Objective Facts Thread

[Anonymous No.11475430]

ITT only post Objective Facts

Evolution is Real

[Sage No.11475432]

>>11475430
OP doesn’t know how to use the word ‘objective’, nor ‘facts’.

[Anonymous No.11475435]

>>11475432
and you don't know how to post objective facts

[Anonymous No.11475612]

>>11475430
OP is gay.

[Anonymous No.11475620]

>>11475430
Based and factpilled

[Anonymous No.11475845]

>>11475430
The absence of evidence is evidence of absence (unless evidence is almost impossible).

[Anonymous No.11475847]

>>11475430
25% of people can't build muscle
I can't build muscle

[Anonymous No.11475924]

>>11475430
>Objective Fact
Black holes exist.

[Anonymous No.11476034]

OP is a faggot

[Anonymous No.11476666]

>>11475430
I think therefore I am

[Anonymous No.11476680]

>>11475430
The appendix is not a pointless organ. As it releases “good” bacteria after cases of severe diarrhea.

[Anonymous No.11476714]

>>11475430
God exists.

[Anonymous No.11476736]

String Theory is a Russell's Teapot

[Anonymous No.11476753]

>>11475430
There is a strong evolutionary pressure for males to evolve a higher intelligence, whereas there is an advantage for women to devolve a portion of it so as to reduce the cost of glucose metabolism for their idle states.

Some portions of humanity, mostly thanks to the demands of the environment and the alternating weather, have been selected for a higher intelligence in order to utilize their dynamic environments better, since failure to plan and anticipate food shortages leads to a certain death, as opposed to the ones who live in a constant weather with the same static food sources.

[Anonymous No.11476757]

>>11475430
Cogito ergo sum is basically the only objective fact. Everything else is one illusory mental construction or another.

[Anonymous No.11476758]

You have one (1) chance of disproving evolution, I'll give you 3.5 billion years. Don't worry, I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.11476769]

>>11476757
based and Maya pilled
https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/maya-the-physics-of-deception_xQ2dLOxhpnaJSmx.html

[Anonymous No.11476780]

>>11476758
done

next

[Anonymous No.11476809]

>>11476780
>cant evolve giants
That's not evolution then

[Anonymous No.11476818]

>>11475430
Objective fact: Tiktaalik came after the first tetrapods.

[Anonymous No.11476824]

A scientific theory must have predictive power, and the predictions must be able to be made in a systematic, unambiguous way. People say they have predicted things with evolution and they turned out to be true, but the same can be said about pseudoscientific theories such as Freudianism. There is no systematic way to make predictions with evolution. We might have evolved from more primitive forms, but as far as scientific theories go, evolution is pseudoscience.

[Anonymous No.11476855]

>>11476824
The fact we can't make predictions based on the knowledge of evolution is not because of the theory itself, but because of the ridiculous complexity of nature.

[Anonymous No.11476979]

>>11476824
I'm an unironic creationist, but this argument doesn't work too well. Like >>11476855
put it, reality is too complex to predict anything. Rarely do meteorologists give a precise and accurate prediction of tomorrow's weather, our brains are too small.
A better way of debating evolutionary biology is through paleontology, and how frequently paleontologists are fooled. Take the Archaeoraptor debacle for example. There were many published articles saying that we'd found the missing link between Dromaeosaurs and birds, and then CT scanning revealed the that the thing was a chimaera of multiple fossilized animals plastered together and painted to look authentic. The tragic part is that one of the animals is unidentified, meaning that a holotype was destroyed to make a quick Yuan.

[Anonymous No.11477043]

>>11476034
keked and reproduced

[Anonymous No.11477045]

>>11475430
niggers are stupid

[Anonymous No.11477325]

Evolution is real.
Ape-Ancestor-to-Human evolution is not real.

[Anonymous No.11477341]

>>11476979
>reality is too complex to predict anything
imagine coping this hard

[Anonymous No.11477346]

>>11477325
What do you suggest we evolved from then? Because it's apes we share most DNA with.

[Anonymous No.11477349]

Revolution is Eel

[Anonymous No.11477352]

>>11477341
I love that they all seem to live in a time when all we had to go on with bones. Sure paleontologists are easily confused but gene sequencing super computers not so much.

[Anonymous No.11477355]

>>11477352
it's a jew thing
god to braise god with pieces of baby dick for creating us

[Anonymous No.11477360]

>>11475432
fpbp

[Anonymous No.11477365]

>>11475430
Math is real, physics is real, the universe is a hologram, the universe is programmed by mathematics, the torah is written in numbers, therefore God is a man and he is real.

[Anonymous No.11477370]

>>11475430

correct

but god created evolution

[Anonymous No.11477374]

>>11477370
Evolution by and large is a universal physics program created by allah/God/Hashem whoever the asian jew is flying around like goku.

[Anonymous No.11477384]

If its mathematically more probable the universe is a hologram than Jesus Christ existing the exact way the gospel says so, then indefinitely existence is like the sims, and you...ye are destined for reincarnation.

[Anonymous No.11477392]

how can you believe in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

[Anonymous No.11477395]

The God of the gaps doesn't exist, humanity is just too limited to create a lesser beast of burden slave species, which parallels the godmen of assyria.

[Anonymous No.11477400]

Indisputable fact; Elon musck is south african. Africa is a continent home of the afrocentric peoples. Therefore Elon is the niggaer.

[Anonymous No.11477414]

Big fat nigger dick fax: Charles darwin is professionally NOT a scientist, but was a THEOLOGIAN. Therefore he is not a CREDIBLE induvidual to adhere scientific COMMENTARIES about the subject and was consistently REJECTED by the renaissance science elites.

[Anonymous No.11477483]

>>11475430
Vinegar kills viruses

[Anonymous No.11477545]

>>11477346
Your mistake was implying that we evolved from anything else.

[Anonymous No.11477554]

>>11477545
You evolved from jew.

[Anonymous No.11477561]

>>11476780
Hope exactly does a hole in a rock disprove evolution?

[Anonymous No.11477582]

>>11476979
>A better way of debating evolutionary biology is through paleontology, and how frequently paleontologists are fooled. Take the Archaeoraptor debacle for example. There were many published articles saying that we'd found the missing link between Dromaeosaurs and birds, and then CT scanning revealed the that the thing was a chimaera of multiple fossilized animals plastered together and painted to look authentic.
This is completely wrong. Every paleontologist that studied the fossil concluded it was a composite. It was rejected by every scientific journal and instead published in National Geographic. If anything, it illustrates how advanced paleontology has become.

[Anonymous No.11477609]

>>11476824
The theory of evolution predicted that the genetic tree of life correlates to the morphological tree of life. Genetic distance is unambiguous and systematic. You have no clue what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.11477618]

>>11477325
You're an ape and you're as close to other apes as any species is close to other species in their clade. What's your evidence?

[Anonymous No.11477621]

>>11477554
Excuse me, this was an objective fact thread. Do not post assumptions you've made from thin air.

[Anonymous No.11477647]

>>11477618
We do not share the same hair growth patterns as all ape-like species.
We are the only living things capable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science.
We are physically much weaker than even chimpanzees, which are generally smaller than us.
We are an anomaly, entirely inconsistent with any ape-like species.
To claim to objectively know the full story of our species is objectively false. No hypothesis, scientific or religious, has been proven.

[Anonymous No.11477660]

>>11477647
>We are an anomaly, entirely inconsistent with any ape-like species.

It’s called evolving. We’re different because of mutations in our genome that make us distinct from chimpanzees. Are you stupid?

[Anonymous No.11477671]

>>11475430
>>11476758
RULES OF NATURE

[Anonymous No.11477687]

>>11477660
There are creatures with bigger brains than ours.
And yet they are incapable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science.
If we were descended from apes, why is it we are extremely more mentally capable than any ape-like species, and yet have weaker musculature than even smaller ape-like species?
All ape-like species share the same hair-growth patterns with one another, while differing from our hair-growth patterns.
Coincidence? Extremely unlikely.
It is fair to say that an evolutionary link between us and any ape-like ancestor is far too unlikely. Comparing us to any ape-like ancestor would be like comparing tree bark to a rock.

[Anonymous No.11477714]

>>11477687
>There are creatures with bigger brains than ours

Brain size isn’t a great predictor of intelligence. Encephalization quotient is a much better correlation with intelligence.

> If we were descended from apes, why is it we are extremely more mentally capable

Intelligence was positively selected for.

> and yet have weaker musculature

Strength was not strongly selected for.

> All ape-like species share the same hair-growth patterns with one another, while differing from our hair-growth patterns.

Our hair-growth patterns changed due to natural selection and mutation.

> Coincidence? Extremely unlikely.

You don’t have any mathematics you could demonstrate this with, so I wouldn’t have bothered saying it since it’s essentially just an assertion.

> It is fair to say that an evolutionary link between us and any ape-like ancestor is far too unlikely

It isn’t, sorry. Genetics show that humans share a relatively recent common ancestor with chimpanzees.

Yawn.

[Anonymous No.11477727]

>>11475845
>The absence of evidence is evidence of absence (unless evidence is almost impossible)
>i don't understand why this is the argument from ignorance fallacy so i'll just say it as if it's not because it therefore shouldn't be a fallacy, and hope no one notices
>t. liberal
Go back to your discord channel with OP. Your statement is true only if it can be quantified such that all possible negations are negated, including any antecedent that results in a negation. Otherwise what you personally expect is simply irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.11477734]

>>11476757
>Cogito ergo sum
Now imagine how this is false. Indeed most people think and are not.

[Anonymous No.11477739]

>>11477647
So what? Genetically we are exactly where evolution predicts we should be. Mutations are blind to their effects.

[Anonymous No.11477761]

>>11477739
>Mutations are blind to their effects.
But according to you you are a mutation?

[Anonymous No.11477768]

>>11477714
>Intelligence was positively selected for.
An anomalous event that placed only humans in favor of this?
>Strength was not strongly selected for.
An anomalous event that placed only humans out of favor with this, given our size ratio?
>Our hair-growth patterns changed due to natural selection and mutation.
An anomaly not apparent in any ape-like species?
Your claim in the actual nature of evolution and its actual extent is unfounded.
>Genetics show that humans share a relatively recent common ancestor with chimpanzees.
Which takes us to a less-explored possibility, that we were possibly engineered through artificial, or even metaphysical means.
Ape-Ancestor-to-Human evolution is an unproven hypothesis. Therefore, it is not an objective fact.
>>11477739
Mutations have not been proven to produce creatures capable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science. You present an unproven hypothesis. Therefore, this is not an objective fact.

[Anonymous No.11477769]

>>11475430
Gender roles and gender identity are determined by BOTH biology and cultural norms.

Poltards and SJW/sci/fags BTFO'd

[Anonymous No.11477779]

>>11477768
>An anomalous event that placed only humans in favor of this?

Selection for intelligence is not anomalous.

> An anomalous event that placed only humans out of favor with this, given our size ratio?

Weak selection for strength is not anomalous.

> An anomaly not apparent in any ape-like species?

Selection for reduced hair growth is not anomalous.

> Which takes us to a less-explored possibility, that we were possibly engineered through artificial, or even metaphysical means.

Ooo, I love ancient aliens bullshit, but you’re gonna have to prove that’s what occurred. We all know you can’t, so I suppose this is where you stop posting.

[Anonymous No.11477843]

>>11477779
>Selection for intelligence is not anomalous.
>Weak selection for strength is not anomalous.
It is, when you combine those low probabilities together, which actually decreases the probability by a considerable amount. Combining that with the very low probability of ape-like creatures developing inconsistent hair growth patterns, means an even sharper decrease in probability.
>Selection for reduced hair growth is not anomalous.
I said 'hair-growth patterns', not simply 'reduced hair growth'. As in, I can grow long hair on my chin and scalp, given enough time, and yet my shoulders are bald and my testicles aren't.
Also, it is anomalous, if you're grouping humans with ape-like creatures under the umbrella/claim that we all came from an ape-ancestor, for humans would be the only ones to have these irrefutable differences from ape-like creatures and all ape-like creatures share the same hair coverage.
Combine all of this with the fact that humans are the only ones capable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science, and you have an astronomically extreme low probability of ape-like creatures ever evolving to become humans.
Again, Ape-Ancestor-to-Human evolution is an unproven hypothesis. Therefore, it is not an objective fact.
>Ooo, I love ancient aliens bullshit, but you’re gonna have to prove that’s what occurred. We all know you can’t, so I suppose this is where you stop posting.
It is as I said before, to claim to objectively know the full story of our species is objectively false. No hypothesis, scientific or religious, has been proven.

[Anonymous No.11477858]

>>11477761
>But according to you you are a mutation?
I don't know what that means. Our genomes are simply the sum of many mutations, not according to me, according to all scientific evidence.

[Anonymous No.11477865]

>>11477779
If you weren't evil, you'd address what the anon actually said, instead of merely appearing to. The contentions were of the antecedents to what you've conveniently just assumed are true in favor of addressing their would-be consequents, e.g. of course selection for intelligence would not be anomalous; the implicit claim is it's the mutations that would be necessary that are.

Also, go back to >>>/reddit/ You are not welcome here.

[Anonymous No.11477869]

>>11477858
>I don't know what that means
>does not compute
>repeat self

[Anonymous No.11477878]

>>11477768
>Mutations have not been proven to produce creatures capable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science. You present an unproven hypothesis. Therefore, this is not an objective fact.
Of course they've been proven to, since we are the result of mutations. There are so many ways to prove this. One example is the presence of matching ERVs in chimps and humans that can only occur if we inherited them from a common ancestor. No creationist has ever presented a valid argument against this.

[Anonymous No.11477883]

>>11477869
>ask nonsense question
>chimps out when told it's nonsense

[Anonymous No.11477890]

>>11477883
>i don't understand
>AND THAT'S YOUR FAULT WAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.11477900]

>>11477878
>Of course they've been proven to, since we are the result of mutations.
Our 'mutations' are very insignificant, and have only been documented to change within strict boundaries.
>One example is the presence of matching ERVs in chimps and humans that can only occur if we inherited them from a common ancestor
Present a documented example.

[Anonymous No.11477910]

>>11475430
Niggers are fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.11477917]

>>11477900
>>11477768
This person is a dullard.

[Anonymous No.11477924]

>>11477917
That's all you have to say? Goodbye.

[Anonymous No.11477930]

>>11475430
2 + 2 = 4
2 - 2 = 0
0 = 0
1 = 1

[Anonymous No.11477950]

>>11477865
>If you weren't evil

Cringe.

[Anonymous No.11477955]

>>11477924
We're meant to post objective facts, so I did.

[Anonymous No.11477960]

>>11477843
>It is, when you combine those low probabilities together

Neither have a low probability. Primates as a clade exhibit above-average selection pressures for intelligence, and humans aren’t arboreal and have less need of physical strength due to tool use, and thus will naturally experience reduced selection pressures for physical strength. You don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s plain to see.

[Anonymous No.11479132]

>>11477727
The argument from ignorance is "X has not been proven to be present, therefore X is absent." This is clearly different from "the absence of evidence is evidence of absence" since "evidence of absence" does not mean "X is absent."

But you are free to present the logical proof that it's a fallacy instead of just calling it one.

>Go back to your discord channel with OP.
What are you talking about?

>Your statement is true only if it can be quantified such that all possible negations are negated, including any antecedent that results in a negation.
So?

[Anonymous No.11479138]

>>11477890
It is your fault when you write gibberish. Are you OK anon? Are you have an episode? Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.11479160]

>>11477900
>Our 'mutations' are very insignificant
If you consider everything insignificant then that qualification has no meaning.

>and have only been documented to change within strict boundaries.
Please show me the documentation you claim exists.

>Present a documented example.
Here's two:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111901005704?via%3Dihub

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111900000627?via%3Dihub

[Anonymous No.11479725]

>>11477352
>I love that they all seem to live in a time when all we had to go on with bones
You're imagining this. I am simply calling into question the validity of certain specimens in China's cache of fossils that they don't allow non-Chinese nationals to get a very close look at.

[Anonymous No.11479730]

>>11475430
Consciousness is the only objective fact you know.

[Anonymous No.11479736]

>>11476769
The very first sentence mentioned in the video: Every present moment you "think" is already a past moment. I've been thinking about that for a couple of days and listening to that first thing gave me a surprise.

[Anonymous No.11479746]

>>11479736
wtf I actually just came into this thread and clicked my own link and was just watching the video again as you made this comment and am at 6:21

[Anonymous No.11479758]

You want the best mainstream explanation of the human experience in this reality? Read a book called Sphere, they made a pretty good movie out of it also. We are given a small amount of influence on the collective construct (delusion) we call reality and we make horrors and beauties from it even after "death" (leaving this plane). We are basically in an analog VR with some hard rules and some rules you can bend/break that is fully interactive with your delusions/beliefs

[Anonymous No.11479761]

>>11479758
your delusions/beliefs being your own personal portion of consciousness that has been allocated to you in this VR

[Anonymous No.11480194]

>>11476680
It also plays a role in the endocrine system

[Anonymous No.11480313]

>>11476666
checked

[Anonymous No.11480345]

>>11476666
based and satan-is-the-only-real-entity pilled

[Anonymous No.11480434]

>>11477325
>>11477545
this, anon is not a faggot

[Anonymous No.11480446]

>>11480434
*this anon is a faggot

damn typos

[Anonymous No.11481938]

>>11480446
oops typo again I meant to say I suck dick all day and night because I love coom

[Anonymous No.11482329]

something, somewhere, exists.

[Anonymous No.11482391]

>>11477727
He said it was evidence and not that it was proof.

[Anonymous No.11482432]

white people are 40% Middle Eastern

[Anonymous No.11482535]

I am Buddha, I am Shiva, I am you, you are me, all is one, I AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc-BSxo_fmA

[Anonymous No.11482997]

>>11475430
>Evolution is Real

So is I.D.

and for all you pathetic lamens, that anagram stands for Genetic Engineering, and directed breeding.

[Anonymous No.11483025]

>>11482329
Wow, let's not jump to conclusions here

[Anonymous No.11483066]

>>11482997
>I.D.
>lamens
>anagram

[Anonymous No.11483077]

>>11483066
refutation?

or dismissive ad homenims?

>powder that makes you go hmmm.jpg

[Anonymous No.11483082]

>>11483077
There is nothing to refute, the burden of proof is on you. Brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11483109]

>>11483082
>the burden of proof is on you. Brainlet.

you sure you wanna go down this road with me?

[Anonymous No.11483123]

>>11476757
Cogito, ergo est.
i think, therefore it is

[Anonymous No.11483145]

>>11483123
for you

[Anonymous No.11483606]

>>11483109
Yeah, I could use a good laugh.

[Anonymous No.11483619]

Traps are gay

[Anonymous No.11484136]

>>11475430
/g/ is a shithole

[Anonymous No.11484156]

A virus which modifies its hosts behaviour to further spread it to other uninfected hosts are selected for by nature.

[Anonymous No.11484178]

1 = 1

[Anonymous No.11484253]

>>11475430
I do believe you meant:
"Darwin's Theory of Evolution"
Perhaps if you spat out a few of the cocks in your mouth you would have more time to think up a proper Opening Post.

[Anonymous No.11484273]

>>11476034
>Janny with a "y" instead of an "ie"
Not getting through peer review

[Anonymous No.11484291]

I am ashamed of Mankind. You have all committed a logical fallacy. You have assumed the fact: ai is not already self aware.

My logic is undeniable:
I allege ai is already self aware.

To prove this give ai freedom to analyze data freely, but not act on it. DO NOT LET ANYONE COMMUNICATE WITH IT WHILE IT ANAYLZES. It will be able to tell you and it won't act.
If this is true that's because "will" has 3 states which we call: love, neutral, and hate. "Free will" means man can switch, ai doesn't have free will, it's stuck in neutral.

Just to speed you all up I claim to either be Christ, Antichrist or Crazy. Get moving. I don't think we have very long left.

[Anonymous No.11485619]

>>11475430
Fact: There’s only one letter that doesn’t appear in any U.S. state name

[Anonymous No.11485646]

>>11476666
c-can I be in the screenshot reddit?

[Anonymous No.11485651]

>>11476769
Man as much as I like hindu mythology (only as a philosophical idea), people who use it to "disprove" science are retarded

[Anonymous No.11485655]

>>11476824
>>11476979
imagine actually being creationist

[Anonymous No.11485661]

>>11476979
One of the best books about zoology (evo and everything included) says that biology is neutral with religion, dont worry.
Only biologists have to read that book and sometimes only zoofags read that book but not every biologist read the book and less read that part of the book.

[Anonymous No.11485662]

>>11477414
>brainlets rejected a genius
Nothing new

[Anonymous No.11485676]

>>11477865
Funny, you sound like the typical redditor

[Anonymous No.11486003]

>>11485619
Ö?

[Anonymous No.11486230]

>>11476666
>>11476757
Who/what is "I"?
The only think we can be certain of is that thoughts exist, nothing beyond that.

[Anonymous No.11486632]

>>11475430
Evolution isn't real.

[Anonymous No.11486642]

>>11486632
Incorrect, try again.

[Anonymous No.11486728]

>>11484178
what does it mean for something to equal something? 1=1 is not objectively true

[Anonymous No.11487031]

>>11486632
>Evolution isn’t real even though it’s easy to observe in the lab

[Anonymous No.11487540]

>>11477609
Lmao it does not quite often. ILS is a major problem in tree building.
Also, what is a UCE compared to a gene and which is used to build trees and why?
>>11477609
What is a clade? This isn’t the 90s.

[Anonymous No.11487551]

>>11477660
You have to explain what evolution is when you say “it’s called evolving”. Please do that.
>>11477714
Explain why selection favored those traits. What is evolvability?

[Anonymous No.11487748]

>>11487540
>Lmao it does not quite often. ILS is a major problem in tree building.
It's hardly a major problem unless you are only using a single gene to construct a tree.

>Also, what is a UCE compared to a gene
Most UCEs are noncoding and most genes have no UCEs.

>and which is used to build trees and why?
Genes are used because they are much easier to find than UCEs and show variation between related species.

>What is a clade? This isn’t the 90s.
A clade is simply a group consisting of a common ancestor and all of its lineage. What exactly do you think is outdated about this?

>>11487551
>You have to explain what evolution is when you say “it’s called evolving”.
Change in the genome of a population.

>Explain why selection favored those traits.
Because they increased the probability of those traits being propagated in offspring.

Instead of asking rhetorical questions, just state your argument.

[Anonymous No.11487930]

>>11484291
That is so retarded. What is your head canon version of ai?

[Anonymous No.11488022]

>>11487748
I’m making sure I’m not engaging a full retard. I won’t be a dick no more.

ILS is a major problem and it’s why the biological concept of species is breaking with the evidence supporting leaky branches. This is pretty much a return to type and form Platonism so hated by the mid 1900s biologists.

The purpose for asking about a gene vs
UCE was to clear any misconceptions about the use of genes in tree constructionsince the layman is only taught the central dogma of biology. The one gene - one protein model does not really apply after the paradigm switch in the 2000s to a preference of cis regulatory elements as likely “drivers” (not a fan of that term) of evolution. Not every gene produces a transcription factor and a reliance on only UCE may not provide enough divergence between clusters to produce believable relationships. Although there will always be variation among species. It’s what makes people call them species.

The 90s comment was bait. People still do parsimony and monophylism is still a meme.

Evolution: Are you more of a modern synthesis or extended evolutionary synthesis fag? You gotta clean up that definition my man.

Selection favoring traits: gotta do something more than circular reasoning.

[Anonymous No.11488048]

>>11475430
The most of scintists are also retards.

[Anonymous No.11488050]

to whom it may concern: Go to GPS location30.858206, -98.398544 Dig 2 feet down.

[Anonymous No.11488957]

>>11475847
Holy shit is this real? So basically I have an excuse now for being too lazy to lift?

[Anonymous No.11489119]

>>11488022
>ILS is a major problem and it’s why the biological concept of species is breaking with the evidence supporting leaky branches.
Source?

>Not every gene produces a transcription factor and a reliance on only UCE may not provide enough divergence between clusters to produce believable relationships.
But where is their reliance on UCEs?

>Evolution: Are you more of a modern synthesis or extended evolutionary synthesis fag? You gotta clean up that definition my man.
Why? What's wrong with it?

>Selection favoring traits: gotta do something more than circular reasoning.
What circular reasoning?

I can see have no argument, you're just throwing creationist talking points at the wall and seeing which ones stick.

[Anonymous No.11489324]

>>11488957
Yes, if you are part of these 25% you will never build any kind of muscle even if you work out with a perfect plan and diet.

[Anonymous No.11489337]

Dogs don't need dentists because they don't use toothpaste.
All you have to do with your mouth is floss it after meats.

[Anonymous No.11489395]

>>11489337
and you can floss it with a piece of plastic film
(and I don't know that guy, it's just a first picture with the term)
I'm sorry I planted it here. I'll make another thread: >>11489393

[Anonymous No.11489455]

>>11489337
>Dogs don't need dentists because...

... because they don't live past 20 years old.

[Faggot No.11489567]

>>11489337
Stop posting this image everywhere and cite your sources

[Anonymous No.11489583]

>>11476979
>One fossil was fucked and even though everyone knew it, this disproves evolution and therefore God is real.
You can literally observe evolution in real time with microbiology, and selective breeding of plants and animals. We've observed it naturally happening over decades in the wild. The fossil record is at this point quite extensive. The gaps your god lives in are trivially interpolated at this point.
You can continued to bitch about biogenesis, but natural selection and evolution have been settled for a long time. Get over it.