/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11425218]

Wow looks like his anti-aging stuff is really working.

Can you believe he's actually 57 years old while he looks 46?

[Anonymous No.11425231]

>>11425218
>Can you believe he's actually 57 years old while he looks 46?
I hope you aren't implying he said that because he didn't, only that he's biologically equivalent to a 46 years old according to some "tests".

Brainlets also let his beard influence too much the impression of how old he looks like, even though at that age whether you have a beard like that has to do with whether and how much you decide to shave rather than how healthy you are. Just imagine him without it and he looks pretty much as old as he is.

[Anonymous No.11425234]

>>11425231
Chill Aubrey

[Anonymous No.11425235]

>>11425218
17 years until we have even odds of beating ageing. i trust this prediction completely

[Anonymous No.11425236]

He looks just as unhealthy as a vegan. How do these people convince themselves this is a good idea?

[Anonymous No.11425254]

>>11425218
He looks like a teenager

[Anonymous No.11425274]

I can't believe someone would fall for such an obvious con artist. Brainlets are so easily attracted to pseudoscience.

[Anonymous No.11425288]

is that zz top

[Anonymous No.11425291]

>Wow looks like his anti-aging stuff is really working.
What anti-ageing stuff, did he ever mention that he takes some therapy against ageing?

[Anonymous No.11425301]

>>11425291
>What anti-ageing stuff, did he ever mention that he takes some therapy against ageing?
No he doesn't take anything and is an alcoholic.

David Sinclair on the other hand has turned himself into a lab rat for anti aging treatments and looks like picrel at 51.

[Anonymous No.11425312]

>>11425218

he's actully 2000 years old anon, he's already an immortal

[Anonymous No.11425317]

>>11425218
he's a fucking alcoholic (admits in this interview) and looks like one

[Anonymous No.11425320]

>>11425301
>>11425317
>I drink a couple of beers now and then
>OMG OMG HES AN ALCOHOLIC
Are you guys sure you're old enough to post here? Maybe have your first beer then come back.

[Anonymous No.11425337]

>>11425320
he said he drinks 6-7 drinks almost every day dumbass. everyone that works with him mentions hes a heavy drinker

[Anonymous No.11425346]

How come brainlets defend this guy so much? Your anti aging idol looks like he's twice as old as he really is. Face it, it's total pseudoscience. It doesn't work.

[Anonymous No.11425349]

>>11425301
I wasn't impressed by this until I saw he was from Australia. Australians tend to age rapidly, probably from all that hot sun exposure, but this guy looks normal

[Anonymous No.11425350]

>>11425320
it's the fact that he has the blown out skin too, you know. multiple signs

[Anonymous No.11425355]

>>11425218
Wow if I take anti-aging tech I can look like THAT? What an amazing opportunity.

[Anonymous No.11425374]

>>11425291
Well he said he's "biologically 46 years old" whatever that means.

[Anonymous No.11425379]

>>11425346
what doesn't work?
He hasn't undergone any treatments.

[Anonymous No.11425391]

>>11425301
He looks impressively young for his age here for some reason but if you search for pics of him he overall looks only a bit more on the well-preserved side for a 50 years old and not exceptionally so.

[Anonymous No.11425398]

>>11425379
>biologically I'm a decade younger

[Anonymous No.11425399]

>>11425234
lol

[Anonymous No.11425412]

>>11425398
Ok? what does that have to do with anything?

You said "it" doesn't work but can't explain what "it" is. He does literally nothing to try to prevent his own aging yet. He's an alcy with probably a shit diet. Look at david sinclair if you want an example of someone who is proactive and experiments on himself.

[Anonymous No.11425453]

>>11425218
fuck you dude that guy is my hero.

and wtf do you mean his 'anti-aging stuff'? he's not selling fucking skincare products, he's trying to develop methods and research. using his appearance as evidence of the efficacy of something that he would even admit doesn't exist yet is just childish and moronic.

[Anonymous No.11425490]

Is this Hugh Jackman

[Anonymous No.11425595]

>>11425218
Just trust him bro in 5 years you’ll be an immortal 25 year old

[Anonymous No.11425753]

This was one of the shittiest interviews I ever listened to. Fucking nothing of substance for the entire 2 hours.

[Anonymous No.11425815]

>>11425320
Every alcoholic tells other people "I only drink X number of drinks a day." I used to be one. I did the same thing. That being said, him doing research doesn't mean he has to apply it to his life. I just wanted to clarify the alcohol thing. He's 100% an alcoholic

[Anonymous No.11426342]

>>11425753
>just getting my weekly anti-aging injection. chill, bruh

[Anonymous No.11426347]

Do you guys think I can con him into giving me a job? I'm a very young looking 27 year old who is in an aging research lab at my university.

[Anonymous No.11426852]

>>11425753
It's literally every Joe Rogan interview.

[Anonymous No.11426884]

>>11425218
oh just like i look 16 while being 28
nothing like avoiding the sun, not doing drugs and limiting your calorie intake

[Anonymous No.11426897]

>>11425218
>Can you believe he's actually 57 years old while he looks 46?
No because he looks more like 60

[Anonymous No.11426903]

>>11425349
can confirm, spent the last year living in QLD and everyone here is on their way to rubbery old skin (including myself FUCK)

[Anonymous No.11427059]

*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.11427063]

>>11425218
>has beard
opinion ignored

[Anonymous No.11427066]

>>11427059
praised by thy lord of sugar and orange juice.

[Anonymous No.11427068]

>>11425218
>57
More like 67

[Anonymous No.11427070]

>>11426903
Somehow Brits look the same despite living on a rainy island. It's more about genetics bro

[Anonymous No.11427074]

>>11425218
Cool beard

[Anonymous No.11427075]

>>11425337
> he said he drinks 6-7 drinks almost every day dumbass

You don’t? What a queer.

[Anonymous No.11427093]

If you go by looks the best "anti-aging" treatment for guys is HRT.

[Anonymous No.11427097]

>>11425815
>Every alcoholic tells other people
no they don't
>I used to be one
you'll always be an alcoholic, I hope your butt buddies over at AA let you in on this little fact. I just wanted to clarify the alcohol thing

[Anonymous No.11427098]

>>11427093
you mean taking the same hormone that clearly makes women age faster than men is the answer? you should sign right up

[Anonymous No.11427099]

>>11425235
>>11425374
Tf do you test for that

[Anonymous No.11427101]

>>11427099
slice open a limb and count the rings

[Anonymous No.11427109]

>>11427097
>you'll always be an alcoholic, I hope your butt buddies over at AA let you in on this little fact.
AA is a christian cult that tries to make you totally give up on life just so you can fall into the hands of "god"

[Anonymous No.11427137]

>>11425218
My 65 year old dad looks better than this guy

[Anonymous No.11427142]

>>11427093
The biggest difference between those two images is the facial expression. Would fuck both either way

[Anonymous No.11427177]

>>11425218
I can't listen to this guy because he is so irritating and pompous. Maybe he's doing legit research that will help with extending lifespans of humans, but he clearly isn't taking care of his liver.

That being said, there are plenty of people that look awful but live a long time, and then plenty of others that look great but die from something that's in their genetics. Looks are an indicator of healthy genetics, but it doesn't mean you're not part of a batch that's susceptible to cancers or mental illnesses or whatever.

[Anonymous No.11427213]

>>11427177
your deference to genetic basis for everything is just the same psychological instinct that made thinkers of old throw up their hands and refer to god

[Anonymous No.11427272]

>>11427213
Do you have evidence to the contrary?

[Anonymous No.11427382]

>>11427272
do you have evidence in the first place? genes are of course not fake, but they're merely one part of the very complex interconnected system that is life. Any sort of propensity for disease, if it even exists, can be circumnavigated by adapting the treatment of the body in the appropriate manner. Saying someone is prone to diabetes, cancer or alcoholism because of their genes is like saying a dog died of genetic causes because you tried to feed it chocolate. In one sense it is true, but in the other you're talking shit

[Anonymous No.11427391]

>>11427382
So you're not refuting my point?

I don't think "genes are a major factor in lifespan" is far-fetched.

Taking care of yourself will allow you to make the best out of the body you are given, but only to the maximum amount of what you are given. Science/medicine gives you an extra edge above your genes. In a world without medicine it would still be possible for someone to live over 100.

[Anonymous No.11427402]

>>11425274
This, complete scam artist.

[Anonymous No.11427463]

>>11427391
the idea of a "maximum lifespan" is even more ridiculous than total genetic determinism. Explain the mechanism for how genes write your lifespan in stone, without being responding to the overall state of the organism, which corresponds to the chemicals and habits it has been exposed to? Regarding the existence of supercentenarians without medical intervention, it just goes further to show that modern medicine is in many aspects a sham, that tries to sell expensive proprietary molecules as treatment for everything, because the stuff we eat and are made of is too cheap to profit from.

[Anonymous No.11427475]

Imagine a world where no one dies of old age. I think it would make the world a very peaceful place. Life would ironically become infinitely more valuable.

Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.11427484]

>>11427475
People with a lot of power would clutch to their beliefs that get further removed from reality every second that passes. And it would impact the wold negatively. What would the world look like if year 1400 leaders made the most impactful decisions today?

[Anonymous No.11427492]

>>11427484
But wouldn't they unironically be extremely good leaders from having 1400 years of experience at a young, biological, age?

[Anonymous No.11427493]

>>11427484
>Killing people is not possible

[Anonymous No.11427502]

>>11427492
What I'm saying is, they had their childhood (most formative for the brain) during a different segment of time where everything functioned differently. Unless we can induce similar plasticity as when we were 4 years old on 300 year old brains to metamorphosize our brains to the current reality and its reigning belief structures. I know I wouldn't want a religious dogmatic leader for example, because their goal would be removed from my goal. And they would be completely stuck in their head because reality would be too much friction for them. They couldn't talk to 99.9% of the population because their values are far removed, making everything painful. Imagine Savonarola alive today, very very far removed, due to a complex set of morals that no one today fulfills.

>>11427493
Indeed the invisible hand would replace them if they stray too far from reality. This way, we would avoid crazy kings making their life purpose sacrificial fires for some milennia dead god. Someone younger would rally the people, because the younger would believe what the people believes and charm them to action.

[Anonymous No.11427537]

>>11427502
A fair concern, but arguably this technology would be able to provide the plasticity of youth

[Anonymous No.11427555]

>>11427463
I never said anything about a maximum lifespan. Leave your rhetoric for somewhere else and make a sentence that actually has some substance.

[Anonymous No.11427641]

>>11425274
>>11427402
you faggots are retarded, russian 2ch's sci is much more sensible about this (they have 30th thread on biological immortality rn)
What he tells makes complete sense, and he knows the subject well. You know how they say "allow a liar to speak long enough and he will eventually tell himself out" - that's how I knew from the very beginning that something was fishy about miss Holmes it's her secrecy about everything (I know-how I will not tell you nothing attitude) and there were some other issues, but this one is an immediate red flag. Aubrey is completely open, you can meet him in person and ask him anything, and there are hours of him speaking and talking, and point out just one thing he lied about, so stop using your FEELINGS as an indicator of truth, please not on this board.

[Anonymous No.11427653]

>>11427641
That's what makes Aubrey a scam ARTIST. What has he actually achieved apart from talking a lot?

[Anonymous No.11427656]

>>11427641
He makes an interesting point in regards to societys eventual perception switch, and immediate desire for further anti-aging research. It is arguable it would become humanities number 1 priority. Soon as that point is reaches, progress should accelerate dramatically.

[Anonymous No.11427669]

>>11427059
Slightly above average for his age, but nothing too exceptional.

[Anonymous No.11427682]

>>11427555
> but only to the maximum amount of what you are given

[Anonymous No.11427687]

>>11427669
keep in mind that he only got started on his current philosophy of health at the age of like 50 and before that he was fairly unhealthy

[Anonymous No.11427692]

>>11425218
since when is rogan doing interviews with children?

[Anonymous No.11427694]

>>11427093
More so that blond hair makes you look juvenile/feminine.

[Anonymous No.11427698]

>>11427653
Convinced many specialists to dig into this direction. You've no idea what is going at the moment in the field, so please, stop speaking out of your ass

[Anonymous No.11427704]

>>11425753
Worse than LeDoux? No

[Anonymous No.11427705]

>>11427475
>Imagine a world where no one dies of old age. I think it would make the world a very peaceful place. Life would ironically become infinitely more valuable.
It would be so overpopulated there would be wars almost instantly from lack of resources.

[Anonymous No.11427707]

>>11425815
>"I only drink X number of drinks a day."
Because it really feels like this.
You don't even notice yourself how much you sperg out. It's similar with getting fat. You only notice how fat your are when you see yourself on a pic in an unusual angle.

[Anonymous No.11427709]

>noooo I can't be visibly wasting away, the anti aging h-h-has to work!!!

[Anonymous No.11427726]

>>11425753
Was it because you watch too close thus you didn't get nothing new out of it?
Or is it that you didn't understand what they were talking about?

[Anonymous No.11427732]

He looks much older.

Aubrey De Grey is a hack snake-oil salesman, preying on the fears of ordinary people. He has yet to develop a single treatment for ageing, and when confronted about this all he does is ask for more money.

[Anonymous No.11427734]

>>11427705
And the world would drown in the horse mung, right?
Those people will be motivated to live in seclusion of their autonomous homes, because technologies bring not only benefits, but also new hazards. And those homes will have no need to be acres-large, but that is something you will neither understand nor accept if I try to explain why it's a great thing not only for environment, but also for the people.

[Anonymous No.11427735]

It's kinda funny how his fanboys have to paint him as an alcoholic to cover for the fact that they've been conned.

Like your hero is an alcoholic, how is he supposed to do any serious science under the influence?

[Anonymous No.11427736]

>>11427734
You're retarded.

[Anonymous No.11427741]

>>11427732
I don't know if he's a fraud or just sucks, but I find it incredibly annoying how he literally only makes entry-level talks about the subject

[Anonymous No.11427742]

>>11427732
You obviously didn't watch the interview (he didn't have to ask for money anymore, people began investing)
He also never sold anything.
He also invested 7 millions of his own money into this thing at the start.
He also directly stated that it's impossible to have a SINGLE treatment for many-faceted problem (he singled out SEVEN problems we have to solve to stop aging, but you've not a single idea about what he's about, but of course you have an opinion based on your ape culture, you retard)

[Anonymous No.11427745]

>>11427732
>He looks much older.
If you watched the interview, you'd know that he takes not a single treatment, because the later he takes them, the better (and cheaper) they will be - that is not something a salesman would say.

[Anonymous No.11427749]

>>11427736
oh wow! what a magnificent argument!

[Anonymous No.11427752]

>>11427742
Why would anyone invest in someone who's an alcoholic? By his own admittance and those of his biggest fans.

[Anonymous No.11427759]

>>11427749
Right, like your argument that people will basically turn into peaceful versions of the unabomber was any better.

You're ignoring all of history, when there is a lack of resources there is war. If you don't understand this you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.11427763]

>>11427741
>entry-level talks
so retards like you can understand.
I dare you challenge him with a question that would be deeper in the field and film him not knowing what you're talking about. I believe in that very interview I just watched he demonstrated a perfect level of competence when Joe asked him about some specific things neither me nor you knew about.

[Anonymous No.11427769]

Why does /sci/ love pseudoscience so much?

[Anonymous No.11427775]

>>11427759
>You're ignoring all of history, when there is a lack of resources there is war.
You're ignoring all of the present, that the ammount of resources, or our ability to extract them is at all-times high. There's even a term for it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BltRufe5kkI (I don't personally like this guy, but he has the point)

[Anonymous No.11427781]

>>11427769
What is pseudo about it? Please be specific.

[Anonymous No.11427790]

>>11427781
It doesn't actually work

[Anonymous No.11427795]

>>11427781
Jeez I don't know the fact that this guy has been getting millions of dollars and producing nothing?

Like this is the most obvious con of all time how anyone would fall for this shit is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.11427799]

>>11427752
People don't invest in him, they just donate him.
There are many other research groups in the field you can invest into.
When I met him drinking some beer, I asked him about alcohol damaging brains, his answer was "it doesn't damage mine" which was probably a polite way to tell me to fuck off.
Actually, he touches this subject in the interview: some centenarians are drinkers, some are smokers, and the only think they have in common is that they don't give a fuck. So maybe he knows that stress is way more deadly than alcoholism, and he also said that he doesn't drink himself out, which is true.

[Anonymous No.11427803]

>>11427790
What exactly doesn't work? There are quite a few new techonologies actually working in the field.

[Anonymous No.11427804]

>>11427803
That make you look like knockoff gandalf over here?

Let me guess they also sell the tests that show that your biological age is now 10 years younger.

[Anonymous No.11427806]

>>11427799
>let me just donate to this alcoholic
I'm sure he will spend it on science and not more alcohol. How stupid can you be lmao.

[Anonymous No.11427812]

>>11427803
What exactly works?
Nothing

[Anonymous No.11427814]

>>11427795
I personally donated one of his research groups a thousand of bucks, and I visited the lab where they made the research I payed for. And I made a couple of surprise visits into that lab, and I talked to the people who actually worked there. Just one microscope costs about a million, and that thing was literally filled with expensive equipment, so please fuck off. They made the job, it didn't work out, but he specifically tells that he takes routes nobody else would, probably that's the reason they haven't found much.
The way actually successful scientists treat him is the best recommendation for me to donate him some more, you point of view tells about you much more than about the subject it looks at

[Anonymous No.11427816]

>>11427804
So you cannot name a thing, I somehow thought so.

[Anonymous No.11427819]

>>11427814
A fool and his money are easily parted

[Anonymous No.11427821]

>>11427812
Please educate yourself before you open you mouth, gosh..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1zr6JsS5t8

[Anonymous No.11427823]

>>11427816
This is a nice trick you picked up from creationists. Can you prove god doesn't exist? I didn't think so man check mate.

It's up to you to tell us the technologies and proof that they work, not the other way around. You're making the claims dumbass.

[Anonymous No.11427830]

>>11427819
I have no problems with money.
And it wasn't always this way.
And I don't even have to work:
I successfully make science (in completely different field) and I manage to make it independently from state institutions, since first I convinced my relatives to make business, and I took one of them off heroin, so now they feel comfortable with donating me enough so I can donate some of it away. Problems? Who's fool now?

[Anonymous No.11427834]

>>11427821
youtube isn't education, that's probably why you also thing something like that works

[Anonymous No.11427835]

>>11427830
>Who's fool now?
You are, for giving away money to a scam.

[Anonymous No.11427844]

>>11427823
>Can you prove god doesn't exist?
Easily: those who speak the most about him are certified liars. Check mate motherfucker.
If some other god exists, it definitely not something those fool are talking about, and thus it needs another term.
The being who claims he created EVERYTHING is definitely a liar, because he's a part of everything by definition.
And so on, we can play this game for some time, but it's not the right place for it.
And it's not a very good analogy you're using so think about a better one or find a better argument.

[Anonymous No.11427849]

>>11427844
I see you're dodging the actual question here, show me a SINGLE technology you claim exists and proof that it works.

Oh you can't? Is it because you gave away all your money to a scam artist perhaps?

[Anonymous No.11427850]

>>11427834
>youtube isn't education
neither is your university

[Anonymous No.11427853]

>>11427835
It's none of your concern.
Also cynicism is the first obstruction on the way to success.
You also care about other people's money too much, which shows that you're ridiculously poor.

[Anonymous No.11427855]

>>11427853
>Also cynicism is the first obstruction on the way to success.
Right, because the scientific method doesn't work right? We should replace it with an optimistic method that assumes everything works without evidence!

Great idea man I can see you're clearly one of the great minds of our generation.

[Anonymous No.11427861]

>>11427849
They're in that video I posted above: aav-powered genetic therapies which is fantastic, but incredibly expensive; and metformin, which not that fantastic, but incredibly cheap.
And there are many more: stem cells therapies, and a few others some of which I'm not sure of and one I will not announce because of moral reasons)

[Anonymous No.11427867]

>>11427861
videos aren't evidence, especially a video which boils down to
>it works trust me

[Anonymous No.11427869]

>>11427855
No wonder Aubrey drinks. You people are fucking intolerable while sober.
There are many technologies NOW (not when he began) you can apply scientific method onto. When people conceived an airplane, there was nothing to apply that method onto.
Am I making it clear?

[Anonymous No.11427870]

>>11427861
>They're in that video I posted above: aav-powered genetic therapies which is fantastic
Oh right, a youtube video of some guy talking without any challenge.

Some great proof you have there, really convincing stuff.

[Anonymous No.11427871]

The fountain of youth is one of four mechanics people have historically used to deny the fact they will eventually die. Why are you going to such lengths to deny the inevitable?

[Anonymous No.11427872]

>>11427869
>When people conceived an airplane, there was nothing to apply that method onto.
Yes there was, they built a fucking prototype and it either flew or it didn't.

Do you even know how the basics of this stuff works?

[Anonymous No.11427877]

>>11427867
He doesn't ask you to trust him, he speaks about some specific technologies, from where you can dig further. And if you don't know how to extract information from the ocean of it, you probably should stay read-only on this board.
You speak of trust so much, what would you trust? Gosh, you're fucking clueless, here's another video to tell you why you're a fool one more time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5dvUVuwcxg

[Anonymous No.11427878]

It's so sad that some people lose their savings to scam artists like these but it's kinda funny at the same time.

If you have to defend the guy you invested in with "he's an alcoholic" there should be some red flags going up in your head, just saying.

[Anonymous No.11427880]

>>11427877
And where is the evidence?
Youtube video where a guy says "this works" isn't evidence.

[Anonymous No.11427882]

>>11427877
>we put some interns to work over the summer
>they didnt make anything work
Wow another great piece of evidence to support your anti-ageing technology.

[Anonymous No.11427883]

>>11427872
>they built a fucking prototype
BEFORE that, motherfucker.
Before that they somehow knew that was possible, and they definitely had their argumentation, but assholes like you are always around, bottom to the very top!

[Anonymous No.11427888]

>>11427883
Your picture is literally of that prototype. Lmao you're so clueless.

[Anonymous No.11427892]

>nooo you can't just ask for evidence that's not fair nooooo

[Anonymous No.11427895]

>>11427880
What would be an evidence for you?
>>11427882
The only excuse I have for you is that english is not your native language, so you do not recognize speech very well, otherwise you're plain retarde (neither did you understand what that video was telling (it's in the name of it, google what it is if you will) nor,..argh, just fuck off, why do I try to reason with you as if you were smart, when you're obviously not.

[Anonymous No.11427899]

>>11427888
And the first line of it is literally you (you wish) four years before that happened.

[Anonymous No.11427908]

>>11427895
Scientific paper that details the experiment that confirms it works or at the very least argues strongly that it should work with some mice studies or something
You know real evidence? Not a blog or a youtube video

The only excuse you have for not providing it is is that it doesn't exist

[Anonymous No.11427911]

>>11427895
>The only excuse I have for you is that english is not your native language, so you do not recognize speech very well
I watched the video and this is literally what he said, we ask for evidence that your stuff works not evidence that existing literature doesn't.

Also it's funny that you complain about the English of others when you can't even spell right.

You've yet to post _any_ proof of your claims.

[Anonymous No.11427915]

>>11427908
> what replication crisis?
Would Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2009) do?

[Anonymous No.11427920]

>>11427915
Yes the paper detailing how that research is made into use would be just fine

[Anonymous No.11427923]

>>11427920
Can't you find it yourself?

[Anonymous No.11427924]

>>11427895
I don't think you understand the very video you posted. Arguing that existing science is broken is fine, but it does nothing to support your claims.

If someone asks you for proof, showing that someone else was lying about something else doesn't help you.

[Anonymous No.11427926]

>>11427895
>(neither did you understand what that video was telling (it's in the name of it, google what it is if you will)
Listen my man if you're going to nest parenthesis you gotta close them properly.

[Anonymous No.11427927]

>>11427923
>can't find evidence that doesn't exist for me, looks like I win heh I'm a master at arguing
Yes the only reason you can't find evidence to support your argument is because it doesn't exist

[Anonymous No.11427929]

>>11427923
You realize that even if the replication crisis was real it wouldn't help your case right? Like your fake anti-aging stuff still doesn't work you understand this right?

[Anonymous No.11427937]

>>11427924
Oh, boy, you're heavy, you make me make some work here, when we're only talking.
I gave you enough of information already. You don't want it? Fine!
>>11427927
>>11427929
oh for fuck sake, die already

[Anonymous No.11427940]

>>11427937
>I still have no evidence to back anything I say
>Dude just trust me it just werks this youtube guy said so, no one could lie on youtube for financial gain!!

[Anonymous No.11427949]

>>11427940
you handless fucker!
https://www.cell.com/trends/biotechnology/fulltext/S0167-7799(17)30171-3
(it only took me two words: (drugname/companyname) pubmed)

[Anonymous No.11427950]

>>11427940
In b4, "where's your study on how much people lie on youtube." deflection.

[Anonymous No.11427951]

>>11427937
lol fuckin crybaby

[Anonymous No.11427957]

>>11427951
Are you a bully for no reason, because that's how your schoolmates treat you? Make them know that you know it's because they copy how their parents treat them, maybe that will help.

[Anonymous No.11427960]

>>11427957

[Anonymous No.11427967]

>>11427960
Gush, you're so smart!
But straight to bioreactor you go

[Anonymous No.11427970]

>>11427949
You know that literally says "it doesn't work and no such thing exists but if it did it would make a lot of money" right?
It nicely supports my position that it doesn't work and you have no evidence though.

So yes it simply doesn't work see:
https://www.cell.com/trends/biotechnology/fulltext/S0167-7799(17)30171-3

[Anonymous No.11427971]

>>11427949
>Besides, as mentioned above, the success rate of clinical trials is not improving, although we have more information, data, and potential targets than ever before (see Outstanding Questions). Given the various constraints on the study of aging, including the reliance on short-lived model organisms, long validation times, and poor biological understanding, it would be surprising if most of the companies described here are active a mere 5–10 years from now.

Oh wow nice job.

[Anonymous No.11427974]

>>11427970
ZOMG! Your reading comprehension is so high!

[Anonymous No.11427975]

>>11427949
>posts "evidence"
>evidence says that no clinical trials work
Nice one bro really convincing stuff. Did you even read this before posting it?

[Anonymous No.11427977]

>nooooo you can't just quote my source, that's nit fair!!!

[Anonymous No.11427981]

>>11427967

[Anonymous No.11427985]

>>11427937
>Oh, boy, you're heavy, you make me make some work here, when we're only talking.
Well, it could be as easy as posting a link to a clinical trial, peer reviewed study etc.

The reason this feels like hard work to you is because you don't have that, so you're reduced to posting youtube videos and strawmanning something like the replication crisis.

Even if we assume there is a replication crisis without any evidence, it wouldn't make your claim true.

[Anonymous No.11427986]

>>11427985

[Anonymous No.11427987]

>>11427949
Oh no
no no no nonooo
He didn't just post that as evidence
NOOOOOOO


See where it says "None of this actually works" right? That means it means these things don't work

[Anonymous No.11427988]

>>11427971
I didn't read it. But there's a good collection of actual names in the field.
Don't you know what Randy Schekman said about Cell? They most popular magazines are the least reliable.

[Anonymous No.11427997]

>>11427988
>I didn't read it.

[Anonymous No.11427998]

>>11427988
So your best evidence that antiageing tech works is an article from an unreliable (according to one guy) magazine that says the opposite?
I don't think you understand basic logic here.

[Anonymous No.11427999]

>>11427975
>evidence says that no clinical trials work
BioViva didn't even go through clinical trials, they went to South America instead.
Why? First of all because the field is corrupted as everything nowadays: they demand 2 billions (!) in fda to only accept your treatments for the trial, and no refunds if they decide to fuck it up. But this shit is allowed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptdpZvZbMr4 you probably need it

[Anonymous No.11428000]

I don't envy this poor guy, it must be tough to keep up the mental charade when you're a couple of thousands dollars deep in a scam like this.

[Anonymous No.11428001]

>>11427997
lolooolololololl

[Anonymous No.11428002]

>my evidence is an article I didn't read that says the opposite of what I say
the mind on youtube

[Anonymous No.11428003]

>>11427999
I really like how ad-hominems are your only defense

[Anonymous No.11428004]

>>11428000
A-a-a-any day now, with just 500 more dollars they can buy more test tubes...

[Anonymous No.11428007]

>>11427999
>when the only evidence he posts supports the opposite side he goes for the novel right hook and hits back with another youtube video
a master of disaster, the argument annihilator /sci/ poster

[Anonymous No.11428009]

>>11427999
>But this shit is allowed:
It may be questionable to install a tap on your stomach but at least the fundamental idea of physically removing calories from the body without removing the enjoyment of eating them makes some sense.

[Anonymous No.11428012]

>>11425218
This dude looks like he's 120 what are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.11428015]

>>11427999
>BioViva didn't even go through clinical trials, they went to South America instead.
This sounds like really great stuff any reputable company would do.

[Anonymous No.11428016]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6563133/

[Anonymous No.11428017]

>>11428009
>he doesn't just loop the stomach gruel back to his mouth for maximum efficiency
it's like you don't even think

[Anonymous No.11428020]

>>11428009
>makes some sense
and what you deserve

[Anonymous No.11428021]

>>11428017
>>11428009
>not just going to a place with a dodgy hygienic record so the food exits your body automatically
Come on bros you know better than this

[Anonymous No.11428023]

>>11428002
lol im fukkin dyin

[Anonymous No.11428024]

>>11428017
>I would like to have perpetual heartburn and no taste-buds please.
Ok.

[Anonymous No.11428027]

>>11425274
Pretty much this, I guess an english accent is enough to fool some people

[Anonymous No.11428028]

>>11428020
Can someone explain this post to me?

[Anonymous No.11428029]

>>11428021
I get a dose of anti aging every time I eat in my local kebab shop
I propose the secret is the arm hairs

[Anonymous No.11428031]

>>11428028
Don't be too hard on the guy he took some anti-ageing drugs and it turned him mentally into a 12 year old.

[Anonymous No.11428037]

>>11428031
but anon, that would actually in turn end up having physical effects on the body ie making it's processes function closer to how they would in a 12 year old

[Anonymous No.11428042]

>>11428028
He's saying that you're fat

[Anonymous No.11428044]

>>11428037
Yeah my brother got into a car accident and it turned him into a comatose veg, eventually he became a broccoli biologically to match his mental state.

RIP Brandon you were tasty af for broccoli.

[Anonymous No.11428045]

>>11428042
True if big.

[Anonymous No.11428048]

>>11428042
For you

[Anonymous No.11428051]

>>11428044
holy shit im dyin lolololol no but srsly emotions are magic you gotta be a retard to accept it so i get why you'd prefer to be victimized by the sands of tiem instead

[Anonymous No.11428088]

>>11428016
> ignored
ah, forkchong!)

[Anonymous No.11428109]

>>11427502
>Unless we can induce similar plasticity as when we were 4 years
That's actually one of the first things that changes.

[Anonymous No.11428113]

>thinking ageing a problem.

[Anonymous No.11428123]

>>11428113
>Losing physical capabilities and intelligence and dying is not a problem

[Anonymous No.11428128]

>>11428000
Keep investing suckers. Invest enough and I'll spend less money on beer and you might reach longevity escape velocity.

[Anonymous No.11428129]

>>11425218
>57 years

He looks 69 with the beard lmao.

[Anonymous No.11428132]

>>11428123
>Losing physical capabilities and intelligence
>implying that's on behalf of aging and not on behalf of losing touch with passion for living
dying on the other hand well the only thing i find moar terrifying than dying is not dying desu. fuck it, the idea of dying was never scary i cant fucking wait LOL

[Anonymous No.11428137]

>>11425301
>51
If it weren't for the bags under his eyes and the half a century stare I would have guessed early to late twenties!

[Anonymous No.11428149]

>>11425301
To be fair, The Sinclair Family is notorious for messing with the laws of nature and humanity.

[Anonymous No.11428185]

>>11428149
kek

[Anonymous No.11428211]

>>11427109
Who made you so mad? I don't even go to AA

[Anonymous No.11428218]

>>11428211
that's just what I heard about AA

[Anonymous No.11428243]

>>11425753
> a scientist doesn't get funds if he tells something controversial
I guess it just flew over your head, right?
(along with other even more astonishing stuff you didn't pay attention to)

[Anonymous No.11428276]

>>11428243
>Muh terrorist quotes

[Anonymous No.11428279]

>>11428276
Aren't you a little bit too much of a good goy for this place? But any way, I ask you: is he wrong?

[Anonymous No.11428281]

>>11428109
What do you mean? By some anti-age treatment? I don't know about the topics specifics, indulge me.

[Anonymous No.11428286]

>>11428279
I wouldn't say that he's wrong, just that he's fucking batshit insane and refuses to see beyond the hideousness society produces in favor of the obviously desirable safety comfort and security of society.
but fuck jordan peterson fucking faggot god damn another cock sucking intellectual that has to unload ENORMOUS amounts of words without ever hitting a point home.

[Anonymous No.11428292]

>>11427698
>Convinced many specialists to dig into this direction
Jej, wow amazing!

[Anonymous No.11428312]

>>11428279
>But any way, I ask you: is he wrong?

Less “wrong” and more just a mentally ill lunatic who worships treebark and hates humanity. When crazy people talk to you, you’re supposed to just nod and let them babble until their handlers arrive

[Anonymous No.11428314]

>>11425301
>David Sinclair

[Anonymous No.11428322]

>>11428281
Yes. Also the supposed "filters" start fading andyour perception restores, the time starts slowing down to how it was when you were a kid.

[Anonymous No.11428327]

>>11428281
Yes. Also the supposed "filters" start fading, your perception restores, and the time starts slowing down to how it was when you were a kid.
>>11428314
It still seems his facial structure remains young, as if his bones didn't age.

[Anonymous No.11428331]

>>11428281
Yes. Also the supposed "filters" start fading, your perception restores, and the time starts slowing down to how it was when you were a kid.
>>11428314
It still seems his facial structure remains young, as if his bones didn't age that much.

[Anonymous No.11429157]

>>11425218
gandalf the grey lookin ass nigga

[Anonymous No.11429172]

>>11429157

[Anonymous No.11429318]

>>11427883
Lol, what retard would say 'heavier than air is impossible', like have you heard of birds?

[Anonymous No.11429331]

>>11427098

Menopause is why women seem to age faster lol

[Anonymous No.11430043]

>>11429318
The irony is he was not a retard at all, but Sir William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, OM, GCVO, PC, PRS, FRSE
Few decades from now people will say:
> Lol, what retard would say 'negligible senescence is impossible', like have you heard of lobsters?

[Anonymous No.11430052]

>>11428314
I'm 30 and I have those lines appearing on my forehead. How can I avoid this?

[Anonymous No.11430081]

>>11425218
But he says there are currently no treatments with evidence and he doesn't personally do anything for aging or recommend anything yet.
You may as well say the same thing about anyone working on fusion. Oh shit can you believe this guy isn't powering his house with fusion? Clearly he doesn't know anything about fusion technology.

[Anonymous No.11430101]

>>11430081
>he says there are currently no treatments with evidence
timemark, please, because I think he never said it.
>he doesn't personally do anything for aging or recommend anything yet.
and he explains why: the longer he waits, the better quality of those therapies are.

[Anonymous No.11430127]

>>11425218
>t. literal virgin

[Anonymous No.11430161]

>>11430101
>timemark, please, because I think he never said it.
Not from the OP, I didn't watch that. From personal emails I've exchanged with him.

[Anonymous No.11430167]

>>11430052
Sunscreen, moisturizer and stop furrowing your brow.

[Anonymous No.11430177]

>>11430052
tretinoin

[Anonymous No.11430179]

>>11430161
Screenshot the context (or don't)
As I said before, he is not a salesman and doesn't want you to quote him as an endorser of anything other than something that is way bigger than any modern treatment.
But he endorses several scientists who do recommend some treatments.

[Anonymous No.11430180]

>>11430052
Retin-A

[Anonymous No.11430186]

>>11430179
I think we agree there. I just don't consider him endorsing others/companies working on treatments to be the same as him saying these treatments are fully validated and worth using today.