cure for coronavirus

[Anonymous No.11477731]

>Dr. Rife swept through the diathermy range, which he calculated should vibrate these viruses to pieces. Empirical evidence always contradicts the theoretical. Quite below the calculated extreme frequencies, the BX virus suddenly dissolved. He switched off the transmitter and sat there quite amazed. The scene in the microscope was unreal. Not a fraction of a second at the lethal pitch and the specimen was reduced to a glomular mass. The viruses were stuck together in shattered fragments! He had successfully "devitalized" them.
>This represented a major medical discovery of greatest value to all humanity. This principle actually made possible curative broadcasts. Entire populations could be electrically "vaccinated" from single monitored sites. The world potential of this system was staggering. Now the outbreak of epidemics could be controlled without the time-consuming need for individual inoculations. The radiant lethal message would eradicate specific pathogens in several simple broadcasts. The constant monitoring of socially prolific germ populations could be maintained by continual public health "broadcasts".

tldr we can destroy viruses over a large area just by using electricity
what are the political implications of reviving the buried technology of Dr. Rife?

[Anonymous No.11477742]

>>11477731
Pseudoscience belongs in >>>/x/

[Anonymous No.11477751]

>>11477742
this is not pseudo science, you fucking nigger. he worked with other doctors and scientists who vouched for his invention

[Anonymous No.11477778]

>>11477751
A couple of doctors agreeing to work with him doesn't mean he produced any real science. The scientific community of today is certain: he was a kook.

[Anonymous No.11477785]

>>11477731
>An analysis by Electronics Australia found that a typical 'Rife device' consisted of a nine-volt battery, wiring, a switch, a timer and two short lengths of copper tubing, which delivered an "almost undetectable" current unlikely to penetrate the skin

[Anonymous No.11477787]

>>11477731
How are these broadcasts found exactly? How to they make sure they don’t destroy healthy cells?

[Anonymous No.11477797]

>>11477787
Asking the right questions

[Anonymous No.11477798]

>>11477778
he worked with the Mayo institute to combat cancer and other viruses

>>11477785
bullshit. a true Rife microscope has quartz cylinders inside. that's fucking disinformation what you wrote there

>>11477787
the microscope is optic. Abbe was wrong about optics. He also used phosphorecence in his work. Organic material that is exposed to some electric currents I think develops phosphorecence so he doesn't even need a point light source anyway.

[Anonymous No.11477801]

>>11477787
Rife experimented with a host of viruses and wrote a catalogue on the right frequency for every one of them. Healty cells are only affected at a far higher frequencies, so there is no danger to proper organized life forms

[Anonymous No.11477808]

>>11477798
But how does he make sure he doesn’t kill healthy cells? What is the medium of difference between the two that allows for distinction? And that science has to be absolutely spot on.

[Anonymous No.11477811]

>>11477808
see>>11477801

[Anonymous No.11477813]

>>11477801
How did they find this out, with pout destroying loads of healthy cells? It’s not like he magically knew healthy cells die at high frequencies? It doesn’t make sense.

[Anonymous No.11477819]

>>11477813
he made lab tests. the fact that him, himself and all the other lab technicians were fine, actually almost never even catching colds, is proof enough that the device was harmless to proper organized life forms

[Anonymous No.11477821]

>>11477819
Okay so you don’t know. Gotcha.

[Anonymous No.11477824]

>>11477821
you got me retard. it's fake science. now go suck on your college professor's cock.

[Anonymous No.11477830]

>>11477824
I never went to college

[Anonymous No.11477847]

>>11477731
Many people were doing the same at the time. Gosset et al in France, Schereschewsky at Harvard was athermally destroying tumors in mice. This was the 1920's. They buried it then, they finally converged and shut Schereschewsky out for good and he backed down from his athermal assertion. The considerably more braindead and crude method of microwave diathermy came to prominence in Rife and these other's stead. Rife microscope was lost and branded physically impossible.

The only place where similar practices remain active is eastern europe, where they use millimeter waves to diagnose and cure skin cancers.

This shit just pisses me off so much at this point that I can't even bother to generate a coherent post. It's good to see someone else posting about this though.

Refer also to the shitty bullshit implementation by Novocure, which is a 200KHz contact device, and doesn't worth a damn, something that was already known in the 1950's. We already know it doesn't work, it's the wrong method, it's the wrong frequency, but they're trying to retardedly target mitotic spindle formation in cancer cells because they're retarded and don't even know what cancer IS. FDA approved though, foot in the door? Maybe, probably not.

AAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.11477856]

>>11477798
>bullshit. a true Rife microscope has quartz cylinders inside. that's fucking disinformation what you wrote there
First of all, prove it. Second, so what? That just makes it sound like a shit watch.

[Anonymous No.11477864]

>>11477847
maybe we can crowdfund some more investments into this? preferably outside of usa?

>>11477856
>Dr. Rife aggressively pursued and achieved what had not been done in the field of ultra-microscopy. His mind had turned over the method which he had conceived so many years before. The dream which Dr. Rife originally received was now in view. Looking for more light. He decided to try filling the entire objective with cylindrically cut quartz prisms. There would be no difference in refractive index from start to finish along the optical path. Quartz prisms would "open out" each ray convergence, maintaining strictly parallel ray cadence. An increased ray content being thus returned to the ocular, the image would be brilliant in appearance and of high resolution.
>This configuration of quartz prisms caused the rays to "zig-zag" in 22 light bends. The internal optical path was now entirely composed of22 quartz blocks, fitted snugly to lenses. It was as if the entire device were one solid crystal of diverse surfaces. Now, specimen emergent light would launch out in parallel paths through quartz prisms, being magnified only when they reached each quartz lens. This optical tracking method would insure the brilliance of the emergent image
>A second optical innovation was added to this brilliant configuration. Dr. Rife decided to use a phenomenon by which strong specimen-entrant light stimulates internal fluorescence in the specimen. Pumping the specimen with brilliant ultraviolet-rich light would shift the divergence point into the very heart of the specimen rather than beneath, forcing the specimen to radiate its own brilliant ultraviolet rays.
the best I can do

[Anonymous No.11477874]

>>11477864
>There would be no difference in refractive index from start to finish along the optical path
So how does it do anything?

[Anonymous No.11477879]

>>11477864
>maybe we can crowdfund some more investments into this? preferably outside of usa?
Resorting to this New World model may be the best way. Rife had his own climate controlled lab, manufacturing base (lathe, mill, equipment to grind quartz), and according to him the whole apparatus cost around 100k at the time. Though that's froma second hand source. It may be far cheaper to manufacture now.

[Anonymous No.11477886]

>>11477874
that means the image is still crystal clear at the other end and it's not blurry or distorted

[Anonymous No.11477941]

>>11477886
>too dumb to even understand the question

[Anonymous No.11477944]

>>11477731
Mass information for the masses was a mistake OP

[Anonymous No.11477953]

>>11477941
Clamped.
Unclamp.

Don't even care what you're talking about, this is a Rife thread and I won't tolerate it being polluted with greentext and a brainlet image. Contribute or get the fuck out. K? K. ty

[Anonymous No.11478203]

Would listening to these frequencies on a headphone work too?

[Anonymous No.11478212]

>>11478203
No. Not really. The later audio frequencies in electrical form by Crane and Marsh didn't really work well either. Rife's original frequencies were correct, and the sideband/harmonic approach with lower frequencies didn't pan out.