/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11685849]

sci why are women so bad at math and science? do you think its because they have small brains or do you think a slight case of microcephaly is an asset to a scientist?

[Anonymous No.11685863]

>>11685849
my fave excuse is the one where they say it's just preference, like why would they bother doing stem when they can just shake their butts for simp betabux. as if their incompetence and privilege can't both be true.

[Anonymous No.11686906]

>women in science

[Anonymous No.11686997]

logic is just something that we dont have

[Anonymous No.11687359]

>that early 20s peak
fuck aging desu

[Anonymous No.11687379]

>>11685849
Women are smaller, hence smaller brain size. It's the same between, for example, races or species. As far as I'm aware, weight is NOT a predictor of intelligence in modernity (though I believe cranial volume has lead to large jumps, evolutionarily, which makes it an interesting investigation overall).

[Anonymous No.11687392]

>>11687359
no its the maximum of the hibernation period where the brain maximizes its volume to best enable the optimization period which increases neural density, decreases volume, and reduces the number of neural connections required to elicit a certain response over the 2nd half of its operable lifespan in preparation for the inevitable network abstractions that begin to occur (in the early twenties you finally "get" poetry) before the organism transitions to higher order recursive abstractions as networks previously disparate become progressively more recursive tending towards a single unified consciousness composed of a perfectly optomized system with the minimum necessary elements required to generate a qualitatively self containing unitarianaly-multiplicitous infinity in real time

[Anonymous No.11687788]

>>11685849
Theyr not. Men and women aptitude for mathematics is largely the same on average.

Men do, however, represent the greatest share of outliers -- both above and below the curve.
So there is a greater variation of geniuses and imbeciles among men, whereas women are more consistently average.

Maybe read up on these topics beforehand instead of just pulling an edgy opinion out of nowhere. It's not like there aren't sources that will support you.

[Anonymous No.11687814]

>>11687788
Open bobs

[Anonymous No.11687967]

>>11687379
Yeah but that doesn't explain why on average women have 22.5% less neocortical neurons.

[Anonymous No.11687981]

>>11687788
>So there is a greater variation of geniuses and imbeciles among men,
That's not true. You are parroting what some of the normies say about that bell curve study, that was done on girls who were more mature (thus they scored a bit higher because males go into puberty later) then boys. They were the same age (13 years old). Yet males still blew the women out of the water during that famous biased study. Truth is, men aren't more retarded or imbecile. They genuinly have a few IQ points more on average than women.

[Anonymous No.11687987]

>>11687788
Actually now that I've read your post for the second time, I'm realizing how much of a cancer cringe normie you are. Go back. Women are worse at science and math because of several factors. They are also less ambitious because they simply don't have the hormones men have.

[Anonymous No.11688428]

>>11685849
It's because of the patriarchy

[Anonymous No.11688513]

>>11685849

They don't have the same environmental motivation that men are forced to have. A woman can find a man that at least partially mantains her, a man must work in technical fields and work good or he starves to death.

[Anonymous No.11689984]

>>11687392
>muh environmental origin of intelligence
How do you explain niggers?

[Anonymous No.11689992]

>>11685849
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

[Anonymous No.11690002]

>>11687392
Also is this why non-science minded socially adapted normalfags turn into NPC's? They've just internalised and optimised the programming such that they skip the reasoning step and go straight to dogma? I wonder if this evolved due to the dark ages where people were burned for disagreeing with the village psychopaths.

[Anonymous No.11690162]

>>11689984
they're the beta release

[Anonymous No.11690178]

>>11689984
To be fair they constantly live in terrible messed up places.

[Anonymous No.11690230]

>>11690178
Now that's a chicken or egg argument if I ever did see one. In this case black people and poverty

[Anonymous No.11690242]

>>11690230
Yeah fair point because we started our own slavery and now we say it was wyhte boi. If you work hard you can get anywhere these days. It obviously is harder if you grew up in a shit place with no education but you can still do things that allow you to skirt by. Racism is a dumb caveman mindset that boils down to “he different color, all his people bad.” When there are obvious exceptions.

[Anonymous No.11690259]

>>11688428

[Anonymous No.11690277]

>>11690242
racism is science, you dont construct a predictive model with exceptions

[Anonymous No.11690279]

>>11690259
>onions poster can’t see an obvious joke
Kys

[Anonymous No.11690296]

>>11690277
Still doesn’t mean every member of it is x thing. I have a shit ton of white friends because they’re just more based then the black people I’ve interacted with. You can’t just judge off the drop of a hat. Say the world gets flipped over and blacks are in charge and whites are the dumb niggers of the world. If a black person judged you off the drop of a hat at a job simply because of your skin that’s pretty retarded because you have multiple qualities and skills that could make you great at this job. In certain cases sure, but this mindset is dumb. And besides, if they’re this bad, rather than being racist just teach them about your ideologies and teach them in subjects you’re good at. Teaching is the best way to help with the problem you have.

[Anonymous No.11690303]

>>11685849
they arent

[Anonymous No.11690449]

>>11690296
>What is a bell curve
We're talking averages here my dude, it has nothing to do with whites in particular. I just like to shit on blacks because i'm a dick and like pointing out inconvenient facts.

[Anonymous No.11690656]

>>11690449
Ah ok

[Anonymous No.11690692]

>>11690449
That’s the point, you should treat people as individuals rather than statistical exemplars of whatever group they happen to share a particular trait with.

[Anonymous No.11690703]

>>11690692
Who says I don't, I believe people should be IQ tested as part of a job interview and/or hired on merit. But blacks still have the lowest IQ of any race barring pygmy's and aboriginals.

[Anonymous No.11691234]

Everyone is bad at math and science.

[Anonymous No.11691261]

fixed that for you, OP. nobody should care about the brain weight of a 0 year old

[Anonymous No.11691267]

or adjusted to only show working age population

[Anonymous No.11691279]

>>11691261
or adjusted to only show working age population