5G is BAAAAAD 4u

[Anonymous No.11547172]

1.07068735 cm is the wavelength of 5G spectrum which is enough to affect small insects, birds, bees and god knows what other organs/tissues inside us.
Maybe not for a few months, but over the years it will cause some kind of damage that we will only understand after 70 years. Why are we not stopping 5G? Internet doesn't need to be this fast at the risk it poses to us and our environment.

[Anonymous No.11547184]

Current mobile broadband signals are proven to have negative effects over time as well, in humans and other animals (e.g. bees). If anything, we're already fucked and 5G won't make much of aa difference.

[Anonymous No.11547185]

Niggaz don't give a fock niggah!

[Anonymous No.11547228]

>>11547184
This is what I suspect. But is there really proof? And I assume the amplitude of the waves matters more than their frequency.

[Anonymous No.11547237]

>>11547172
Why should I trust you OP when you clearly don't know how to use significant figures?

[Anonymous No.11547727]

>>11547228
>This paper is the first to report the absorbed RF electromagnetic power in four different types of insects as a function of frequency from 2GHz to 120GHz. A set of insect models was obtained using novel Micro-CT (computer tomography) imaging. These models were used for the first time in finite-difference time-domain electromagnetic simulations. All insects showed a dependence of the absorbed power on the frequency. All insects showed a general increase in absorbed RF power at and above 6GHz, in comparison to the absorbed RF power below 6GHz. Our simulations showed that a shift of 10% of the incident power density to frequencies above 6GHz would lead to an increase in absorbed power between 3–370%.
>Therefore, future wavelengths of the electromagnetic fields used for the wireless telecommunication systems will decrease and become comparable to the body size of insects and therefore, the absorption of RF-EMFs in insects is expected to increase. Absorption of RF energy was demonstrated in insects between 10–50GHz
>The absorbed power increases with increasing frequency from 2–6GHz for all insects under exposure at a constant incident power density or incident electric field strength of 1V/m. The absorbed power in the Locust, the largest studied insect, decreases slightly at the studied frequencies >6GHz, but remains higher than at 2 and 3GHz. The Western Honeybee shows an increase up to 12GHz, followed by a slight decrease up to 120GHz (Pabs remains more than 10×higher than<6GHz). The smaller Australian Stingless Bee shows an increase of P abs with frequency up to 60GHz and a slight decrease at 120GHz. The Pabs in the Beetle increases until 24GHz and slightly decreases at higher frequencies.
nature.com
/articles
/s41598-018-
22271-3

[Anonymous No.11547739]

>>11547172
Preach brotha! Upvoted

[Anonymous No.11547748]

>1.07068735 Cm IS tHE wAveLenGTH Of 5G sPeCTrum WHicH iS EnouGh to AFFEcT SMALl INSecTs, BIRDS, bEES and GOd knows WhaT OTHEr oRgaNs/tiSSUEs InsIdE uS.
mAyBe not For A FEw MonThs, buT ovER THe yEarS it wIll caUSE soMe kIND oF dAmAGe tHAt wE wIlL onLy UNdERsTAND aFTER 70 yEars. why ARe WE nOt SToPPiNg 5G? INTERneT dOesn't nEED To Be tHIS Fast At the RiSK IT POSES to US AnD Our enVIronMEnt.

[Anonymous No.11547758]

>>11547172
This
Humans are fucked now since they are known to have the physique of insects.

[Anonymous No.11548719]

>>11547758
Pushing even more insects into extinction doesn't sound sexy to you, but it's a prime candidate for extincting most life on earth, not just insects, and we should avoid it if we could though?

[Anonymous No.11548737]

>>11547727
>This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time due to an increase in body temperatures, from dielectric heating.

The article you're citing is making the same argument that every sane person in these threads has already mentioned. High intensity MMW will heat things up, but if that was happening to you because of 5G, you would physically feel it. The paper you've cited does not show any magical, exotic effects that would justify this constantly being shitposted on here.

[El Arcón No.11548743]

>>11547172
>1.07068735 cm is the wavelength of 5G spectrum which is enough to affect
Yeah, wow, it's short enough to make a piezoelectric antenna 25-50mm long that you can jam up someone's ass for the purposes of sexual torture and then call it Morgellon's disease.

[Anonymous No.11550381]

>>11548737
>if it doesn't have "exotic effects" unknown to physics it can't be harmful to insect populations
?