[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 3.40 MB, 2800x2128, HPIM4097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11448743 No.11448743 [Reply] [Original]

We discuss 5G ITT. I figured while I'm here I might as well post this again. A few changes have been made, a few documents have been added. I haven't made a contact email yet, but a few people suggested it and I will get around to it eventually. It'll be titled "_Contact.txt".

Discuss 5G, whether it be security, long term social and societal implications, the current model of man's nature and "progress", or health effects. All of it is relevant.

An initial contribution:
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF

Pic related isn't 5G. It's primarily a 10 and 18 GHz with some other stuff colocated on it, according to FCC filings. If anyone has more information on this it would be appreciated.

>> No.11448779
File: 2.84 MB, 2800x2128, HPIM4616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11448779

>>11448743
Also, the top document is a perpetual WIP but so far not 1.0, many things planned when I have time. I have like 200 documents open. A lot of people have already done this kind of work (and are listed in the "additional resources" section) but the current plan is to keep the existing section breaking down by type of effect and body system, and have a duplicate section categorizing by signal characteristic or specific type of device (eg wifi etc). The purpose of this document is to collect and synthesize a broad range of sources and to structure the whole RF history in one place, but I think I have to go back to basics and maximize its initial and at a glance utility. ie, someone wants to know about wifi, there it is, wifi section.

This is planned.

>> No.11448901
File: 221 KB, 673x2510, Despiraling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11448901

>>11448743

>> No.11448934

>>11448743
>Discuss 5G, whether it be [...] health effects
We know the health effects of non-ionizing radiation. The health effects are "you get warmer in proportion with how much radiation is absorbed by your body". Which for 5G rounds off to approximately nothing.

>> No.11449099

>>11448934
What about the effects of radio waves on insects?

>> No.11449208

>>11449099
They will get warmer in proportion with how much radiation is absorbed by their bodies. Which rounds off to approximately nothing.

>> No.11449601

>>11448934
False, no matter how much you demand it be all there is to it.

>> No.11451337

>>11448934
Go on, tell Dr Michael Hamblin of Harvard that his entire field of expertise (lllt) is bogus, even though it's already being used in surgery.

>> No.11452568

>>11451337
>Go on, tell Dr Michael Hamblin of Harvard that his entire field of expertise (lllt) is bogus, even though it's already being used in surgery.
His entire field of study has minimal evidence of efficacy in a small range of wavelengths and specific dosage, which is not even close to 5G exposure.

>> No.11452580

>>11451337
Many people more expert on the topic than I am have told him exactly that. I suggest you find a better example.