/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11620015]

So what do you think the UFO was? Any ideas?

[Anonymous No.11620021]

>>11620015
aliens

[Anonymous No.11620031]

>>11620015
visitors

[Anonymous No.11620039]

>>11620021
I'd like to hear some rational hypothesis.
"It's aliens" is not a rational hypothesis. There's o reason to think that. There are literally millions of more likely explanations. If you don't understand that, Occam's razor... then you probably shouldn't be hanging out on /sci.

[Anonymous No.11620048]

>>11620039
the u stands for unidentified.

[Anonymous No.11620084]

>>11620039
here's one rational thought, the univers is so big that there is no way were alone

[Anonymous No.11620106]

Apologize

[Anonymous No.11620111]

>>11620015
aliens
>>11620039
cringe and bluepilled

[Anonymous No.11620196]

It's clearly the spirit of Kim Jong-Un.

Shouldn't have assumed that /sci/ would notice...
> UFO
> *UN*-identified Flying Object

[Anonymous No.11620210]

>>11620015
Whatever it is, its conventional human built craft/objects. Mick West pretty much debunks any notion of it being alien craft or some new sort of craft that breaks our understanding of physics.


>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7jcBGLIpus

[Anonymous No.11620289]

>>11620021
>>11620031
Its us from the future

[Anonymous No.11620299]

>>11620015
A electro-luminous image projected downward from a satellite to intimidate and distract potential enemy combatants.

[Anonymous No.11620306]

>>11620039
that's not how occam's razor works

[Anonymous No.11620339]

>>11620039
-hoax (false/edited footage, hacked equipment programmed to create the hoax realtime)
-Insane hidden off the books government tech(US or foreign). All the planes we see around are production fighter planes. It would be easy to hide and develop some prototype tech.

Either of these are much more realistic. Think about it, if the aliens can do it, so can we. Why would we assume that aliens can break the known laws of physics (speed of light) than assume the government has some advanced propulsion technique ? It's complete absurdity

[Anonymous No.11620342]

>>11620015
The US government has black projects that very few know about.
Good chance that's what it is.

Or a foreign country's black project.

[Anonymous No.11620375]

>>11620015
A bird.

[Anonymous No.11620380]

>>11620210
i was never more convinced that ayylmaoos are real than i am right now after watching this video

[Anonymous No.11620777]

>>11620015
Some kind of electronic warfare plane

[Anonymous No.11620789]

>>11620339
>Think about it, if the aliens can do it, so can we.
Why would you believe that? Look at how far technology has come in the past century.

[Anonymous No.11621596]

>>11620299
I like that one. Another human, non-exotic option would be a drone that accepts beamed power from a sub or carrier's nuclear reactor. For a carrier it could use pulses from AESA radar, from a sub it'd need some kind of dedicated antenna.
>something like this but much smaller and dedicated to electronic warfare instead of nuclear deterrence

[Anonymous No.11622957]

>>11620039
>on /sci.

[Anonymous No.11623092]

>>11621596
>stainless steel wire mesh tires
I love this. It can't have regular tires like any normal plane, it's gotta have SPECIAL tires.

[Anonymous No.11623235]

>>11620039
Occam's Razor? More like REDDIT'S RAZOR amirite /x/?

[Anonymous No.11623238]

>>11620084
Yes, and rationally, there is no real chance they are anywhere close enough to interact with us.

[Anonymous No.11623245]

>>11620015
black budget aircraft

[Anonymous No.11623247]

>>11620306
You don't need aliens to explain this, it's the more complicated explanation

The simpler explanation is this is IR glare from far away with a rotating lens flare

[Anonymous No.11623255]

Probably a flex on China to let em know we have shit they don't know about. Lest they try to heat things up.

[Anonymous No.11623269]

>>11620210
Neat

[Anonymous No.11623320]

>>11620210
This is probably the most lame effort to debunk ufo videos I've ever seen. He's not even trying so he's obviously trying to capitalize on the hype for a few views. Yeah, let's believe the opinion of a youtuber faggot instead of trained pilots & radar operators who saw the thing first hand with their eyes and/or specialized instrumental lmao

[Anonymous No.11623486]

>>11620015
about 35.0 pixels, at least.

[Anonymous No.11623517]

>>11623320
You're just appealing to authority when his evidence and methodology is right in front of you. If you think he's said something foolish you can just point that out.

And pilots aren't trained on forensic analysis of aircraft on FLIR footage, what everyone can see on the videos is what they saw. Radar is susceptible to electronic warfare and impossible maneuvers aren't to be taken at face value.

[Anonymous No.11623531]

>>11623517
So you are basically saying the pilots are deluded, their instruments failed and radar operators are also deluded and their instruments also failed, all at the same time, in three different occasions.

You tried so hard to be rational that you ended up sounding really retarded. Congrats.

[Anonymous No.11623557]

Perhaps glare or they're training us to believe a staged invasion.

[Anonymous No.11623574]

>>11620039
>le razor
Ok. Let's try it.
>mention anything man made
Nope. It's not that.
>Mention any natural phenomenon
Nope. None of those. Hmmmmm. I WONDER WHAT IT COULD BE? Do you have any suggestions?

[Anonymous No.11623826]

>>11620342


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg

Apparently the US government is also into time travel now. Anything but aliens, guys! It can be anything, but surely it can't be aliens.

>because hurr durr, aliens would do this and that (insert some bullshit, implying you know shit about how aliens would actually behave)

[Anonymous No.11623856]

>>11623557

holy shit, you are dumb

>guys we need to train the general population to believe in an alien invasion. How do we do this?
>okay, let's release a few grainy videos of objects moving fast
>yeah, that will do, surely this will convince people that the aliens are invading

Sometimes you read something so dumb on the internet, it actually makes you mad to be the same species as the one who wrote it.

[Anonymous No.11623862]

It's a glorified Navy/military recruitment ad and nothing more.

[Anonymous No.11623866]

>>11620015
advanced drone

[Anonymous No.11623878]

>>11620289
this

[Anonymous No.11623883]

>>11623862

You ever wonder why the world is boring as fuck?

Because people like you try their best to find the most boring explanation possible for everything and then claim that it is the most likely one.

[Anonymous No.11623888]

>>11620289
>>11623878

fucking time travel back to the past is now more likely than aliens

/sci/ really is the dumbest board here, isn't it? Maybe you guys should stick to what you are accustomed to - shitposting about IQ all day long.

[Anonymous No.11623889]

>>11620015
guys this is what the UK did with the iran shit, they got the royal family to do some drama or something and the people got distracted. the US is releasing this so people get distracted from the corona virus situation (it's probably still getting worse there). who cares if aliens exist or not, fuck em

[Anonymous No.11624039]

>>11623531
>So you are basically saying the pilots are deluded
This is easily proven since the pilot in the video says the object is rotating when it's the camera that's rotating. Are pilots infallible?

>their instruments failed
What instrument failure do you see?

>radar operators are also deluded
Which radar operators?

>their instruments also failed, all at the same time, in three different occasions.
It's not clear what you're referring to. The videos don't show radar.

>You tried so hard to be rational that you ended up sounding really retarded.
Says the guy who can't even respond to the analysis in the video.

[Anonymous No.11624052]

>>11623574
>Nope. It's not that.
Source?