[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 30 KB, 352x448, mochizuki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530225 No.11530225 [Reply] [Original]

Apologize.

>> No.11530230

sorry

>> No.11530232
File: 43 KB, 400x328, 48957483975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530232

>> No.11530241

>>11530225
>published in a journal follow which he is the chief editor
This is basically the same as saying he couldn't get published.

>> No.11530252

>>11530241
>Mathematicians often publish papers in journals where they are editors. As long as the authors recuse themselves from the peer-review process “such a case is not a violation of any rule, and is common”, says Hiraku Nakajima, a mathematician at the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe in Tokyo formerly part of Publications of RIMS’s editorial board. Mehrmann confirms that this would not violate EMS guidelines.

>Kashiwara said that Mochizuki had recused himself from the review process, and had not attended any of the editorial board meetings about the paper. The journal has previously published papers from other members of the journals’ editorial board, he said.

>> No.11530524

>>11530252
>Allowing corruption means corruption doesn't exist!

>> No.11530529

>>11530252
Oh he recused himself, I guess that means they forgot who he was and that this was his paper.

>> No.11530533
File: 181 KB, 750x598, __remilia_scarlet_and_flandre_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_60mai__12b22ea48909e69512481d854d2eaa18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530533

>>11530225
Mochizuki-sama? I kneel!

>> No.11530607

>>11530524
Ok schizo

>> No.11530664
File: 139 KB, 1539x1080, yukari_okina_laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530664

>>11530252
>Kashiwara said that Mochizuki had recused himself from the review process, and had not attended any of the editorial board meetings about the paper.

>> No.11530733
File: 258 KB, 1282x1373, hodge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530733

Can somebody explain this autism to me?

>> No.11530735

>>11530225
can someone please redden his cheeks some more

>> No.11530821

>>11530225
Isn't the smartest mathematician of all time and even other top mathematicians can't understand his Inter-Universal theory with ease?

>> No.11530830

>>11530821
It's not that they can't understand it necessarily, but its very obtusely written and they don't want to work through it

>> No.11530869

>>11530232
Second life!

>> No.11530875

>>11530733
Quite literally, no one can.

>> No.11530924

>>11530733
Bridges serve to connect different realms of existence, in this case the dental D with the the snake t(hell). As if God's angels fell from God's grace to Hades domains. The hodge bridge a contraction of Hod bridge, is this connector where all the souls walk one before the other, in an ordered fashion, for as long as the mirror l-imits of living beings permit such movement. A movement that takes you from the upworld to the downworld, which itself is mirrored and connected by functorial algorithms: one to define the indeterminacy, as to how one will accomodate the lost souls that walk through the bridge, as one jumps in small increments or decrements through this chain of being. It is through this algorithm that those waiting in the bridge can later be accomodated in an infinite theater (just look at the ... at the bottom of the page), around a stage, much like in a cell formation. So that everyone around the theater can watch the main demon throw an arrow right into a ball of radius 0 in an indeterminate event of wonder

>> No.11530937

>>11530924
Based

>> No.11530951

>>11530821
This faggot writes it convoluted on purpose just to make it harder to check, then says just trust me bro

He is the one jap we should've nuked

>> No.11531053
File: 47 KB, 400x400, 1546980321385.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11531053

>>11530225
I-I-I always believed in you senpai

>> No.11531153

>>11530951
>faggot
Why the homophobia?

>> No.11531158

>>11530607
Retard.

>> No.11531201

>>11530951
Why the faggotphobia?
Why the convolutionphobia?

>> No.11531205

>>11531201
I've always thought
>why the failure to acknowledge fagversion?
would be a good quip for that one but mostly the only people that worry about fags are fags closeted fags so I never used it

>> No.11531308

Woit is seething

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709

>> No.11531371

>>11530733
dude i understand all of this and he is 100% correct.

>> No.11531419

>>11530225
Why, did he finally deliver on his theory of Inter-universal Teichmüller autism?

>> No.11531493

>>11531419
>Why, did he finally deliver on his theory of Inter-universal Teichmüller autism?
He delivered 8 years ago.

>> No.11531655

whit*oids SEETHING

>> No.11531660

>>11531655
Not really, I'm just glad it weren't the Chinamen

>> No.11531687

>>11531655
Umm, Japanese are white you sick fuck.

>> No.11531693

>>11531655
Japan is unironically whiter than the US.

>> No.11531703

>>11531687
>>11531693
>appropriation
nice

>> No.11531704
File: 151 KB, 1200x785, photo.php.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11531704

>>11530225
Request for translation acknowledged.

Request sensor disengaged.

Processing "Apologize."

Apologize = 謝罪。

Request sensor engaged.

>> No.11531705

>>11531704
>doing it wrong
Pretty sure he isn't even in the direction of Mecca

>> No.11531706

>>11531703
>>appropriation
What am I "appropriating"?

If anything I am distancing myself from the disgusting pile of shit that is the US.

>> No.11531708
File: 176 KB, 1024x681, fwssp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11531708

>>11531705

>> No.11531712

>>11531706
>yellow guy made an accomplishment
>hurr he's white therefore we white made the accomplishment

>> No.11531715

>>11531712
Nice strawman.

>> No.11531719
File: 7 KB, 275x183, download (735).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11531719

>>11531715
Thanks I made it myself

>> No.11531729

>>11531708
based Isukiri casually letting himself be crucified

>> No.11531731
File: 88 KB, 840x502, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11531731

>>11531708
Fascinating. Could this be true?

>> No.11531732

>>11531708
>12yo Jesus walking to Japan
So that's where that "walking on water" lore came from?

>> No.11531733

>>11531731
For how long does something that is true last?

>> No.11531739

Nothing to apologize for. I always knew he was based as fuck.

>> No.11531741

>>11531733
To put it into more scientific terms what is the half-life of truth? Interdasting

>> No.11531743

>>11531741
Is its distribution a limiting factor?

>> No.11531757

>>11531743
I'm not sure. Should we run it through the Monte Carlo simulation to see?

>> No.11531954

>>11530225
There is no need to apologize; that would shift the burden of proof. It is people who make the claim who have to provide the proof, not the skeptical audience which would allegedly be supposed to show the work is wrong.
Even if the skeptical side fails to refute the claim, it is not evidence that the claim as true in the first place, the candidate still has to provide the complete proof of it claim.

>> No.11532020

>>11531954
>the burden of proof.
This is a spook.

>> No.11532213

>>11530733
fucking brainlets can't into history-erasing operations

>> No.11532221

so why won't he be interviewed then? got something to hide, mr mochikuzi?

>> No.11532404
File: 57 KB, 702x259, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11532404

>> No.11532431
File: 14 KB, 188x268, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11532431

>>11532404
>I would sit Scholze on my lap and explain everything to him, but he needs to at least know the basic theory of heights on a late undergraduate to early graduate level.

>> No.11532436

>>11532431
>the basic theory of heights on a late undergraduate to early graduate level.
Probably the most unexpected zinger of the last decade

>> No.11532442

Why don't we just convince Google to feed his papers through an AI or something and see if it can produce any contradictions.

>> No.11532459
File: 53 KB, 403x448, cvbbmwwe4rzz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11532459

>>11532442
>Why don't we just convince Google to feed his papers through an AI or something and see if it can produce any contradictions.

>> No.11532476

>>11532459
Ok Shinichi, you're obviously an expert in IUT, want to give us your counterexample for the papers?

>> No.11532486
File: 56 KB, 621x702, ce8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11532486

>>11532476
>Ok Shinichi, you're obviously an expert in IUT, want to give us your counterexample for the papers?

>> No.11532512

>>11532442
Proof Checks barely can formal proof undergrad math using massive amount code lines and decades research.

>> No.11533257

>>11530252
>such a case is not a violation of any rule, and is common
But it does mean that we can disregard the result until other, independent sources verify it.

>> No.11533381

>>11533257
>But it does mean that we can disregard the result until other, independent sources verify it.
What do you consider "independent"?

>> No.11533426

>>11531655
White people don't seethe they sneethe

>> No.11533493

>>11532442
>>11532476
Based retard

>> No.11533811
File: 6 KB, 300x168, 2Q==.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11533811

>>11531757
How do we Monte Carlo the half-life of a variable?

>> No.11533823

Can somebody make an edit of the "yes" meme about him?

>> No.11533954

>>11531308
>https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709
>try commenting
>he rejects it
This guy is such a shill for Scholze it's out of this world

>> No.11533984

>>11531205
TOOKER
How are you doing with the coronavirus fucking up everything?

>> No.11534011

>>11533823
Kill yourself

>> No.11535157

>>11530830
>very obtusely written
That is not a problem in itself. For instance Maxwell's equations were part of a collection of 19 equations. It was Heavyside who later simplified this and showed it could be distilled down to 4 equations.
There is therefore no excuse to say the first round is obtuse.

>> No.11535587

>>11533954
He just deleted mine too :(

>> No.11535597
File: 12 KB, 500x300, Japan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11535597

>>11530225
Japan number 1

>> No.11535602

>>11535157
Keep in mind, I'm just repeating what I've heard. However, 600 pages of new (and possibly just bad) notation is not the same as 19 equations

>> No.11536307

>>11535602
Sure. Then again we now have computers, Internet and far more of a scientific community than back then. Much in EM is far from intuitive.

>> No.11536552

>>11534011
Ok!

>> No.11536641

>>11530733
This is worse than my graph theory textbook.