[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 118 KB, 1200x959, 1200px-Active_Noise_Reduction.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11662820 No.11662820 [Reply] [Original]

Is there any way to record a specific sound, get an inverse wave of that sound and cancel that sound?

>> No.11662828

>>11662820
Yes. Take two speakers one in front of you and one behind you and just change the phase till you hear nothing

>> No.11662836

>>11662828
what if I wanted to cancel the noise from the air conditioner.
Is there a software to record the air conditioner noise and make anti noise?

>> No.11662840

>>11662836
Wear noise canceling headphones it will do the job better then your hack.

>> No.11662846

>>11662840
Why?

>> No.11662859

>>11662820
yeah its called noise cancelling

>> No.11662867

>>11662836
why dont you just record the sound of your
air conditioner and flip it using audacity

>> No.11662871

>>11662820
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk1swhjARbk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysNkjEnoRsU
It's not sound, but the theory is pretty much identical in theory.

>> No.11662885

>>11662867
I've just recorded some sound on audacity and clicked on inverse and it sounded the same.

>> No.11662887

>>11662885
>I've just recorded some sound on audacity and clicked on inverse and it sounded the same.
No shit, inverting it is just the same as adding a 90 Degree phase shift, doesn't mean it wont cancel lul

>> No.11662917

>>11662820
Yes. Considering you could google a suitable picture (or did you draw it tourself) you know that it does exist. So tell me, why are you asking?

>> No.11662922

>>11662871
OP.
This is exactly what you need to understand what you're doing right here.
You need to produce waves that cancel out at 180degrees (so opposite waves).
Waves = sound.

i.e. if I have a positive peak of a wave that goes to +1, you would need a wave that goes to -1 to cancel out that wave.
Different instruments or sounds are at different frequencies, so you can cancel out a specific sound at a frequency if you know the negative inverse.

>> No.11662936
File: 19 KB, 1184x514, dongs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11662936

>>11662922

>> No.11662939

>>11662885
fucking idiot

>> No.11663011

>>11662820
This is how noise cancelling headphones work, they have microphones that are on the outside of the headphones. Then, after the sound wave is picked up by the microphone but before it gets all the way to your eardrum, the headphones process the inverse and inject it into your audio at the perfect moment to try and have both waves enter your ear at the same time and cancel.

>> No.11663263

>>11663011
no, this is how high schoolers think they work and what their marketing hopes people will think too.
here's a hint for you to try to figure out why what you've suggested won't work: noise in engineering does not mean the same thing as sound

>> No.11663283

>>11662828
Why can't this be done with jet engines? Have one engine produce the opposite sound to the second engine. Or any loud noise environment.

>> No.11663286

>>11662885
you have to put the speakers behind you, dum dum

>> No.11663290

>>11663283
It only works in a single spot since sound bounces and shit so it wouldn’t do anything

>> No.11663371

>>11663290
Ok, so why don't the airlines use a noise cancelling device within the cabin rather than me having to wear an irritating noise cancelling headphone?

>> No.11663375

>>11663290
If you cruising at 30 000 feet isn`t that like being in one spot anyway. Air is air wherever you are at that height.

>> No.11663378

>>11663375
Doesn't understand superposition

>> No.11663414

>>11662887
Phase shift isn't the same as inverting. A phase shift is more of a delay.
If the wave is 100% symmetrical, a 180 degree horizontal phase shift will cancel it out. Otherwise an inversion and summation is needed for perfect cancellation.

>> No.11663440

>>11663414
Don't give him the answer ffs.
He needs to work it out himself.

>> No.11663507

>>11662846
Because you're trying to reinvent the wheel, thats what noise canceling headphones do. They record sound coming in and use destructive interference to cancel the noise.
You could also try a white noise generator.

>> No.11663652

>>11663371
The cabin is not a single spot. It's made of many different materials vibrating.

>> No.11664019

>>11663263
Idiot.

>> No.11664153

>>11662820
DAW's can do that easily.
Even the most basic ones like Audacity

>> No.11664159

>>11662885
You need to have two channels with the same wave
Select just one of them and reverse it.

Otherwise you'd be just inverting, and cancelling the wave

>> No.11664162

>>11664159
*Not cancelling...

>> No.11665446

you just described active noise cancellation, which many headphones have, so yes, it is possible.

>> No.11665461

Do the air molecules literally collide?
Can you cancel a water wave by generating an antiwave? Like from a tsunami?

>> No.11665880

>>11664019
wow good argument. look up the actual mechanism

>> No.11665937

>>11665880
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_noise_control
>wow good argument. look up the actual mechanism

>> No.11666114

>>11663652
Also you want to make the plane itself as light as possible so you can pack as much onboard per flight as possible. A commercial plane is aluminum foil over a light skeleton so you can carry 30 more people. It's just easier to give people headphones and earplugs.

>> No.11666727

>>11662820
>Is there any way to record a specific sound, get an inverse wave of that sound and cancel that sound?
Theoretically yes, practically, you can come pretty close to cancelling a sound from one speaking using another one at a specific point in space from both speakers.

>> No.11666738

>>11665461
>Do the air molecules literally collide?
no really. usually you assume they don't interact with each other at all
>cancel water wave
sure

>> No.11666807

>>11665461
>Do the air molecules literally collide?
yes

>Can you cancel a water wave by generating an antiwave? Like from a tsunami?
destructive interference works on pressure waves in water too, so yeah, in theory

>> No.11666813

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform

>> No.11666822

>>11666807
>yes
"no"

>> No.11666826

if you did it realtime you would be limited on the buffer size and maybe it won't work
but in digital land you'd take a copy of your source buffer, reverse the ordering of the samples in the copy, then subtract the copy from the source buffer.
then output that result.

I don't think this will do what you want tho

>> No.11667695

try to suspend the unit in the air away from solid surfaces and attachments and put pillows or something on any suitable faces without vents etc.
also break up your space with room dividers to change the shape and therefore the acoustic properties, if it is like a cube or double cube as these resonate more

>> No.11667718

>>11662828
This is not going to work because of reflections in the room. If you want two speakers to cancel out, you would need a studio. Also, the two speakers need to be connected to the exact same source or else their frequencies might be off from one another.

>> No.11667722
File: 1.63 MB, 800x392, z8jg89jz.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11667722

>> No.11667754

>>11667722
checked
water be blessed