[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 341 KB, 789x711, 61d7e1eac56f87f499fe4c3d6d16db2e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11388175 No.11388175 [Reply] [Original]

What are some signs of low IQ? I'll start
>Being swayed by the public speaking skills of someone as opposed to the substance of what they say

>> No.11388216

Obsession with industrialized popculture

>> No.11388219

>>11388175
A lack of understanding that a "logical argument" does not mean the conclusion of that argument is certainly true

>> No.11388227

>>11388219
nor does an illogical argument mean the conclusion is false

>> No.11388229

Looking around/in people's eyes in public too much. Not being centrally focused on what's in your head. Most often see this with women, young men, and those with low self control (ie. intelligence)

>> No.11388251

browsing and/or posting on 4channel

>> No.11388261

>>11388229
do you lack self-confidence ?

and for me : people who watch tv too much

>> No.11388340

>>11388175
a clear sign of low intelligence is that you think 4chan is viable tool for advice.

>> No.11388352

>>11388175
not having an internal monologue.

>> No.11388356

pronouncing R or L as W
pronouncing Th as F

>> No.11388371

Thinking you can actually do something new.

>> No.11388394 [DELETED] 

>>11388371
There are more new things than old and they are hiding in plain think.

"The task is, not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees." - Erwin Schrödinger

>> No.11388403

If you are like me you are low IQ, I am retarded moron I should kill myself.

>> No.11388661

>>11388175
Thinking you are high IQ
>>11388229
Nice cope autismo

>> No.11388668

>>11388175
this, most people care too much about presentation and so little about actual substance.

>> No.11388675

>>11388175
Nonexistent attention span
Casual sadistic violence
Jumping to conclusions in split seconds
Being unable to realize you can be wrong in any argument
Lack of awareness regarding their intelligence
Constantly giddy
Very emotional reactions to anything
Speak with the full volume of their voice
Extreme obnoxiousness
Lack of accountability
Does not notice when they contradict themselves

>> No.11388704
File: 46 KB, 640x616, 5Q6He0f_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11388704

>>11388175
>marrying
>asking gf/wifey permission to do anything
>not managing your own resources and money
>chasing women and be a sucker for them
>doing anything for a whiff of pussy, even betrayal and murder
>being a white knight
>having LTR
>not paying for surrogate to have your children
>falling for stupid shit women and simps say
>falling in love and entertain the notion of a relationship without taking into account the hypergamy of women
>being a literal slave to anyone
>falling for shaming
I can go on and on...and here it comes, the classic "who hurt you?" and "found the incel".

>> No.11388714

>>11388175
>>>Being swayed by the public speaking skills of someone as opposed to the substance of what they say
that's actually a high iq thing to do. meta communication generally portrays character much better than substance of speech. MUCH harder to fake too.

>> No.11388715

>>11388675

who hurt you lol

>> No.11388723

>>11388704
found the rational thinking man.

>> No.11388725

>>11388675
sorry to break it to you but 90% of those are attributes of the high iq

>> No.11388729

>>11388725
>bpd
>high iq

>> No.11388736

>>11388704
Lmao! People love good ol' blokes like that! Probably has tons of friends, nice job, loving wife and kids! Sounds like a bliss of a life!
>>being a literal slave to anyone
People LOVE slaves!

>> No.11388749

>>11388736
>loving wife
if only unicorns were real.

>> No.11388792

Being swayed by the public speaking skills doesn't necessarily make you low IQ.

In my opinion, an intelligent person has goals, and tries to achieve them through logical means.
But let's say you're a woman and you're trying to find a good boyfriend. Would you rather pick some scrawny or obese AUTIST with poor speaking skills - who claims he has an IQ of 200 though, or would you rather pick Chad with the sixpack abs and good public speaking skills? An intelligent woman would pick Chad

>> No.11389148

"Consider a few of the wonderful bugs that still afflict even our own grand human brains:
* Obsessive preoccupation with inappropriate goals
* Inattention and inability to concentrate
* Bad representations
* Excessively broad or narrow generalizations
* Excessive accumulation of useless information
* Superstition; defective credit assignment schema
* Unrealistic cost / benefit analyses
* Unbalanced, fanatical search strategies
* Formation of defective categorizations
* Inability to deal with exceptions to rules
* Improper staging of development, or living in the past
* Unwillingness to acknowledge loss
* Depression or maniacal optimism
* Excessive confusion from cross-coupling
Seeing that list, one has to wonder, -Can people think?-"
--Marvin Minsky

>> No.11389390

>>11388175
Likes tedtalks
Doesn’t read expert books..
Watches American football on tv.
Does well in school

>> No.11389455

>>11388175
Is not white or Asian

>> No.11389549

>>11389390
>Does well in school
Brainlet cope. IQ correlates with grades by 0.5.

>> No.11390971

>>11389148
too many of these hit home
What's cross-coupling?

>> No.11391258

Saves documents onto the desktop

>> No.11391262

>>11388175
Thinking larger words means larger understanding

>> No.11391265

>>11388227
The fallacy fallacy

>> No.11391266

>>11388175
Being African American

>> No.11391275

>>11388792
>Being swayed by the public speaking skills doesn't necessarily make you low IQ.

t. brainlet

>> No.11391279

>>11389549
So, weakly coorelated and probably a sample bias?

>> No.11391280

>>11391266
EBIC AND BREADPILLED XDXDXDXD
How do I upvote?!

>> No.11391669

>>11391280
The data says I'm right.
Remind me again what the average is.

>> No.11391688

>>11388792
>But let's say you're a woman
already slow IQ then

>> No.11391691

>>11391266
based

>> No.11391743

>>11390971
i think he means holding two conflicting ideas at the same time

>> No.11391754
File: 331 KB, 750x403, bernie_no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11391754

>>11391266

>> No.11391850

>>11388704
So, basically gen-pop normie(s) = simp(s).

>> No.11392042
File: 46 KB, 791x520, 1444980083653.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392042

>>11391754
I didn't just hear or see the statistics. I've seen it in action in my day to day life.

>> No.11392205

>>11392042
That graphic is fake. 80 iq people can’t even dress themselves

>> No.11392273

>>11392205
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality

>> No.11392276
File: 374 KB, 1920x984, 1920px-World-iq-map-lynn-2006.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392276

>>11392205

>> No.11392306

>>11388175
Just look at California, I think they have an I.Q. of like 94 on average, but it's also one of the biggest economies in America. Don't you think low I.Q. and consumerism have something in common? The chase of a quick rush rather than a long term work.

>> No.11392310
File: 9 KB, 271x186, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392310

>>11392306

>> No.11392314
File: 942 KB, 1600x943, c0d556e53f36539fe944b8828194893d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392314

>>11392310
I think a big culprit is race. Just read Bell Curve. It says a lot.

>> No.11392364
File: 202 KB, 540x500, 32CBC34D-14C5-47D9-936D-5010BF6ABE09.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392364

>>11392273
Oh come on, did you even read your link?
> dicated by national IQ estimates
>estimates
>... 79 nations, they estimated the mean IQs on the basis of the arithmetic means of the measured IQs of neighboring countries
>>11392273
>>11392276
>>11392306
>>11392310
>>11392314
Don’t get me wrong, I am deeply racist and pro ethnic nations/tribalism but if the American black population had an average iq of 80 half of them could not live daily or at least weekly without social worker help and another 16 precent would have trouble with even basic jobs unless the job was super routine and had no element of choice. Making 64 precent of them unemployable and that’s just not the reality

>> No.11392381

>>11391669
The average in the US of A is 85 for blacks
100 for whites
115 for Ashkenazi jews
So a sign of being a brainlet includes non-Ashkenazi, rather than just blacks

>> No.11392413

>>11392381
>115 for Ashkenazi jews
The data on this has been proven to have selection bias. You are retarded if you think they are a full standard deviation abovewhites.

>> No.11392417

>>11392413
whites are 1sd above blacks
>haha what retards
Ashkenazi are 1sd above whites
>NOOOOOO ITS A LIEEEEEE

Cite a scientific source, or kill yourself and fuck off

>> No.11392432

Thinking that capitalism is a "system" that can be turned on and off.

>> No.11392436

>>11392417
>cute a scientific source
You first,
for the “115 Jews” please

>> No.11392437

>>11392205
Saggin

>> No.11392458

>>11392436
>The data on this has been proven to have selection bias
>>11392436
>You first,
Besides you already said the literature claims 115?
And now you are denying it.

Lynn, Richard; Longley, David (2006). "On the high intelligence and cognitive achievements of Jews in Britain". Intelligence. 34 (6): 541–547. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.03.011.

Jewish Genius
Jews are extravagantly overrepresented in every field of intellectual accomplishment. Why?
by Charles Murray (the author of the beloved bell curve book)
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/jewish-genius/

>> No.11392472
File: 375 KB, 1205x440, 117 jew iq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11392472

>>11392458
>>11392436
Another Lynn paper with a reference to a 117 average IQ.
You can read the paper on sci-hub if you don't have university access

sci-hub tw/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00079-5

sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886903000795
The intelligence of American Jews
RichardLynn

doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00079-5

I await your source on "The data on this has been proven to have selection bias"

>> No.11392479

>>11392458
>data from 7 year olds
Confirmed for knowing shit about iq, children have more vidabiltiy, and it can not be compared to adult white average.
As to your request if the thread is still up tomarrow I will reply with the study that sources the samples had selection basis after I find it again,

>> No.11392524 [DELETED] 

>>11392479
I'm aware of the "vidability", which means the adult IQ could be higher or lower than the childhood IQ.

I'm sure I know more about IQ than you, as I've worked in a lab that studies IQ in traumatic brain injury and neuro-degenerative disorders. And my lab has published more papers than I care to count in top journals, on the subject of IQ and intelligence, such as nature

If you jump to conclusions about what I do and do not know, based on information I simple omit, then it seems reasonable to assume you aren't capable or intelligent enough to have a discussion on these relatively simple topics

>> No.11392528 [DELETED] 

>>11392479
>>11392479
I'm aware of the "vidability", which means the adult IQ could be higher or lower than the childhood IQ.

I'm sure I know more about IQ than you, as I've worked in a lab that studies IQ in traumatic brain injury and neuro-degenerative disorders. And my lab has published more papers than I care to count in top journals, on the subject of IQ and intelligence, such as nature

If you jump to conclusions about what I do and do not know, based on information I simple omit, then it seems reasonable to assume you aren't capable or intelligent enough to have a discussion on these relatively simply topics

>> No.11392531

>>11392479
>>11392479
I'm aware of the "vidability", which means the adult IQ could be higher or lower than the childhood IQ.

I'm sure I know more about IQ than you, as I've worked in a lab that studies IQ in traumatic brain injury and neuro-degenerative disorders. And my lab has published more papers than I care to count in top journals, on the subject of IQ and intelligence, such as nature

If you jump to conclusions about what I do and do not know, based on information I simply omit, then it seems reasonable to assume you aren't capable or intelligent enough to have a discussion on these relatively simple topics

>> No.11392536

>>11392531
Nice larp

>> No.11392539

>>11392458
A longass link with opening lines that suggest the only two significant Jewish contributions were monotheism and Christianity. Einstein was a Jew.

>> No.11392540

>>11391266
Chill

>> No.11392553

>>11392364
Mild mental retardation is defined by a tested IQ of between 50 to 70

Moderate mental retardation is defined by a tested IQ of between 35 to 40 and 50 to 55.

Severe mental retardation is defined by a tested IQ of between 20 to 25 and 35 to 40.

Profound mental retardation is defined by a tested IQ of less than 20 to 25.

You don't need a carer if you have a mild case of Cognitive limitation, Global Developmental delay, Learning disability and are a slow learner

>> No.11392556

>>11392536
You don't have to believe me.

I'm not interested in goalposts being shifted

You simply have to provide evidence, by which I mean scientific evidence, for the claim made here >>11392413

If you can't do this, and are the aforementioned poster:
Kill yourself then fuck off

>> No.11392632

Following almost any religion. Stupid coping mechanism.

>> No.11392662

>>11388229
>low self control
sorry to break it to you Mashmellow test was not reproducible psycology and IQ aren't science just another Jew scheme how is this not obvious with ur high IQ ?

but whatever makes you feel superior at night lol

>> No.11392692

>>11392276
wrong. India has more IQ than America.

>> No.11392892

>>11392205
>80 iq people can’t even dress themselves
there you go another proof white people have more iq

>> No.11393146

>>11392632
dismissing theology all together bc "I fucking love science" is low IQ normie tier.

>> No.11393182

>>11388229
I do this and it isn't about self control, it's mostly looking for approval because of low self confidence. Needing to make eye contact with the hobo on the sidewalk is a way of asking his permission to continue walking.

>> No.11393252

>>11393146
Did I dismiss it all together? It seems as if you lack basic comprehension. Read my post properly with some appreciable effort. Only after enduring that painstaking endeavor, as it might be to one such as yourself, do you qualify to criticize it.

>> No.11393363

>>11392479
>As to your request if the thread is still up tomarrow I will reply with the study that sources the samples had selection basis after I find it again,
Not him, but I'm looking forward to this.
Just out of curiosity, do you think black and asian IQ averages might also be tainted by selection bias?

>> No.11393455

>>11393252
did I say you dismissed it all together? I made a general remark in response to your post, but did not criticize you or the post. it seems as if you are thinking dichotomously and you're possibly autistic.

>> No.11393562
File: 216 KB, 351x329, 1476190256374.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11393562

>>11388175
Being anyone but me

>> No.11393582

>>11388229
Youre just autistic.

>> No.11393592
File: 1.48 MB, 1436x1674, frog_mirror.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11393592

>>11393562
nice

>> No.11393597

>>11388175
Making IQ threads

>> No.11393616

>>11388229
I do this a lot.
I have no idea how eye contact works for other people.
Is it very weird if I look into someones eyes randomly?

>> No.11393634

>>11393616
you must be a autist. ok you need to look them in the eyes and not say anything for a while and even when they look away you keep looking at them . they will look back at you

OR

you need to look at them and touch yourself. not your groin thats dirty. your nipples.

>> No.11393635

>>11388175
Scoring low on an IQ test

>> No.11393667

>>11392458
>muh ecomomic grof
>muh galaxy colonization

that's you right
the "medical tools" idiot
lol you're a fucking moron.

>> No.11393676
File: 409 KB, 789x747, 51505907_863844784008813_1687112807985709056_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11393676

>>11393634
is this supposed to be funny?
I need actual help

>> No.11393683

>>11393635
>taking an IQ test
yeah that's a red flag

>> No.11393763

Obsession over how a person looks, speaks, acts, behaves instead of what a person says/does. Focus on their social standings.

>> No.11393790

>>11388175
>Ecouter ce que dit quelqu'un avant de vérifier avant l'école d'où il provient
>Donner de l'importance à quiconque sort d'une école autre que Ulm ou X

>> No.11393792

>>11388175
Low score on an official IQ test.

>> No.11394014

>>11392381
Whites have done just fine with their averages (skewed by immigrants)

>> No.11394026

>>11393455
>dismissing theology all together
Seems, maybe you did.

>> No.11394034

>>11388175
thinking IQ is measurable and not a social construct

actually putting stock into your IQ to feel superior to others

>> No.11394059

>>11388792
But this is exactly why you're wrong you fucking retard. In your argument the supposed highly intelligent women care about the most direct and primal things that makes her no different than a lowly intelligent one. This is why we need eugenics, so people like you can't continue existing, you're the reason why this world is so shitty.

>> No.11394154

Being OP. I'm sorry.

>> No.11394200

>>11388175
Making threads on /sci/.

>> No.11394229

>>11394026
why don't you read the thread's premise properly with some appreciable effort and try again?

>> No.11394287
File: 102 KB, 939x1323, Sagging_crop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11394287

>>11392205

>> No.11394308

A lot of you have valid points, others less so. That said, I don't understand the obsession with the intelligence quotient. It's extremely limited and abstract and in my opinion doesn't really have any appreciable value. I enjoyed the idea when I was around 14 years old and felt having a (very slightly) above average IQ made me unique and/or special, but I've since humbly grown to realize that all types of people are needed to provide value in a society and my IQ really doesn't reflect whatsoever on my life...

>>11388229
This is just an odd response. Eye contact is normal in society. You don't sound neurotypical.

>>11388704
You don't sound hurt you just sound like an unpleasant, negative person. I'm not surprised why you would be so opposed to something such as matrimony that nobody would enjoy sharing with you regardless.

>> No.11394314

>>11394059
How much you wanna bet no one picks you for your genetic material? And I'm not talking about Eugenics. I'm hoping you never procreate.

>> No.11394322

>>11388229
All of this can be changed with effort. Why does IQ matter again? The Brain is limitless so long as it's not physically limited either by surroundings or trauma. Have any of you studied the Human Brain? Or anything past introductory level psychology/sociology?

>> No.11394332

>>11388704
Not really seeing the limitation on intelligence by being married? Who hurt you? Was it life? Was it being excluded? I'll include you anon..Just put the rope around your neck..

>> No.11394337

>>11388749
LOL

>> No.11394340

>>11394308
goddamn based anon

>> No.11394341

>>11389455
This guy has a low IQ

>> No.11394344

>>11388175
Judging IQ by race and not accounting for situational data. Confirmed IQ of a Smashed Brick

>> No.11394348

>>11388675
>having emotions or being loud (possibly hearing impaired) means you're dumb

>> No.11394361

>>11392042
you'd think with all the galaxy brain "muh IQ is over 9000" anons on this board, they'd have the two braincells to rub together to recognize that correlation =/= causation

>> No.11394363

>>11388175
>I thought s/he was very well spoken!
I agree

>> No.11394467

>>11394361
>correlation =/= causation
Another dumb thing that people say. More often than not, wrong.

>> No.11394484

It doesn't matter even a retarded person can say something truly profound that even the most high IQ big brained science man could never think of.

>> No.11394644

>>11394484
That was profound of you.

>> No.11394667

>>11394467
Yeah, that's why I know my rooster makes the sun rise every morning. He crows, and then the sun rises! Every morning.
Also how I know that touching my crucifix every morning before I walk out of the house, it protects me from getting into an accident on my bicycle. Never been hit by car-- it's got to be because of my religious touching of the crucifix as a respectful gesture to god every morning.
Oh, and my friend whose dog was sick, the dog died the ONE day she didn't pray. Obviously her prayer was keeping god protecting her poor sick dog.
I have another friend who swears his dead mother is in his house because when someone in the house says her name, lights go out. No other explanation for that!

This is how stupid you sound.

>> No.11395245

>>11388175
Wanting to avoid displaying signs of low IQ and getting flustered when you see one of your common behaviors listed as low IQ by anonymous 4chan users.

>> No.11395250

>>11388704
>tfw no mannequin gf.

>> No.11395274

>>11394484
and then everyone clapped

>> No.11395291

>>11394667
When the sun rises, the roosters crow. When I drink coffee, I pee. Whenever a car runs out of gas, the engine stops. When someone smacks you, your face hurts for some unknown reason. You think you can be stupider than me?

>> No.11395292

>>11395274
clamped*

>> No.11395314

>>11388175
making iq threads on /sci/

>> No.11395325

>>11388175
Replying to IQ threads on /sci/

>> No.11395396

>>11394667
Imagine being this much of a brainlet and not realizing correlation doesnt necessarily imply causation but it also doesnt imply the lack of it either

>> No.11395567
File: 44 KB, 1024x500, 1574587181606.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11395567

>>11392413
Seethe, sweats.

>> No.11395569

>>11388704
Found the incel. Who hurt you?

>> No.11395943

>>11388229
nice cope autismo

>> No.11396759

>>11388704
Aka simping

>> No.11396841

>>11388175
I've talked many times with a low IQ dude on discord and we're always debating and discussing news/politics etc which I enjoy even though it's almost never constructive.

Patterns I've noticed:

Starts with a conclusion, always working around it.
Almost incapable of accepting that he is wrong, when he does he moves the goalpost immediately and try to cover his tracks
Attempt of gaslighting where he changes his past arguments retroactively
Incapable of basic logical frameworks ex. if A means B, B doesn't necessarily mean A
Very limited knowledge of almost any topic
Limited vocabulary, have trouble understanding meaning of statements. Ex. he belies that the Israeli Iron Dome literally runs on an electrical battery, not knowing the meaning of the word in that context (missile battery)
Always brags in the rare cases he is right about something

>> No.11396867

>>11396841
>discord
what else did you expect?

>> No.11397663

Being unaware of your surroundings makes ya a fucking idiot

>> No.11397667

>>11388229
>in people's eyes
I'm just mirroring you guys bro I don't actually think there's meaningful information to be gained from eye contact lol

>> No.11397685

>>11388175
>Being swayed by the public speaking skills of someone as opposed to the substance of what they say
Believing in emotion-reason dualism.

>> No.11397688

Imagine pulling up averages without realizing outliers exist.

>> No.11397758

>>11388661
Nah Man if u were tested 3 times by psychogists and your iq is like 137 you can think like this

>> No.11397770

>>11388675
Totally agree anon i studied do much about iq cause i allways wanted to like know instantly with who i can be friend with and its kinda person with relationship will be very... (Nvm who cares)

>> No.11397776

>>11388725
Nope, just false

>> No.11397785

>>11394341
Or u have?

>> No.11397798

>>11388175
Read "the Bell curve" Charles A.Murray you will get the answer, i mean a Lot Of Answers.

>> No.11397914

>>11391266
People saying this bullcrap. Either you don't know enough black people or, you know too many.

>> No.11397980

>>11388229
I do this because:
-I want to force my environment to give me information about its state. ie, people's reactions, the look in their eyes, and so on. The communication is unavoidably bidirectional as well, it used to bother me that my father would wave to people walking on the road or whatever (just a lifting the hand off the wheel). Like, why would you connect with them, who cares, fuck them and what do they matter? They have nothing to give and I don't owe them anything. Only now do I understand.
-I like to know what's going on and actually take in where I am, particularly given that I have very little connection to my body in a more physical sense. I look up frequently.
-I view the world as uncertain and threatening.
-I want to either get people "oscillating" on my level of awareness and bring them "out of solution", or if they will not shift / rise, spur them, in a subtle way, to submit. It's not really about dominance so much as holding a mirror up, simply by existing and creating that contrast.

I go between the two extremes. Other times I don't acknowledge other people exist, walk around them, etc. I'm pretty fucked up, but at least I'm better than you. What a little bitch.

>> No.11398014

>>11388175

Lack of competency or willingness to actively learn or create new things. In addition to this, creating threads about measuring IQ on /sci/ to subvert any discussion of actual science and mathematics. Congrats OP on considering yourself a "high IQ" individual! But hey, what ever makes you happy...

>> No.11398274

>>11397980
Same. High iq society dont care about what low iq people with an aura of small radius

>> No.11398278

>>11397914
statistics

>> No.11398279

>>11388175
Applying worth to IQ scores is a sign of low intelligence.

>> No.11398313

Excessive stationery

>> No.11398319
File: 20 KB, 716x724, 1563268238809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11398319

>>11398279
Stick your head a little deeper in the sand brother. It's cozy down there.

>> No.11400325

>>11392432
what

>> No.11400522

>>11388175
Posting in this thread... Oh no...

>> No.11400558
File: 101 KB, 800x527, 1514378705271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11400558

>>11388175
Ah well, it is what it is, isn't it, even in the year 2020

However I'm still not so sure you can say okay this is because people are stupid. I think its just you can override most peoples systems of logic with emotion, psychological tricks, and charging up the crowd with a well delivered speech

>> No.11400922

>>11400325
You can read what I wrote, fool! I don't understand when people respond to my posts with, "what."

>> No.11400934

>>11388175
>Being swayed by the public speaking skills of someone as opposed to the substance of what they say
As a person with nule speaking skills, people who can speak in public impress me. Politicians say things with substance in extremely rare occasions and yet they are among the most powerful class out there all just because they can talk. You don't even need to know anything, if you are good at talking you can get away with pretty much whatever you wish.
A dude that's an expert bullshitter and has barely any idea of what's on an exam would do better at an oral than the average guy who has studied a good bunch but has no speech skills.

>> No.11400969

>>11388352
Internal monolgue distracts you from reading, which causes you to end up not understanding the text you've just read because there was a voice reciting inertial ideas triggered by a random thought that suddenly popped up while your eyes automatically scanned word by word.
I'd rather not have an internal monologue, I would spend my entire days studying and reading successfully without distracting myself every 10 minutes.
I don't get why this whole internal monologue thing is about intelligence, there's way that people with no internal monologue are incapable of reasoning.
Wording out your thoughts slows down reasoning, which even implies that someone with no internal monologue has the potential of reasoning things faster.
After all this meme I've came to the conclusion that NPCs aren't those who lack an inner monologue, but rather those who are not active outside their comfort zone

>> No.11401462

>>11388229
Yikes. Have sex

>> No.11401475

>>11388725
exactly

>> No.11401483

>>11392413
sources ?

>> No.11402794

>>11388175
anime

>> No.11402941

>>11394332
Marriage is a very shitty prospect.

>> No.11403318

>>11388704
I don't think anyone hurt you; I don't think you are an incel, either. I think you are misguided man who is probably intolerable socially. You likely only have relations with vain women because that is all who will have sex with you, because looking deeper will reveal that which is undesirable. This perpetuates your beliefs.

It doesn't have to be this way. Respect women and your fellow man. Be strong, be wise, and be compassionate if you want a good woman. You can find a good woman. They exist. If you are a shitty person, they will not be around you. Also, if you are the type of guy who would cheat on them, then why the hell would they not be the type to cheat on you?

Finally, if this is all based on things you have read online, go actually talk to some women, have some women as friends, and be with good men who do the same. You will find that the world is not as bad as you once believed. Take the white pill.

>> No.11403682

>>11402941
You're either a cuck or a MGTOW cringelord.

Either way, pretty sad desu.

>> No.11403711

>>11403682
No I'm someone who was married once and learned that lesson the hard way.

>> No.11403727

spending time on 4chan of all places

>> No.11403737

General dunning-Kruger shit so blindly thinking that you know a lot about any subject

>> No.11403860

>>11388175
Thinking the universe is three-dimensional

>> No.11404021

>>11388725
retard cope

>> No.11404055

>>11393146
There is nothing to be found in theology besides coping. And an understanding of history I guess.

>> No.11404234

>>11388352
I'm really curious how having no internal monologue affects IQ

>> No.11404336

>>11404234
Reminder the study that “”proved”” people, had no internal monologue had shitty as fuck methodology.
>basically just rang up subjects at random times and asked them tore
Let what they were thinking
If you think that proves anything you are retarded. It’s a completely loaded question and the way that people answer says more about their frame then a lack of internal dialog. It was also published in a shitty journal

>> No.11404689
File: 505 KB, 1120x2499, nigger_gene.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11404689

>>11391266

>> No.11404696

>>11391280
you're obnoxious, thus likely to have a low IQ as well... maybe on par with the niggers we reference.