[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.68 MB, 1179x897, rk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670130 No.11670130 [Reply] [Original]

What does /sci/ know about r/k evolutionary selection? Will the r's destroy the west before the k's can correct or balance the situation? Very interesting dynamics with numerous factors (sine wave/yin yang dynamics). I know most here are borderline retarded but let's see if we can have a high IQ thread on this topic and its implication in numerous aspects of society/civilization.

Great interview with Matt Forney for those who don't about the topic to get started:
https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/matt-forney-r-k-selection-theory-the-evolutionary-psychology-behind-politics-hour-1_kqCjAYRbgbDrXMy.html

>> No.11670177

>>11670130
>>/pol/

>> No.11670210
File: 270 KB, 450x360, texan2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670210

>>11670177
>evolution is politics not science

>> No.11670300
File: 761 KB, 1280x2096, leftists don't breed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670300

>>11670130
>liberals are r-selected
You're retarded. Liberals are hardly breeding at all.

>> No.11670318

>>11670210
>implying you wrote about evolutionary theory

>> No.11670337

>>11670130
Your species don't change because of your ideology. Moron.

>> No.11670343

>>11670130
I'm all for this discussion but your image is a really poor representation of r/k. Conservatives are the group with the highest birthrate in America

>> No.11670560

>>11670130
Last time I exhausted the 40 seconds of mental energy it takes to start and stop caring about r/k selection I'm pretty sure I read in wikipedia that it's been replaced by other theories and it was never much more than a general trend that had exceptions...

>> No.11670570
File: 80 KB, 1000x900, dysgenics?.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11670570

>>11670130
>K-selected
>conservatives
>quality over quantity
I'm not saying conservatives are subhuman but really the creator the OP image definitely is retarded
or false flagging

>> No.11670628

>>11670343
I just jewgled r/k and it was the first one to pop stop being so autistic ffs. Also the birth rate changes with circumstance and who is doing what has nothing to do with overall evolutionary strategy dim wit, have you not seen the opening to idiocracy? I actually already explained this to this moron >>11670300 but he is obviously stupid af and can't seem to catch on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N9nVLXMhPc

>> No.11671889
File: 86 KB, 1280x1001, model-breeders-win.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11671889

>>11670628
>Also the birth rate changes with circumstance and who is doing what has nothing to do with overall evolutionary strategy
Who is doing what has a lot to do with evolutionary strategy.

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/where-do-babies-come-from/

>> No.11671902

>>11670130
it isnt science