first IQ test thread of 2020

[Anonymous No.11364078]

Gather here everyone, time to show the world how much of a brainlet you are! The test takes 25 minutes at most and only has pattern recognition questions.

http://test.mensa.no/

[Anonymous No.11364090]

>Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data. Remember that it is a good idea to practice tests such as this - there are many others available online.

[Anonymous No.11364103]

135 IQ brainlet reporting in
feels bad mang

[Anonymous No.11364119]

Shit test.
Note that I finished it around question 27 because my attention span isn't enough for these kind of tests.
Also I have hard time with highschool math, failed to get into the university and pretty fucking retarded irl.

[Anonymous No.11364149]

[Anonymous No.11364196]

Only real test is wais2 mensa moron

[Anonymous No.11364336]

>>11364090
How did you manage to get an IQ result less than 20?

[Anonymous No.11364409]

>>11364090
I chose A for every question and got this

[Anonymous No.11364428]

>>11364149
very big brain

[Anonymous No.11364532]

>>11364428
it means he gave up early or guessed a lot

[Anonymous No.11364569]

Can someone explain to a brainlet what these were meant to be

[Anonymous No.11364575]

bump

[Anonymous No.11364590]

i diidn't sleep at all last night and i am feeling very sleepy. does it affect the score?

[Anonymous No.11364600]

>>11364590
No, I don't think so, but you scored very well anyway. Please answer questions above (>>11364569)

[Anonymous No.11364622]

I took it while listening to kpop

[Anonymous No.11364628]

I got 102 IQ. You mirin?

[Anonymous No.11364636]

>>11364569
Top left: if the symbol is in both A and B, it is in C, otherwise it disappears.
Top right: black = 5, white = 1, left = positive, right = negative. Add up A and B. Top row, for example, is (5+2) + (5-2) = 10 = 2*5.
Bottom left: dot + dot = box, nothing + box = box, nothing + dot = dot, box + dot = nothing.
Bottom right: Not sure and don't feel like thinking about it.

[Anonymous No.11364679]

Did it on my phone, got incalculable as result because I didn't fill in what I didn't know.

[Anonymous No.11364695]

>>11364636
Wow. The fact that you got that maths one is really something. The other two don't seem that hard now they're explained, but still.
I guess the second row for the maths one was the giveaway.

[Anonymous No.11364766]

>>11364078
>>11364090
how is it possible to get anything wrong on this test? i'm pretty sure it only exists to diagnose retardism

[Anonymous No.11364772]

>>11364766
are you an autist/mentally ill by any chance?

[Anonymous No.11364782]

>>11364569
since the other anon answered the rest,
bottom right = commons + flipped along horiz axis

[Anonymous No.11364799]

>>11364636
>Top right: black = 5, white = 1, left = positive, right = negative. Add up A and B. Top row, for example, is (5+2) + (5-2) = 10 = 2*5.
lol... wtf are you talking about you autist.
where is it implied they're worth 5 or 1?
It's a lot simpler than that, the sides just cancel eachother if there's a corresponding block of the same colour on the opposite side, they cancel, if it's on the same side you add them. simple.

[Anonymous No.11364809]

>>11364772
I probably have mild autism but I'm not really sure, but I accel in interpersonal relationships
I have been diagnosed with ASPD though. Also I also have major depressive disorder.

[Anonymous No.11364811]

>>11364782
Doesn't seem to work, first two rows are inconsistent with the flip + common.

[Anonymous No.11364836]

>>11364811
if we're talking about the same question, which is the bottom right one..
it does work..the answer is A btw

[Anonymous No.11364840]

>>11364809
makes sense then, not memeing but most high IQ people are like this, except for the interpersonal relationsh

[Anonymous No.11364845]

>>11364836
I agree

[Anonymous No.11364895]

I always end up rushing these things, does time taken factor in the score?

Scored 112 anyway with 9 min left.

[Anonymous No.11364929]

npc coming thru

[Anonymous No.11364996]

>>11364929
do you have difficulties in planing for the future and visualizing things?

[Anonymous No.11365014]

>>11364996
yes and yes.

[Anonymous No.11365030]

>>11365014
fuck off nigger

>>11364996
>do you have difficulties in planing for the future
i love making plans and i cant start anything without a mental list of steps i want to make
>visualizing things?
i love to imagine stuff, but trying to picture images of really complex and detailed shit its more difficult.
My orientation is garbage, i get lost easily, but im good at recognizing familiar stuff so i just go by memory

[Anonymous No.11365056]

>>11365030
So lets say that you are reading a book, can you visualize the environments, characters and the actions that they perform?

[Anonymous No.11365065]

>>11365056
No i can't do that.

[Anonymous No.11365260]

>>11365065
autistic larper

>>11365056
>can you visualize the environments, characters and the actions that they perform?
i have problems picturing detailed characters in my mind, but thats because i dont pay a lot of attention to the description details, i care about the plot, not that the character is brown eyed or blue eyed, unless its highlited characteristic.

the actions are environments are quite clear most of the time, but without high details

[Anonymous No.11365266]

>>11364090
How did you type this with an IQ of 4 lol

[Anonymous No.11365325]

>>11364078
i think i would rather be king of the midwits than dunce of the brainiacs

[Anonymous No.11365372]

I've been smoking a lot of weed the past month.
My IQ used to be tested at around 130 and this is the first time I got 110

[Anonymous No.11365378]

I stopped at question 22 and got 102 lol I've never finished an IQ test because once I have to think about the answer for more than 15 seconds I get retard frustration and quit. I never went to college. It's ok I have a lot of money

[Anonymous No.11365572]

>>11364636
For the last one just flip the right side of A and left side of B and get C

[Anonymous No.11365578]

>>11365572
In conclusion it's yet another one of these crap IQ tests with multiple valid (yet conflicting) answers.

[Anonymous No.11365610]

I got bored by the 8th question and just answered randomly after that and got 85

[Anonymous No.11365612]

test
[math] \[
A^{-1}_{ij} = {1 \over 2 \, \text{det} ({\bf A}) } \epsilon_{jmn} \, \epsilon_{ipq} A_{mp} A_{nq}
\] [\math]

[Anonymous No.11365615]

>>11365578
>multiple valid answers
wrong. cope brainlet

[Anonymous No.11365616]

test2

[math] A^{-1}_{ij} = {1 \over 2 \, \text{det} ({\bf A}) } \epsilon_{jmn} \, \epsilon_{ipq} A_{mp} A_{nq} [\math]

[Anonymous No.11365617]

>>11365615
Show that either of >>11365572
>>11364782
Does not work. Protip: you can't. Checkmate, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11365618]

okay now i got it 100+ iq

[math]A^{-1}_{ij} = {1 \over 2 \, \text{det} ({\bf A}) } \epsilon_{jmn} \, \epsilon_{ipq} A_{mp} A_{nq}[/math]

[Anonymous No.11365701]

You know what sucks is my dad had a stroke and got retested for IQ at a psychiatrist and still scored 150 after having two strokes in one day. That did not get passed down to me, I got bored half way in because I had to think too hard after answer 22 and so I got a score of 102. I never thought or cared much about IQ. What do you think the average IQ of like a medical scientist is? I'm interested in genetics, haven't gone to college, probably won't be able to attend full time until I'm like 35 years old. Money isnt an issue but I thought in my older age it would be cool to be a researcher

[Anonymous No.11365706]

>>11365701
>medical scientist
Not much higher than 100.
>researcher
As much a researcher as a gender studies PhD holder is a legitimate doctor.

[Anonymous No.11365710]

>>11365701
>What do you think the average IQ of like a medical scientist is

the floor appear to be 110, i'd imagine the average is around ~120 (real WAIS administered by a neuropsych, not online test). too bad your dad's intelligence didn't get passed down to you; you know, in males, the single x chromosome you inherit from your mother plays an important role in your intelligence, so look to your maternal grandparents for an idea on your intellectual inheritance

[Anonymous No.11365743]

>>11365710
That sucks lol, they were alcoholics living in a trailer who basically gave her up for adoption when she was already five years old. I never had problems in high school understanding anything, I just didn't retain any of it after I didn't use it. I went through school like a hard NPC. Don't you think a lot of research is just reading and remembering and applying to new and current ideas? I want to explore genomes and give rats shit to see how it changes their expressions.

[Anonymous No.11365745]

>>11365743
i don't think you need a particularly high iq to work in genomics research, just need to be able to study all day practically

[Anonymous No.11365761]

>>11365745
Which is something I like doing, I'll read medical journals and watch lectures about whatever I'm interested in that week until my eyes are blood shot lol. I think it's because I'm just waking up in the past couple years to realize I've not had a lot of thought in my life and playing video games isn't a personality trait and I'm just mad at myself for not knowing I had interests sooner. So I don't want to be like 45 years old and have both my children be out of the house and have nothing going on. When my dad retires he can do so much stuff, my mom I don't really know about lol. I'm afraid she's going to be so bored when she's not working and it makes me feel bad, because she's so nice, but I don't want to get older and be bored because I have nothing but watching TV and sewing baby clothes

[Anonymous No.11365865]

>>11364078
I took the WAIS-IV at a psychologist recently as part of the process of getting an ADHD diagnosis. The differences between scores on subtests were too large for an overall IQ to be assigned. This was actually strong evidence for the diagnosis: I performed much better on the untimed portions of the test.

[Anonymous No.11365917]

>>11364078
Some of the last ones don't make much sense, like 33. You basically have to guess there, choose the least bullshit option.

[Anonymous No.11365934]

Bullshit test btw

[Anonymous No.11365948]

>>11364078
An IQ test is a good way to determine what you would score on a IQ test.

[Anonymous No.11365949]

>>11365865
>all verbal intelligence without the grounding in reasoning to ground it.
pseudointellectual word salad poster spotted

[Anonymous No.11366012]

i did it with 13 minutes to spare cause it was boring

[Anonymous No.11366028]

Did it until question 23, after that just jumped everything because it got too hard/stupid.

[Anonymous No.11366057]

>>11364628
congratulations you have above average iq.
Now you can boast about it on the internet whenever you cant find any evidence to support your arguments.

[Anonymous No.11366062]

This is like 15 points higher than ur actual IQ right? I dropped out of engineering and switched to pharmacy because the physics/maths was too hard.

[Anonymous No.11366069]

All of you schizos should subtract 30 from your score for taking online IQ tests seriously

[Anonymous No.11366262]

>>11365948
cope
it's highly correlated with success

[Anonymous No.11366352]

>>11364569
for the bottom right: subtraction of fractions and take the reciprocal value (ignoring the horizontal positions). The answer to that logic is not given though .

[Anonymous No.11366356]

>>11366352
wait actually it's A as well , so my logic works too

[Anonymous No.11366494]

>>11364090
You get this message if you're too low IQ

[Anonymous No.11366549]

>>11364569
Top left:E
Top right:C
Bottom left:D i think
Bottom right:A

[Anonymous No.11366591]

>>11366356
>>11366549
i got A too but i literally cant remember what i did. i dont get it anymore

[Anonymous No.11366599]

>>11366549
Bottom left is E.
Bottom right can be either A or C and there's no way to know the answer without having the answer sheet.

[Anon No.11366682]

>>11364569
Best guess

[Anonymous No.11366696]

>>11366682
Top left is C.

[Anonymous No.11366700]

>>11366682
top right is C, if you are subtracting 3 from 1 you are getting -2 which would go on the right side still

the rest are correct tho

[Anon No.11366710]

>>11366682
on the top right I just canceled likes. Left and right were never demonstrated to be dependent in the 2 examples. C makes much more sense if inferred that way. But what if the answer always had to be on 1 side of the bar. Then F is more valid. Pretty bad question IMO.

[Anonymous No.11366714]

>>11366710
Good point desu. Another shitty question. Wonder how many people get much lower IQ scores than they deserve simply because their solution is no less valid than the one expected, but it wasn't the one that was intended.

[Anonymous No.11366721]

>>11366710
>>11366714
pretty sure its a genuine part of iq tests to decide between multiple "viable" answers and pull an occam's razor. it always seems like its the brainlets complaining about ambiguity when in reality it's pretty obvious that C is the answer. there is nothing to suggest that subtracting the right from the left gives you something on the left, and math-wise that doesn't make any sense either.

its also funny how 3 people reply to you with the same answer and you latch on to the guy that gives you an easy out. you were wrong man

[Anonymous No.11366729]

>>11366721
>pretty sure its a genuine part of iq tests to decide between multiple "viable" answers and pull an occam's razor.
No, that's not in the test's statement and smarter people are the ones who will see many non-obvious patterns. Which one they see first is going to depend on too many aspects, including what they're thinking of at the moment and the overall lighting in the room and if their girlfriend is leaving them.
The point is, it's only brainlets who find the ambiguity acceptable because they're the only ones not penalized by this.

[Anonymous No.11366732]

>>11366721
>everyone who's smarter than me is one person and also a retard because there's no way someone can be better than me waaaaaah mommy said I'm the best ;_;

[Anonymous No.11366740]

What are the essential books and papers to understand IQ?
I know there's the Bell Curve but what else?

[Anonymous No.11366761]

>>11364078
I don't give much credit to these tests, regardless of mensa being in the name.
Especially as I realised Mensa are very complimentary on their free tests in order to try and prompt people to pay to take their actual IQ tests.
In these things I always score(d) around 140 give or take 5 points depending on the test, but then at one point had to take an actual in depth IQ test which doesn't just test this sort of stuff (These online tests are usually purely pattern recognition with a couple of other 'area' questions thrown in and usually largely exaggerate your score) but also accounted speech, recognition, memory, math and quite a lot of other areas and the test took a good long while. (Obviously I should mention it depends on the institutes test and their data pool, don't remember the exact test or with whom I did it with. Was literally given it for free due to having dyspraxia and the educational institute querying whether or not I had aspergus or autism, this IQ test was given as a complimentary side query I suppose to those disputes)
On a genuine test I only scored 119 (Shamefully or whatever, it's an honest number). What was interesting in my results at the time though was how polarised they were. In a couple subjects I scored low 90's while on others I was scoring extremely high.
I suppose ultimately IQ isn't really the best measurement of intelligence but rather the capability for an individual to capitalise on their strengths and diminish the impacts of their weaknesses.
I know a few people with ridiculously high IQs (130+) and none of them (My social circle is purely anecdotal mind you) have particularly achieved much in life beyond typical middle class tier stuff and usually they're very cringe worthy and recycle reddit tier jokes when it comes to humour. Otherwise mostly just average joe in every other aspect.

P.S. My education is centered around biological sciences

[Anonymous No.11366770]

>>11366761
>119 iq
brainlet pls
i scored 145 on this test and got 147 on the WAIS IV so in my case it was decently accurate, as long as you take it once and only once
>P.S.
go back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.11366783]

JCTI is the only legit online IQ test

[Anonymous No.11366786]

>>11366770
All I'm saying is that people which put stock into these free online tests as being wholly accurate are wishful fools and simply pointing out the difference between these tests and genuine tests are very stark.
>P.S.
Nah you're stuck with me.

[Anonymous No.11366811]

>>11366783
this desu

[Anonymous No.11366823]

>>11365014
If you were a girl, that would be cute.

[Anonymous No.11366845]

Any solid broscience for increasing IQ? My self esteem is so fragile I need at least 120 to validate myself. I'm willing to practice these stupid little puzzles during coffee breaks.

[Anonymous No.11366848]

>>11366845
Also, if you're unsure, is it better to skip or answer incorrectly?

[Anonymous No.11366849]

>>11366845
try n-back

[Anonymous No.11366860]

>>11366849
don't waste your time, n-back doesn't transfer to other skills

[Anonymous No.11366866]

>>11366849
Lots of evidence proving that it doesn't work, lots proving it somewhat does, though I personally am not sure. Perhaps it improves working memory.

[Anonymous No.11366867]

>>11366866
I think short term memory can be improved but not working memory

[Anonymous No.11366869]

>>11366783
>>11366811
Is it still about?

[Anonymous No.11366870]

>>11366867
What's the difference between the two? I was under the impression that working memory = STM

[Anonymous No.11366874]

I got this but only made it thru 92% cause i ran out of time. I would not trust this caus im dumb as hell

[Anonymous No.11366881]

>>11366869
the JCTI is brutal, it took me 2 hours to complete it
it's still up, yes, it's archived, and the scores on the archived version are deflated so add 5 points to the score you get

[Anonymous No.11366889]

>>11366881
Cheers anon, will give it a go and see what I get when I get back from work tonight.
Rather brutal honesty than false compliments.

[Anonymous No.11366897]

>>11366870
look up reverse digit span

[Anonymous No.11366910]

I had an assessment once which was along these lines:
>Sequence of numbers flashes on screen
>Recite the sequence back to the assessor
>New different sequence flashes and repeat
>No pattern was involved (That I recognised at least)
>Number sequences at times exceeded 15 digits

What exactly was this trying to test for does anyone know?

[Anonymous No.11366914]

>>11366910
sounds like the digit span test
did you have to recite any sequences in reverse order?

[Anonymous No.11366918]

>>11366914
Yeah, it was exactly this comment >>11366897 which made me think about it once again.

[Anonymous No.11366935]

>>11365949
>without the grounding in reasoning to ground it
>99.6 percentile in matrix reasoning

[Anonymous No.11366939]

>>11366849
Nevermind, I took it again and got 125. Good enough for me. I forgot how open ended the patterns can be, and it threw me off the first time. Obviously a second attempt is a bit like cheating, though. But it boost my self esteem all the same, so idc

[Anonymous No.11366969]

>>11366761
>>11366770
It was the WAIS IV test I scored 119 on overall (Like I said though, very polarised results).
To be fair I am dumb as fuck though. I once stood behind a chain linked fence to get out of the wind.

[Anonymous No.11366993]

NO NO NO NO NO
IT WAS ACTUALLY TRUE AGE REDUCES iq. I USED TO GET 133

[Anonymous No.11366998]

HOW ARE THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SOLVED? WTF

[Anonymous No.11367002]

>>11366845
The test is only valid on your first attempt retard, since its the same every time. They designed it like that so people with fragile egos could memorize the test and not feel bad about themselves

[Anonymous No.11367026]

>>11367002
>They designed it like that so people with fragile egos could memorize the test and not feel bad about themselves
well, it works. I'm confident I could take a fresh test and get a similar result. It's not like this matters at all anyway, I would never tell anyone or bring it up irl; it just made me feel better, so I'll take that

[Anonymous No.11367030]

>>11366939
>Obviously a second attempt is a bit like cheating, though. But it boost my self esteem all the same, so idc
based

>>11366993
>IT WAS ACTUALLY TRUE AGE REDUCES iq.
age doesnt reduce iq that much, that quickly

>>11366998
For the first one, you only keep in the third box what is common to the first two. This means that E is the answer.

For the second one, you suck your own dick and find out that E is also the answer.

For the third one you break a few ribs and realize that sucking your own dick just got a bit easier, and realize A is the answer.

For the fourth one you just guess and, if your iq score was high, you know you got it right

[Anonymous No.11367036]

>>11367030
>For the first one, you only keep in the third box what is common to the first two. This means that E is the answer.
i realized this one later. so i guess we are on the same boat... no fukcing way to solve the 4 last items of the test... (forgot to add the last one to my collection of unsolvables)

[Anonymous No.11367068]

/pol/ poster here, got 122 but had to rush through the last 15 or so % of the test

not posting screenshots because dont want to be datamined by glow-in-the darks

[Anonymous No.11367114]

>>11367068
>/pol/ poster here, got 122 but had to rush through the last 15 or so % of the test
>not posting screenshots because dont want to be datamined by glow-in-the darks

[Anonymous No.11367196]

>>11367068
ngl dude, that's hella low

[Anonymous No.11367220]

>>11367114
still better than the other 80%

[Anonymous No.11367222]

>>11367220
Weird how the majority of people in the thread got a better score than you, hey?

[Anonymous No.11367278]

>>11367222
Are you under the mistaken belief that I was the previous anon?

[Anonymous No.11367296]

>>11364078
121.
Academic background: BSc in math from McGill. Currently a PhD in math at McGill. If the score is accurate, I am not sure. But based on my own feelings, my IQ seems about right. I always estimate myself at 120-125.

[Anonymous No.11367307]

>>11364078
How much does re-taking it invalidate your score because you're already familiar with the questions? I'm in the process of taking it once while hungry and a bit light headed, and I'm going to take it again later after eating and getting "in the zone."

[Anonymous No.11367321]

I refuse to take an IQ test because I know my score would be shit.

I’m a graduate student in physics at a top university but I’m also pretty fucking stupid, and I know a low score would wreck me. At least I can pretend I’m not a moron if I don’t take it.

Anyone else feel this way?

[Anonymous No.11367322]

>>11367307
>>11367321
its an online iq test guys. just take it until you get a score that makes you feel good about yourself and then laugh at everyone that got a lower score.

[Anonymous No.11367326]

𓀐𓂸

[Anonymous No.11367418]

>>11364078
Is the test based on how many you get right? Or how many that you attempted are correct?

[Anonymous No.11367420]

>>11367418
How many you get right

[Anonymous No.11367433]

There is a problem with the test, its based on spatial thinking as opposed to a combination of categories for measuring the average IQ. Having a lower IQ in one aspect may/may not accurate for determining ones overall IQ.

[Anonymous No.11367476]

>>11367196

i'm satisfied that my IQ is high enough to realize it's [always] the Jews, but low enough that my social skills and emotional intelligence allow me to fly under the radar and redpill people socratically without breaking their minds

[Anonymous No.11367498]

I got 97 I’m retarded

[Anonymous No.11367509]

>>11367498
Also I’ve been sleeping less

[Anonymous No.11367553]

>>11365325
Was that and now I’ve been getting dumber

[Anonymous No.11367556]

>>11367476
>i'm satisfied that my IQ is high enough to realize it's [always] the Jews
LMAO

[Anonymous No.11367566]

>>11367476
based

[Anonymous No.11367573]

>>11366740
the g factor - jensen
far more definitive and in depth on the statistics than the bell curve

[Anonymous No.11367629]

>>11367476
Nice

[Anonymous No.11367653]

>>11364078
>tfw i have an iq of a 100 and still hold a stem field office job where my title ends with -ologist.

I don't even know man.

[Anonymous No.11367654]

>>11367653
>soci-

[Anonymous No.11367684]

>>11367654
I said STEM, undergrad.

[Anonymous No.11367776]

>>11364078
second time I've taken that test, exact same result

[Anonymous No.11367784]

Reminder if you got anything less than 145 on this online test your real IQ is capped at 115

[Anonymous No.11367792]

>>11367653
you don't need to have a high IQ to work in modern science. just patience. you need high IQ, creativity, and patience to be an innovator, but most of science is just building background information for those people to work off

[Anonymous No.11367899]

>>11366993
Yeah I got 135 when I was like 24 am now 27, age fucks you up. I have also gotten fatter and more depressed though so maybe that's a factor.

[Anonymous No.11367903]

>>11367784
Sorcery on your bullshit?

[Anonymous No.11367926]

>>11367899
Depression and obesity impair cognitive function

[Anonymous No.11367937]

>>11364078
>posting the mensa pleb test
>trusting a test that conflates processing speed with intelligence

https://web.archive.org/web/20180701142825/http://www.cerebrals.org/jcti/index.html

Take this test.

[Anonymous No.11367948]

>>11367937
This version isn't accurate, there's no agreement on how much it deflate your scores. Tho you can take it as a predictive of your real score, to assume that your real spatial IQ is probably at least what you got on this test.

Sucks because the JCTI was extremely good test, some IQ clubs even recieved applications from people who took this test rather than WAIS or Mensa.

[Anonymous No.11367953]

>>11367948
>This version isn't accurate, there's no agreement on how much it deflate your scores.
You mean the specific link I posted? Do you have a more accurate version of the JCTI? And do you have any estimation on how much this version might deflate scores?

[Anonymous No.11367956]

>>11367953
>>11367948
Also, this one doesn't give exact results, but a 95% confidence interval.

[Anonymous No.11367963]

>>11367476
>my IQ is high enough to realize it's [always] the Jews
Sad, with only a few IQ points more you would have realized that it's really a bunch of occultists at the top, many but not most of which are Jews. Specific scapegoats are a low-IQ crutch.
t. 134IQ

[Anonymous No.11367965]

>>11367433
The type of question isn't the problem with this test, since matrix reasoning is highly g-loaded. What is the real issue is the (visible) time limit.

[Anonymous No.11367969]

>>11367963
>you would have realized that it's really a bunch of occultists at the top, many but not most of which are Jews. Specific scapegoats are a low-IQ crutch.
So it's Jews.

Christopher Langan, the man with the world's highest IQ also thinks it's the Jews.

[Anonymous No.11367970]

>>11366845
If you can increase your score on a test by practicing, it's not a valid IQ test. Do the JCTI I linked here, that one has one of the best test-retest reliabilities.

[Anonymous No.11367973]

>>11367969
>Christopher Langan, the man with the world's highest IQ also thinks it's the Jews.
No, he doesn't.

[Anonymous No.11368001]

>>11367970
>>11367956
>>11367953
>>11367948
>>11367937
Just do the TRI-52, it's basically the same as JCTI just normed more accurately. The JCTI is deflated probably by about 4-7 points, from people who copied their answers to TRI-52.

[Anonymous No.11368005]

>>11367973
Sorry but he does sweety.

[Anonymous No.11368010]

>>11368005
No, he describes a power structure that goes beyond merely autistically screeching da joos.

[Anonymous No.11368013]

>>11368005
>what is the burden of proof
This is your average /pol/tard

[Anonymous No.11368022]

>>11368013
As a frequent /pol/ lurker, I hate to agree.

[Anonymous No.11368025]

>>11368010
>>11368013
>>11368022
t. midwits

>calls out globalists and international banksters
>namedrops the Protocols of the Elders of Zion
But somehow it's not the Jews. Obviously a man of his stature is smart enough that he won't mention them by name but it's quite obvious unless you're autistic. Learn to read between the lines, or do you guys lack any abstraction capablities? have a higher IQ than all of you most likely or you guys have Aspergers.

[Anonymous No.11368046]

>>11367963
>occultists

oh yes, my mistake, I must be a few IQ points too low to remember to use my good goy dogwhistle as if the fact there is not a widespread and aggressive movement to ban male infant circumcision isn't absolute proof it's the jews.

>mutilate and scar infant's genitals permanently at birth when the brain is still at its most malleable
>have some old jew priest suck the blood from the penis
>infant goes silent and stares into the abyss having experienced a violation he will never understand
>misery and physical agony is the nucleus around which experiences are shaped
>become desensitized to it after years of learning about how Hitler killed Jews with masturbation machines and staring at photos of typhus victims in concentration camps
>your people have suffered more than anyone else in the world for longer than anyone else in the world
>daddy goldstein has a brain aneurysm bending down to pick up a nickle and dies
>you get his fortune
>some stupid goy who probably isn't even circumsized and never got put in the masterbation machines starts complaining about how his stupid goy child has leukemia
>call dr goldblatt who works on jews for free and broker a deal where stupid goy's kid gets some treatments that might slow down the death for a few years for a price
>jew doctor charges the stupid goy three hundred thousand dollars. "i can't pay that!!"
>jew doctor says "oh, don't worry mr goy... i will call in a favor with my friend saul, he works over at Goldberg and Goldman Medical Loans. we'll work something out"
>medical loan 20% annual interest 60 months
>saul and dr goldblatt give you 20% of the profits for finding them another goy
>stupid goy ends up killing himself at month 48 because he lost his job at your friend mr rosengoldblum's tech firm after he flew in pakistanis to run maintenance on the software goy programmed
>one of the pakis kidnaps stupid goy's kid and trafficks it to eastern europe
>gives 50% of the cut to mr rosengoldblum

[Anonymous No.11368127]

>>11367307
The experiment is done. My score varied by 18 points between the food and no food attempts.

[Anonymous No.11368157]

>>11364078
I got bored at 80%, submitted, and got 115. What would my final score be? Got stuck on 2 questions

[Anonymous No.11368249]

>>11368157
115, attention span and follow-through are built in to the test, welcome to lift as a midwit

[Anonymous No.11368296]

>>11364090
based

[Anonymous No.11368308]

>>11364799
he's not wrong. You can just about assume any figure and it's still right, though my initial method is the generic cancelling the sides out.

[Anonymous No.11368322]

I got a 92 :/ am I fucked guys

[Anonymous No.11368331]

>>11364772
what do you do for living?

[Anonymous No.11368333]

Should I be worried? Last year I took (similar thread) and got 135. This time I got 110.
What does this even mean?

[Anonymous No.11368335]

>>11364569
Like bit masking in programming. How is this used to measure IQ?

[Anonymous No.11368388]

Check emmmm

[Anonymous No.11368463]

>>11364078
I have a high IQ and I am good at math/science but my verbal IQ is low and I struggle with finding the right words/constructing sentences. Is this because of autism?

[Anonymous No.11368565]

>>11368463
absolutely

[Anonymous No.11368772]

>>11368463

do you struggle with writing as well, or is it verbal communication specifically?

[Anonymous No.11368830]

>>11368772
Not him but i too have problem communicating my thoughts in fast paced real life scenarios. I write pretty well, when i was younger i used to publish film reviews which got positive feedback.

I think my vocabulary is decent and i don't really struggle learning new languages, I just feel like i'm 20IQ points dumber as a speaker.

Is it convergent thinking problem?

[Anonymous No.11368834]

>>11368322
Yes. Please don't reproduce.

[Anonymous No.11368851]

>>11368333
Same here. I dropped from 125 (few years ago) to 115. Either my unhealthy lifestyle is catching up on me (which is quite likely) or the test have updated it's standards (since usually only smart people bother to take online IQ tests it would skew what test perceives as a normal IQ).

I don't care about being an ugly, constantly tired fat neckbeard, but when I have evidence that my lifestyle affects my IQ it's a serious problem. I don't want to be stupid.
I've started learning a new language, working out and stopped eating sweets. That probably won't be enough, but it's a start.

[Anonymous No.11368868]

>>11368830
it can be a few things. anxiety is a big one for some people. if you know that you are knowledgeable about a subject, but also know that you're not good at communicating it verbally, an anxious person will focus more on trying to get all the information out so they don't have to talk anymore. the problem is that a bunch of information that is useful to you in the context of your total knowledge of a subject is not useful to someone who doesn't have any context for what you're saying.

verbal communication is not about showing off how much you know, it's about assuming the other person doesn't know anything about what you're going to be talking about and establishing a conversational foundation. if you start at a couple of basics and then move forward from there, even if it seems redundant, you're priming the more complicated stuff into your verbal queue

[Anonymous No.11369036]

>>11368851
programming language or communication language?

[Anonymous No.11369901]

Eat a better diet, sleep properly, and get exercise.
don't stress out

[Anonymous No.11370029]

>>11368851
It's winter in the Northern Hemisphere so the lack of vitamin D might be fuck you up.

[Anonymous No.11370037]

>>11364569
>>11364078
you can solve every IQ tests by setting the problems up as a matrix and using gauss jordan elimination

[Anonymous No.11370174]

>>11364078
Took me 5 minutes to recognize multiplication by negative number...

[Anonymous No.11370190]

When I was younger, I took it and reach 30 more... Nowdays I really explained every question to be sure about it, and I got 30 points less than before...

Explanations take time,...

[Anonymous No.11370330]

>>11366682
>>11364569

First thing is called union....

Second is C, if you mirror you disappear.

Yes, when twice change, when once keep. When different erase.

Yes, two same appears on the other side.

Also explanation and correct answers differs.

[Anonymous No.11370333]

>>11364766
It's possible to run out of time due to not having that kind of visual information for long time... Or when you have to test and explain it, not just "it's this".

[Anonymous No.11370336]

Got ~100 but I can write a computer program that goes trough all questions I had and score 100% on that kind of images.

[Anonymous No.11370520]

117

[Anonymous No.11370586]

https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/technology/article/1624720/chinese-researchers-discover-why-so-many-writers-are-heavy

[Anonymous No.11370886]

>>11364895
I got a 115 and guessed on the last 10 lol

[Anonymous No.11371042]

>>11364078
>took this 2 weeks ago while under slept and on a hurry
>scored 135 then 137
>took it again just now
>scored 133 then 131
There's a reason why IQ tests are taken in very controlled environments several times, instead of on the midwit institution, snow department's site

[Anonymous No.11371055]

>>11370336
>that kind of images
You should write a program thst teaches you how to speak english

[Anonymous No.11371059]

>>11371042
I took Mensa eligibility test for another branch about a year ago, and got IQ 130.

Took this Norwegian eligibility test and got 102.

The only conclusion is that I'm a brainlet in Norway.

[Anonymous No.11371143]

I'm not medicated for my ADD and got a 95, at most, how much would my synthetic meth help my score?

[Anonymous No.11371180]

>>11364078
Just a thought, how much of a correlation is there between intelligence and being a great general? For instance what would say Alexander the great's, Napoleon I, Julius Casser, Rommel, Patton, Fredrick the great's IQ be estimated to be? And if not IQ what does correlate with being a successful general?

[Anonymous No.11371190]

>>11366845
If it makes you feel any better you probably have an easier time socializing and flirting with chicks the closer your IQ is to 105, whereas finding a chick with an IQ 2 or more significant decimal places from the norm is next to impossible.

[Anonymous No.11371298]

>>11368851
>>11368333
They changed the test, the old one was better, this one is really bad with some retarded questions.

You can find the old one in mensa finland

[Anonymous No.11371364]

>>11371143
are you successful in life? if you are then please disregard this iq test for it has failed in its sole purpose

[Anonymous No.11371561]

>>11365710
putting policeman and detectives under the same category lol

[Anonymous No.11371612]

All we really need to do to validate this test is just ask people who've taken legit IQ tests IRL to also take this test and compare the results

I scored 133 on this but there's no fucking way that's correct since I'm a worthless college dropout NEET training to be a pro MMA fighter because the ungabunga life is the only life I enjoy living

regardless, we're on fucking /sci/ I'm confident somebody here has taken a REAL IQ test and can compare the results, right??

also IQ is pretty useless IRL since some of the happiest & most successful people I know are at MOST 105 IQ, they just work hard as fuck and generally rely on age old wisdom rather than pure intelligence
I only think having a high IQ really matters if you're a proper hard worker who is trying to be the absolute best in your field desuuu

[Anonymous No.11371614]

>Online IQ tests
For fuck sake. Just post your GRE unless you never went to college.

[Anonymous No.11371636]

>>11364078
I got an IQ of 100 lol.
sorry i'm not a big brain like you all.
time to give up on maths.
what kind of jobs should i go for?

[Anonymous No.11371650]

>>11371636
online IQ tests are bullshit mate just work your ass off & you'll make it
you'd only need a genius level IQ if you wanted to discover some new groundbreaking shit & be a little fuckin rockstar
fuck that, stay the course & you'll be well-off

[Anonymous No.11371667]

>>11369036
>programming language or communication language?
Esperanto. I already know how to program in C, C# and some java, but communication languages were always a problem for me.
After learning it enough to shitpost on esperanto forums I plan to learn Spanish as well since it's so popular.

>>11370029
>vitamin D
I didn't know it could be the cause. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.11371711]

how do you brainlets feel about this, hmmm ?

[Anonymous No.11371732]

>>11371636
sucking cock in public bathrooms xD

[Anonymous No.11371750]

DESU was expecting more.

[Anonymous No.11371993]

>>11371750
kek dunning kruger

[Anonymous No.11372120]

I scored 85 which is the bottom percentile they measure.
I've never been good at geometric pattern recognition though and I started to get impatient about analyzing each one about halfway through. Might attempt again in the future.

>t. american brainlet graduating with a BS in MIS and trying to go to grad for psychology or law

[Anonymous No.11372209]

>>11365610
attention span proves result is accurate. nice

[Anonymous No.11372242]

>>11366599

Bottom right is A. The "pattern" is dumb though and precisely the reason this type of tests should stop being used. Everyone in this thread could create their own ridiculous "pattern", it doesn't even need to be consistent. You could for example say "dot" has 3 letters and so does "box" so they're "equal" in that sense. But only if you read the boxes top down instead of left to right. Otherwise, forget that rule. It's insane.

[Anonymous No.11372290]

>>11365710
All you said is bs regurgitated popsci trash, with no scientific relevance whatsoever. If anything his lack of intelligence is explained by bad nourishment and lack of challenge during childhood, not muuuh 'female power cromosow'

[Anonymous No.11372307]

>>11371059
IQ is measured globally, but their site does say 'we do not have data for you range yet' if you just guess everything. My guess is that they have their own measurement based on people taking that very same test, so the way the stats are normalized is very skewed, and so is your score. The linked test then should be a good way to measure your intelligence against people taking that same test, not against the whole world population

[Anonymous No.11372428]

>>11364078
for all of you bitches getting 140+ that are still bitching and moaning and ungrateful: having a high iq is the biggest advantage you can have in life

i can't even begin to explain to you, as a midwit, how it felt when a girl in my class (smartest person i ever met) breezed through math classes acing every test 95%+ while studying very little and maintaining a social life (she was pretty cute too, shy cute type)
while i incel type guy worked my ass off, working so much that i felt extremely depressed, isolated and suicidal and barely got 70s
there is no god

[Anonymous No.11372453]

I managed to solve the captcha by clicking the traffic lights.... what does that make my I.Q?

[Anonymous No.11372457]

Any online test with automated scoring can be gamed. Hell, you guys are talking about the answers in the thread.

[Anonymous No.11372484]

maybe math isnt your thing

[Anonymous No.11372521]

I feel retarded, from about 29 onward they stopped making sense to me.

[Anonymous No.11372540]

>>11372521
same. The one with the black line with white and black dots to each side took my last few minutes.

Don't be sad though mate. IQ is a fake construct.

[Anonymous No.11372561]

>>11372453
>doing a captcha
0 mate

[Anonymous No.11372579]

>>11368331
idk if you asked the wrong guy but i'm a medical student

[Anonymous No.11372587]

>>11372540
nah, it's not fake.

[Anonymous No.11372631]

>>11372540
>throwing the baby out with the bath water
Obviously IQ has some validity for determining intelligence, it's not a complete picture but it correlates very positively with a bunch of indicators of intelligence and success. Anything else is just cope.

[Anonymous No.11372638]

>>11372587
It has no mechanistic basis and makes no extension of current models possible. The predictive power of the test is itself tied to ambiguous and uninformative cultural metrics. IQ fails to provide even its own standard of life outcome prediction for the very intelligent relative to one another and those slightly below the upper stratum of the intelligent.

[Anonymous No.11372659]

>>11372587
Do you even psychometrics?

>>11372631
Some validity sure. But to the extent people believe it to be here? No way.

[Anonymous No.11372671]

>>11372638
High IQ translates into success in other areas consistently, not sure about your argument.

[Anonymous No.11372672]

>>11372638
>>11372659
IQ tests predict life outcomes because they correlate with g
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480787/

[Anonymous No.11372698]

>>11372672
Oh really? Well i'm sure the million of indians with a higher IQ than you must have much better lives.

[Anonymous No.11372719]

>>11372540
>IQ is a fake construct.
IQlet cope

[Anonymous No.11372781]

I might be brain damaged. Second time I took it my score went down by 8. I also always fail the image recognition part of concussion tests.

[Anonymous No.11372880]

>>11372698
Obviously it applies to whatever scope we're talking about. IQ does mean something and if you deny that you're denying that people's intelligence levels vary.

[Anonymous No.11372967]

>>11372880
Don't worry about him, he's a coping brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11373035]

ok I guess.

[Anonymous No.11373142]

>no friends
>no gf
>don't speak to family anymore
>dropped out of college
>unemployed 1 year
>not working on anything productive

[Anonymous No.11373153]

daily reminder https://youtu.be/4lwFK1ImzcA

[Anonymous No.11373428]

>>11373142
It's more common than you think. There's a point where you don't relate to society anymore.

[Anonymous No.11373498]

>>11371650
thanks fren! i'll try!

[Anonymous No.11373504]

>>11373142
Same here brother.
>>11373428
Yeah and the only people I met that I could relate with were all crazy/psychotic/neurotic because they couldn't handle reality or could never adjust to society. I have a couple normie friends and I used to hate the mundane shit they talk about but now it's just soothing to have others around.

[Anonymous No.11373642]

>>11364078
Kill me.

[Anonymous No.11373763]

>>11365325
Better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.

Also too lazy to take the test but I took jt a year or two ago and got 135 or so. Been tested multiple times by shrinks and fluctuate between 130-140 so I'm just smart enough to know I'm a fucking moron. *party horn*

[Anonymous No.11373993]

107 IQ here, kinda sad because I thought I would get higher. I'm 16 if that affects the score somehow.

[Anonymous No.11374074]

>>11364078
I swear i think i made the tic tac toe board slant side ways for my brains client side

121 iq

[Anonymous No.11374290]

[Anonymous No.11374370]

I did 31 questions. I have done this test a few times in my life now and always get the consistent result of 128-132 even if I answer less questions.