[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 33 KB, 451x597, broz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1151016 No.1151016 [Reply] [Original]

Any fellow chemfags out there who understand this?

>> No.1151028

>>1151024
>>1151016

samefaggot

>> No.1151024
File: 75 KB, 600x600, 1272744130135.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1151024

rofl

>> No.1151030

A Higgs boson walks into a church the priest says "we don't allow your kind in here." The Higgs boson says "but without me how can you have mass?"

>> No.1151037

Dude you can make so many puns from chemistry, Its hilarious

>> No.1151040

BROS BEFORE HOS BRAH!

>> No.1151043

To cross the other side.

>> No.1151045
File: 34 KB, 604x453, buttsecks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1151045

Moar science jokes!!!

>> No.1151051

Inb4 "I'm positive" jokes

>> No.1151056

My organic chem teacher lives off this shit. Theyre mostly terrible, but thats what makes it funny

>> No.1151067

So I'm buyin 4 mols of hydrogen and the clerk akses me, "paper, or plastic?"

And I say, "neither, ITS A GAS."

thanks high school chem teacher who looked like michael richards but was actually just a really ugly woman

>> No.1151077

Two tigers walk into a bar. One of them is hungry, and spots some prey, a woman, at the other end of the bar. He pounces, comlpetely devours the woman, then returns to his seat next to the other tiger. A short time later, he says to the other tiger that he feels very sleepy. The other tiger replies, "Of course, that's a barbiturate."

>> No.1151091

>>1151051

LMFAO. So true. I'm so sick of the "I'm positive" joke. That and "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate." That got old fast.

>> No.1151092
File: 11 KB, 155x202, 1275698493803.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1151092

>>1151077

>> No.1151108
File: 18 KB, 120x115, kobenigger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1151108

OH SNAP

>> No.1151110

If I were an enzyme I'd be DNA Helicase so I could unzip your genes.

>> No.1151117

>>1151016
Bromate

>> No.1151119

>>1151051
My favorite one is the one that deals with AIDS patients and their unwaivering positiveness on life.

>> No.1151121

>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
>>1151110
fucking solid

>> No.1151133

Two functions are walking down an alley when a differential operator jumps out and says"give me all your money or ill differentiate you to nothing"

The first function runs away but the other one just stands there. The operator asks "aren't you scared" to which the second function responds

I'm e^x

Well nice to meet you e^x, I'm dy/dt

>> No.1151146

>>1151133
god I hate you for saying that. Its just too good

>> No.1151158

>>1151146
I groaned the first time I heard it, but it's always stuck with me

>> No.1151166

>>1151133
>>1151133
>>1151133
Calculus ftw

>> No.1151215

>>1151133
Care to explain? Please?

>> No.1151228

>>1151110

Epic.

>> No.1151236

>>1151215
when e^x is derived it stays exactly as it is, it cant be derived in relationship to X (dx/dt). But when you derive it with relationship to Y (dy/dt), thats a whole different story

>> No.1151251

>>1151236
Well I knew the first part, but what happens when you do dy/dt e^x?

>> No.1151254

>>1151215
engineer here... i forget what it's called, but i think it's a partial differential:

basically, e^x isn't afraid of differentiation because d/dx of e^x is just e^x...thus, he can't be differentiated to zero.

however, if you take dy/dt of e^x, it is zero. why? because you're differentiating by t instead of x. when you take d/dt of e^x, it is zero, because there is no 't' in e^x... it is, with respect to t, a constant, and thus differentiates to zero

>> No.1151281

>>1151254
original joke writer here, it's this
e^x differentiated by x is e^x no matter how many times you do it

e^x differentiated by anything else is zero as it's just a contant

>> No.1151319

>>1151254
>>1151281
Thanks, makes sense now.

>> No.1151323

Physicsjoke!

A man stuffs a cat in a box...

>> No.1151348

>>1151323
Minutes later, a gentleman called the man: "Oh Mr. Schr...," before being clawed to death by the cat and not being clawed to death by the cat's corpse at the same time.

>> No.1151372

>>1151281
You misspeak. If t is a function of x, then d/dt e^x is not necessarily 0.
e.g. t=2x
d/dt e^x=(e^x)/2

>> No.1151571

>>1151372
Yes but it's dy/dt
not dt/dx