sci/ server link is https://discord.gg/uQr9PQWe will interview Bill Nye this week, join.

>>11690975op said prove by contradiction so we can assume the given statement..

>>11688067zero (0) is shorthand for minus one (.000...1) infinity definition

>>11688076not really. 0/0 = 0 in [math]S^{-1}A[/math] being the quotient ring where [math]A,S = (0)[/math]

>>11688094By saying 0/0 = (1/0)*0, you're implying that 1/0 is defined, which it isn't.

>>11688067>Can you prove otherwise without using limits"can you prove me wrong without using the key concept that makes me wrong?"

>>11690911I can assure you that OP is not a math major, in fact I doubt he's even passed middle school.

>>11694238>OP says 1/0 = 0>Use basic multiplication to show that can't be true>Nuh-uh, you can't do basic multiplication to it, because it's undefined>BECAUSE IT'S UNDEFINED>Somehow this means it might NOT be undefined?????

>>11694591The post I replied to wasn't disproving 1/0=0. They were trying to prove 0/0=0, by assuming 1/0 is defined in the process.

>>11688067a * 1/a = 1, but0 * 1/0 != 1disproved

It's clearly undefined

>>11696607look again

>>11691019Thank you for defending out Scifu Waifu

>>11688067Yeah just graph it retard

>>11696607actually that looks like it's clearly defined at inftynow plot 0/x

>>116968191/inf ==! 1/0 are you retarded?Of course 1/inf is defined. Its 0. y=0/x Is just a straight line. Y=0 when x=0

>>11688067Why can't I prove it using limits? How is that valid? It's like asking me to prove that 1+1=2 without using addition. Also, don't ever post my wife again, brainlet.

>>11697007you need to disprove it without resorting to using aparatus which can disprove it. that's the game.

>>11697877Well its graphed above, which proves it. Although graphing is just a visualized limit.

There is nothing to disprove. Its all a childish fantasy. Zero does not exist and has no place in mathematics. One might as well ask "What is 1 divided by Unicorn? Its nonsense.Yes, just nonsense. And one day we of the true faith will EXPUNGE that GOD CURSED nonsense from the textbooks. WITH OUR SWORDS! WE MARCH! IN THE NAME OF GOD! WE MARCH!DEUS VULT! DEUS VULT! DEUS VULT!

>>11698025You are also a brainlet. The number 0 revolutionized mathematics.

>>11688067*Defines the symbols 0/0 & 1/0. Disprove these definitions.* You have to give assertions. All you've done is define symbols. It's like arguing about the definition of a made up word.

>>11698597OP's assertion is that this definition is consistent with the rest of math if you ignore all the instances where it's not consistent with the rest of math. it's not wrong, but it's also completely retarded.