RH thread.

[El Arcón No.11309070]

RH is false, as you well know.

Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function Within the Critical Strip and Off the Critical Line
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1912.0030

[Anonymous No.11309133]

>>11309070
Oh Tookey's back. We missed you Tookey. We've been overrun by schizos far less entertaining than yourself. What were you up to?

[Hoaxfag No.11309792]

>>11309133
*Overruns*

>>11309070
Hey man, what's your endgame in all this?
Like what do you want?

[El Arcón No.11309828]

>>11309792
>what's your game?
My opening move will be to nuke Israel. Then I will find out what's the worst anyone has ever suffered in the history of the universe. Then I will develop a workaround for whatever made that "the" worst, and then I will put all my enemies and their servants and children and their servants children into something which is clearly worse than whatever had been previously devised. Then I will round up some beautiful young women for my harem and as prize women for my favored servants. Then I will nuke all the large cities in the world. Then I will consolidate power and use my free energy device to pump water uphill for free so as to irrigate the arid lands of the Earth and create an unlimited source of wealth for socialist programs in my kingdom which shall endure forever: the Kingdom of God.

>what do you want
To do every single thing that my prophets of old promised I would do.

>>11309792
Why do you ask?

[Anonymous No.11309830]

i was just wondering, jon, based on pic related, how you justify that higgs is spin 1.... i mean then it couldn't generate masses for the W's and Z's right? like it couldn't take on a non-zero vacuum expectation value because of lorentz invariance.... how do you generate W and Z masses using your spin-1 higgs theory?

[El Arcón No.11309875]

>>11309830
>then it couldn't generate masses for the W's and Z's right?
I've not been convinced of this. I did see a convincing argument once that said, "If you assume ten things that might be wrong, then the W and Z mass requires rules out spin-1," but I never saw the case for that idea made without the ten simlifying assumptions, and I did see this video where Nima plainly says that spin-1 is fine.
>The Inevitability of Physical Laws: Why the Higgs Has to Exist
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykp4OA4bI90
>[1:01:55]
In fact, since Nima says spin-1 is fine right in the middle of talking about the physics of W and Z, I am pretty sure that spin-1 is fine and you guy who think it isn't don't know shit about it compared to famous subject matter expert Nima.

Also, I saw this paper where the author plainly shows that spin-1 is fine
>The Need to Fairly Confront Spin-1 for the New Higgs-like Particle
>https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2288

Also, pic related, CERN never published anything saying spin-1 was ruled out. In fact, I think the only person who ever said that it was ruled out was Detractor Anon from my 10,000 earlier threads. Not only that, I am quite sure that I explained this to you in the exact same way in each of every one of those previous 10,000 threads and you just keep pretending like I haven't already shown you this contrary evidence against the claim that you never support with any evidence of your own.

[El Arcón No.11309882]

30 Tooker Papers
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=08673880568874767256

[Anonymous No.11309888]

>>11309875
jon just give up. you are citing literature and (pseud alert) youtube shit from 8+ years ago. there is a reason you have no newer sources and that is because standard higgs theory was proven experimentally and thus ruled out your outdated crap

[Anonymous No.11309900]

Does anyone have the RH "proof" by this guy were at the end of the pic there's a mr clean thing? I remember seeing it at 8ch's /tech/, but I can't find it on my computer.

[El Arcón No.11309918]

>>11309888
The reason there's nothing new in this department is because the USA thinks it's vital for their national security for CERN to deny that the particle has spin-1, as the people at CERN all know fully well. Incidentally, those people at CERN are people who agree with the USA that is in their best interest to withhold exactly that result which they built LHC to find because it will result prove I am not the retard that my parents have been trying, successfully, to convince everyone that I am, and there is nothing more important to them than preserving Helene's and Joe's lies.

FYI: the USA is correct to think this is in their best interest because I will use my success to destroy everything they built while they were trying to tear me down. I will hurt their children on the road to the final genocide, and I will not have mercy on them.

>from 8+ years ago
And from what year is your wrong idea about he W and Z? 1974?

[El Arcón No.11309926]

>>11309900
This new paper is much better, and I do an independent disproof based on the properties of holomorphic functions
>Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function Within the Critical Strip and Off the Critical Line
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1912.0030
>alt mirror
>http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=05487512629102173334


Long before I became homeless, they knew I was right about the particle not being the Higgs at all, but instead having spin-1. Long before I became homeless, they already knew the negative frequency optical mode I predicted in 2011 produces free-energy amplified photons. The fact about the the USA is that they thought it would be better for them to let me rot in the gutter that to give me even a low paying job in which I might demonstrate my absolute intellectual dominion. So they put me in the mental midget group where I was doomed to fail at the task of being a retarded moron. In that mental midget scientology group, they had people write reports about me, "He's too stupid to even be a complete fucking retard. No matter how much we try, we absolutely cannot get him to give a fuck about shit that absolutely does not matter, and he just keeps thinking that satanism is a stupid thing to waste time and effort on compared to the math ans physics that he so dearly loves, and where he would have easily found vast professional success if we didn't bribe people to hide his 2009 paper and then expel him from university wrongfully without a PhD in 2011."

[Anonymous No.11309930]

>>11309918
great argument jon. stellar. a very unique new conspiracy theory that coincidentally revolves around you (since apparently you are special) tacked onto a denial of electroweak theory. i give you an A+ on cope

[El Arcón No.11309934]

>>11309930
Are you calling my anecdote an argument, or my quip? Not sure which of the two things which aren't arguments you're referring to.

[Anonymous No.11309938]

>>11309934
all i’m saying is that you are absolutely retarded physics-wise. if i had an undergrad come to me to argue that they deserved more points on a test because a conspiracy against them, i would recommend for them to see a doctor (because really i can’t recommend for them to kill themselves according to the rules, but i’d prefer that honestly)

[El Arcón No.11309953]

>>11309938
So then it's your opinion that you think my argument is that I deserve extra points due to some nebulous conspiracy, but not due to my single-handedly outperforming 40+ years of the world's elite physics PhDs?

Did you ever taker a reading comprehension test? Can you tell me: if the boy watched the quick brown dog jump over the low fence, then what color was the quick dog that jumped over the low fence?

[El Arcón No.11309964]

Note very well: I didn't just outperform each and every one of them. I outperformed all of their efforts combined, working alone in isolation, without ever reaching class material as advanced as GR or QFT.

Bless Wikipedia: the best website on the internet!

[Anonymous No.11309965]

>>11309953
no jon, my point is that you can’t put 2 and 2 together in physics so that’s why you and your “theories” and even more, your conspiracy theories are better off dead

[El Arcón No.11309981]

>I outperformed all of their efforts combined
It's like how there's this partial sums definition of infinity:
[math] \infty = \lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^\infty k [/math]

Infinity isn't just greater than any natural number, it is greater than the sum of all of them. That's how my own work compares to the combined works of every other living physicist. I trounced them handily in the professional arena, and they hate me for it, and they especially hate for it after they dismissed my early work for being typeset in MS Word instead of LuhTuhK. My results were so simple, it means they sitting right in front of all those other thousands of salaried PhDs all along, and not one of them was good enough to see that low hanging-fruit right in front of their face. It's a ego thing for them, just as much as it a life-or-death for children thing for the natsec people. If they ever admit the particle is a spin01 particle other than the Higss, then those egos are going to get dinged and those childlren are going to get defiled for along time before they die.

>>11309965
My point is that there must be something in this world that you care about very much, otherwise you wouldn't keep nay-saying me so laboriously across all these years, and I will find that thing and make it filth and wretched, and I will use it as something with which to cause you distress.

[Anonymous No.11309985]

>>11309926
Thx, that was the one I was looking for.

[Anonymous No.11309989]

>>11309981
>I will find that thing
please do. i would welcome anything that makes sense from “outsiders”. in the meantime you need to revise and update your crap to take into account all the results since 2012

[El Arcón No.11310003]

>>11309989
Give citations for the results to which you refer

[Anonymous No.11310006]

>>11310003
i am sorry jon but you need to do your own homework. Nima abandoned the spin-1 higgs idea based on results from experiments and if you are unable to repeat that sort of homework i fear you are not up to the actual task at hand

[El Arcón No.11310015]

There is no homework to do because the particle does have spin-1, and all the experts know it, and they all agree with my enemies that it is in their best interest to withhold the result that the LHC was built to discover. When find out that I kill their children for that reason, then they will know it was not in their best interest to align themselves with my enemies, just like you will know you were wrong to make these posts I don't like when I similarly hurt you and/or your author.

[Anonymous No.11310021]

>>11310015
sorry, but you are factually incorrect.

[Anonymous No.11310050]

Deconstruct the analytical continuation of the Zeta sum into its constituent parts, and you'll see all the zeros must be on the critical line.
Everybody knows that.

[El Arcón No.11310066]

>>11310050
Most of those same people will tell you that the critical line starts near the origin, extends in both directions through the neighborhood of the origin, and then gets to infinity without ever going though the neighborhood of infinity.

[Anonymous No.11310078]

>>11310066
>gets BTFO'd on physics, again, after 8 years of BTFOs
>retreats to mathematical pseudery

[Anonymous No.11310101]

>>11310066
how big is the neighborhood of infinity? where does it start?

[El Arcón No.11310158]

>>11310101
It is infinitely big. As the complement of a neighborhood of the origin, asking where it starts doesn't make sense. To answer that, it would have to be the complement of a set with a least upper bound. Any patch defined by a radius of the origin such that the radius is less than some natural number is said to be a patch in the neighborhood of the origin. The naturals have no supremum, so the complement doesn't have an infimum.

[Hoaxfag No.11310177]

>>11309828
Have you considered applying your demonstrated intelligence on something lik getting rich with cryptocurrency, then hiring like 7 high class prostitutes and buying heaps of OxyContin and cocaine and Xanax and just hanging out with said prostitutes in the top floor of a hotel.
Surely that would be more fun than a thermonuclear war.
How would you get past the Israeli missile defence laser grid man?
What futuristic stealth tech you got for a garage built ICBM that can do 6000 kilometres without being notice by the global antimissile defence grid running hot, so it's going to be a huge ICBM to travel that far, what's your stealth tech?
I'm curious about keeping the propellent gas at room temperature so it's not spotted by thermal satellite feeds?

[Hoaxfag No.11310180]

>>11309828
I was asking because I would like to be helpful with your quantum research, we have similar interests.

[El Arcón No.11310243]

>>11310177
>demonstrated intelligence on something lik getting rich
This is what my intelligence tells me: if they can make my irrefutable proofs and results in the fundamentals of mathematics fail, then they can and will make anything else I try to do fail.

>that would be more fun
If you think that my interest is having fun for myself rather than making my enemies suffer in Biblical catastrophe, then I cannot take you seriously, Hoaxfag. I want to kill and maim and make war and destroy because, among very many other, better reasons, they made it impossible for me to spend my money on good looking hookers back when I was trying to do that. Even as recently as this week, they were still sending their gangstalkers to mock the hand they dealt me back when I was trying to find a woman. Although that is what I earnestly sought, they sent me evil women, and disgusting women, and men disguised as women, and they put sexual torture implants in my asshole because I turned in severe desperation on a small handful occasions to experiment with homosexual behavior as a cure for me desperate loneliness, and they have been sexually torturing me ever since, all day every day, even now ten years later, long after I learned that the sexual company of men is not at all any improvement on sad loneliness.

I would get the past the missile defenses with either next-gen impulse-drive missile propulsion to advance the warheads along undefeatable far-from-ballistic trajectories or else I would send a preliminary wave of nuclear weapons to destroy the air defenses, and then I would send the follow on nuclear carpet bombing attack to destroy the entire population except for them who hide in bunkers until they eventually emerge to be immediately killed by the hunter-killer drones that I will deploy to patrol that desolate wasteland forever after, killing every living thing.

[El Arcón No.11310246]

>>11310243
Indeed, even as I wrote that post, the ultra-high intensity 3:00 sexual torture implant was activated and gaggle of infidels make a joyous noise in the hallway so as to mock my suffering and ongoing years of loneliness.

>>11310180
I don't believe you. What I believe is that when I go back through these threads later looking for people who addressed me irreverently, you will be lumped into the group of the guilty.

[Anonymous No.11310254]

>>11310158
I think you should call it a minfimum in that case...
I also like how you use the analogy of the inflationary epoch to make your point, very classy.
You have to love the inflationary period.
You know there's some simple ideas and theories, explanations for it right?

p.s. if it's infinitely big, then it must be the same or less cardinality, and if it has no minfimum (which I agree, it wouldn't) then any finite number is in the neighborhood of infinity: that is, the same way any number is in the neighborhood of the origin, you could always go infinitely far back from infinity to some number.
No?
Wouldn't the complement still be something like the neighborhood of infinity being infinitesimally close to infinity? I think that's closer to a complement. idk.

[Anonymous No.11310266]

I guess i should have added, that the neighborhood of the origin being more accurately defined as that which is infinitesimally close to it. Otherwise the neighborhoods are the whole number line.

[El Arcón No.11310273]

One of the hecklers out in the hall said, "You liked it!," when I wrote about the sexual torture implants. About 10 years ago, Emily was licking my asshole and I thought she was using her fingernail too, and I said I liked it. However, it turns out that it was an implant which I did not recognize as a sexual torture implant because it was brand new at the time and it was being activated while she was licking my asshole... and I had not learned that sexual torture implants were a thing yet.

Ever since that day, they have been saying that they were well-justified to stab me in the anus and non-consensually place that sexual torture implant in there, and these dozen others apparently, because I said I liked what I thought Emily was doing with her fingernail. I do not like it that they stabbed me, and I do not like how it feels now that I know it is a sexual torture implant. Even if i did like it, I don't like it that they stabbed me in the anus to put it in there to begin with, and I don't like it that they sexual torture me with it all day, everyday, even when every woman I tried to fuck in the last five years has flatly turned me down, and every good looking woman in the five years before that.

I have an analogy about this. Around the time I was seeing Emily, I was ordering from this restaurant Chinese Buddha a lot. They were putting rat shit in my General Tso's chicken. Now, when I didn't know there was rat shit in that chicken and it was covered with the General Tso's syrup, I did like to eat it. Does that mean that I like to eat shit? No, it does not. Similarly, when Emily had me thinking she was doing that thing with her fingernail, I liked it the way I liked that chicken. However, finding out that it was a sexual torture implant implanted in a stab wound was like finding out there was rat shit in that chicken. Even though I liked eating that chicken in my ignorance, I stopped liking it when I learned that there was shit mixed into it.

[El Arcón No.11310279]

Even unto this day, they still send gangstalkers to insist that I like to eat shit. The fact is, I don't like it and it makes angry to know that when I was paying them for food, they were mixing shit into it before serving it to me. Mixing shit into it before they served it to me was certainly a good descriptor for the situation when I was trying to pay a woman to show me affection too.

So, now here we are ten years after that, and the person out in the hall is still shouting, "You liked it!," and even just this week at school five years I stopped trying to find a hooker to take the place of no good looking being willing to fuck me, they are still sending gangstalkers to mock me about that too.

So, I have no more interest in having fun. My interest is to make them suffer.

[El Arcón No.11310298]

>>11310254
>like how you use the analogy of the inflationary epoch to make your point, very classy.
>Gandalf pic unrelated

>>11310254
>the same or less cardinality
all continua have the same cardinality

>any finite number is in the neighborhood of infinity
every number which is less than some natural number is in the neighborhood of the origin

>something like the neighborhood of infinity being infinitesimally close
it is like that but slightly different.

>the neighborhood of the origin being more accurately defined as that which is infinitesimally close
If the two things are mutual complements, why do you think one is infinitesimal but not the other one? I think neither of them are.

[Anonymous No.11310312]

I’m a big fan of the infinity-hat
Basically the formal equivalent of a 12 year old’s “infinity plus 1” in a powerlevel argument

[El Arcón No.11310326]

I think of it more like the formal equivalent of a 12 year old’s “infinity minus 1” in a powerlevel argument, but that is probably the the best, most accurate summary I've seen.

[Anonymous No.11310526]

>>11310326
this is my new wallpaper, thank you

[Anonymous No.11310605]

>>11309926
i mean, probably a thousand people have already told you about the things that don't make sense in your screenshot, so whatever i say will ring on deaf ears, but just for one moment reconsider whether you might actually be the most special person in the world or whether you're just insanely arrogant:

it's fine to add $\pm \hat{\infty}$ to the real numbers and just say "alright, these are the real numbers with two new points added". however, there are a bunch of unaddressed questions:
- what is the norm/absolute value $\| \hat{\infty}\|$? how is it defined?
- how do you define objects like $\hat{\infty} - a$ for positive reals $a$? just saying "$\hat{\infty}$ is like $\infty$ but without additive absorption" does not actually give any meaning to the numbers $\hat{\infty} - a$. you prove in theorem 1.10 that, retrospectively, these objects were real numbers all along, but that runs into the next problem:
- theorem 1.10 relies on the ordering you defined on objects of the form $\hat{\infty} - a$ to fulfil the property $x < y \implies x \neq y$. however, you have not proven anything about the order that you define, but you have only written that you "suppose this order exists". and sure, you're free to define a relation between your objects $\hat{\infty} - a$ for different positive reals completely as you like, but without proof, who is to say that this relation actually defines an order?
- why does $\|\hat{\infty}\| = \|\infty\|$ imply that $\overline{\mathbb{R}} = [-\hat{\infty},\hat{\infty}]$? we do not even know what $\|\hat{\infty}\|$ is supposed to be, yet it somehow tells us something about the shape of the extended real numbers? and what is $[-\hat{\infty},\hat{\infty}]$ even supposed to be? the real numbers with $\pm \hat{\infty}$? the real numbers with $\pm \hat{\infty}$ and $\pm \infty$? the real numbers with $\pm \hat{\infty}$, $\pm \infty$ and all objects $\hat{\infty} - a$ for all positive a?

[El Arcón No.11311368]

>>11310605

[Anonymous No.11311396]

>>11310273
You just have hemorhoids you fucking retard, Jesus christ

[Anonymous No.11311406]

>>11310605
Tooker is a fucking retard that doesn't understand the concepts of field and closed under operations. Dont bother friend.

[El Arcón No.11311433]

>>11311396
I don't have them. I went to the GI doctor in August and he diagnosed me specifically as not having hemorrhoids.

>>11311406
>doesn't understand the concepts of field and closed under operations.
pic related: are you really so sure about that?

[Hoaxfag No.11312524]

>>11311433
Hey man, sorry if I stepped over the line before,
So do you think getting your PhD or working are impossible as you are being sabotaged.
I think amassing an army and arming yourself with nukes is also impossible.
Maybe you could try for a third plan?
Stop working for people, work for yourself. Why don't you program some spyware app and blackmail your evil enemy's, you are smart enough.
The world has a filter now for the special people, and I fear you might be right now caught in that filter.
Much love brother.

[El Arcón No.11312553]

>>11312524
I'm not your brother you hideous infidel.

[Anonymous No.11312956]

>>11311433
>Fields and closure are not needed because my retarded proof fails because of that

[El Arcón No.11313046]

>>11312956
If you think fields and closure are needed, then you might better convey that idea by making statements motivating your belief instead of mocking my own belief.

For instance, I believe closure is not important because all whole numbers between minus fifty and plus seventy six, taken with the additive operation, form a perfectly sound algebraic structure with which we can do summation mathematics in the usual way, and the lack of closure which makes it not an additive group doesn't matter at all.

In your opinion, how does it adversely affect the mathematics of summation that the set is not closed under addition?

[Solivagus (God of Eternity) No.11315708]

>>11313046
Exhaustive Binary English is only defeated by money, but not very well as everyone wants to experience a new dimension.

[El Arcón No.11315709]

how does it adversely affect the mathematics of summation that the set is not closed under addition?

[El Arcón No.11315804]

>>11315708
You can buy an awful lot of meme plutonium with money, and it doesn't take much of that to get people to deny their interest in a new thing.