Ebin

[Anonymous No.11499363]

>ids judst da flu :DDDDDDDD

[Ksenia !!/HQMg5yHuiK No.11499366]

>>11499363
>estimates
Meaning that reality is not as you want, so you had to appeal to a fantasy.

>flu
Influenza is much worse in terms of infections AND deaths.

[Anonymous No.11499374]

>>11499366
>modeling is fantasy
Epidemiology, meteorology, paleontology, economics, biology, physics, logistics, astronomy, finance, materials science BTFO.

Someone better notify all the universities in the world that statistical modeling is useless. They are all doing it wrong. I see a Nobel Prize in your future tripfag. Your post will be framed and taught in universities from now on. They will make motivational posters out of it.

[Ksenia !!/HQMg5yHuiK No.11499379]

>>11499374
Models in physics usually are justified by first principles. This is not. This is just somebody’s opinion. If you think biology and physics are comparable in rigor, you are honestly a lost case.

[Anonymous No.11499389]

>>11499366
>Influenza is much worse in terms of infections AND deaths.
flu is thousands of strains and covid is a couple. and no the death rate is not worse for flu than covid, you complete brainlet. pic related, and korea is one of the countries that has the best handle on this.

[Anonymous No.11499395]

>>11499379
models in genetics and biophysics are justified by first principles, the tenants of physiological theory haven’t been disproven by experimental evidence in 2.5 centuries since the dawn of biomedical research

[Anonymous No.11499405]

>>11499379
what about string theory models? has no validation meanwhile biological models do. so please piss off.

[Ksenia !!/HQMg5yHuiK No.11499406]

>>11499389
>death rate
>rate
I never wrote that. I wrote “deaths”, i.e.: in absolute numbers. Learn to read.

>>11499395
>models in genetics and biophysics are justified by first principles
That is just wrong. There is not even a theory in biology that is capable of providing first principles for that to hold. From first principles, everything in the theory follows. One can not predict everything there is to predict in genetics from the few postulates you think that constitute first principles.

[Anonymous No.11499409]

>>11499366
>>11499379
why is this low IQ moron tripfagging?

[Anonymous No.11499414]

>>11499406
>I never wrote that. I wrote “deaths”, i.e.: in absolute numbers. Learn to read.
you just said deaths, that can be interpreted in multiple ways, you fucking idiot. you never explicitly said absolute, further rates turn to absolutes. it is a much more informative measure.

[Anonymous No.11499416]

>39 million
>haven't even broke 10k

[Anonymous No.11499470]

>>11499416
So far it has a doubling time of 7 days.
You do the math.

[Anonymous No.11499496]

>>11499416
>>11499470
Also, it has broken 10k.

It's sitting at nearly 19,000 deaths as of 03/25 04:33 GMT

[Anonymous No.11499502]

>>11499470
>doubling time of 7 days
1000x in ten weeks, mid-June
10k*1k = 10 million

[Anonymous No.11500537]

>>11499366
kys tranny