Are women equal, scientifically speaking?

[Anonymous No.11469673]

From the evolutionary perspective, can't we view them as baby incubators and little more? Breasts are physical impediments to any serious activity, their brains are smaller, the distribution of fat is for the benefit of the womb and is inefficient otherwise. Men are better at literally everything else. If this is true, why did feminism come about?

[Anonymous No.11469681]

>>11469673
And from the evolutionary perspective men are just sperm carriers. The reason feminism developed is because women are people too.

[Anonymous No.11469718]

>>11469673
Are men equal, scientifically? From the evolutionary perspective, can't we view them as existing only to compete and provide genetic variation?

By the way, that line of reasoning above is how women can justify treating ugly men like subhumans without thinking.

[Anonymous No.11469729]

scientifically speaking no one is equal. but if we speak averages of all group members then females do slightly to significantly worse than men in some aspects like academia, leadership, etc.

[Anonymous No.11469750]

>>11469681
>And from the evolutionary perspective men are just sperm carriers.
No, men are sperm carriers and literally everything else. Leaders, hunters, builders, inventors. Men are optimized for all these things and have a penis on top of it. Meanwhille, evolutionarily women are optimized for two things: having children and raising children.

[Anonymous No.11469754]

>>11469718
>By the way, that line of reasoning above is how women can justify treating ugly men like subhumans without thinking.
How does it justify women treating ugly men who are better at everything (but children) than them poorly?

[Anonymous No.11469761]

>>11469673
Even weaker parts of society can have word or are smart enough to have a word, and thing and commit actions, if educated well.

It's all about the fact, that man can be better at anything, but woman still remain sufficient, and man can even be worse than a woman, because he's egoistic dumbfuck, who cannot see over their mainhood.

There are many scenarios where woman are more usefull, and many where men.

It's not all about the breeding. Even if it would, would you lock them up somewhere?

If not, which is most probable, there's that thing you cannot forbid them from thinking about certain things, therefore be even better than man, because man haven't had such interest.

When you cherrypick correctly you can prove woman can be better at anything, but really do you want them to be a lumberjacks?

They have different role in society than man, and we should accept that.

Also personality is more of a factor to decide if perons suitable for a job or being good at something than genitals.

However, they shouldn't overdo it with "a man can do I can do too"

[Anonymous No.11469763]

>>11469754
The role of male exists to foster optimal genetic variation. Since breeding is more time-gated for the role of female, they are heavily incentivized to ignore partners which they see as less valuable than them. It's not that the male is inferior to the female, it's that the female is going to compare them to other potential mates and see them as having little to no value.

I wasn't implying that women _should_ treat men that way, but simply that they are not incentivized to do otherwise.

[Anonymous No.11469774]

>>11469673
that image gives me a RB
where do I find a woman who looks like this but doesn't behave like this in public?

[Anonymous No.11469804]

>>11469750
based comment

[Anonymous No.11469818]

>>11469673
>women
Not science or math.

[Anonymous No.11469827]

>>11469750
From the evolutionary perspective, women are much more valuable than men.
Why have societies sent men off to war, to die in the tens of thousands? It's because men are relatively expendable. It's the same reason why we hunt bucks during the hunting season, and shooting a doe is illegal.
A woman represents near-guaranteed reproductive capacity. Men exist to provide genetic diversity. For all of the "Leaders, hunters, builders, inventors", there are an equal (if not greater) amount of genetic dead ends; homeless/NEET/loser types who will never have kids and never attract a woman to have kids with.

[Anonymous No.11469840]

>>11469827
>From the evolutionary perspective, women are much more valuable than men.
Only under certain conditions. If on a deserted island you could choose to get rid of all the women or the men you'd get rid of all the women because it is certain that on the aggregate they suck ass at what is demanded of them to survive on the island and having kids would only make it worse. Women are only "more valuable" when you're afraid of a population bottleneck. 500 men and 1500 women repopulates 3x faster than the reverse BUT that society is going to be pretty cringe until it gets more men
>Why have societies sent men off to war, to die in the tens of thousands?
No, it's because men are better soldiers. Imagine sending an army of women to fight the Persians...

[Anonymous No.11469849]

equality now and equality 1000 years ago is not the same, that's what you brainlets fail to understand.

woman wouldn't demand equality 1000 years ago because 99% of the jobs available back then were lifting heavy things and cleaning shit. now that we have these 'none-essential' jobs the equality debate is open to discussion.

back when offices didn't exist, woman didn't even think about emancipation. they were happy cleaning dust

[Anonymous No.11469857]

>>11469849
>demand equality
We don't have feminism because WOMEN demanded equality for themselves....

[Anonymous No.11469951]

>>11469763
>The role of male exists to foster optimal genetic variation.
AND everything else, whereas females exist to give birth and nothing else

[Anonymous No.11470126]

>>11469951
I don't even think you're wrong, I'm just explaining their lines of justification. Ever heard of Self-made Man, by Laura Vincent? It's literal proof that women are not up to the standard of being a man.

[Anonymous No.11470129]

>>11469774
join a running club i guess

[Anonymous No.11470291]

>>11469673
I don't like text on undergarments. Especailly CALVIN KLEIN CLVIN KLEIN CALVIN KLEIN.

Yeah, more like Calvin KLAMED.

[Anonymous No.11470308]

>>11469673
I don't like text on undergarments. Especially CALVIN KLEIN CALVIN KLEIN CALVIN KLEIN.

More like Calvin KLAMPED.

[Anonymous No.11470314]

>>11470308
Ralph Lauren? More like Ralph Losin' Oxygen from being CLAMPED.

[Anonymous No.11470442]

>>11469827
women are only useful for making more men

[Anonymous No.11470683]

>>11469673
>Are women equal, scientifically speaking?
Yes. Mentally anyway, physically women only differ from men in the obvious ways (which includes a more robust immune, detox and lymphatic system due to two copies of the X chromosome). Any and all existing inequalities are down to cultural, social, economic factors inherited from previous generations, including being unequally tasked with giving birth and raising children, as just one example.
>From the evolutionary perspective, can't we view them as baby incubators and little more?
You can do whatever you want to your worldview, doesn't lend it any credence or make it valid.
>Breasts are physical impediments to any serious activity
I think we've isolated your problem.

[200 IQ Superior genius anon No.11470704]

>>11469673
Holy shit this thread is only for backward. Hope some anons do the flipflop.

[Anonymous No.11471054]

>>11470308
You must admit, that without words on it, it is really sexy,

[Anonymous No.11471123]

>>11470683
>Yes. Mentally anyway,
Not really, hormones change some of that. Males will usually be more agressive for example. But intellectually they're more or less the same, albeit men seem to show a greater variance I believe.
>Any and all existing inequalities are down to cultural, social, economic factors inherited from previous generations
Which also happens because they are weaker and can't take some jobs or compete for resources with strenght (by stealing and plundering). It's not just 'man makes women weak', it's also because they were too weak to take advantage of certain opportunities directly. Male and female reproductive strategies are different as >>11469763 pointed out, and for a female it simply makes sense to risk less even if it means gaining less, because they can simply compete for a sucessful male instead. Even if it fails, they can still breed fairly easy anyways. So you'd end up with lots of males that become very sucessful, males no one cares about and average females. Give some millenia and of course that develops into social and political inequalities.
>You can do whatever you want to your worldview, doesn't lend it any credence or make it valid.
Yeah, which is why he's asking if his opinion is correct and providing supporting arguments. He's not asking if he can think like that, he's obviously asking if thinking so is valid. But you know that already.

[Anonymous No.11471129]

>>11471123
>(by stealing and plundering)
Forgot to add, but of course those are not the only ways. You could compete for land or prey for example, but those are the ones that directly fuck your competitors the most while giving you a lot of resources.

[Anonymous No.11471142]

>>11469857
The only type of people who were against pedophilia were women themselves, not men. They believed that child sex with an adult isn't healthy and harmful for the child, they pushed the idea of the age of consent.

[Anonymous No.11471354]

>>11469673
>If this is true, why did feminism come about?
Dumb beta males got together and decide to fuck up the world and their own lives.

[Anonymous No.11471355]

>>11470308
I hate when I see a bitch wearing fucking calvin klein. Gets up my nerves

[Anonymous No.11471358]

>>11471142
Anon, you're fucking retard. Imagine thinking that pedophilia is normal and healthy for the child. Hope you die anon.

[Anonymous No.11471366]

[Anonymous No.11471374]

>>11469673
Women are superior. We can look at reproductive success, lifespan, criminality or many other measures to prove that.

[Anonymous No.11471376]

>>11471366
>>/sci/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=women+are+stupid&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

[Anonymous No.11471383]

>>11471374
decent bait but won't work on most people here

[Anonymous No.11471392]

>>11469673
how is this even a question?
civilization has been dominated by males from its inception

[Anonymous No.11471393]

>>11471374
Whore?

[Anonymous No.11471406]

>>11469774
>that image gives me a RB
what did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.11471990]

>>11470683
>>11471123
huh what? What planet do you fags live on? Women are extremely mentally inferior to men. Have you ever talked to a woman? They're idiotic, pic related

[Anonymous No.11471993]

>>11471142
Based. Old women hate "pedophilia" out of jealousy.

[Anonymous No.11472373]

>>11469673
I would destroy her ass so hard.

[Anonymous No.11472708]

>>11472373
She's a he and you are gay

[Anonymous No.11473280]

>Are men and women equal
No. Cause women are hot. I'd bang a girl but I would never bang a guy. That in itself makes us unequal

[Anonymous No.11473756]

>>11469673
Don't care, don't give a fuck, fuck women.

[Anonymous No.11474172]

>>11469673
This may well be a really dumb analogy but; my legs are far stronger than my arms, so are my arms totally useless? My arms have my hands which I need to manipulate the world, so are my arms more useful than my legs?
It's a bit of a senseless argument. Men need women and women need men. Baby incubation and child raising turns out to be pretty important.

[Anonymous No.11474334]

>>11469827
women are asset, property

men are the owner of such property
we keep them like jewels, like cars, like baby incubators.
that's it all to it son.

[Anonymous No.11474338]

>>11474334
women are naturally better than men at:

-raising children and infant
-being maid (maintaining home, (habitat, etc))
-efficient natural/biological baby incubators which are very important for the survival of human species

[Anonymous No.11474376]

>>11469681
>The reason feminism developed is because women are people too.
Holy cringe

[Anonymous No.11474377]

>>11469827
>From the evolutionary perspective, women are much more valuable than men.
Well yes, because their only function (having children) is also the most important one for humanity.

[Anonymous No.11474380]

>>11469857
Robert Mercer isn't a jew.

[Anonymous No.11474382]

>>11469681
>because women are people too.
That was never into question. Feminism developed because of male philosophers wanting women to become part of the realms that were male inclined like science, politics and religion. Read Poullain de la Barre.

[Anonymous No.11474616]

>>11469673
someone's pissed off after a breakup

[Anonymous No.11474641]

>>11471366
>brain size = iq
Which is why elephants tower above humans physically and intellectually.

[Anonymous No.11474644]

>>11474382
The vast majority of men are hopeless at those fields.

[Anonymous No.11474656]

>>11469681
>because women are people too
No they're not.

[Anonymous No.11474662]

>>11474382
>n. Feminism developed because of male philosophers
No, ideas dont drive history, its vice versa. Retarded and braindead

[Anonymous No.11474663]

>>11474641
>the elephant fallacy

[Anonymous No.11474670]

>>11474663
>brainweight (kg) is the chart shown and the "argument" in the OP

[flu=flu "corona" virus = mass (...) No.11474685]

>>11469673
Feminism is trigger blah blah about nothing like corona virus (flu) keeping you occupied from finger out how to make life more wonderful and serve, Usury is legal, everything else is distraction.

[Anonymous No.11474689]

>>11474670
>brainweight between humans
>but muh elephants

[Anonymous No.11474695]

>>11474662
>No, ideas dont drive history
Holy fuck thats retarded.

[Anonymous No.11474698]

>>11474689
>between humans
And this is relevant, how?
The elephant case demonstrates that neuron composition and functional connectivity matter more than sheer numbers or sheer mass.
Though I doubt you have an infographic that addresses this.

[Anonymous No.11474701]

>>11474644
>The vast majority of men are hopeless at those fields.
>male inclined before XX century
>absolutely no reading comprehension
american education

[Anonymous No.11474708]

OP's question is wrong because women aren't even equal to other women and men aren't even equal to other men.

I will say, however, that men are generally forced to be better than women (and other men) if they want to stand a chance in society. Gender Egalitarians should look at that phenomenon more closely.

[Anonymous No.11474709]

women aren't only biologically inferior, they rae also psychologically inferior

you'll never find a woman in academia that risks getting criticized by her peers. women will always, ALWAYS publish scientific "research" which is "safe" and unlikely to cause an argument/confrontation with somebody else

women LOVE titles, hierarchies because it reinforces their position without having to prove themselves over and over again (not having to battle for your position is a female trait)

they also, even in the highest positions, generally don't speak out thier mind directly.. i've seen fucking female math professors talking shit behind others backs instead of confronting people directly

they also always are afraid of the hiveminds opinion of them, leading to making subobptimal decisions in favour of being socially liked i.e. they will NEVER fire somebody who isn't performing but is liked by his peers , because that could make the peers dislike her


all in all, women are completley unfit to rule , lead, and also to invent, because they avoid risks as much as possible while men compromise the biggest retards and geniuses that take risks

if you want a pro life tip: NEVER let a woman be in a higher position than you in the job or academic hierarchy, nothing good will ever come from it , you have been warned

[Anonymous No.11474739]

>>11469673
>If this is true, why did feminism come about?
egalitarism- the rebelion against nature

[Anonymous No.11474740]

>>11474698
Answer this: is the layout and anatomy of the elephant brain the same as the humans? Do the neurons work to do the same things? Nope.
>being this stupid

[Anonymous No.11474747]

>>11474695
>dusty books that spergs write that noone reads cause massive societal change
Holy fuck the retardation
Ok let me enlighten you: It's all about the will of the wealthy which is determined rather shallowly, by genes and the material environment. They will fund/pay lip service to ideas that rationalize this will and they will censor/ignore other ideas. So the will (history) comes BEFORE the ideas you find in the dusty old books. The ideas are just a post hoc rationalization of whatever the elite wanted at that point in time. The ONLY way ideas can drive history is this route, more or less: idea -> technology -> environment change. So no, philosophers have nothing to do with history and feminism didn't come about because some guys wrote that it should

[Anonymous No.11474754]

>>11474695
If philosophy drives history and not vice versa, then why aren't women back in the kitchen even though I proved they should be? https://oligarchicalneoformalism.blogspot.com/2020/02/part-i-few-questions-are-as-important.html
Why aren't blacks on the boat back to Africa? https://oligarchicalneoformalism.blogspot.com/2019/11/iq-is-extremely-important-more-so-than.html
You're so retarded it's funny. You LITERALLY believe some guy wrote a book saying "we should let women vote" and then everyone read it, had a great dialectic in the sky and rationally decided (even though they were wrong) to let the holes vote. Your understanding of history is profoundly disabled.

[Anonymous No.11474761]

>>11474701
The vast majority of men were even more hopeless then, indicating that something else would be a better determinant of one's capabilities in those fields than sex.

[Anonymous No.11474767]

>>11474709
Hello /r9k/, and welcome to /sci/.
I trust you have citations for all this?

[Anonymous No.11474769]

>>11469673
scientifically speaking you won't get to ever be with one (not a good looking one for sure), so why do you even bother, my man? go solve some other scientific mysteries.

[Anonymous No.11474777]

>>11474740
>The elephant case demonstrates that neuron composition and functional connectivity matter more than sheer numbers or sheer mass.
Reading comprehension. Learn it. Know it. Use it.

[Anonymous No.11474784]

>>11469673
"if"
Because as technology has freed us of the burdens of survival it has allowed us to become more equal as individuals. Feminism came about to promote equality.

[Anonymous No.11474787]

>>11474777
>Reading comprehension. Learn it. Know it. Use it.
Nope, you're missing the fact that neurons in the back do different things than neurons in the front. Get schooled pseud

[Anonymous No.11474788]

>>11474769
lol why you think women actually care about personality? cringe

[Anonymous No.11474789]

>>11474787
What do you think functional connectivity is?
We're saying the same thing i.e. mass means nothing, wiring is what matters. Therefore, one can't simply assert without evidence that a more massive brain is a smarter one.

[Anonymous No.11474790]

>>11474777
seems unlikely that women have some super secret connectivity pattern which makes up for their ~4 billion fewer neocortical neurons (1)/overall smaller size given male brains have greater complexity as well (pic related)

which again, is in line with a reality in which almost nothing has been invented by women, the most prestigious awards continue to be male dominated (fields medal, nobel prizes, IMO perfect scores), pretty much what you would expect with men having higher means for these traits. which, of course, doesn't mean there aren't some small minority of women who can compete at that level - just that they will necessarily be very rare compared to the male prevalence

>1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9215725

[Anonymous No.11474791]

>>11474709
>women LOVE titles, hierarchies because it reinforces their position without having to prove themselves over and over again
Well women love those because it shows she's being propped up by men. Women can't earn their own authority because they're inferior physically and mentally

[Anonymous No.11474793]

>>11474767
>I trust you have citations for all this?
Source: go outside and talk to females

[Anonymous No.11474796]

>>11474789
>Therefore, one can't simply assert without evidence that a more massive brain is a smarter one.
I didn't, in humans mass correlates with IQ at .4
Get BTFO you cringe, hole'd pseud whore

[Anonymous No.11474802]

>>11474747
>feminism is only recent and has no precedents
Keep feeding on what media gives you ameritard

[Anonymous No.11474804]

>>11469673
I want her to step on me and call me dumb

[Anonymous No.11474805]

>>11474754
>If philosophy drives history and not vice versa, then why aren't women back in the kitchen even though I proved they should be?
Cringe

[Anonymous No.11474809]

>>11474802
Elaborate eurofag

[Anonymous No.11474810]

>>11474805
seethe

[Anonymous No.11474812]

>>11474790
You certainly read that paper.

[Anonymous No.11474823]

>>11474761
>The vast majority of men were even more hopeless then, indicating that something else would be a better determinant of one's capabilities in those fields than sex
I never stated how "good" men were as a whole in those subjects, nor did I state "sex" was determinant to their success. Its a historic fact that men were more inclined/motivated than women before there was a paradigm change. Try reading before replying.

[Anonymous No.11474844]

>>11469827
>Men exist to provide genetic diversity. For all of the "Leaders, hunters, builders, inventors", there are an equal (if not greater) amount of genetic dead ends; homeless/NEET/loser types who will never have kids and never attract a woman to have kids with.

Yes, men carry the brunt of the weight of selection pressure. Those genetic dead ends are the necessary consequence of having male geniuses.

[Anonymous No.11474858]

>>11470683
>Mentally the same
>Overwhelming majority of scientists, explorers, leaders, politicians, philosophers, scholars, painters, architects, artists, singers, historians, etc is male
>"Yeah bro were mentally the same, its just sociocultural factors"

Fucking imbecile

[Anonymous No.11474874]

Girls are better than boys at talking and expressing themselves and worse at math/science/building.

In other words boys have valuable ideas that are worth saying, but they dont speak their ideas that easily.
Girls on the other hand cant speak their ideas fluently but the ideas themselves are worthless.

[Anonymous No.11474877]

>>11474874
“Girls on the other hand *can* speak their ideas....”

[Anonymous No.11474934]

>>11474874
Yeah this is exactly why every great speaker in history is a male and charisma is a very masculine trait. Fucking retard.

Truth of the matter is that women are weak and dumb, this is exactly why we have the responsibility of guiding them and caring for them thru life, as in their inferiority they can do something no man could ever do, give live and care for her children and make a home for her family.

[Anonymous No.11474954]

>>11474810
pentagram of evil

[Anonymous No.11475008]

>>11474874
Women complain more and are more inefficient with language and feminist jews call this superiority.
Source: try arguing with a woman. She will repeat herself 50000 times and make the most profound verbal logic errors. Her "reasoning" (if you can even call it that) will be filled with non sequiters, appeals to consensus, appeals to authority, and is/ought confusions. As is well known, they are also very likely to cite their feelings as evidence for some objective reality.

[Anonymous No.11475109]

>>11469673
>pic
Wh is she wearing two panties? Extra protection?

[Anonymous No.11475110]

>>11475008
>appeals to consensus, appeals to authority, and is/ought confusions. As is well known, they are also very likely to cite their feelings as evidence for some objective reality.
Kind of sounds like scientists.

[Anonymous No.11475240]

>>11474874
This is due to ultrasounds, early clamping of the umbilical cord, pitocin, vaccination, circumcision, and microwave irradiation.

Basically, estrogen strongly downregulates neuronal apoptosis. Men are becoming so dysfunctional because perinatal trauma and early life toxic stressors cause males vastly more damage. This is well known.

Men today != men of the past. For the resource availability and general level of education, no matter what we can say of its quality, males have been obviously crippled and quite deliberately.

Clamped. Unclamp. Wake up. IQ reduction programs are in full swing.

[Anonymous No.11475244]

>>11475240
Think of US as the proto-epsilons of Brave New World. Look at kids who are 5 or 6 right now, look at their behavior. They're behind the schedule I think they had in mind, but they're getting close. Also look up golems.

[Anonymous No.11475247]

>>11475240
THEY ARE CLAMPING US.

[Anonymous No.11475329]

>>11469673
they're better

[Anonymous No.11475384]

>>11475329
Because all the males have brain damage and the system is designed for women to begin with.

Seriously, who even cares at this point? We're so far away from having access to intact subjects by which we can derive the absolute truth, we just can't know. You might as well be comparing the group that got hit in the head with a hammer and the one that didn't, and whoa, lo and behold, the group without brain damage is smarter.

Listen up kiddos, I know this shit is fucked up but you've gotta get real. There is only one instance I know of where brain damage can make an animal smarter, and that's in the case of outright ablation of certain areas. For example in the kangaroo rat, damaging, if I recall, the reticular formation caused it to become more intelligent, long range thinking, planning, tricking the researcher, etc. This was propped up as evidence that surgical methods could cure certain psychological disorders, naturally, being the 1950's. But nonetheless, prior to the operation the animal was curled up in the corner of the cage, smashing itself on the cage, practically breaking its teeth out on the cage.

Is this what you want? Is this the world you want? A bunch of brain damaged psychopaths lording over the more generally brain damaged normies who aren't even allowed to have a foreskin?

[Anonymous No.11475387]

>>11475384
You've gotta start thinking this way. Connect the dots into a bigger picture. If you don't use your brain, someone else will use it for you. If you don't take yourself by the reins, someone else will. That's how it works.

[Anonymous No.11475388]

>>11475240
>>11475244
>>11475247
This is retarded, the only plot is White Genocide, not this boomer tier "they're posining us with the 5g phone waves!!!1!!!!11!!11!1"
Men are the same, life is just easier, they're slightly more onions in the diet and the propaganda is intense. Clamping has not made a generation of retards

[Anonymous No.11475389]

>>11475384
wrap it up in one sentence

[Anonymous No.11475403]

>>11475384
Quit with the disinfo and remember we WILL find your badge in the coming chaos.
Men are not braindamaged and we outperform women because of it. The data you linked was fake and the boomer conspiracy theories are a trick to divert the attention from your ZOG masters to the lizard people on the moon a la Alex Jones and David Icke.

[Anonymous No.11475410]

>>11469673
there's a reason why the vast majority of people in STEM are male even though more women graduate college than men

[Anonymous No.11475417]

>>11475389
To maintain control and soften people for a transition to a new economic and social model, they clamp, vaccinate, circumcise, induce with pitocin, ultrasound, give prenatal vaccines, pitocin prevents breastmilk production and therein the child is denied the breast and fed toxic formula, they fluoridate and chlorimate the water supply, recycle the water supply with methods which are inadequate to filter out post metabolic or excreted prescription drugs, they brominate the flour, they irradiate, they irradiate with cone beam CT at the dentist's office, the food is all poison, we're all full of micron and nano sized aluminum particles, the nuclear family (like clans before them) has been destroyed so children are essentially property of the state, they view us as cattle and raw material because that's how you must think if you're manufacturing parts, organizing, and securing them into a machine.

>>11475403
You are clamped. You need to wake up and unclamp.

[Anonymous No.11475443]

>>11475417
When you're born people don't look at you and think "oh look, another person joins us in the story of our journies through life". They think "oh look, yet another one, ugh."

When you die, it is no great tragedy. No one cares about anyone else, ultimately. Most people just think, in secret, "good, one less person, we've got too many anyway". Or some variation in between.

Every birth is a tragedy. I will be fighting this evil until my death. If I cannot mobilize others it is due to an inadequacy.

[Anonymous No.11475480]

And lastly, I don't know what to make of corona virus, but it should be no surprise that a power structure of a rapidly collapsing planet would fall back on the techniques of control and depopulation developed over the last 200 years. If whatever has manipulated us for millennia is even human, they're probably psychopaths. Even now, people won't see where we really are. They don't care about you. Don't you get it yet? THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU. YOU'RE NOT NECESSARY. YOU'RE A LIABILITY.

It all reminds me of Ergo Proxy, actually. It's all there. Biomimetics (the "cells" of the Gods are synthetic biology, biomimetic, which is how they shapeshift), nanotechnology, the dual nature of the creator, domed cities, a virus proliferating. Though I don't think the planet will freeze over, and the odds of man organizing any kind of space oriented temporary escape (they boomeranged around one of the outer planets) is low. Perhaps this is how it happened the last time.

Yet here we are. Still debating whether it's okay if they clamp our umbilical cords early and cut on our penises without permission. What a joke. Tell me about "the flood that cleans".

[Anonymous No.11475508]

>>11475388
About the pic: It's countries trying to wipe out the more critical thinking people within the population to saturate it with less developed people so that the population is easier to manipulate and control.

[Anonymous No.11475568]

>>11475384
>system is designed for women to begin with
This is the case mostly. The education system is biased against boys and its designed for girls. When boys struggle with the energy they have during their young years they get diagnosed with ADHD and sedated into apathy. And this is just elementary school. Onto high school and academia the difference just gets bigger with women outnumbering men in college in general and scholarships given.

[Anonymous No.11475688]

>>11469840
>500 men and 1500 women repopulates 3x faster than the reverse BUT
doubt, all the 1500 women would be wanting the top 10 chad cock, leaving the rest 490 men useless

[Anonymous No.11475824]

>>11469750
>raising children

WTF? You weren't raised by your mother, were you?

[Anonymous No.11475860]

>>11475329
Grades. LOL. How about standardized test scores, where no favor can be sought?

[Anonymous No.11475888]

>>11474874

lol you are simply wrong. girls are worse at EVERYTHING. the biggest reason for that is because they only learn by imitation and not by confrontation

men usually challenge other men, and if you cant beat them you have to develop a new, better way to do so

women just adopt or copy what already exists and try to make their superiors happy

[Anonymous No.11475906]

>>11469673
Short answer, no, men are smarter but on paper die to testing women are shown to be as smart or smarter than men, look into this book, everything is cited, over 300 citations, it's free as well.

[Anonymous No.11475918]

>>11475906
its just the old binomial (men) vs normal (women) distribution dilemma. Most women are smarter than the stupidest men while most of the smartest men are smarter than the average women.

[Anonymous No.11475919]

>>11475906

> smart and sexy
> i have many citations so i must be right!!!

kys nigger

[Anonymous No.11475929]

>>11475918
>the smartest men are smarter than the average woman

you don't say

[Anonymous No.11475934]

>>11475918

lol. almost all men are smarter than all women

women do well on IQ tests because they are good at guessing what is expected from them, not because they are intelligent

[/x/theposter !82ssh8bxXw No.11475942]

>>11469673
Why is she doing calculus in her skimpies?

[Anonymous No.11476038]

>>11469673
imagine not knowing how important women/mothers are in the history of the humanity

[Anonymous No.11476056]

>>11475919
Fuck you you nigger piece of shit I bet you ask for citations you ugly ass bitch ass nigger bitch, get fucked chodestar

[Anonymous No.11476057]

>>11475417
>To maintain control and soften people for a transition to a new economic and social model, they clamp, vaccinate, circumcise, induce with pitocin, ultrasound, give prenatal vaccines, pitocin prevents breastmilk production and therein the child is denied the breast and fed toxic formula, they fluoridate and chlorimate the water supply, recycle the water supply with methods which are inadequate to filter out post metabolic or excreted prescription drugs, they brominate the flour, they irradiate, they irradiate with cone beam CT at the dentist's office, the food is all poison, we're all full of micron and nano sized aluminum particles, the nuclear family (like clans before them) has been destroyed so children are essentially property of the state, they view us as cattle and raw material because that's how you must think if you're manufacturing parts, organizing, and securing them into a machine.
Do you have data that shows that this stuff causes docility?

[Anonymous No.11476062]

>>11475688
>all the 1500 women would be wanting the top 10 chad cock
Implying without jews to kvetch about hole rights they would get the seed they want

[Anonymous No.11476065]

>>11475918
>the smartest men are smarter than the average women.
fucking kek

[Anonymous No.11476102]

>>11476057
Not all of it causes docility, at least not directly, but given that the body is one highly interconnected connected whole it can all be said to be "connected" and in large part synergistic. Therefore even aspects which don't directly cause docility or whatever word we might use, they cause bodily issues or states which establish feedback loops that bias behavior toward being further harmed by the other elements. An example, say you're being poisoned and have metabolic disruption of some kind, are chronically stressed, and therefore in a constant sympathetic dominant state. Your cholesterol and blood pressure is high. You go to the doctor. He gives you a statin and something to modulate your blood pressure. What's the problem? The brain is made of cholesterol. Your circulating cholesterol is elevated because you have arterial inflammation, your body is using it to manufacture stress hormones, and is using it for repair. If you pharmacologically drive it down, it cannot repair, the body starts to try to take it from the brain, neurodegeneration results. Statins cause brain damage and stroke. That's just one branch.

Regardless. I have this dream of sorts to finally consolidate all of this into one mega-document, all in one place. Sections for all of the above, and more. Some history and commentary on the behavior of the broader system (like dentists purchasing fancy new cone beam CT, and to pay it off, wanting to use it as much as possible). I can imagine finishing this, and finally breathing a, though perhaps and probably temporary, sigh of relief. I think people tend to assume I just come out with this shit, but actually I was arguing with people about water fluoridation over ten years ago, looking into the manhattan project connection (uranium refinement, uranium hexafluoride, etc), P. Mullenix, fluoride inhibiting over 200 enzyme systems. Then it was the food supply in general. I've had this line of consideration,

[Anonymous No.11476105]

>>11476102
and this frame of thought, in my life for quite a while. My entire adult life and somewhat before

So anyway, if I did the research, cross referencing, trying to validate and substantiate, anyone can do the research. There's just too much to cite off the top of my head. I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.11476130]

>>11476102
>Over 10 years
Well actually it was probably around 7-8 years. It feels like decades though. Decades of endless bullshit.

[Anonymous No.11476145]

No, and the science is settled.

[Anonymous No.11476149]

>>11469681
Even if women were people, not all people are equal.

[Anonymous No.11476185]

What about lesbian independent women who's happy with her life?
Check mate, natural selection fags.

[Anonymous No.11476192]

>>11476185
They still separate into masculine and feminine roles.

And childhood trauma. ;^)

[Anonymous No.11476204]

>>11469673
>If this is true why did feminism come about
Because real life isn't an RPG video game where everything is distributed into stat points. There are brilliant women and stupid men. Women are worse at somethings generally and better at others just like men. Are men better at economic growth activities? Sure, but that doesn't mean women shouldn't do those things. The problem with trying to fit an entire group into a box is that you refuse to allow for greatness. Look at female astronauts, absolute paragons of humanity, yet they are female. What would happen if we denied them the opportunity? We would all be worse off. The key is treat individuals with individual judgement, and avoid "identity politics"

[Anonymous No.11476225]

>>11476102
>>11476105
>>11476130
give 1 source showing any of that shit causes docility or you're a schizo/fed that needs to take its meds

[Anonymous No.11476226]

>>11476204
>Look at female astronauts, absolute paragons of humanity, yet they are female. What would happen if we denied them the opportunity? We would all be worse off
Almost fell for it

[Anonymous No.11476246]

>>11476225

[Anonymous No.11476256]

>>11476225
(Occurs as well and sometimes more at lower power densities, nonlinear dose response)

[Anonymous No.11476260]

>>11476225
.

[Anonymous No.11476264]

>>11476225
..

[Anonymous No.11476283]

>>11476225
>>/sci/thread/S11447584
An important paper that was not included.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423128/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635423
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215582
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29689745

Again, if I went about building up a framework showing how all these pieces interact to produce, relative to some particular context or subpopulation, and by some definition, "docility" (which is a word I didn't use to begin with) I'd be at it all day.

[Anonymous No.11476339]

Also, I realize now that my life has been somewhat traumatic, and this has led me to be able, and prone, to somewhat mindlessly traumatize others in the same way. Generally justifying means by ends, or necessity. And unfortunately we are at a point where it is necessary, people have to know, and this shit has to be systematically dismantled and stopped. Some of this stuff, I've been at it for so long, odds are I've pretty much lost the ability (or desire, because I know how fucked up it is) to come at it from a perspective of someone who is encountering it for the first time. For this I am sorry. The world is a crooked scam and predatory at every level, and I don't know what else I'm supposed to say. It's relevant here, it's relevant there, it's gotten so bad, it's relevant just about everywhere.

[Anonymous No.11476384]

>>11476264
(Like many things, hidden away under an innocuous title. I almost skipped it.)

[Anonymous No.11476397]

>>11469673
>Are women equal, scientifically speaking?

the question has no basis in reality.

equality isn't something that can be abstracted to the level that you are attempting to abstract it to, while still remaining a scientific topic.

[Anonymous No.11476410]

>>11476062
This

[Anonymous No.11476777]

ITT: Incels desperately attempt to rationalise why they hate women while totally avoiding their emotional bias

[Anonymous No.11476793]

>>11469673
Incel neck beard op fuck off and shit yourself with your toilet paper in your basement

[Anonymous No.11477250]

>>11476777
>>11476793
lol
>>11476384
send?

[Anonymous No.11477274]

Why is she wearing 2 pairs of underwear

[Anonymous No.11477278]

Life wouldn't be fun if I couldn't chase thots

[Anonymous No.11477559]

>>11477250
>send?
4chan banned me for telling the truth outside of the allowed format, again, but I have returned.
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
I put documents here.

[Anonymous No.11477562]

>>11477274
It's only one. The other is underunderwear.

[Anonymous No.11477564]

>>11470308
>paying to be an advertisement isn't sexy to him

[Anonymous No.11477566]

>>11469673
>? Breasts are physical impediments to any serious activity,
>t. Virgin

[Anonymous No.11477567]

>>11477562
Ah.

[Anonymous No.11477568]

Women are Jews.

[Anonymous No.11477641]

>>11469673
We are different. We differ in sexual traits, variability and various other factors.

>From the evolutionary perspective, can't we view them as baby incubators and little more?
We are more similar than different. In nearly everything, individuals from these group differ much more among themselves, than males and females compared to each other as a whole. Also that's moral problem, not science.