[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 60 KB, 928x571, Race_IQ_Sketch_OrderFlipped.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11551588 No.11551588[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What % of the Black-White IQ gap is due to genetic differences?
Please source your response.

>> No.11551590
File: 122 KB, 960x423, IQ and civilizational advancement.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11551590

100%

>> No.11551616

>>11551588
>What % of the Black-White IQ gap is due to genetic differences?
>Please source your response.
100%, /pol/

>> No.11551681

>>11551590
>>11551616
Seriously though. Does anyone have a percentage estimate with some sound reasoning?

>> No.11551692

>>11551681
>>11551588
everyone is genetically different. define "race". also somebody please link that famous genetic clustering chart so i can get a good laugh
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_genetic_clustering#Controversy_of_genetic_clustering_and_associations_with_%22race%22
But of course once you have a low enough iq to strap into mr bone's race realist's wild ride, there's already no way off for you so no amount of evidence will change your mind

>> No.11551732

>>11551692
>define "race"
populations of people geographically separated that interbred and thus are genetically and physically distinguishable
https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/329/

>> No.11551735

>>11551588
There's genetic, but there's also nutrition/culture. African issue is primarily genetics. Asia/Whites issues is mix bag. Poor whites/Poor asians can have lower IQ simply due to lack of resources/nutrient rich food/etc.

>> No.11551753

>>11551735
Do you have a %?

>> No.11551780
File: 18 KB, 387x249, int.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11551780

>>11551753
There is no settled answer here. The best you can get is from a recent survey of expert opinions from intelligence researchers.

>> No.11551782

In Rushton & Jensen 2005, they suggest that default hypothesis should be 80% genetic, 20% environmental on the grounds that individual differences are explained by this model and that there is no reason to assume it's different between blacks and whites. You'd have to show that there are different sources of variance in one group or you'd have to treat both groups as subsets of the same population

>> No.11551785

>>11551780
I'd like to know on what basis they believe in a percentage range

>> No.11551787

>>11551753
There is no answer to this question as 'we' do not know nearly enough about genetics or the brain to answer it

>> No.11551801

>>11551782
That sounds reasonable

>> No.11551827

>>11551785
>0%
Obvious cognitive dissonance. Anyone trying to argue intelligence has absolutely no heritability in 2020 is either intentionally ignoring obvious evidence or completely retarded themselves.
>50%
Most likely effect range based on twin studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms (yes, they do exist, not all intelligence is polygenic) and genome wide studies.
>80%
I highly doubt these people.

>> No.11551891

>>11551801
>Furthermore, while a 50-80% heritability is not definitive evidence for that the measured IQ gap between Blacks and Whites is 50-80% genetically caused, hereditarians have argued that this makes the 50-80% genetic explanation the most probable "default hypothesis".[8][9][76][77][7]
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence:_The_genetics_or_not_debate#Heritability_and_the_.22default_hypothesis.22

>> No.11551899

>>11551732
>propaganda.org, it's a .org so you know it's legit
Please

>> No.11551911

>>11551782
The 20% environmental factors that determines one's IQ could be the cause of 100% of the observed racial gap. Learn more about how heritability works.

>> No.11551936

>>11551911
>could be
That's an empirical question. You have to prove that's the case