[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 75 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11444794 No.11444794 [Reply] [Original]

Hi. I'm Norman WIldberger, and FUCK real numbers

>> No.11444838

He looks sickly and sleep deprived

>> No.11444876
File: 70 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11444876

>>11444838
hes been worse

>> No.11444880

>>11444794
>*Record Scratch*

>*Freeze Frame*

>''so by now you are probably wondering how I ended up here''

>> No.11444884

>>11444880
hahahahaha you're so funny anon

>> No.11444889
File: 10 KB, 220x289, Leopold_Kronecker_1865.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11444889

>>11444794
The greatest mathematician since Kronecker. The Pythagoreans live on.

>> No.11445184

>>11444794

norman "the last pythagorean" wildberger
he should form an akatsuki like group of rogue mathematicians to battle the establishment

can you imagine partnering him up with a shizo like tooker?

mochizuki would be like itachi

>> No.11445399

>>11445184
>mochizuki would be like itachi
who would be tooker and who would be wildberger ?

>> No.11445455

>>11445399
tooker would be kakuzu
and wildberger would be hidan (always drawing circles and triangles on the ground to buff himself)

>> No.11445624

>>11444794
>Rat
what did he mean by this?

>> No.11445628

>>11444876
Is that real? Where is he now?

>> No.11446170

>>11445628
still makin shit, latest one here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d15H-ote-0
he's not awful when he's not talking about real numbers, but you can watch him seethe when he even gets close to having to talk about them

>> No.11446177

>>11446170
Thats because *aham*
>God made the integers, all else is the work of man

>> No.11446215

>>11444794
Based

>> No.11447201
File: 247 KB, 576x440, 1574770903857.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11447201

Listen. Many moons ago one of you anons dropped this pic in a tooker thread. I'd been on /sci/ for over a year, so the name wildberger wasn't new to me. Prior to reading the thread I hadn't realized /sci/ was shitposting about a guy named "wildberger". We all know /x/ is usually wrong about everything but a broken clock is right twice a day and one time the Mandela Effect was fucking real you guys, but only happened once. There were around 1.5 of the 10 years since /sci/ was created when "wildberger" meant "zany autist" and nobody fucking noticed. I didn't even believe the tooker thread until after I ran a few google searches for "wildberger" and even then I was skeptical. Thinking about it now lends perspective to how closeminded it was to dismiss the truth of the tooker threads, but I am much wiser now. Feeling a bit dizzy, I spent some additional minutes researching "wildberger the person" and ended up on fucking /r/math. In particular I found one of their very popular threads about the man. I gathered from their discussion that he's a crank, and they like the AOC. I had no choice but to check out his channel. I love math schizos but most people just ignore them. Wildberger had to be the most controversial crank I'd ever heard of.
Once upon a rainy afternoon, I found the hours I needed, and when the mood was perfect, I checked him out. I actually watched his videos, and I really liked them. He's not a hack. He's not even boring, and most of what he says is well presented and entertaining. Please watch his videos before making fun of them, and please stop making fun of norman. I don't know how else to say it. He's really fucking wholesome you guys.

>> No.11447454

>>11447201
>nice pasta
Still a fag, the irrationals have been proven to exist for thousands of years.

>> No.11447473
File: 2.79 MB, 853x480, 1583558220676.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11447473

Wildberger is actually right about everything and I'd be surprised if there is anyone on this board who could even come up with a valid argument against him.

>> No.11447481

>>11447201
>I love math schizos
*blocks ur path*

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJkPgol4Kf9iJqnxhsoaQPQ

>> No.11447515

>>11447473
>I'd be surprised if there is anyone on this board who could even come up with a valid argument against him.
His entire program would require generations of mathematicians to implement.
The effectiveness of analysis makes it very unlikely that any analyist, engineer or physicist would not outright ignore these ideas, even if the rest of mathematics would want to implement them.
The desirability of implementing these mathematics, *before* there is any demonstration that they can effectively reproduce things like ODEs and PDEs and give sufficient room to investigate these objects, seems questionable.
The idea to base mathematical constructions on knowledge about the physical universe seems by itself retarded. Even IF the universe were finite and discrete infinite mathematics is still able to describe it with reasonable effectiveness.

Far more interesting would be if there was an effort by him to computerize his mathematics. It seems *exactly* what this kind of mathematics would be useful for.

>> No.11447546
File: 196 KB, 569x802, 1565654373304.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11447546

>>11447481
God, what even was that.

>> No.11447559
File: 454 KB, 1775x180, wew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11447559

>>11447546
This is literally retarded. He's just some grocery store cash register worker, right?