Psychology of Men vs Women

[Anonymous No.11368852]

Hello friens. I need the help from /sci/ to destroy a redditfag friend who thinks that women and men are psychologically the same. Give me the best resources, scientific articles, citations, graphs, anything to completely blow him away with information. Also discuss.

[Anonymous No.11368856]

that norwegian documentary series "brainwash"
The Gender Equality Paradox

[Anonymous No.11368859]

>>11368852
>arguing with morons

[Anonymous No.11368874]

>>11368852
having different hormones alone changes the male/female brain development. different brain, different psychology

[Anonymous No.11368885]

>Give me the best resources, scientific articles, citations, graphs, anything to completely blow him away with information
there is none lmao, we are literally the same, get ready to get absolutely and irrevocably destroyed by that reddit chad

[Anonymous No.11368901]

>>11368852
the fact my mum became convinced she can live on her own receiving 230usd a month proves that women are a separate species

[Anonymous No.11368903]

>>11368852
Have sex

[Anonymous No.11368904]

>>11368885
t. coping hon

[Anonymous No.11370529]

>>11368885
kys

[Anonymous No.11370612]

>>11368885
>reddit chad
Hmmm...

[Anonymous No.11370642]

>>11368852
God that picture is disgusting. Imagine having all that shit hanging off you.

[Anonymous No.11370718]

>>11368852
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0163638300000321

Sex differences in human neonatal social perception

Sexual dimorphism in sociability has been documented in humans. The present study aimed to ascertain whether the sexual dimorphism is a result of biological or socio-cultural differences between the two sexes. 102 human neonates, who by definition have not yet been influenced by social and cultural factors, were tested to see if there was a difference in looking time at a face (social object) and a mobile (physical-mechanical object). Results showed that the male infants showed a stronger interest in the physical-mechanical mobile while the female infants showed a stronger interest in the face. The results of this research clearly demonstrate that sex differences are in part biological in origin.

[Anonymous No.11370719]

>>11368852
www.nature.com/articles/srep19669

Experience-independent sex differences in newborn macaques: Females are more social than males

Human females exhibit greater social interest and skills relative to males, appearing in infancy, suggesting biological roots; however, male and female infants may be treated differently, potentially causing or amplifying sex differences. Here, we tested whether sex differences in social motivation emerge in infant monkeys (n=48) reared in a controlled postnatal environment. Compared to males, females at 2–3 weeks looked more at conspecifics’ faces (d=0.65), especially the eyes (d=1.09) and at 4–5 weeks exhibited more affiliative behaviors (d=0.64), including gesturing, looking and proximity to familiar and unfamiliar human caretakers. In sum, converging evidence from humans and monkeys suggests that female infants are more social than males in the first weeks of life and that such differences may arise independent of postnatal experience. Individual differences in social interest have wide-ranging developmental consequences, impacting infants’ social interaction quality and opportunities for learning. Understanding the evolution of sex differences and their developmental emergence is necessary to best support infants with varying levels of sociality.

[Anonymous No.11370722]

>>11368852
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/icd.2064

Sex differences in children's toy preferences: A systematic review, meta‐regression, and meta‐analysis

From an early age, most children choose to play with toys typed to their own gender. In order to identify variables that predict toy preference, we conducted a meta‐analysis of observational studies of the free selection of toys by boys and girls aged between 1 and 8 years. From an initial pool of 1788 papers, 16 studies (787 boys and 813 girls) met our inclusion criteria. We found that boys played with male‐typed toys more than girls did (Cohen's d = 1.03, p < .0001) and girls played with female‐typed toys more than boys did (Cohen's d = −0.91, p < .0001). Meta‐regression showed no significant effect of presence of an adult, study context, geographical location of the study, publication date, child's age, or the inclusion of gender‐neutral toys. However, further analysis of data for boys and girls separately revealed that older boys played more with male‐typed toys relative to female‐typed toys than did younger boys (β = .68, p < .0001). Additionally, an effect of the length of time since study publication was found: girls played more with female‐typed toys in earlier studies than in later studies (β = .70, p < .0001), whereas boys played more with male‐typed toys (β = .46, p < .05) in earlier studies than in more recent studies. Boys also played with male‐typed toys less when observed in the home than in a laboratory (β = −.46, p < .05). Findings are discussed in terms of possible contributions of environmental influences and age‐related changes in boys' and girls' toy preferences. Despite methodological variation in the choice and number of toys offered, context of testing, and age of child, the consistency in finding sex differences in children's preferences for toys typed to their own gender indicates the strength of this phenomenon and the likelihood that has a biological origin.

[Anonymous No.11370724]

>>11368852
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982210014491

Sex differences in chimpanzees' use of sticks as play objects resemble those of children

Sex differences in children's toy play are robust and similar across cultures 1, 2. They include girls tending to play more with dolls and boys more with wheeled toys and pretend weaponry. This pattern is explained by socialization by elders and peers, male rejection of opposite-sex behavior and innate sex differences in activity preferences that are facilitated by specific toys [1]. Evidence for biological factors is controversial but mounting. For instance, girls who have been exposed to high fetal androgen levels are known to make relatively masculine toy choices [3]. Also, when presented with sex-stereotyped human toys, captive female monkeys play more with typically feminine toys, whereas male monkeys play more with masculine toys [1]. In human and nonhuman primates, juvenile females demonstrate a greater interest in infants, and males in rough-and-tumble play. This sex difference in activity preferences parallels adult behavior and may contribute to differences in toy play [1]. Here, we present the first evidence of sex differences in use of play objects in a wild primate, in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). We find that juveniles tend to carry sticks in a manner suggestive of rudimentary doll play and, as in children and captive monkeys, this behavior is more common in females than in males.

[Anonymous No.11370726]

>>11368852
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xp0tg8
www.youtube.com/watch?v=E577jhf25t4

Hjernevask ("Brainwashing") - Part 1: The Gender Equality Paradox

[Solivagus (Memory Dragon Supre(...) No.11370734]

>>11370726
Almost like, ya know, genders sometime like spending time apart from each other for reasons they don't want to have to keep fucking explaining to the other gender.

[Anonymous No.11370736]

>>11370726
A little scary that youtube forces you to log in to watch the full version since it's just a documentary with no disturbing or controversial content.

[Anonymous No.11371552]

>>11368901
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128/full

update from gay mum

she rammed her car against the garage wall and leaving totally unrelated and unimportant "car shit" scattered everywhere, but at least she warned me that she may have forgotten to close the gate that her mental 3 year old self had just effectively closed and witnessed

vagina shit passive aggressive cope is amusing