[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 38 KB, 720x795, 9chb8sbm7qn21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11506171 No.11506171 [Reply] [Original]

Scientifically speaking, can you prove that you exist?

>> No.11506196

>Scientifically speaking, can you prove that you exist?
What have you tried?

>> No.11506198

>>11506171
if the evidence that suggests I exist is not enough proof, scientifically speaking nothing can be proven

>> No.11506241

Need to exist to solve the captcha baby cakes

>> No.11506352

>>11506171
literally the ONLY thing you can prove is that you exist

>> No.11506533

>>11506171
I cannot prove to anyone that I exist. People tend to believe it though since they aren't fucking Pyrrho. However, I can prove to myself that I exist (Cf Descartes)

>> No.11506556

>>11506533
/thread

>> No.11506561

>>11506352
goes to sci/ shits out philosophy

>> No.11506580

>>11506171
i never understood this delusion, or maybe i did but forgot. must be long long time ago.

>> No.11506581

>>11506171
Scientifically yes, philosophically/absolutely no

>> No.11506761

>>11506198
>scientifically speaking nothing can be proven
Correct. Science does not deal with proof.

>> No.11507917
File: 9 KB, 304x166, 04-19-50-images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11507917

>>11506171
No , because I am Internet bot and my creator didnt implement this function for me.

>> No.11507927
File: 136 KB, 250x203, basudo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11507927

I think therefore I am

>> No.11507931

COGITO ERGO SUM

>> No.11507993

>>11507931
>>11507927
>>11506533
>>11506352
The statement "I think therefore I exist" presupposes the existence of an individual "I" or a "self".
The correct statement would be "I think therefore consciousness exists".