[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 151 KB, 500x497, 4639289860_e1ea3d150e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154151 No.1154151 [Reply] [Original]

NASA busted using fake stars in image

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2010/184/fake-starfield.htm

What else are they lying about?

>> No.1154170

>>1154151

Sure is reputable source here. I don't believe NASA would use such poor form when fabricating an image.

>> No.1154192

More looks like that guy did it himself. When I compare lets say Star A to Star A' it has a difference in brightness.

>> No.1154209

What a load of shit. If they really had to cover something up why didn't they just paint over it in black? IT'S FUCKIN SPACE GUYS

>> No.1154210

>What else are they lying about?
Keep asking questions like that and you'll find yourself decapitated in some dark alley.

>> No.1154212

>Joseph P. Skipper, Investigator
>skipper

yeah ok

>> No.1154214

Mars really isn't that red. The images are tinted to meet our expectations.

>> No.1154218

>>1154214
Go look outside at mars then, looks like a god damn red star to the naked eye.

>> No.1154226

moon landing never happened, guise
scientists are lying and getting me pissed

>> No.1154243

whats even cooler are blurred images of structures on the moon.

>> No.1154246

>>1154192
It's in the NASA original, but my guess is it was caused by the optics, not an inept 'shop job.

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-106/hires/s106e5052.jpg

>> No.1154263

>>1154214
derp

>> No.1154397
File: 16 KB, 251x204, 1-186-alienskull.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154397

I love how you go to other parts of the web site and they talk about aliens.
http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2010/186/vatican-aliens.htm

>> No.1154414

>>1154397

What are you implying?

>> No.1154446

Maybe there was more than one exposure.

>> No.1154450

>>1154414
That the site is full of shit that cant be trusted so the article is shit as well. I like to call it creditability.

>> No.1154457

>>1154446
Then the much brighter parts would be double exposed, not just the relatively dim stars.

>> No.1154467
File: 16 KB, 260x364, 260px-Delta_II_7920_launch_with_NROL-21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154467

USA-193, also known as NRO launch 21 (NROL-21 or simply L-21), was an American military spy satellite launched on December 14, 2006.[2] It was the first launch conducted by the United Launch Alliance.[3] Owned by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the craft's precise function and purpose were classified.

^^ GDI Ion Cannon maybe?

>> No.1154481

>>1154218
>>1154263

That's red dust particles in the atmosphere. I'm talking about the surface shots.

>> No.1154490
File: 53 KB, 2352x713, 1272801328461.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154490

>>1154481
wat

The whole surface is full of rust, of course it's going to be a brown/red.

>> No.1154491

http://marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2002/047/47-e0302448-report.htm

This article claims there is a city on mars.

"Don't worry, if you don't see much of anything, you are seeing correctly. The fog and blur object specific treatment done at a much closer resolution than released to the public all over this scene has very effectively obscured almost all city structure detail. In fact, most researchers passing over this scene would not give it any thought as being anomalous and would quickly move on."

The entire website is like a cauldron of bullshit.

>> No.1154501

This is most likely not optics because the duplicate/triplicate stars in question are all separated by the same 160-pixel horizontal offset, 0 vertical offset. Could be fake stars, or it could be an artifact of image processing, although I'm not sure what would cause this.

>> No.1154511

>>1154490

That's what they want you to believe

BTW nice shot of the Arizona desert

>> No.1154525

This reminds me of another website like this, that cited itself multiple times about the existence of aliens on earth.

I lol'd and closed the tab.

>> No.1154529

>>1154525

>citing yourself for proof

But isn't that what the Bible does?

>> No.1154535

/sci/, let's compose an email together and ask Phil Plait about this.

>> No.1154536
File: 46 KB, 249x248, 13.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154536

>>1154511
thanks

>> No.1154540

>>1154491
I don't understand where these ideas come from, if the only images available are "photoshopped NASA pics"

>> No.1154542

>>1154537

>4 black pixels

>man without space suit

>> No.1154537
File: 22 KB, 510x362, moonhoax.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1154537

>>1154151

Look theres a man wearing no spacesuit on the apollo missions.

Hmm, I guess they couldnt afford space-suit props for the stage-hands.

>> No.1154557

>>1154542
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPUpmW04OIY&feature=related

Watch this you see a man without a space suit coming from the right picking something up then disappearing out of camerashot again.

>> No.1154568

>>1154557

Shit man, that's absolutely trustworthy and convincing.

>> No.1154593

well, what is this then
it' obviously not photoshop, since the stars have different brightness

>> No.1154614

>As long as we allow this type of slavery and crime against Earth humanity to continue against us and yet through advancing technology we are emerging into the greater environment and interaction with it, surely you can see that this would be a concern for any others out there who may be faced with interaction with us. Remember, doing nothing is itself a choice and one we will almost certainly be held accountable for.

XD

>> No.1154621

>>1154557
If he was sleeveless, his arms wouldn't be hanging out like they were in the video, they'd be right next to his/her body.

>> No.1154623

>>1154537
>>1154557
I LOVE HOW THEY COMPLAIN ABOUT US WHEN WE HAVE LO RES PICS PROVING THE MOON LANDING. YET WHEN THEY USE THESE THEY EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THEM.

>> No.1154643

>NASA Conspiracy Theories

And you faggots just keep on poooooostin'.