>>11524567
assuming there's no hidden shit it should be 9 due to order of operations weighing the division of 6 and 2 as equal to the multiplication of 2 and 3, forcing you to do the problem from left to right
if you're falling into the trap of 1, its because you see the question being written as a fraction with six over the rest of it, when that is NOT the case because otherwise there would be an additional set of parenthesis making it 6/(2(1+2))