/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11349968]

SCIENCE vs SOIENCE thread
lets start off with an example:
>the science of astronomy: observing the stars and planets, noting their patterns and using that information to aid in predicting the season and in timekeeping and navigation
>the soience of asstronogay: lets waste billions and taking neat-o pictures of shit in the sky because its all psychedelic looking and shit, so what if its completely useless and massive waste of resources?

[Anonymous No.11349981]

IQ isn't science
Psychology isn't science
Forensics isn't science
Economics isn't science
Nutrition science isn't science

[Anonymous No.11349992]

>>11349981
Lol OP BTFO

[Anonymous No.11350310]

>>11349992
lol

[Anonymous No.11350432]

>>11349968
> Science says human genders have different average IQs
Science says the differences are, at most, within statistical error. And most of them find no differences at all. And even that comes from a very limited number of studies.

Next up: .5% of scientists say climate change is not real, therefore it is not fucking real!

>>11349981
> Psychology is one part philosophy and one part linguistic statistics. And the two tolerate each other at best.
> IQ is the best statistical tool available to Psychology at the moment. If IQ is not real, neither is statistical math.
> Forensics method of acquiring repeated findings using other sciences. Such as physics, biology, and statistics.If forensics is not real, literally all physical experiments are not real.
> Microeconomics is applied psychology. Macroeconomics is applied history. If neither is right, then consider not keeping money in savings account, because the interest you're getting on it does not really exist.
> Nutrition science 90% meme, and 10% eating a little bit of many things, not too often.

[Anonymous No.11350549]

>>11350432
>> IQ is the best statistical tool available to Psychology
Stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.11350559]

>>11350549
Name one better.

Name a single other tool that has better statistical strength than the measure of IQ.

[Anonymous No.11350570]

>>11350432
>Science says the differences are, at most, within statistical error.
wrong

[Anonymous No.11350572]

>>11350559
race

[Anonymous No.11350580]

>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.11350589]

SCIENCE vs SOIENCE
>the science of anthropology: taxonomical classification of human biodiversity based on differences of physical characteristics and behavior
>the soicence of anthropology: We all from africa! Watch this discovery channel documentary about evolution! Humans had sex with Neanderthals!

[Anonymous No.11350601]

>>11349968
Everything pol says and believes is "soience".

[Anonymous No.11350642]

>>11349981
based defender of science and epistemological pilled

[Anonymous No.11350644]

>>11350432

[Anonymous No.11350669]

>>11350570
> wrong
Well, if you say so, then it clearly must be true.
You're a true /sci/ material, and you definitely shouldn't go to back to /pol/

I'm sure you're not referring to the single study which found 5 IQ points, which is the entire reason that one website exists.

Because all the other studies say otherwise.

See: >>11350432
> Next up: .5% of scientists say climate change is not real, therefore it is not fucking real!


>>11350572
Which also just so happens to correlate to IQ. What's more, IQ also predicts for difference in performance within a single race. Therefore IQ is more universal predictor.

But yea, that was a nice try. Orange boy

>>11350644
> half
Well, I said the IQ is the strongest predictor. Not that everything in psychology is reproducible.

But I'll bite. Kindly show me that IQ theory is in the half the body of research that does not reproduce.

Come on, friend. You can do this. After all, your post show that you are clearly in the right. This should be a child's play, for anyone of your magnitude.

The Nature Magazine clearly says half of psychology does not reproduce, so there clearly has to be at least one study that demonstrates that IQ is included.

The field is open for you. Educate me. This is an open challenge for you. Superior fren.

[Anonymous No.11350680]

Soience: light speed travel!
Science: nobody has managed to even make anything go as fast as 1000km/s yet, speculating about transluminal speeds is scifi faggotry

[Anonymous No.11350682]

>>11350680
Because of the "basedence" we know speed of light is a thing, and how much it is.

That "basedence" is the reason why your GPS works.

[Anonymous No.11350702]

>>11350601
out of curiousity who believes in more bullshit, /pol/, /x/, or /lit/?

[Anonymous No.11350706]

>>11350702
That's like asking whether dogshit, catshit or bullshit smells worse.

[Anonymous No.11350720]

>>11350682
GPS is a military development, so is the internet, they're both things with funtional use.
university soientists don't ever produce anything of value

[Anonymous No.11350730]

>>11350720
The reason why the potato phone you're posting this from is able to interpret GPS signal is that we are able to comprehend what happens to its signal at relativistic speed. Turns out electromagnetic waves are subject to the same limitations os light. Weeee.

Turns out, GPS did not work at first. They had to adjust for time "ticking slower" at high speeds, and doppler shift of the GPS signal. Soibois solved that for the evil 'ment real quick.

As for the pic. Go dig a tunnel at the side of a mountain.

See how far you get.

Also, go build a road by piling on loads of gunk without knowing how any of that works. See how long it lasts.

Not to mention. Money moves the world. Go ahead. Organize an interstate highway between Dallas and Nevada. It's almost as if there were people in your way.

[Anonymous No.11350785]

>>11350730

[Anonymous No.11350789]

>>11349968
Subversive pop science media outlets need to be incinerated.

[Anonymous No.11350810]

>>11350785
That settles it then. Thank you for proving the point.

[Anonymous No.11350815]

>>11350730

[Anonymous No.11350939]

[Anonymous No.11350943]

>>11349968
>using that information to aid in predicting the season and in timekeeping and navigation
If only we had things like calendars and clocks....
Oh well

[Anonymous No.11350946]

>>11349981
>Forensics isn't science
Brainlet

[Anonymous No.11351029]

>>11350815
Fine. Let's lower the tax again. That would surely solve this.

[Anonymous No.11351042]

>>11351029
Why not let people pay for the streets they use directly? Children and students without income they could get loans

[Anonymous No.11351047]

>>11351042
I don't trust the government, instead I trust the (((bank))).

[Anonymous No.11351143]

Race and IQ aren't even science

[Anonymous No.11351146]

>>11350669
Psychology isn't science.
It's a field for females that give you anti depressants and take 300 dollars an hour.
You're a cuck for defending it.

[Anonymous No.11351151]

>>11349981
Imagine getting a degree in sciences just to be a glorified doorman.

[Anonymous No.11351231]

>>11350702
/sci/

[Anonymous No.11351309]

>>11349981
technical is math not a science too. its more of a Geisteswissenschaft ( human sciences such as philosophy, history, philology, musicology, linguistics, theater studies, literary studies, media studies )

[Anonymous No.11352194]

>>11351231
pmt

[Anonymous No.11352524]

>>11350680
>b...but... NASA eagleworks is working on the EM Drive and we will have starfleet senpai!!! I found a reddit thread that said so!

[Anonymous No.11352539]

>>11350432
>climate change
>Global warming
Way to move the goal posts. 20 years ago your kind were swearing the ice caps would melt and we'd all be underwater right now.

[Anonymous No.11352548]

>>11350432 <--soience

<--science

[Anonymous No.11352737]

>>11350946
National Academy of Science called forensic sciences a pseudoscience with very little basis in science

[Anonymous No.11352746]

>>11351151
i know bro just let others spread non truths into the world and let it have an impact on laypeople.

[Anonymous No.11352780]

>not calling it basedence

[Anonymous No.11353072]

>>11349968
>SOIENCE
people who argue on the internet over what is and isn't science
or argue over partisan biased subjective interpretation of facts

>SCIENCE
people who just get shit done


I feel like anyone posting soi memes isn't objective. Anyone who uses science to validate racism or gender biases is also biased. Anyone who claims "but this chart I found on /pol/ supports my personal beliefs and charts are science so you can't say I'm wrong" is both biased and delusional. I feel like the world has become so warped, partisan, biased, and delusional that people don't even know what's real anymore. They turn to the internet for confirmation of their own biases and beliefs, knowing there will always be at least 1 person who will tell them anything is that they with to be true is actually true, and then they get mad, angry, and troll everyone else out of resentment or revenge for making them angry. I feel like we're moving towards a world where objective truth no longer exists.

[Anonymous No.11353097]

>>11350669
>Well, if you say so, then it clearly must be true.
pottery

[Anonymous No.11353120]

>>11353072
>I feel
not science

[Anonymous No.11353145]

>>11352737
>Appleal to authority.
M..masta s..s.said its n..not! Use your brain

[Anonymous No.11353160]

>>11353145
but, neither is simply saying "not science." Therefore, my point is valid must scientifically true. Which now means it is science. I win. Thank you for this very scientific debate. [/sarcasm]

The point is, literally ANYTHING can be or can not be science if some retard wants to believe it and doesn't have a firm grasp of reality. And sadly, reality is becoming more biased and objective.

>>11353145
>appeal to my internet memes

Why are you people even posting here is all you post is "science isn't real science" and "hey look at this graph that confirms racism" and "everyone else is lying listen only to me!!"
The modus operandi of you posters is right out of a government propaganda play book. It's plain for anybody to see, but what do you expect to get from your efforts? You know 4chan is a bunch of nerds living in their mother's basements, right? Why bother trying to brainwash a few retard rejects on an anonymous mongolean basket weaving forum?

[Anonymous No.11353164]

>>11349968
Cool
>Science: Testing and expanding the boundaries of human knowledge solely in the name of scientific progress
>Soience: Only researching something because of potential "practical use"

[Anonymous No.11353175]

>>11349968
>you see! it says so right there: google.com/....

[Anonymous No.11353180]

>>11353120
but, neither is simply saying "not science." Therefore, my point is valid must scientifically true. Which now means it is science. I win. Thank you for this very scientific debate. [/sarcasm]

The point is, literally ANYTHING can be or can not be science if some retard wants to believe it and doesn't have a firm grasp of reality. And sadly, reality is becoming more biased and objective.

>>11353145
>appeal to my internet memes

Why are you people even posting here is all you post is "science isn't real science" and "hey look at this graph that confirms racism" and "everyone else is lying listen only to me!!"
The modus operandi of you posters is right out of a government propaganda play book. It's plain for anybody to see, but what do you expect to get from your efforts? You know 4chan is a bunch of nerds living in their mother's basements, right? Why bother trying to brainwash a few retard rejects on an anonymous mongolean basket weaving forum?

[Anonymous No.11353182]

>>11352780
>what words filter
>i'm not a newfag

[Anonymous No.11353187]

>>11353072
Stopped reading at the second feel like, but I'm pretty sure I could extrapolate the rest of your shitpost.

[Anonymous No.11353506]

>>11351146
Yeah. Nah. Have a read on big 5 personality traits. It's essentially applied statistics.

[Anonymous No.11353518]

>>11349981
Science isn't science.

It's smashing things together to see what happens, writing down the results, and hoping the results are repeatable the next time someone else tries to smash the same things together again.

[Anonymous No.11353525]

>Science: Something I like
>Soience: Something I don't like

There, thread over

[Anonymous No.11353542]

>>11352539
They called it global warming, because the statistics show the average temperature of the entire earth is rising.

Then plebs started to interpret it as "well it's gonna get hot everywhere".

Climate change is now used to describe well, change of climate, resulting from global warming.

Not moving the goal post. Adapting the presentation.


The oceans have risen .2 meters in the last 100 years. .1 meters of that was in last 20 years. It's happening, and it's speeding up.

Also, I like how the same people calling out soience also ignore statistical probability of predicted outcomes with the studies they don't like:

"Well, what you predicted was only 30% accurate. THEREFORE THE ENTIRE THING IS A LIE."

[Anonymous No.11353543]

>>11350680
>Science: nobody has managed to even make anything go as fast as 1000km/s yet

Wrong. Particle accelerators can accelerate particles to near-c velocity.

[Anonymous No.11353547]

>>11349968
>>11353525
This.
Not science or math.
Contribute to productive and well-intentioned threads, not dumb childish arguments.

[Anonymous No.11353568]

>>11353547
>not dumb childish arguments
so is this soience? I don't follow

[Anonymous No.11353635]

Soi-ence: "Do you have a peer reviewed study backing that up?"
Science: Realizing that academic science is driven by groupthink and the pursuit of careers, not truth; most published, peer-reviewed science is false.

[Anonymous No.11354002]

>>11353542
>redi spacing
go away soifag
exit the premises

[Anonymous No.11354019]

>>11349981
Not an argument

[Anonymous No.11354691]

>Soience
We ARE SO CLOSE TO A CURE FOR AIDS GUYS. FINALLY YEARS OF SUFFERING WILL BE ENDED IF MORE SCIENTISTS START WORKING ON IT.

>Science
I'm working in another vaccine for this years mutation of the flu. No I am not interested in finding a "cure" for a disease that only infects sexually degenerate and irresponsible people. The flu can kill millions.

[Anonymous No.11354718]

>>11350680
Well hypothetically speaking there is a rather simple way of going about it. We could send a ship up into space and then it would procede to orbit around the earth, accelerating at 1G, which is a very comfortable speed for us. After about a year we would reach 75% of the speeed of light (or after 2 years I forgot).

[Anonymous No.11354722]

>>11354691
Holy shit do scientists actually decide who lives and who dies by virtue of what they care to work on?
When twitter campaign to compel all scientists everywhere whether their field or not, to cure AIDS and find better method to turn boys into girls, NOW

[Anonymous No.11354767]

>>11350702
What specific bullshit do those boards believe?

[Anonymous No.11354788]

>>11354722
I'm a molecular biologist and I'm not working on cancer or aids because I don't care about them so yes.

[Anonymous No.11354790]

>>11354722
It's me again, I am working on how to feminize males though.

[Anonymous No.11354907]

>>11350946
DNA analysis and chemical analysis are science. Hair analysis, bite mark analysis, tire tread analysis, fiber analysis, handwriting analysis, audio analysis, etc. are all bullshit. Fingerprint analysis is on thin ice but they're actually making an effort to improve that so they get a pass for now. The actual state of forensics is an absolute shitshow -- there's a reason all the labs are owned by police or prosecutors.

[Anonymous No.11354932]

>>11354907
>Any of that is science
Okay brainlet

[Anonymous No.11355183]

>>11351151
He is keeping the field pure from pseudoscience

[Anonymous No.11355222]

>>11354002
>thinks this is reddit-spacing

[Anonymous No.11355525]

soi
ooi
iii

[Anonymous No.11355577]

>>11349968

SOIENCE
>"We're going to Mars!"

SCIENCE
>NEAs and belt asteroids are literally inside-out planets, with an insane amount of mineral wealth available to a technologically proficient space-borne society, and refueling depots already in the planning stages on the moon, with later ones harvesting comets to augment that initial resource

[Anonymous No.11355637]

>>11353543
Don't be autistic anon, you know what he meant

[Anonymous No.11355677]

>>11349981
actually those are all science stay mad

[Anonymous No.11356058]

>>11355677

[Anonymous No.11356380]

>>11350669
wrong

[Anonymous No.11356382]

>>11350682
which has absolutely nothing to do with accelerating mass to c, good job

[Anonymous No.11356388]

>>11350730
literally believes no corporation has every dug a tunnel kek

[Anonymous No.11356397]

>>11353506
that's why your field has <50% replication rate lmao

[Anonymous No.11356402]

>>11353072
reality is racist retard get over it

[Anonymous No.11356404]

>>11353180
everyone else IS lying dumbass

[Anonymous No.11356406]

>>11353525
seething redditor lol

[Anonymous No.11356409]

>>11353542
nice moves goalposts fag lmao

[Anonymous No.11356411]

>>11354019
suck my dick lol

[Anonymous No.11356461]

>>11356404
>REEEEEEEE stop posting facts that contradict the preconceived ideals i choose to believe in because the kikes drilled them into my head during 12 years of public schooling

[Anonymous No.11356467]

>>11354002
This is 4chan spacing. Reddit borrowed it. You would have known that, if you weren't a newfag. Lurk moar.

[Anonymous No.11356484]

>>11356461
mad as fuck lol

[Anonymous No.11356486]

>>11356467
nope

[Anonymous No.11356517]

>>11356484
yep

[Anonymous No.11356519]

>>11356467
I know it for a fact. Been here since last summer. Of '08.

[Anonymous No.11357065]

>>11351146
>he thinks psychiatry is psychology

[Anonymous No.11357068]

Another example of wojakniggers creating the worst threads. Nice.

[Anonymous No.11357071]

>>11352548
What exactly is that picture supposed to prove? Weight =/= intelligence
Female brains have a very different proportion of white to grey matter compared to brains, meaning that you cannot simply compare the weight of their brains to that of men. It's like determining that elephants must be smarter than humans based on their higher brain weight.

[Anonymous No.11357120]

>>11353180
>muh racism
>muh propaganda
>muh brainwashing
Ugh, you just reek of onions and HRT.
Appeal to authority is a fallacy, not some internet meme. It's one of the most basic ones too, which every kid that learned about Galileo and Kopernikus in 5th grade should be able to recognize. Just because "people" like you just looove to jump onboard with whatever opinion (because that's exactly what it is) some 3-letter political association is peddling as fact, does not in the slightest invalidate research to the contrary of that "official" opinion.
If you wanted to slightly increase the validity of your judgement, you could base it on expert surveys. That way you would still be appealing to authority like the vermin you are, but at least you would be referencing a majority viewpoint, as opposed to the politically convenient opinion of a handful of "researchers".

[Anonymous No.11358144]

>>11356519
fucking newfag nigger

[Anonymous No.11358333]

>>11350720
Most roads are built by private companies under contract from a government. The actual employees of governments typically only do patch work though there are exceptions here and there. The real difficulty in building roads isn't the construction, it's getting the land to build it on that is consecutive. That's where governments have the special power of eminent domain backed up by the threat of force.
Private companies only have the power of offering more and more money until everyone sells. If some people want too much money to make the road economically viable, you end up needing to detour around, which at best is costly and reduces throughput of the road. At worse it can be impossible due to topography and other land issues. Governments can simply take the land and pay the owner what they decide is the fair market value. No gouging allowed.

[Anonymous No.11358359]

>>11349981
Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

[Anonymous No.11358366]

>>11358359
thank you based uncle ted poster

[Anonymous No.11358579]

>>11358359
t. got raped by psychologists by harvard

[Anonymous No.11358608]

>>11354767
>/pol/
schizo shit that requires an inkling of brainpower to process
>/x/
bottom of the barrel schizo shit like ghost adventures and finding bigfoot
>/lit/
that modernism is the greatest movement in literary history

[Anonymous No.11358612]

>>11349968
Wtf is the graph? Brain weight vs age? How is that conclusive to iq? Bigger brain = bigger iq?

[Anonymous No.11358617]

>science says human genders have different average IQs
Actually, most studies suggest that the average IQs of men and women are the same, while the standard deviation is different. That is, one sex may have more geniuses and more morons, while the other may have most of its members clustered around the mean. Interestingly, while it is considered common knowledge in the West that the flatter bell curve belongs to men, I have found studies from India* suggesting the exact opposite. It is entirely possible then, that the distribution of intelligence between men and women may be entirely cultural, and not so much biological.

* This was several fucking years ago while working with a professor trying to find proxy data for the intelligence of Iranian women. Don't ask me for the source. I can't fucking remember it and this isn't my field of study anyways.

[Anonymous No.11358651]

>>11358617
male variability is tied to bateman's principle man, the sex with the smaller gametes has higher variability as a result of being subject to greater sexual selection pressure. some studies from india don't have any bearing on this evo bio fact. it's borderline feminist retardation to argue on this point, the pattern is the same across many taxa

btw male's have higher IQ from age 15 on, about 2-8 points, as a result of greater complexity of neural structures and millions more neurons and connections as a result of greater size

>>11358612
it is well known brain size is positively associated with intelligence

[Anonymous No.11358664]

>>11358651
>result of greater complexity of neural structures and millions more neurons and connections as a result of greater size
This is not completely true. IQ is dependent on two things: how quickly neuron build networks and how quickly those networks are strengthened over time. Pattern recognition is just an exercise in your ability to reach logical conclusions based on observation of previous patterns, which is a test of how strong the connection between neurons associated with that pattern is. High IQ brains have fewer overall connections, but more organization of neurons in the larger scale brain structure, so you are somewhat right. To some degree the number of neurons is just indicative of body size and sensory processing.

[Anonymous No.11358858]

>>11355677
How is economics a science? There are reasons why it's a liberal art.

[Anonymous No.11358869]

>>11358664
pattern recognition isn't the whole of what iq is testing for or what g is intended to represent. you could presumably recognize patterns others do not without being able to represent them in a useful way or without processing them quickly enough to do anything interesting. The broadest set of components to general intelligence are qunatitative reasoning, processing speed, verbal reasoning, visual-spatial reasoning, working memory and executive function.

[Anonymous No.11358870]

on average men have 4.6 higher iq then women that could explain why the top 50 people with high iq aren't women

[Anonymous No.11358897]

>>11354718
underrated post

[Anonymous No.11358936]

>>11358870
Sexism can also explain it

[Anonymous No.11358939]

>>11350702
>>>/biz/
Just read through a crypto general thread, see how much bullshit everybody just swallows.

[Anonymous No.11358962]

>>11358936
honest question
why are all the best chefs in the world men? were women excluded from cooking because last time i checked they were never historically excluded from cooking yet the best chefs are still men

[Anonymous No.11359337]

>>11358962
Women and Men were segregated in the kitchen as well though. Women were usually confined to only working with what they found at the grocery store and cooking for a house every day, they weren't expected to have any art to it

[Anonymous No.11359742]

>>11359337
wow cope

[Anonymous No.11359764]

>>11358936
>>11359337
lmfao, your brain on "equality"

[Anonymous No.11359771]

>>11350601
Cope

[Anonymous No.11359779]

Science:
>We will have to use pre-assembled modules made of high-quality materials to survive in the caverns of Mars, as the radiation will most certainly hurt any life.
Soience:
>YAAAAAAAY WE CAN 3D PRINT COLONIES ON MARS WITH DUST YAAAAAAY FREE FUNKO POP I CAN FINALLY BROWSE REDDIT AND LOOK AT PUPPERINOS WITH MY WIFE AND HER BOYFRIEND IN SPACE! WUBALUBDUB

[Anonymous No.11359785]

>>11358858
Physical sciences are also liberal arts.

[Anonymous No.11359806]

>>11359764
>>11359742
a woman would have been admonished for attempting to experiment in the kitchen in the way that is necessary to become a great artist

[Anonymous No.11359952]

>>11349968
IQ changes by education

[Anonymous No.11360737]

These days "science" means statistics which is just a bunch of useless bullshit people circlr jerk over.

I respect true science but I wish people would separate it from statistics problem is most "established science" breaks down if you do because guess what science is flawed but it can be a useful TOOL nothing more.

[Anonymous No.11360741]

>>11358617
Wow it is almost as if there are so many variables effecting a human life that all these "scientific" studies are ultimately useless and only really serve the purpose of reinforcing beliefs and values of specific groups of people rather than revealing any kind of deeper truth about what it means to be human.

[Anonymous No.11360757]

>>11358359
Lmao leftistd are the exact opposite. They worship science and think everything is a mental illness. What you described is a decent human being who understands truth real truth not this statistical bullshit.

[Anonymous No.11360766]

>>11349981
>Forensics isn't science
ok retard i guess medicine isnt neighther

[Anonymous No.11360774]

>>11360766
It really isn't. Not in the way people want it to be. Medicine is not something that gives definitive answers but honestly most science isn't. Yet people like to pretend science is facts but it is not the case at all. Medicine is not factual it is statistical. You don't ever know whether a medication will definitely work or not.

[Anonymous No.11360780]

>>11353072>>11353180>>11353525>>11353542>>11350432
nice reddit spacing no wonder why so inteligent non cringy posts

[Anonymous No.11360782]

>>11360774
thats not the notion of science, retard
although i agree it barelly is a science

[Anonymous No.11360798]

>>11353072
This.

[Anonymous No.11360805]

>>11360782
I never said it was I said the practice of science and the way it is treated by people including scientists themselves are very different.

[Anonymous No.11360840]

>>11360766
https://www.pnas.org/content/115/18/4541
I hope you never get charged with a crime.
>hurr durr dis boot mark look same
>hurr durr jeans analysis
>grug look here dis gun shot make mark on bullet look same durrr dis science rite officer?

[Anonymous No.11361264]

>>11358962
Women aren't allowed to experiment in the kitchen so they can't innovate

[Anonymous No.11361374]

>>11359779
>Funko Pop bad
Yes.

[Anonymous No.11361384]

>>11357071
>soience

[Anonymous No.11361387]

>>11358664

[Anonymous No.11361432]

>>11349968
You still can't disprove the fact that IQ is environmental no matter your race/gender

[Anonymous No.11361433]

>>11361374

[Anonymous No.11361434]

>>11361432
This only happened after apartheid was removed

[Anonymous No.11361453]

>>11355577
The mars one is more plausible though, because mars is closer to earth and has gravity. I do think mars could definitely serve as an industrial planet though, processing metals and shit that are mined from the asteroid belt.

[Anonymous No.11361460]

>>11350720
The problem I have with that pic is that nobody would actually want to put the money up to build the road, you'd end up paying a flat road fee monthly equivalent to your taxes for roads, but the money would go to a road utility company instead. Not sure which would be better desu. Also, the roads are there for the military in the US at least, civilians are just borrowing them during peacetime.

[Anonymous No.11361519]

>>11358939
BUY HIGH SELL LOW
THAT'S THE /BIZ/LET WAY

[Anonymous No.11361654]

>>11349981
I'm sorry but IQ research has better replication rates than pretty much every hard science except physics.
While arguably there's quite a lot of junk psychology that occurs within Academia, neuropsychology, evolutionary psychology and behavioral genetics have better replication rates than nearly all materials science subfields and hold up very well under scrutiny from outside fields.
Forensics is literally an applied science and uses significant amounts of physical chemistry and biophysics in order to gain decent statistical models. This argument makes no sense and seems to be based much more on perceptions of TV forensics than actual forensics research.

If you're arguing that nutrition research isn't science, then you literally are arguing that molecular biology and internal medicine aren't sciences. Nutrition science is just application of molecular biology to human biological systems, there's no reason to believe that MolBio is science if you're saying Nutrition science isn't.

Basically you're a nigger faggot who gets his information from YouTube comment sections and should shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.11361674]

>>11353180
>[/sarcasm]
Youre a red/ditor. No one on the chans uses this dumb meme

[Anonymous No.11361719]

>>11358936
Egalitarianism is a lie.

[Anonymous No.11361733]

>>11361434
/POL/ ALERT /POL/ ALERT THEY JUST NEED MO MONEY FOR DEM POGRAMS YOU RACIST BIGOT

[Anonymous No.11362895]

>>11349968
>SOIENCE
I read that in an east coast accent lmao

[Anonymous No.11363407]

>>11361654
>I'm sorry but IQ research has better replication rates than pretty much every hard science
Psychology and women studies isn't "hard science"

[Anonymous No.11363722]

>>11349981
not scientifically backed up