[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 24 KB, 220x330, 220px-Daniel_Dennett_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11528010 No.11528010 [Reply] [Original]

pseud

>> No.11528199

>>11528010
what else is new?

>> No.11528243

>>11528010
https://youtu.be/EJsD-3jtXz0?t=30m

Two lotteries

A. The winning ticket is chosen After the
tickets are sold
B. The winning ticket is chosen Before the
tickets are sold

If determinism is true, all your lottery tickets
were chosen before you were born.
So what?
So you are determined to have good luck on
some occasions and bad luck on others.
But also true if indeterminism is true!

There is no difference between indeterminism and determinism as far as having opportunities in this life.
So we should temper our traditional conviction that there is a deep incompatability between determinism and free will, and moral responsibility - it just isn't there.

>> No.11529758

>>11528243
This is a very low IQ post.

>> No.11529800

>>11528010
I wouldn't call the man a pseud just because I disagree with him.

>> No.11529876

>>11528010
>>11528243
However, Dannett's determinism doesn't give the slightest view why it is that we have subjective perception of things in the first place.

>> No.11530238

>>11529800
It's not that. He genuinely doesn't understand the phenomenon that defines his field of study. He is a fool.

>> No.11530246

>>11529876
>why
Dumb question. You mean how?

>> No.11530255

>>11530238
Of anyone understood the phenomenon that was their field of study, thre field would not need to exist, retard. Let me guess... the universe is made of consciousness, right?

>> No.11530268

>>11528010
puh-see-do

>> No.11530425
File: 259 KB, 835x764, 324234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530425

>>11530238
>>11528010
give him some slack, he's a zombie after all.

>> No.11530528

>>11530255
Dennett says things like "Try to spot the difference between picture A and picture B. You missed some? That's because your consciousness isn't as special as you think."

I am not joking, that is ACTUALLY the kind of garbage he peddles. He completely misunderstands the very nature of the thing he claims to "study".

>> No.11530532

>>11530528
>Dennett says things like "Try to spot the difference between picture A and picture B. You missed some? That's because your consciousness isn't as special as you think."
Where?

>> No.11530538
File: 605 KB, 750x1011, Dennett vs Socrates.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530538

>>11528010

>> No.11530541
File: 103 KB, 858x649, you're not conscious.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530541

>> No.11530545
File: 488 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530545

>> No.11530604

>>11530528
Also you didn't answer my question. Tell me your great understanding of consciousness.