/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11632763]

I F*CKING LOVE SCIENCE

[Anonymous No.11632809]

What's wrong with loving science?

[Anonymous No.11632824]

>>11632809
Don't be an obnoxious faggot about it

[Anonymous No.11632827]

Me too!

[Anonymous No.11632828]

>>11632824
>faggot
why the homophobia?

[Anonymous No.11632833]

>>11632828
Good question.

[Anonymous No.11632839]

>>11632828

[Anonymous No.11632854]

>>11632828
Why the faggotry?

[Anonymous No.11632930]

>>11632828
what's wrong with saying faggot?

[Anonymous No.11632978]

>>11632763
Don't you?

[Anonymous No.11633045]

Type theory

[Anonymous No.11633053]

>>11632828
you are, indeed, a faggot

[Anonymous No.11633071]

>>11632978
Of course not. I put up with it because I need a job.

[Anonymous No.11633113]

>>11633071
Then maybe this isn't the board for you?

[Anonymous No.11633134]

>>11633113
>gatekeeping 4chan boards

[Anonymous No.11633151]

>>11632763
ME TOO!

[Anonymous No.11633165]

>>11632763
I don’t like the Microsoft

[Anonymous No.11633166]

>>11632763
>I only love science that affirms my beliefs, anything that actually challenges my worldview is heresy

[Anonymous No.11633196]

>>11633151
She never claimed she was sexually assaulted

[Anonymous No.11633238]

>>11633166
just once i wish one of you woke posters would be referring to something other than how much you hate niggers.

[Anonymous No.11633259]

>>11632763

[Anonymous No.11633278]

>>11633259

[Anonymous No.11633298]

>>11633278
>verbal intelligence
LMAO that is worse than "eq"

[Anonymous No.11633980]

>>11633278
>Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups. In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status. Our results suggest that cognitive abilities play a critical, albeit underappreciated, role in prejudice. Consequently, we recommend a heightened focus on cognitive ability in research on prejudice and a better integration of cognitive ability into prejudice models.
>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797611421206?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed

and this study actually uses g not "verbal intelligence"

[Anonymous No.11633983]

>>11633278
>https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-carl.pdf
my favorite thing about this image is the actual title of the paper,
>Verbal intelligence is correlated with socially and economically liberal beliefs

would you describe yourself as socially liberal?

[Anonymous No.11633991]

>>11632763
Ah, good, old fashioned anti-intellectualism

[Anonymous No.11634001]

>>11633278
>https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-carl.pdf
>The primary measure of intelligence available in the GSS is a 10-word vocabulary test in which the respondent is asked to identify which of five phrases supplies the correct definition of a given word

>science

[Anonymous No.11634112]

>>11633278
Jesus Christ what a cope

[Anonymous No.11634126]

>>11633980
>>11633983
get a load of this samefag

[Anonymous No.11634329]

>>11634126
I'm guessing from this response and the study referenced you would describe yourself as very socially conservative.

[Anonymous No.11634341]

>>11632763