[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

# /sci/ - Science & Math

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 677 KB, 1000x1024, untitled (44).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Can you prove otherwise without using limits or derailing the conversation by saying something about rings or wheels?

Also does putting an anime girl on the image make it so people will look at the post?

 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:36:33 2020 No.11688076 >>116880670/0 is undefined.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:37:09 2020 No.11688080 >>11688067christ just use the definition you dumbfuckax = bif a = 0 then x can be any number in R not just 0 so their is no one solution
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:37:40 2020 No.11688081 >>11688067>0/0 is 0 and so is 1/0In which wheel?
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:38:19 2020 No.11688085 >>11688067You're a fucking retard.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:38:58 2020 No.11688086 >>11688080Let me find the contradiction to that give me a minute, i already wrote out the funny thing.>>11688076A classic, "you are wrong because I am right">>11688081I am going to say the normal one
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:40:23 2020 No.11688090 >>11688086its a contradiction that you can have so low IQ and still breath
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:41:04 2020 No.11688094 File: 215 KB, 800x2560, yes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11688080Contradiction if its any number but 0
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:41:34 2020 No.11688096 this idiot doesn't know about l'hopitals rule
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:43:31 2020 No.11688102 >>11688096No i don't, care to explain? I specifically asked for NO LIMITS though. Can you disprove it via contradiction?>>11688090>>11688085You're clearly dumber if you can't refute my point and are just hurling insults because your too stupid to actually prove me wrong/
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:45:01 2020 No.11688106 >>11688086>A classic, "you are wrong because I am right"No idea what that means. I just stated an axiom that OP ignored.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:45:40 2020 No.11688107 >>11688106Care to prove that axiom?
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 02:57:55 2020 No.11688136 File: 126 KB, 1131x622, 1559436137406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] *ahem* let me introduce you to null numbers$\frac{1}{0} = n$$\frac{x}{0} = xn$Every "contradiction" that comes after this is pure distilled cope. This is objective reality.>b-but what's $n$ supposed to be then?what's $i$ supposed to be then?
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:00:46 2020 No.11688141 >>11688136You are a goon and a dumbfuck. i is the square root of negative 1, it has useful properties. What is 2*1/0? You literally showed jack shit, just put a random symbol to represent 1/0 that nothing supports. My proof doesn't even NEED 1/0
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:02:04 2020 No.11688144 >>11688141>What is 2*1/0? ummm bro hello it's $2n$?? 90 IQ post lol
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:05:09 2020 No.11688152 >>11688144So logically, (1/n)*n = 1 correct? And I assume 2n*0=2 yes?
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:06:28 2020 No.11688158 >>11688102no, and I'm not going to. you have a phone in your hands dumbass or better yet learn calc
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:07:24 2020 No.11688161 >>11688144based nullposting$sqrt{-4/0}=2i*n$
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:07:37 2020 No.11688163 >>11688158Apply it to what i am saying please
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 03:23:02 2020 No.11688193 >>11688163apply my balls down your throat please
 >> bump Tue May 19 03:24:20 2020 No.11688196 >>11688193No thank you
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 04:55:41 2020 No.11688348 >>11688141take your meds anon
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 15:20:48 2020 No.11689817 >>11688067Nothing divided by nothing is nothing.If one doughnut exists but no one takes it, one doughnut still exists.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 15:41:17 2020 No.11689904 >>11688107>proving an axiomYou are either a non-STEM undergrad or never visited a university apart from getting shit faced with your cousin phil and his trashy gf
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 20:09:41 2020 No.11690863 >>11688067assume 1/0=0=0/0, 1/0=0/0, 1=0
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 20:29:35 2020 No.11690911 >>11688067This is why everyone thinks math majors are space spergs
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 20:30:50 2020 No.11690915 >>11688067>Can you prove otherwiseIt's literally trivially easy.0/0 = 01/0 = 01 = 0Oops! We have a problem! Both can't be true.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 20:51:11 2020 No.11690975 >>11690863>>11690915You can't just substitute them nigs because they are both undefined.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 20:56:57 2020 No.11690999 >>11688067>Can you prove otherwise without using limits or derailing the conversation by saying something about rings or wheels?If you think 1/0 equals 0, you probably have down syndrome. Whatever 1/0 is, it's obviously bigger than 1/1
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 21:01:09 2020 No.11691019 File: 56 KB, 427x431, Makise Kurisu 6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11688067Please don't post my wife ever again.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 21:09:36 2020 No.11691047   File: 49 KB, 360x240, 240_F_296775109_oTQ6qJtDfpL18PcRdLCNweWHxfSfnNBS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11688067The /sci/ server link is https://discord.gg/uQr9PQWe will interview Bill Nye this week, join.
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 21:13:54 2020 No.11691063 >>11690975op said prove by contradiction so we can assume the given statement..
 >> Anonymous Tue May 19 21:47:35 2020 No.11691129 File: 3 KB, 238x380, 1385145691899.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 10:48:17 2020 No.11692626 >>11688067zero (0) is shorthand for minus one (.000...1) infinity definition
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 17:53:32 2020 No.11694210 >>11688076not really. 0/0 = 0 in $S^{-1}A$ being the quotient ring where $A,S = (0)$
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 18:05:03 2020 No.11694238 >>11688094By saying 0/0 = (1/0)*0, you're implying that 1/0 is defined, which it isn't.
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 18:07:36 2020 No.11694248 >>11688067>Can you prove otherwise without using limits"can you prove me wrong without using the key concept that makes me wrong?"
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 19:35:40 2020 No.11694504 >>11690911I can assure you that OP is not a math major, in fact I doubt he's even passed middle school.
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 20:02:09 2020 No.11694591 >>11694238>OP says 1/0 = 0>Use basic multiplication to show that can't be true>Nuh-uh, you can't do basic multiplication to it, because it's undefined>BECAUSE IT'S UNDEFINED>Somehow this means it might NOT be undefined?????
 >> Anonymous Wed May 20 20:06:53 2020 No.11694599 >>11694591The post I replied to wasn't disproving 1/0=0. They were trying to prove 0/0=0, by assuming 1/0 is defined in the process.
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 07:15:15 2020 No.11696253 >>11688067a * 1/a = 1, but0 * 1/0 != 1disproved
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 09:51:18 2020 No.11696607 File: 84 KB, 1344x1506, Capture+_2020-05-21-09-50-32.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] It's clearly undefined
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 09:59:23 2020 No.11696624 File: 75 KB, 1344x1506, capt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11696607look again
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 10:15:05 2020 No.11696660 >>11691019Thank you for defending out Scifu Waifu
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 10:37:46 2020 No.11696705 >>11688067Yeah just graph it retard
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 11:17:57 2020 No.11696819 >>11696607actually that looks like it's clearly defined at inftynow plot 0/x
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 12:15:09 2020 No.11696968 File: 47 KB, 1184x930, Screenshot_2020-05-21 Desmos Graphing Calculator.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>116968191/inf ==! 1/0 are you retarded?Of course 1/inf is defined. Its 0. y=0/x Is just a straight line. Y=0 when x=0
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 12:26:33 2020 No.11697007 File: 33 KB, 492x500, 1589438764262.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11688067Why can't I prove it using limits? How is that valid? It's like asking me to prove that 1+1=2 without using addition. Also, don't ever post my wife again, brainlet.
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 16:32:46 2020 No.11697877 >>11697007you need to disprove it without resorting to using aparatus which can disprove it. that's the game.
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 16:36:27 2020 No.11697891 >>11697877Well its graphed above, which proves it. Although graphing is just a visualized limit.
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 17:22:20 2020 No.11698025 There is nothing to disprove. Its all a childish fantasy. Zero does not exist and has no place in mathematics. One might as well ask "What is 1 divided by Unicorn? Its nonsense.Yes, just nonsense. And one day we of the true faith will EXPUNGE that GOD CURSED nonsense from the textbooks. WITH OUR SWORDS! WE MARCH! IN THE NAME OF GOD! WE MARCH!DEUS VULT! DEUS VULT! DEUS VULT!
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 17:25:16 2020 No.11698035 >>11698025You are also a brainlet. The number 0 revolutionized mathematics.
 >> Anonymous Thu May 21 20:23:19 2020 No.11698597 >>11688067*Defines the symbols 0/0 & 1/0. Disprove these definitions.* You have to give assertions. All you've done is define symbols. It's like arguing about the definition of a made up word.
 >> Anonymous Fri May 22 03:38:12 2020 No.11699559 >>11698597OP's assertion is that this definition is consistent with the rest of math if you ignore all the instances where it's not consistent with the rest of math. it's not wrong, but it's also completely retarded.
>>