[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 24 KB, 450x311, 126a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1161589 No.1161589 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11211.0

I'll just leave this here.

>> No.1161597

>Q: "Why doesn't water run off the Earth?"

>A: There is a vast "ice wall" that keeps the water where it is.

wat

>> No.1161604
File: 28 KB, 368x294, blackhole.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1161604

LOL@sillysuperstitions

>> No.1161605
File: 27 KB, 331x334, 127132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1161605

>Q : "Why is the North pole colder than the equator?"

>A: The sun circles over the equator, so the poles do not receive the same intensity of light.

>> No.1161609

>ice wall

lolwut

>> No.1161615

> The sun and moon, each 32 miles in diameter, rotate at a height of 3,000 miles above sea level

what is this i dont even

>> No.1161634

Q : "Why is the North pole colder than the equator?"

A: The sun circles over the equator, so the poles do not receive the same intensity of light.

>> No.1161635

>Q: "When traveling in a straight direction, you will always reach the same point on the globe from where you started. How can this happen if the world is flat?"

>A: You need to have evidence for this to be true.

OOOOOHHHHHHH

>> No.1161638

>>1161605
that works.

imagine holding a lightbulb over a table. The ends of the table furthest from the lightbulb would get the lowest intensity of light.


This would of course mean that the sun was much much smaller than the flat earth and much much closer than all scientific data suggests.

>> No.1161641
File: 15 KB, 250x250, 1264962626609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1161641

"Also, nobody has been to the edge of the Earth and lived; conditions on the Ice Wall get increasingly treacherous the further you get out, and navigation methods become unreliable that far south. It is also possible that the Conspiracy is guarding the edge to prevent people from getting too close to the truth."

>> No.1161661

wtf is this shit

>> No.1161666

what causes a person to believe such ridiculous bullshit?

>> No.1161673

Master trolls.

>> No.1161677

>implying this has not been exposed as a hoax/troll attempt years ago

>> No.1161679

It's common knowledge that the FES is just a gigantic troll.

Basically a bunch of scientists devised it as an experiment wherein they attempt to explain how scientific theories could be preserved while also assuming the earth is flat.

If you believe they're serious about anything they post there, then I'm sorry, but you just got trolled.

>> No.1161680

>>1161677
>Implying there is nobody on Earth stupid enough to believe it's true.

>> No.1161686

>>1161679
>implying the majority of people on site dont actually believe that flat earth theory shit

>> No.1161699

>>1161641

I never understood this... I mean... what would anyone gain by keeping the true form of the earth a secret...

>> No.1161701

I couldn't read it all, I got to about the bit where they claim there are no satalites and every goverment on earth is in a huge conspiricy to tell everyone the earth is round >.<

>> No.1161704

Its a huge joke - like the http://www.landoverbaptist.net/ site.

The individual sites even refer to eachother.

THEY ARE TROLLS!

>> No.1161708

Q: "If the Earth's acceleration is constant, wouldn't it be traveling faster than light eventually?"

A: The equations of Special Relativity prevent an object with mass from reaching or passing the speed of light.

They believe in special relativity, but they also believe the earth is flat...

Wow!

>> No.1161729
File: 7 KB, 279x267, 1274888646012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1161729

Q: "Why are other planets round, but not the Earth?"

A: The Earth is not one of the other planets. The Earth is special and unlike the other bodies in numerous ways.

>> No.1161740

>Q: "In the accelerating Earth models, how does one reach terminal velocity?"

>A: Once the acceleration of the object is equal to the acceleration of the Earth, the object reaches terminal velocity.

>> No.1161753

>Q: "How is it that the Earth does not have a gravitational pull, but stars and the moon do?"

>A: This argument is a non-sequitur. You might as well ask, "How is it that snakes do not have legs, but dogs and cats do?" Snakes are not dogs or cats. The Earth is not a star or the moon. It does not follow that each must have exactly the properties of the others, and no more.

Has to be a fucking troll

>> No.1161875

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=2620.msg22714#msg22714

LOL