The great debate

File: 138 KB, 720x380, Beautiful-Minds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

The great debate Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:00:34 2020 No.11360015 [Reply] [Original]

Now that the dust has settled, who was humanitys greatest mind?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:07:47 2020 No.11360031 >>11360015 Not the Jewish quack Einstein, that's for sure.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:15:29 2020 No.11360043 >>11360031 >photoelectric effect >special relativity >general relativity Id love to hear your rebuttals

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:22:34 2020 No.11360069

>>11360043
/pol/tards don't have arguments.

>>11360015
Really difficult to decide. I'd still go with Einstein, as he did a lot more than what he is praised for.
>Brownian motion
>asymmetric river bed erosion
>developed a cooling process
>advanced quantum mechanics a lot with his thought experiments
>lasers
>fission

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:27:55 2020 No.11360080 >>11360069 >asymmetric river bed erosion Elaborate?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:28:17 2020 No.11360082 Who's the guy that figured out that units make sense and cancel out mathematically? My vote is for that guy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:45:13 2020 No.11360121 >>11360069 literally responsible for none of those 0/10 einstein typically stole all his ideas from previous german, french, and italian scientists

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:50:31 2020 No.11360131 >>11360043 https://u.trs.tn/otgkyh.pdf

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:52:38 2020 No.11360133 File: 81 KB, 1027x1079, 1580531100355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] me

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:53:13 2020 No.11360134

>>11360043
>special relativity meme
Completely debunked.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zWy6_Mog70

>>11360043
>general relatvity meme
Completely debunked.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

>inb4 you stick your head in the sand and refuse to face reality
Yeah, carry on with that. It won't alter reality, you'll only accomplish deluding yourself.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:53:39 2020 No.11360137 >>11360121 Yes, yes, drink the koolaid

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:57:28 2020 No.11360142
File: 191 KB, 1080x1020, oh no no no no!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11360043
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCmEyK4YLdI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI14fpM3ouU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz8RRN8rY00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc9PB_4F-OU

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 17:58:36 2020 No.11360147 File: 258 KB, 785x1000, OY VEY, OY NOOOOOEEE!!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11360043 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tB3IBXTgEc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zELjb6iDjL8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev10ywLFq6E

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:01:38 2020 No.11360155 >>11360147 >>11360142 Go back

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:10:00 2020 No.11360179 File: 152 KB, 1300x1279, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11360155 Ah, there we have it, that willful ignorance of the facts.

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:16:10 2020 No.11360193

>>11360179
Are you alleging a conspiracy is in place that prevents the true discoverers of relativity from getting credit? Then you aren't sane.
Are you alleging that SR and GR have somehow been debunked? Then you dont know any physics.

It's obvious to everyone here what your motivation is.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:16:41 2020 No.11360194 >>11360134 >black holes don't exist!!! Bruh, we have pictures of black holes. Back to the psyche ward you dumb schizo.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:27:35 2020 No.11360212 >>11360134 >>11360131 Nobel prize winner Gerard Hooft vs College dropout/gardener Stephen Crothers http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/gravitating_misconceptions.html

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:39:35 2020 No.11360231 >>11360193 >wahh waah conspraceeez!!! Just keep ignoring the science, bro.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:41:46 2020 No.11360237 >>11360231 Okay, so if there is no conspiracy then why is Einstein regarded as brilliant?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:51:51 2020 No.11360266 >>11360212 >>11360231 pottery

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:52:44 2020 No.11360271
File: 1.02 MB, 1361x1183, Arno_Breker,_Orpheus_u._Euridike(1944) contrast improved half size.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11360194
>we have pictures of black holes.
Cringe. No, we don't. None. And we'll never have.

The "black hole" photo (and the theory of "black holes") has been 100% scientifically debunked over and over again. Of course, you'll keep ignoring the facts and will never confront the science. When small minds are confronted with an uncomfortable scientific truth, they resort to obsessing over people and personalities while running away from the uncomfortable science.

But to the lurkers here who wish to learn:

https://files.catbox.moe/b3aur6.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4NffTr_GMk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk2-lH9ewuA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev10ywLFq6E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8y3VrrVEpI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz2A4qXJQjc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FdWTH08u30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q185InpONK4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHZ5O0jTH8A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI14fpM3ouU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz8RRN8rY00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc9PB_4F-OU

Following aren't specifically about black holes, but related and some of the following mention black holes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmROfjgViLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIgmsQOKnmk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz-Bwi5xTTs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8lKQMEYYLw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUC_a-IMmGs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLC4MA6_Oq0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNCWMD6so4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IdMz8PkGZM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeIHTCdOGWs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c9M33FLH40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-03lh_tHMJ0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiKYvUtpJXA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC_KkLvG22A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot-9R2GZxp8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdYrgJrBFr0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-03lh_tHMJ0

https://u.trs.tn/ficjpc.PDF

https://u.trs.tn/fxcsh.PDF

https://files.catbox.moe/gqopm2.pdf

https://u.trs.tn/gmklih.pdf

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:53:01 2020 No.11360274 >>11360043 /pol/tards hate Einstein because he was Jewish. It makes them cry or something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:54:04 2020 No.11360278 >>11360134 >Citing YouTube videos, not research papers published in scientific journals This isn’t the board for you.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:54:36 2020 No.11360280 >>11360274 You love him because he was a Jew. His pseudoscientific garbage theoriues be damned, all that matters is that he was Jewish. That makes him great!

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:55:37 2020 No.11360283 >>11360278 >attack the medium or the messenger instead of the facts and the science Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:57:46 2020 No.11360289 >>11360280 >You love him because he was a Jew Nope. His ethnicity is irrelevant to me, as is everyone’s ethnicity. > His pseudoscientific garbage theoriues be damned Cite peer-reviewed papers documenting observations inconsistent with relativity.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:58:03 2020 No.11360290 Bach was humanity's greatest mind, and his music is proof God exists.

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:58:03 2020 No.11360291

>>11360278
See: >>11360271
There's your papers bro. You can try debunking a single thing, if you did you'd fail. But you won't even try because you know you can't. The science is rock-solid and you have no ground to stand on - your Einsteinian fantasy-physics can't support you, on the contrary they work against you.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:58:21 2020 No.11360292 >>11360271 imagine if instead of going down youtube schizo rabbit holes you opened a book and learned physics

Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:59:05 2020 No.11360294

>>11360289
Consensus science isn't science. The whole idea of consensus science is nonsense anyway because the truth is not found by a vote.

>>11360292
>attack the medium or the messenger instead of the facts and the science
Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:59:14 2020 No.11360295 >>11360283 >nooooo my YouTube videos are just as good sources as scientific papers subject to peer review

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 18:59:24 2020 No.11360296 >>11360237 >/pol/niggers still can't respond

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 19:00:15 2020 No.11360299 >>11360291 >There's your papers bro. No, that’s a bunch of YouTube videos. Please cite actual papers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 19:00:31 2020 No.11360300 >>11360294 Again, imagine if instead of using your time to go down youtube schizo rabbit holes you opened a book and learned physics. Not for my sake, for yours.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 19:01:16 2020 No.11360303 >>11360294 >Consensus science isn't science That’s lovely, now cite some papers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 19:02:17 2020 No.11360305 >>11360271 See >>11360212

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 21:04:48 2020 No.11360542 >>11360043 >>11360069 >>11360274 Relativity was pioneered by physicists like Poincare and Lorentz, you fucking idiots. >>11360015 And Newton was a rip-off who stole the credit for discovering gravity from Robert Hooke

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 21:07:46 2020 No.11360551 >>11360031 fpbp. albert was a hack Isaac ftw everytime

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 22:56:52 2020 No.11360747 >>11360542 ...and it was pioneered by Einstein. Weird how that works.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 4 23:06:22 2020 No.11360768 >>11360015 Euler

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 00:09:59 2020 No.11360875 File: 31 KB, 477x491, 20200204_194411.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 04:36:52 2020 No.11361201

>>11360069
Big Einstein fan here, currently reading a biography about him from Walter Isaacsaon, but you have to remember that Newton lived in a time where there was fuck all communication, and he still figured this shit out. Einstein had regularly communication all over Europe.

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 04:50:56 2020 No.11361226

>>11360080
He showed that it is caused by Coriolis force in rivers running from north to south or south to north, respectively.

>>11360542
Yes, but who saw the bigger picture and put it all together and most importantly, made sense of it?
Science is always done standing on the shoulder of giants. You're just looking for straws to hold on to for criticizing people of high intellect to appear knowledgeable and edgy.

>>11361201
True, that's why I mentioned it was difficult to decide between the two. The communication all over Europe was done by snail mail though. Tedious and time-consuming.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 04:53:31 2020 No.11361231 >>11360142 >first video >relativity is wrong So you're saying Maxwell equations don't accurately describe electromagnetic processes? It's not worth giving any other of these shit shows any attention.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 04:58:41 2020 No.11361235 Newton hands down

Anonymous Wed Feb 5 05:05:43 2020 No.11361242

>>11360274
>>11360542
Nobody outside pol gives a shit
Collaborating with others, getting inspiration from others, using models developed by others else, and so on, all valid, all common, and all do not take away from his contribution. And even (not saying this was necessarily the case though) packaging many already developed ideas into one model, is a (massive) contribution.
There's value in what he did do and that's that. Now fuck off to your Dunning Kruger den. And take this with you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 05:12:56 2020 No.11361255 Also whats up with sudden einstein defence force

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 05:19:06 2020 No.11361263 >>11361255 >le einstein was a kike he dindu shit and relativity is fake is extremely tiresome

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 06:26:12 2020 No.11361331 >>11361255 They hate him because they accuse him of stealing even though he cited the white losers in his papers

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 11:37:00 2020 No.11361844 >>11360069 >Brownian Motion Did he predict the migrant crisis?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 16:46:55 2020 No.11362456 >>11360015 Isaac Newton by a long shot. He's authoring theorems and developing mathematical methods almost 300 years after his death.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 16:59:34 2020 No.11362485 >>11360134 >>11360142 back to /x/

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 17:53:42 2020 No.11362621 File: 583 KB, 982x1274, JohnvonNeumann-LosAlamos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 22:57:44 2020 No.11363234 File: 585 KB, 1060x1600, St-Thomas-Aquinas-poplar-tempera-Demidoff-Altarpiece.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >thinking its anyone but him

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 23:27:38 2020 No.11363278 >>11363234 >christcuck philosopher Lamo

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 5 23:31:02 2020 No.11363282 >>11360015 Euler and Gauss > Newton and Einstime

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 00:30:58 2020 No.11363401 >>11360015 Grug, the inventor of fire.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 10:01:32 2020 No.11364104 >>11362621 my nigga

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 10:16:06 2020 No.11364125 >>11360015 Leibniz or Euler

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 10:17:14 2020 No.11364128 >>11363278 Ya seethe?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:06:44 2020 No.11364206 >>11360082 Based

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 11:08:58 2020 No.11364210 >>11363282 >the only correct answer.

Anonymous Thu Feb 6 15:54:42 2020 No.11364981

>>11361226
>True, that's why I mentioned it was difficult to decide between the two. The communication all over Europe was done by snail mail though. Tedious and time-consuming.

True, although most of the theoretical physics was done in Germany and Switzerland. Einstein regularly worked between the 2 countries.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 16:55:34 2020 No.11365120 File: 91 KB, 1000x845, YOURWELCOME.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11360015 Not even a contest he jobs everyone else by a quantum metric.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 17:02:33 2020 No.11365140 either Galois or Euler.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 18:30:44 2020 No.11365356 File: 144 KB, 500x586, 1576791198116.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Choosing anyone other than Plato or Gödel basically admitting you're retarded.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 18:32:03 2020 No.11365361 >>11360015 Euler.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 18:57:18 2020 No.11365433 >>11360015 Leibniz. >invented calculus independent of Newton >contributed to philosophy >invented the world's first calculator

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 19:42:41 2020 No.11365542 >>11360015 Not the Jewish quack Einstein, that's for sure.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 19:43:49 2020 No.11365545 File: 258 KB, 785x1000, OY VEY, OY NOOOOOEEE!!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11360043 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tB3IBXTgEc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zELjb6iDjL8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev10ywLFq6E

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 6 19:44:50 2020 No.11365547 >>11360237 Same reason Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber were successful.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 7 12:03:58 2020 No.11366837 >>11360015 Miles Mathis.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math