/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11319375]

How many more IQ points does the average man have than the average female? Does HRT reduce IQ?

[Anonymous No.11319383]

>>11319375
the incels that get their dick chopped off because somebody told them they would feel better aren't sharpest tools in the shed to begin with

[Anonymous No.11319392]

>>11319375
Richard Lynn says its around 5-7, after puberty is complete for both the men and women (18+)

[Anonymous No.11319394]

>>11319383
N-no..., please dont talk mean about women.
They are the only things that give me meaning in life

[Anonymous No.11319405]

>>11319383
The correlation between high rates of circumcision and retards really is astounding

[Anonymous No.11319407]

>>11319392
that little? only about 5% or so? that estimate must be heavily shaded by political correctness

[Anonymous No.11319578]

>>11319375

the averages are the same retard. males have a higher variance in iq than women, which results in a larger proportion of men at the extremes. due to social safety nets the lower extremes aren't impacted much but the higher extremes of iq are predominantly men and women cry about it e.g., more men named "john" are ceo's than total female ceo's

[Anonymous No.11319588]

>>11319578
This get your shit straight

[Anonymous No.11319591]

>>11319405
I think anon was referring to transgenders.

[Anonymous No.11319617]

>>11319375

About IQ & Intelligence:
https://femto.pw/wgfv.webm

About Women:
https://femto.pw/mgmx.webm

"Women are Evil!":
https://femto.pw/zqgt.webm

The Role of Women:
https://femto.pw/bm6r.webm

[Anonymous No.11319626]

"woman do not have panis and they stupid" - abraham L.

[Anonymous No.11319754]

>>11319617
>LARPagan welfare queen
fuck off

[Anonymous No.11320282]

The IQs of men are more polarized than women's.
The average is the same, but men have more low and high IQ people in comparison to women whose IQs are more likely to be around average.

[Anonymous No.11320283]

Women have a tighter IQ distribution than men. Basically, there are more stupid men but there are also more smart men. It's a trade-off

[Anonymous No.11320332]

>>11320282
>>11320283
But would hormones effect that in any way? Surely that's genetic?

[Anonymous No.11320338]

>>11319578
>>11319588
>>11320282
nyborg's a good researcher

did you know he was in the olympics as well?

this kinda makes sense as well given male brains are larger, men have accomplished 99% of everything in science and art, men experience greater selection pressure due to having the smaller gametes and must compete more to reproduce...

[Anonymous No.11320398]

>>11319375
>>11319407
What is it that so attracts /pol/tards to IQ? You would think they would deny it when they are mostly blue collar workers on the low end of the bell curve

[Anonymous No.11320412]

>>11319375
the average male is very slightly dumber than the average female, there are just proportionally more highly intelligent men than women which becomes a progressively larger disparity past ~2SD+ so that men greatly outnumber women in the top 99th percentile of intelligence

[Anonymous No.11320433]

>>11320282
men have higher visuo spatial but equal verbal/reasoning

[Anonymous No.11320674]

>>11320398
>You would think they would deny it when they are mostly blue collar workers on the low end of the bell curve
Are they?

[Anonymous No.11320834]

>>11320283
>that pic
Can't believe anyone has called it out already.
Science doesn't say that, there is no scientific definition of race on a genetic basis. Seeth again.
>>11320338
>>11319375
>perfect bell curve
>>11319392
>Richard Lynn
Every time you see an repartition of IQ test results forming a perfect bell curve, you can dismiss it, as it means the results have been altered/tampered to make it look like a bell curve, because the ones behind it expected it to be a Bell cruve to begin with.

This is what the repartition of intelligence test look like when not tampered.

[Anonymous No.11320837]

>>11319392
>Richard Lynn
Hack:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBc7qBS1Ujo

[Anonymous No.11320842]

>>11319375
>that pic
Can't believe anyone has called it out already.
Science doesn't say that, there is no scientific definition of race on a genetic basis. Seeth again.
>>11320283
>>11320338
>perfect bell curve
>>11319392
>Richard Lynn
Every time you see an repartition of IQ test results forming a perfect bell curve, you can dismiss it, as it means the results have been altered/tampered to make it look like a bell curve, because the ones behind it expected it to be a Bell cruve to begin with.

This is what the repartition of intelligence test look like when not tampered.

[Anonymous No.11320849]

>>11319407
To note, when you make a brain weight/body weight ratio, it comes about the same for men and women.

[Anonymous No.11320864]

>>11320849
Not as significant for within species comparison, brain volume has higher variation than brain:body mass. the reverse holds for between species comparison especially distant taxa

[Anonymous No.11320871]

>>11320864
what actually matter is the amount of folds, not the volume or even the mass. Very little data exist on the actual amount of folds though.

Fun fact: Neanderthal had, on average, bigger volume, but Sapiens was more proficient at tool making.

[Anonymous No.11320943]

>>11319617
I haven't clicked the links but I'm 90% sure this is Varg just from the titles

[Anonymous No.11322187]

>>11320332
Not sure about hormones, but X-chromosome defects in men will not be backed up by a second X-chromosome. That could lead to defects or improvements.