/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11631535]

I don't get it.
how am I as a black person holding back and interrupting the world from achieving sóyspace travel? What a disappointment, I thought this board would be less braindead

[Anonymous No.11631566]

>>11631535
Honestly, I think it's due to the IQ arguments, and the crime arguments as well.

[Anonymous No.11631576]

>>11631535
>how am I as a black person holding back and interrupting the world from achieving sóyspace travel?

A single black person is not a big problem ... But MILLIONS of black people are always a HUGE problem ...

[Anonymous No.11631582]

>>11631535
How much did the American civil war set back the American people
Surely decades. The hundreds of casualties. Instead of working, people spent years grabbing guns and killing one another.

[Anonymous No.11631585]

>>11631535

[Anonymous No.11631587]

>>11631535

[Anonymous No.11631596]

>>11631535
There were two great crusades for white people in the late 20th century. The WW2 generation went for the Moon and the Boomer hippies went after World Hunger.

‘That money should be spent on Africa’ was a meme and alot if space news is kept low key as possible even still. A cursory google suggests Africa recieves 133billion a year from the US tax payer while NASA recieves 19Billion and the nonclassified US military space budget is around 22 billion.

Without African aid alone the sciences could be funded higher by a power of 5 at least. Now factor in welfare spending.

[Anonymous No.11631785]

>>11631596
Well, I’m sorry but this continuing notion that WE are responsible for the billions of dollars of aid being sent to Africa has always been principally asinine.

I’m also of African descent and firmly believe that meddling with Darwinism was the biggest mistake that the west had made. Just stop blaming the black anons who browse this site for it. We are literally just one person in the midst of powerful elites.

[Anonymous No.11631814]

>>11631785
>Just stop blaming the black anons who browse this site for it
Who did ?

[Anonymous No.11631832]

>>11631785
Nobody blamed you personally. You yourself took that as an affront.

[Anonymous No.11631850]

>>11631535
>how am I as a black person holding back and interrupting the world from achieving sóyspace travel?
you personally killed a /sci thread making this shitpost, what if that denied the next Einstein some crucial idea that would lead to space travel. You might has well have burned the Library of Alexandria.

[Anonymous No.11631873]

>>11631785
The majority of those opposed to foreign aid and non-white immigration don't really blame blacks. They're taking what they can from exploitable people, taking care of their own interests... It's natural. I blame feminism, liberalism, jews and traitorous elites.

That said, you must appreciate that proportionally few non-whites in the West would share your apparently reasonable views (at least not publicly). Most are totally on board with subverting whitey and will hold that line until they've taken everything they can from us.

[Anonymous No.11632003]

>>11631596
>Without African aid alone the sciences could be funded higher by a power of 5 at least

[Anonymous No.11632096]

>>11631535
Space is black, white people should stay away.
Bad things happen when they don't.

[Anonymous No.11632112]

>>11632096
>Space is black, white people should stay away.
True, and black people should be sent there.

Bad things happen when they're here.

[Anonymous No.11632140]

>>11631596
>Without African aid alone the sciences could be funded higher by a power of 5 at least. Now factor in welfare spending.
Foreign aid is a diplomatic tool that allows us to extract trillions in resources. It is an overwhelming net benefit to society. We cannot function without securing our vassal states.

[Anonymous No.11632280]

>>11632140
>trillions in resources
Such as?

[Anonymous No.11632383]

>>11632140
According to a 2017 study, described as “The most detailed study so far of Chinese aid,” by AidData, between 2000 and 2014 China gave about $75 billion, and lent about $275 billion — compared to $424 billion given by America during the same period.[5] A fifth of this Chinese aid, $75 billion, was in the form of grants (about equivalent to Britain’s), while the rest was concessional lending at below-market interest rates.[5]

Seems like China found a way to extract resources from Africa for much cheaper.

[Anonymous No.11632398]

>>11631576
Jews imported and owned most if not all of them

[Anonymous No.11632416]

>>11631582
How many centuries forward did the black slaves bring the US? If it weren't for blacks, we'd be set back at least 100 - 200 years.
Also, the civil war was started by retarded whitoids, not blacks, you dumb cunt.

[Anonymous No.11632420]

>>11631535
https://youtu.be/goh2x_G0ct4

[Anonymous No.11632428]

>>11631535
Someone post the IQ and crime stat

[Anonymous No.11632432]

>>11631535
>What a disappointment, I thought this board would be less braindead
are you implying that the collective conscience called /sci/ thinks that black people are holding back and interrupting something?

[Anonymous No.11632443]

>>11632416
>Having niggers set the US forward
Bwhahahaha

Nope, industrialization begun in the North. The South was a shithole well until the 1930s and had to be dragged into the 20th century kicking and screaming.

Want to see the benefits of importing millions of blacks? Look no further than Detroit and Brazil.

[Anonymous No.11632450]

We are wasting resources (economic, political, or simply brainpower) on dealing with the negatives caused by inferior races instead of using them for advancing space travel or science/tech in general.

[Anonymous No.11632452]

>>11632443
Retard, where do you think the north got their resources for industrialization?
You can have all the machines you want, you can't make anything if you don't have resources.

[Anonymous No.11632466]

>>11632452
Hasn't stopped Japan. The Netherlands. Or the UK. Resources are easy to acquire from elsewhere. Particularly when the resource in question is labour, Europe was full of emigrants in the 1800s.

No nogs = Higher agricultural wages = More immigrants

[Anonymous No.11632472]

>>11632140
That's a myth. Africa is potentially a major source of oil and rare earths, but remains relatively untapped. Natural diamonds aren't important anymore. If foreign aid to Africa is an investment, the ROI is extremely shitty (and the Chinese are going to poach it). You no clue what you're talking about but lie through your teeth anyways... People like you are an overwhelming net negative to society.

[Anonymous No.11632490]

>>11632428

[Anonymous No.11632491]

>>11632466
>the UK
Directly benefited from it.
>Japan and the Netherlands
Developed after the US and the UK had established a lot of this technology.
>Resources are easy to acquire from elsewhere.
You're literally now just arguing what ifs. Sure, hindsight is twenty-twenty. The fact of the matter is, you have blacks to thank for us being in this century and not the 1800s.

[Anonymous No.11632514]

>>11632491
>Abolitionist UK benefitted from slavery
>The Netherlands developed after the US
>"Why are you arguing with hindsight about whether past event was good or not???"
>It is the merit of black laborers that whites developed industrial technology
The retardation is too much to bear. You are just proving those IQ charts correct, Jamal.

[Anonymous No.11632520]

>>11631566
participation in inventions aswell, behaviour, logics, also art and writing.

[Anonymous No.11632539]

>>11632491
I'm sure some people got rich off of tobacco, sugar cane and cotton, but these things weren't crucial to the technological advancement of civilization. You're nuts.

[Anonymous No.11632541]

>>11632514
>Not an argument
>"Why are you arguing with hindsight about whether past event was good or not???"
Strawman. The conversation has nothing to do with whether or not a past event was good. Everyone who isn't thoroughly inbred believes slavery is bad.
>It is the merit of black laborers that whites developed industrial technology
Strawman again. I never said that. Learn to read, Cletus.
>The Netherlands developed after the US
Intentional misinterpretation of an arbitrary term.
>Abolitionist UK benefitted from slavery
Ever heard of importing goods, dumb-dumb?

[Anonymous No.11632553]

>>11631582
>How much did the American civil war set back the American people
....
The South (and I don't mean just naggers, ALL the South) hasn't recuperated economically since the civil war. Reconstruction was a failed meme.

[Anonymous No.11632554]

>>11632398
[Citation needed]

[Anonymous No.11632557]

>>11632539
It feeds the economy, and allows more people to not spend 16 hours a day farming. This results in a cascade of inventions leading to more and more automation.
Your statement is like saying that economics is useless, because besides making some people rich, it provides nothing tangible to society.

[Anonymous No.11632608]

>>11632541
>I didn't say that hurrr durrr
Yes you did.

You said that the Netherlands developed after the US (it didn't, industrialization begun earlier in the Netherlands), that the UK benefitted from American slavery (the UK was the leading advocate for abolitionism in the 19th century), and you tried to disqualify my arguments about history by saying "they use hindsight" (no shit Sherlock).

You have no point at all, you are just mindlessly arguing like a drone because you can't cope with the fact that shipping blacks over was a net negative to America.

[Anonymous No.11632610]

>>11632557
See >>11632443
The south were not the forerunners of industrialization, and the north did not rely upon the south for food. Furthermore, slaves need to be bought and fed — they were not magical money-trees. The use of slaves did not achieve the kind of leverage that you imply. We're also not talking about some ancient civilization that didn't have specialization of labour before slaves came along.

You're pushing a transparently false narrative.

[Anonymous No.11632616]

>>11631566
Africa has received aid that equals up to like 50 Marshal Plans and is still a shit hole with war, famine and disease. Black people have been nothing but a fucking sink hole for the entirety of humanity.

[Anonymous No.11632635]

>>11631785
No one is blaming you black anon dont take it personally. Obviously you are not part of the problem most people are speaking of trends/generality. It is mostly the Jews that are the problem they just use low IQ nogs as a weapon. People don't want problems solved, there is no money in solving problems, there is money in creating problems and getting the clueless masses to throw money at what you try and convince them is the cause and censoring people telling the real cause. This is what Jews do create problems they can profit off of.

[Anonymous No.11632650]

>>11632608
Like I said, learn to read, Cletus.
>>11632610
The north initially did have slaves. Also, I didn't say anything about the north relying on the south for food?
Buying and feeding slaves is significantly cheaper than the alternative.
>We're also not talking about some ancient civilization that didn't have specialization of labour before slaves came along.
What do you mean "before slaves came along"
Slavery existed thousands of years ago; America didn't invent it. It was used for a reason, and the only reason it was ever abolished was because industrialization caused it to become redundant.

[Anonymous No.11632664]

>>11632491
>you have blacks to thank for us being in this century and not the 1800s.
Dumbest thing I ever read, wow

[Anonymous No.11632666]

>>11632664
Seethe more about it, asshole.

[Anonymous No.11632670]

>>11632635
>This is what Jews do create problems they can profit off of.
at every one else's expense I forgot to add

[Anonymous No.11632681]

>This is what Jews do create problems they can profit off of.
at every one else's expense I forgot to add

[Anonymous No.11632683]

>>11631535
Let me suggest a more fundamental reason.

Modern politicians and elites push ill-considered authoritarian agendas on its population by using mass media narratives that suppress with arguments which can be boiled down to childishly calling anything in opposition "racism". For example many effective policies that used to considered left wing and progressive are now against this new agenda which the elite wants to push for obvious reasons (direct democracies, limits on immigration to allow for wage growth, equal opportunity, racial equality (as opposed to equity), free markets and individualism).

Any intelligent individual responds to this narrative by becoming simply becoming racist so that the argument becomes ineffective.

The normalization of racism will save the world. Everyone should become racist (most people already are anyway).

[Anonymous No.11632736]

>>11631535
>how am I as a black person holding back and interrupting the world from achieving sóyspace travel?
It's just Dolchstoßlegende for fascistic techno geeks for why their fantasies have failed to come true.
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/08/space-cadets.html

[Anonymous No.11632836]

>>11632650
I mean that farmers had been feeding non-farmers long before the U.S. existed. Yes, slavery had been around in Europe, but mostly in the form of indentured servants (whites). Slaves were never so cheap and abundant that their labour liberated a significant proportion of whites from agricultural labour, and it can just as easily be argued that their presence stifled industrial adoption (we already know the inventions came from elsewhere) due to inertia and masking of necessity.

Your argument that African slaves were a crucial springboard for advancement doesn't hold up.

[Anonymous No.11632860]

>>11631535
One nigger is not a problem. Millions are.

[Anonymous No.11632867]

>>11632416
>How many centuries forward did the black slaves bring the US?

Please, tell me this is a bait.

[Anonymous No.11632874]

>>11631535

[Anonymous No.11632888]

>>11631535
You arent, but the bulk of your braindead race is since it is financially impossible to stop the problems you blacks cause in human civilizations.

[Anonymous No.11632924]

>>11632683
>Modern politicians and elites push ill-considered authoritarian agendas on its population by using mass media narratives that suppress with arguments which can be boiled down to childishly calling anything in opposition "racism".
>Any intelligent individual responds to this narrative by becoming simply becoming racist so that the argument becomes ineffective.
>The normalization of racism will save the world. Everyone should become racist (most people already are anyway).
Do "PC gone mad!" crowd also say that their "everything is communism!" shtick has made socialism popular?

[Anonymous No.11632948]

>>11631535
Because niggers lower the standards of education. Try to teach something to a class full of niggers.

[Anonymous No.11633054]

>>11631535
It's just retards who want to look at the billions of aid we've given to African and ignore the trillions we spent killing brown people in the M-E.

[Anonymous No.11633176]

>>11632948
what...the fuck

[Anonymous No.11633623]

>>11632948
Isn't the girl doing anything bad to that animal or is something missing me?

[Anonymous No.11634230]

>>11632836
It's not about where the inventions came from. The slaves provided the resources to give those inventions any use at all.

[Anonymous No.11634251]

>>11631535
Blacks in the US have an average IQ one full standard deviation below whites. Their average IQ is 85. And you know why it's even that high? Because US blacks are, on average, 20% white. Studies done on native African IQ shows it's somewhere around 70.

It's not anyone's fault. Just like it's not an Eskimo's fault that he's a stubby little barrel-person. It's just genetics.

[Anonymous No.11634263]

>>11631535

[Anonymous No.11634267]

>>11631535
You aren't. There's plenty of reasons we're not going to space anytime soon,but you're not one of them.

[Anonymous No.11634272]

[Anonymous No.11634275]

[Anonymous No.11634282]

[Anonymous No.11634286]

[Anonymous No.11634287]

>>11631535
What's up my nigger, I don't see too many fellow african americans here.

[Anonymous No.11634291]

[Anonymous No.11634298]

[Anonymous No.11634307]